logo
Is your phone provider's autopay discount really worth it?

Is your phone provider's autopay discount really worth it?

Android Authority15 hours ago

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Autopay is easily one of the most convenient ways to pay your bills, especially if you're like me and struggle to keep track of everything manually. Without autopay, it's easy to accidentally miss a payment if you're not careful. In the past, I've used autopay for nearly everything — from health and car insurance to utility bills, recurring entertainment subscriptions, and, of course, services like phone plans that offer discounts for autopay enrollment. While there's much to appreciate about autopay, there's also a dark side I've discovered over the years.
Is the autopay discount offered by your phone provider worth it? For many, I believe the answer is yes, but it's essential to be aware of the downsides and take precautions. Let's start by exploring a few potential disadvantages of autopay discounts and some steps you can take to mitigate the associated risks.
Is that autopay discount really worth it?
0 votes
Yes
NaN %
Yes, but with extra precautions like a second bank account or credit card.
NaN %
No
NaN %
Unsure/other (Tell us more in comments)
NaN %
Accidental charges
Accidental or incorrect charges are more common than you might think. For example, in a recent Reddit thread, user Ok-Concentrate4461 reported being triple-charged by Verizon in one month. Another user experienced a bill attempting to charge again for the previous month, despite the account already being current.
Sometimes, these charges aren't even related directly to your account! About a month ago (though I can't find the source anymore), I saw a Redditor complaining about charges from an old landline account not associated with their mobile service. It turned out someone on their line had an unpaid bill from years prior, and the carrier charged it using the autopay method, regardless of whether the actual account holder had any involvement.
Autopay makes it easier to forget about some of your bills, increasing the likelihood of accidental charges slipping through unnoticed.
There have also been incidents where accounts ended up with someone else's autopay information, likely due to a customer service mix-up.
Even if you convince your carrier to acknowledge the mistake, securing an actual refund can be challenging. Most carriers prefer to provide bill credits rather than outright refunds. If this happens to you, insist on clarity regarding how long it'll take to recover your money.
Reduced awareness of bills and service changes
Joe Maring / Android Authority
If you don't actively review your bill each month, you'll likely overlook the exact amounts deducted from your account. Autopay users are more susceptible to unnoticed accidental charges because of reduced visibility.
Less frequent review of your bill also means missing critical notices regarding fee increases or service changes. Autopay customers often fail to detect incremental price hikes, resulting in less frequent comparison shopping and potentially paying higher rates over time.
Risk of payment failure, insufficient funds, and overdrafts
Reduced visibility also heightens the risk of payment failures due to insufficient funds. While most autopay transactions are typically predictable, I've experienced instances — particularly with Verizon — where pull dates randomly shifted with no explanation. If a payment hits before funds are available, you could face significant issues, especially if you live paycheck to paycheck or meticulously manage your finances.
Even with overdraft protection, you might avoid an unpaid bill, but you'll likely incur additional bank fees. Without overdraft protection, or if you've forgotten to update your payment method after changing cards, you risk missed payments, additional fees, and potentially negative impacts on your credit score.
Privacy and security concerns
Storing your bank or credit card details on third-party servers introduces security risks. While we'd like to trust major carriers have our backs, the reality is that security breaches happen. Autopay offers convenience and potential savings, but it's crucial to weigh this against the privacy and security risks involved. It's also important to consider what account you give your provider access to, as you may have a few other options, including using a credit card for better control over any disputes.
Should you keep autopay, or not?
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Ultimately, I still personally use autopay and find the convenience worth the risks. However, whether autopay is suitable for you depends entirely on your personal circumstances. Those living paycheck-to-paycheck face higher risks, so evaluate your financial stability carefully.
If, like me, you decide autopay's benefits outweigh the downsides, consider the following measures to better protect yourself: Use a second, dedicated bank account: I personally use a primary bank for daily finances and a separate account, like Chime, solely for autopay bills. This arrangement limits your risk since the secondary account only contains enough funds to cover expected payments, making it easier to spot any discrepancies quickly.
I personally use a primary bank for daily finances and a separate account, like Chime, solely for autopay bills. This arrangement limits your risk since the secondary account only contains enough funds to cover expected payments, making it easier to spot any discrepancies quickly. Consider using a credit card: If managing multiple bank accounts seems complicated, consider using a credit card with a fixed limit for autopay transactions. Disputing incorrect charges is typically simpler with credit cards compared to reversing debit transactions.
If managing multiple bank accounts seems complicated, consider using a credit card with a fixed limit for autopay transactions. Disputing incorrect charges is typically simpler with credit cards compared to reversing debit transactions. Set a monthly calendar reminder to review your bills: Once a month, thoroughly examine your autopay transactions and billing statements. Verify all charges and account notices, promptly addressing any unusual activity or discrepancies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fenway concession workers vote to authorize strike over stalled contract negotiations
Fenway concession workers vote to authorize strike over stalled contract negotiations

CBS News

time11 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Fenway concession workers vote to authorize strike over stalled contract negotiations

Workers who staff the concession stands at Boston's Fenway Park have voted to authorize a strike, but are continuing to work for now. What the vote means Local 26 said it has been trying to negotiate a deal with Fenway's food contractor - Aramark - since the first of the year. The union's contract expired on December 31, 2024. According to the union, 95% of workers voted to authorise a strike during Sunday's vote. However, the workers have not yet walked out. The workers include about 700 cashiers, cooks, beer sellers and souvenir vendors. What do workers want? The union said key issues in the negotiations include wages, technology and scheduling. The workers contend they make less than $20 per hour, which is less than the major league standard. "We love working at Fenway. My co-workers and regular Red Sox fans are like my second family. But workers are underpaid, and increased automation is taking away jobs and cutting into our earnings," said Natalie Greening, a beer seller who started at Fenway when she was in high school and has worked at the stadium for 20 years. The union cited Marlins Park in Miami as an example, claiming that workers at the stadium earn $2.73 more per hour while a beer at the Florida ballpark costs $5.65 less than at Fenway. "Boston is a union town, and it's time to bring all Fenway workers' wages up to standard," said Carlos Aramayo, president of UNITE HERE Local 26, which represents the Fenway workers. "Local 26 hotel workers fought for, and won, $10-an-hour raises last year, and Local 26 university dining workers will be making a minimum of $30 an hour by 2028. There's no reason for Fenway workers to be left behind. They deserve raises and respect!"

Jim Cramer on Oklo: 'These Guys Are Serious Professionals'
Jim Cramer on Oklo: 'These Guys Are Serious Professionals'

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jim Cramer on Oklo: 'These Guys Are Serious Professionals'

Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO) is one of the 16 stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Discussing the hype around nuclear stocks, Cramer said: 'What else fits the moment? We've become transfixed by nuclear power. We know that the data centers that seem to be going up everywhere are humongous users of electricity. We know that the hyperscalers who run the data centers would prefer to use nuclear power because it's clean. We know that we've been decommissioning nukes for decades because we thought they were unsafe. But one company, Oklo, never gave up hope that the nuclear industry could turn things around and has toiled for 12 years to get its form of nuclear power endorsed by our government. A close-up of a businessperson energetically pointing at an electronic stock chart. Oklo (NYSE:OKLO) designs and builds fission power plants that produce steady, large-scale energy. The company also handles services for recycling spent nuclear fuel. While we acknowledge the potential of OKLO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Insiders At Vistra Sold US$39m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness
Insiders At Vistra Sold US$39m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Insiders At Vistra Sold US$39m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness

Over the past year, many Vistra Corp. (NYSE:VST) insiders sold a significant stake in the company which may have piqued investors' interest. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Notably, that recent sale by Scott Helm is the biggest insider sale of Vistra shares that we've seen in the last year. That means that even when the share price was slightly below the current price of US$174, an insider wanted to cash in some shares. When an insider sells below the current price, it suggests that they considered that lower price to be fair. That makes us wonder what they think of the (higher) recent valuation. However, while insider selling is sometimes discouraging, it's only a weak signal. This single sale was just 16% of Scott Helm's stake. In total, Vistra insiders sold more than they bought over the last year. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction! View our latest analysis for Vistra If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar). Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Vistra. In total, insiders dumped US$22m worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain. Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. It's great to see that Vistra insiders own 1.0% of the company, worth about US$576m. Most shareholders would be happy to see this sort of insider ownership, since it suggests that management incentives are well aligned with other shareholders. Insiders haven't bought Vistra stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. Despite some insider buying, the longer term picture doesn't make us feel much more positive. But it is good to see that Vistra is growing earnings. While insiders do own a lot of shares in the company (which is good), our analysis of their transactions doesn't make us feel confident about the company. So while it's helpful to know what insiders are doing in terms of buying or selling, it's also helpful to know the risks that a particular company is facing. To assist with this, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Vistra. Of course Vistra may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store