logo
How golden ages really start

How golden ages really start

Business Times09-05-2025

Peak Human By Johan Norberg. Atlantic Books; 400 pages; US$32.99 and £22
THE way to start a 'golden age' is to erect big, beautiful barriers to keep out foreign goods and people. That, at least, is the view of the most powerful man on the planet. Johan Norberg, a Swedish historian, makes the opposite case. In Peak Human, Norberg charts the rise and fall of golden ages around the world over the past three millennia, ranging from Athens to the Anglosphere via the Abbasid caliphate. He finds that the polities that outshone their peers did so because they were more open – to trade, to strangers and to ideas that discomfited the mighty. When they closed up again, they lost their shine.
Consider the Song dynasty in China, which lasted from 960 to 1279AD. Song emperors were much keener on the rule of law than their predecessors, who tended to rule by whim. To enforce predictable rules, they hired lots of officials via meritocratic exams. The first Song emperor enacted the 'unconventional policy reform' of '(not) killing officials who disagreed with him'.
Peasants were granted property rights and allowed to move around, rather than being tied to a lord's land. Farm output more than doubled, and the extra food supported much larger cities. In the 1100s Kaifeng, the capital, had 65 times the population of London. Canals made domestic trade easier. International trade followed. Merchants started issuing paper money, six centuries before Europeans did, and the government embraced this brilliant idea – so much easier than carrying heavy strings of copper coins.
'Crowded cities set the stage for an unparalleled exchange of ideas, goods (and) services,' notes Norberg. Artisans devised new industrial processes, such as burning coal to smelt iron. The invention of movable type in the 1040s allowed the printing of books so cheap that one philosopher griped that people would stop learning the classics by heart. By 1200, Song China had the world's richest economy, a merchant navy with 'the potential to discover the world', and a habit of tinkering that could have brought on an industrial revolution centuries before Europe's. But then the Mongols arrived.
The popular image of Genghis Khan and his mounted hordes sweeping across the world slaughtering and burning is accurate as far as it goes. However, the Mongol dynasty took pains to preserve its predecessor's technological marvels – even if it did not add much to them. It was only when the Ming emperors took over in 1368 that China really turned in on itself.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Free movement within the country was ended. Free exchange gave way to forced labour. Foreign trade was made punishable by death, and even the construction of ocean-worthy ships was banned. Pining for the good old days, a Ming emperor brought back the fashions of 500 years before. Men caught with the wrong hairstyle were castrated, along with their barbers. Largely thanks to reactionary Ming policies, Chinese incomes fell by half between 1080 and 1400. The country did not recover its mojo until it opened up again in the late 20th century.
Some of the golden ages Norberg describes will be familiar to readers, but he adds fresh details and provocative arguments. Athens was not just the birthplace of democracy; it grew rich because it was, by ancient standards, liberal. Tariffs were only 2 per cent. Foreigners were welcome: a Syrian ex-slave became one of the richest men in town. On a measure devised by the Fraser Institute, a Canadian think-tank, ancient Athenians enjoyed more economic freedom than citizens of any modern nation, narrowly beating Hong Kong and Singapore. (Such freedom did not apply to women or slaves; a caveat that applies to all golden ages until relatively recently.)
Rome grew strong by cultivating alliances and granting citizenship to conquered peoples. It learned voraciously from those it vanquished – Greek slaves taught Roman children about logic, philosophy and drama. During Rome's golden age, one set of laws governed a gigantic empire, markets were relatively free, and 400,000 km of roads sped goods from vessel to villa. As a gobsmacked Greek orator put it: to see all the world's products, either travel the world or come to Rome.
The emperor Augustus introduced a flat poll tax and a modest wealth tax. Extra income from hard work or innovation suddenly faced a marginal tax rate of zero. Small wonder Augustan Rome grew as rich as Britain and France were 1,500 years later.
Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of America's House of Representatives, thinks Rome collapsed because of 'rampant homosexual behaviour'. Norberg offers a more convincing explanation. Bad luck – plagues and barbarian attacks – was compounded by policy blunders.
Cash-strapped emperors debased the coinage, reducing its silver content. This caused wild inflation. Price controls were then slapped on everything 'from sandals to lions'. Trade atrophied.
Intellectual freedom gave way to dogma, with the persecution first of Christians and then by Christians. Finally, Rome was too weak to resist the barbarian onslaught. Revisionists say the Dark Ages that followed were not so bad. Archaeological evidence, such as a sudden fall in the number of cargo-ship wrecks, suggests they were 'the biggest social regression in history'.
Norberg deftly punctures popular misconceptions. The zealots of Islamic State revere the Abbasid caliphate, but would have hated its tolerance. The Italian Renaissance, which modern nationalists such as Viktor Orban see as evidence of European and Christian cultural superiority, began as a revolt against Christian orthodoxy and in imitation of pagan cultures. Despite what you read in Blake and Dickens, Britain's Industrial Revolution was not miserable for the workers: a study of diaries shows the only group consistently dissatisfied was poets and writers.
Could a history book be more timely? Of all the golden ages, the greatest is here and now. Of all the progress of the past 10,000 years in raising human living standards, half has occurred since 1990. Openness went global after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But now it is in rapid retreat, as a multilateral trade war looms and ever more states suppress free inquiry.
Previous golden ages all ended like Rome's did, jinxed by a mix of bad luck and bad leadership. Many thriving societies isolated themselves or suffered a 'Socrates moment', silencing their most rational voices. Peak Human does not mention Donald Trump; it was written before he was re-elected. America's president will not read it, but others should. The current age of globalisation could still, perhaps, be saved. As Norberg argues: 'Failure is not a fate but a choice.'
©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia central bank pondered outsized rate cut in May, decided to be predictable
Australia central bank pondered outsized rate cut in May, decided to be predictable

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Australia central bank pondered outsized rate cut in May, decided to be predictable

[SYDNEY] Australia's central bank considered cutting interest rates by an outsized 50 basis points last month as 'insurance' against global trade risks, but decided to go the predictable route with a cautious easing. Minutes of its May 20 policy meeting, showed the Reserve Bank of Australia board also debated holding rates unchanged at 4.10 per cent, but saw strong arguments both domestically and globally for a move to 3.85 per cent. Crucially, President Donald Trump's tariffs had been much higher than first assumed and posed significants risks to global growth, and thus to Australian business and consumer confidence. Indeed, if the worst scenarios eventuated policy might need to move to 'an expansionary setting', implying rates falling below a neutral range around 3.0 per cent. However, board members were not persuaded that a cut of 50 basis points was needed at this meeting given the domestic economy was still resilient and the labour market still tight. The board also noted it would be challenging for businesses and households should the RBA, for whatever reason, have to reverse such a rapid easing. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'They also judged that it was not yet time to move monetary policy to an expansionary stance,' the minutes showed. 'Globsal policy uncertainty led members to express a preference to move cautiously and predictably when withdrawing some of the current policy restriction.' Markets imply around a 70 per cent chance the RBA will ease again at its next meeting on July 8, though most analysts assume it will wait for inflation data for the second-quarter to be released later in the month before deciding in August. Futures see rates bottoming around 2.85 per cent or 3.10 per cent by early next year, roughly where policy would be neutral as in neither stimulating nor restraining economic growth. The minutes showed the board udged progress on domestic inflation alone would have allowed for a cut in rates, and global uncertainty merely strengthened the case. Core inflation ran at an annual 2.9 per cent in the first quarter, back within the RBA's 2 per cent to 3 per cent target range, and is projected by policy makers to reach 2.6 per cent by year-end. The board also saw a risk that household consumption might not pick up as expected, having been surprisingly subdued in recent months despite the RBA cutting rates for the first time in February. REUTERS

Gold hovers near four-week peak on weaker US dollar, trade concerns
Gold hovers near four-week peak on weaker US dollar, trade concerns

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

Gold hovers near four-week peak on weaker US dollar, trade concerns

[BENGALURU] Gold edged up to hit a near four-week high on Tuesday (Jun 3), as a weaker US dollar and rising uncertainty over the US-China trade deal boosted demand for the safe-haven asset. Spot gold inched up 0.1 per cent at US$3,381.13 an ounce, as at 0038 GMT, after hitting its highest level since May 8 earlier in the session. The metal gained about 2.7 per cent in the previous session, marking its strongest daily performance in more than three weeks. US gold futures was up 0.3 per cent to US$3,406.10. The US dollar index touched a more than one-month low, making gold cheaper for buyers holding other currencies. US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The European Commission said on Monday it would make a strong case this week for the United States to reduce or eliminate tariffs even after Trump said he would double import duties on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. The Trump administration wants countries to provide their best offer on trade negotiations by Wednesday as officials seek to accelerate talks with multiple partners ahead of a self-imposed deadline in just five weeks, according to a draft letter to negotiating partners seen by Reuters. Meanwhile, Russia told Ukraine at peace talks on Monday that it would only agree to end the war if Kyiv gives up big new chunks of territory and accepts limits on the size of its army, according to a memorandum reported by Russian media. Elsewhere, spot silver fell 0.4 per cent to US$34.67 an ounce, platinum rose 0.4 per cent to US$1,067.40 and palladium was up 0.2 per cent to US$990.76. REUTERS

Elon Musk taps investors for billions days after Washington exit
Elon Musk taps investors for billions days after Washington exit

Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Business Times

Elon Musk taps investors for billions days after Washington exit

[NEW YORK] Elon Musk is selling US$5 billion in debt for his artificial intelligence (AI) startup, xAI, the latest in a series of fundraising efforts across his business empire as the billionaire pivots away from politics and returns to running his various companies. Morgan Stanley is shopping the debt for xAI with a double-digit interest rate, according to sources familiar with early pricing discussions. The financing could help Musk continue to spend aggressively on AI infrastructure as he builds out a massive data centre in Memphis. Musk appears eager to refocus on his array of businesses after announcing last week that he would be stepping back from politics. He had spent months as a senior adviser and regular companion to US President Donald Trump, for whom he campaigned in the 2024 election and was a top financial supporter. The debt package includes a floating-rate term loan, a fixed-rate term loan and senior secured notes, said the sources, who are not authorised to share the information publicly. The proceeds will go towards general corporate purposes, with commitments due Jun 17. Early pricing discussions are seven percentage points over the benchmark rate for the floating-rate term loan and a roughly 12 per cent yield on the senior notes, different sources with knowledge of the matter said. The debt sale has already garnered demand in excess of US$3.5 billion, they added. A representative for xAI declined to comment. Morgan Stanley did not immediately provide a comment. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Musk's presence in Washington – where he oversaw a broad government cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency – led to widespread criticism of him personally, but also concern about the performance of his companies. Shares at Tesla, where Musk is chief executive officer, are down 20 per cent since the inauguration. In addition to xAI's debt offering, Musk also raised US$650 million for his neurotechnology company, Neuralink., and is selling US$300 million in xAI stock through a secondary offering, according to the Financial Times. Investor enthusiasm Musk recently merged xAI with his social networking platform X into a combined company called XAI Holdings. He has been investing heavily in its Memphis data centre, called Colossus, which the debt sale could help finance. That operation already has 200,000 graphics processing units (GPUs) training its AI systems, and Musk aims to add one million in another location nearby, he said in a May 20 interview on CNBC. Bloomberg previously reported that the company was in talks with investors to raise roughly US$20 billion in funding, underscoring the market's enthusiasm for AI as well as Musk's standing as a business titan and political player. Morgan Stanley has a long history of working with Musk. The bank advised him on his takeover of X – then called Twitter – in 2022 and led a group of lenders that provided debt financing for the US$44 billion acquisition. They intended to immediately sell the loans to investors, but concerns about the underlying business and some of Musk's erratic decisions left banks stuck with US$13 billion of risky debt on their balance sheets for more than two years. Morgan Stanley successfully re-launched the sale process this year, getting rid of the last bits of debt in April, as Musk's standing in Washington bolstered optimism about his business prospects. The early relationship between X and xAI was also marketed as a perk for investing in the platform's bonds. Between the debt sales at or near face value, the interest payments and the advisory fees, Morgan Stanley ended up profiting handsomely from the transaction. BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store