logo
WWE has a Rock-shaped problem on the road to WrestleMania 41

WWE has a Rock-shaped problem on the road to WrestleMania 41

Yahoo23-02-2025
We waited a long time for Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson to show up on Friday night's three-hour 'WWE SmackDown' only to be left with one big question: Was it worth it?
Expectations had been running sky-high since Thursday evening, when WWE made the surprise announcement that 'The Final Boss' would be showing up in New Orleans. 'Everything could change in an instant,' Triple H teased, suggesting he was well aware that most of fan base had come to the reluctant conclusion that the former world champion was skipping WrestleMania 41 this year.
Despite the anticipation, WWE chose not to have The Rock open the show, instead opting for almost two hours of filler matches beforehand. At the risk of being unkind, it reminded me of that episode of 'The Office' where Michael Scott promises to auction off some Bruce Springsteen tickets, only to test the patience of everyone with numerous inferior prizes beforehand.
But things didn't improve much when The Rock finally showed up. Naturally, the home crowd were delighted with his announcement that WrestleMania 42 would be taking place in "The Big Easy" next year. But then he went on to deliver a meandering promo which misfired on several counts. It was slow, flabby, repetitive and did little to revive any excitement in his long-running storyline with Undisputed WWE Champion Cody Rhodes — despite The Rock calling Rhodes down into the ring.
Remember the magic we got when these two were standing across from each other in the run-up to last year's WrestleMania? If that was box office, this felt more like deleted scenes — or perhaps even blooper reel.
"I want your soul." 😳@TheRock will be expecting an answer from @CodyRhodes at #WWEChamber...#SmackDown pic.twitter.com/cN9f6cHzC7
— WWE (@WWE) February 22, 2025
The appearance also repeated the same mistake from January's Netflix premiere, in that the promo seemed to come from Dwayne Johnson (or 'TKO Board Member Dwayne Johnson,' to give him his full title) rather than The Rock. We even had the first ever on-screen mention of Ari Emanuel — TKO's all-powerful chief executive — and a plug for Johnson's latest animated money-maker, 'Moana 2,' to boot.
Maybe some fans will give it the benefit of the doubt, on the basis that they'd rather have The Rock involved than not. But Friday night's segment didn't suggest that we'll be seeing Rock vs. Rhodes or Rock vs. Roman anytime soon. On the contrary, "The Tribal Chief" didn't even get a mention.
The problems stem from a fundamental issue with WWE and The Rock. Having the world's highest-grossing movie star is obviously a massive boon commercially, but it also creates problems when you're willing to hand over so much creative control in return for his involvement, or when you can't create a suitably big role for him.
Let's not forget what happened last year, when this problem manifested in a segment that will live long in the memory of WWE fans: Cody Rhodes suggesting that he would delay his all-important title shot in order to let The Rock take the main stage. Like most people, I still wince when I hear that fateful line: 'I'm coming for you Roman, but not at WrestleMania.'
Yes, the WWE top dogs were able to call an audible and even try to spin the situation to their favor (at least if you believe what we heard in the company's in-house documentary, 'WrestleMania XL: Behind the Curtain'). But it still showed how the world's biggest wrestling company is happy to upend the entirety of its creative plans in order to accommodate a part-timer.
Neither does the WWE appear to have learned from the mistake. While things often move gradually in the run-up to WrestleMania, it's noticeable how non-committal things have been with the creative directions for Roman Reigns and Cody Rhodes this time around — almost as if the WWE execs were keeping things open until they knew the whereabouts of a certain Hollywood star.
It was a similar story last fall, when The Rock's appearance at Bad Blood turbocharged speculation that "The Final Boss" might be the one pulling the strings in The Bloodline story. When the big twist never came, most of us assumed we'd let our imaginations run away with us. But could it be that it was just a case of schedules not aligning?
It's a tricky balance to strike, this legends business. Bringing them back for scene-stealing cameos works great — just look at Stone Cold Steve Austin at WrestleMania 38, or even The Undertaker's appearance in last year's 'Mania finale. But keeping your biggest storylines on ice for them is a different proposition altogether.
Maybe I'll eat my words when the whole "I want your soul" thing blossoms into one of the greatest storylines in modern wrestling history. But based on what we saw last night, I'm not holding my breath.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dan Ziskie, 'House of Cards' and 'Treme' Actor, Dies at 80: 'A Man of Remarkable Talent'
Dan Ziskie, 'House of Cards' and 'Treme' Actor, Dies at 80: 'A Man of Remarkable Talent'

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dan Ziskie, 'House of Cards' and 'Treme' Actor, Dies at 80: 'A Man of Remarkable Talent'

Ziskie died on July 21 in New York, his family revealed in his obituary NEED TO KNOW Dan Ziskie died from arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease on July 21, according to his obituary His family remembered him "as a creative, thoughtful, and interesting man whose presence enriched their lives" Ziskie was well known for his recurring role in Netflix's House of Cards and HBO's Treme Dan Ziskie has died. He was 80 years old. The House of Cards and Treme actor's family announced his death in an obituary, which revealed he died on July 21 in New York City from arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Ziskie is survived by his brother David and his wife Cynthia, along with his nephews Jesse, Brett and Austin and their six children, who say they 'will miss him deeply.' 'Dan was a man of remarkable talent and a keen observer of life,' the obituary reads. 'He was as vibrant and multifaceted as the characters he portrayed on stage and screen.' Born in Detroit in 1944, Ziskie was an athlete throughout college and went on to be a crewman on a Great Lakes freighter before moving into acting. According to his obituary, Ziskie's 'love for performance led him to the Second City of Chicago,' alongside major names such as John Belushi, Brian Doyle-Murray and Joe Flaherty. His success in Chicago led Ziskie to work on Broadway productions in New York, where he was an understudy in Morning's at Seven in 1980. In 1985, he acted with Judd Hirsch in the play I'm Not Rappaport. His other Broadway credits include After the Fall and I'm Not Ready. Ziskie was best known for his recurring role as Vice President Jim Mathews on Netflix's from 2013-2017 and C.J. Liquori on the final three seasons of HBO's from 2011-2013. He also appeared in Chappelle's Show, CBS' Person of Interest, NBC's The Blacklist and Fox's 24, as well as films Zebrahead (1992) and Adventures in Babysitting (1987), among others. Some of his many episodic cameos were in Remington Steele, St. Elsewhere, The Equalizer, Newhart and Murphy Brown. 'Dan's natural talent and dedication to his craft were evident in each role he played, earning him the admiration and respect of his peers,' his family wrote. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. He also pursued his passion for photography, with his family praising 'his eye for detail and ability to capture the essence of his subjects.' His work has been featured in The New York Times, The Guardian and the Financial Times, and he also has a photo book called Cloud Chamber, published in 2017. His obituary describes it as 'a testament to his artistic vision and continues to be cherished by readers and photography enthusiasts alike.' In his free time, Ziskie enjoyed traveling and exploring 'complex topics such as the nature of the cosmos and quantum physics.' 'Dan's life was not only marked by his creative achievements but also by the bonds he shared with his family,' his loved ones wrote, adding: 'Dan's legacy extends beyond his family, as his colleagues and friends will remember him as a creative, thoughtful, and interesting man whose presence enriched their lives.' 'His was a life lived with passion, a life that exemplified the beauty of pursuing one's dreams and the importance of cherishing every moment,' the obituary concluded. 'Dan will be profoundly missed, yet he will forever remain in the hearts of those who knew him, like a cherished character in the timeless narrative of their lives.' Read the original article on People

3 great BritBox shows you should watch in August 2025
3 great BritBox shows you should watch in August 2025

Digital Trends

time41 minutes ago

  • Digital Trends

3 great BritBox shows you should watch in August 2025

Although the U.K. film industry is not as large as its American counterpart, you sometimes find that the shows they make over there are at least as good as the average show made in Hollywood. If you're exhausted by American television, then BritBox might be the ideal solution. The streaming service exports everything that the Brits make for American audiences, and as a result, it has plenty of shows you've probably heard of, as well as a few you probably haven't. We've pulled together a list of three more obscure shows that are worth your time and can all be streamed on BritBox now. Recommended Videos We also have guides to the best new movies to stream, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best movies on Amazon Prime Video, the best movies on HBO Max, and the best movies on Disney+. House of Cards (1990) The British antecedent to the American series of the same name, House of Cards is very much about the same things in both versions. The four-episode miniseries follows a member of the U.K.'s Conservative Party who manipulates his way into power after being brushed aside. The series has a particularly Machiavellian view of politics, but it is undeniably a thrilling reminder of the way some politicians are always trying to find ways to amass more power. Anchored by a brilliant performance from Ian Richardson, the show was hugely influential for decades after its release. You can watch House of Cards on BritBox. Flowers (2016-2018) Olivia Colman is one of the great actresses of her generation, and Flowers is the type of comedy where she can excel. The series follows the eccentric Flowers family and dives into their family dynamics. It examines which members are suspicious of one another and which seem to be in constant competition. It's the kind of thing that we rarely get in the United States. Flowers seems to argue that all families are pretty messed up, even if most of their problems are relatively mundane when pulled apart. You can watch Flowers on BritBox. Waking the Dead (2000-2011) A long-running detective series in the style of American crime procedurals, Waking the Dead follows a group of detectives who utilize new technologies to solve cases that have gone cold. Like any procedural, Waking the Dead ultimately lives and dies based on the charisma of its central cast. Thankfully, this cast has it in spades. Over the course of nine seasons, we see them solve all sorts of cases. Waking the Dead is comforting precisely because it's conventional and because its quality is so high. You can watch Waking the Dead on BritBox.

Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'
Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven'

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. It turns out even Netflix can't get Meghan Markle to open her front door. The Duchess of Sussex may promise an "at home" feel in her lifestyle series "With Love, Meghan", but that sunlit kitchen and cozy dining table on screen? They're inside a $9.5 million rental — not the $14.7 million Montecito, California, estate she shares with Prince Harry, Prince Archie, and Princess Lilibet. In an interview with People magazine, Meghan explained why her Netflix series — which premiered March 4 — was filmed in a nearby rental that mirrors the style of her own home. "I wanted to protect that safe haven," she said. "We're a close-knit family, and I love those moments—putting Lili down for a nap, having lunch together, having sacred time together at the end of the day." Don't Miss: Would you have invested in eBay or Uber early? The same backers are betting on . 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. With a production crew topping 80 people, opening her actual kitchen wasn't an option. "Our kitchen is where Mama just cooks for the family, and with a crew of 80-plus people, that's a lot of people to have in your house!" Meghan said. She and Prince Harry, who married in 2018, purchased their Santa Barbara County property in 2020 after stepping back from royal duties. In a 2022 interview with The Cut, Meghan shared how a unique palm tree on the grounds caught their attention during the first tour — a symbol, perhaps, of the privacy and peace they were looking for. Trending: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . That sense of privacy explains why the on-screen version of "home" is actually someone else's. According to Meghan's first season was shot at a nearby four-bedroom, 4.5-bathroom property owned by local philanthropists Tom and Sherrie Cipolla. The couple purchased it for $4.7 million in 2017, and it's now valued at about $9.5 million. The location proved such a good fit that she returned to it for season two, rather than move production into her family's actual residence. Netflix's official description promised an "at home"-style experience with the former actress, so some viewers raised eyebrows when they learned the backdrop wasn't her real house. But for Meghan, that boundary seems non-negotiable. The Montecito estate is where Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet play, where family dinners happen without an audience, and where — as she puts it — the day ends in "sacred time together."For fans tuning in, the shift may not matter much. The rental property, with its sunlit kitchen, manicured gardens, and airy interiors, delivers the warm, aspirational vibe the show promises. And for Meghan, keeping her home off-limits preserves something even more valuable than a picture-perfect shot: the sanctuary she says keeps her grounded. As "With Love, Meghan" readies its second season, one thing seems clear — the Duchess is happy to share her California lifestyle, as long as the cameras know where to stop. Read Next: 2,000 High Earners Manage $6B With This AI Platform — Image: Shutterstock This article Meghan Markle Refuses To Film Netflix Show Inside Her Montecito Home, Instead Returns to $9.5 Million Rental to 'Protect That Safe Haven' originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store