People back climate policy when weather events feel personal, new study finds
Most people are more likely to support
A few extreme weather events also seem to influence support for climate policies in different ways, according to the team of authors, which included Marina Joubert, an associate professor at the Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology at Stellenbosch University.
The
Nature Climate Change
, found that although extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and intense because of climate change, little is known about how experiencing these events — and attributing them to climate change — affects support for climate policies, particularly in the Global South.
The effects of extreme weather events are disproportionately felt in countries in the Global South.
'Even though the
The study shows that when people connect extreme weather such as heatwaves, floods and droughts to climate change, they're much more likely to support climate action, Joubert said.
'This matters for countries like South Africa where climate impacts are already being felt. One surprising finding from our study is that people in Africa, especially in South Africa, are less likely to say that climate change is behind extreme weather events,' she said.
'That's not because the weather is not changing, but because climate change awareness is still low.'
To build support for climate solutions, there is an urgent need for better public communication that explains to people what is happening and why, Joubert said.
The researchers assessed support for the following five climate policies: increasing taxes on carbon-intense foods, raising taxes on fossil fuels, expanding infrastructure for public transportation, increasing the use of sustainable energy, and protecting forested and land areas.
They used combined large-scale natural and social science data from 68 countries to develop a measure of how many people were exposed to extreme weather events — and to explore whether this exposure, along with people's beliefs about whether climate change has affected extreme weather events over the last decades, predict their support for climate policies.
They also comparatively assessed the link between the size of exposed populations, defined as the average annual proportion of a country's total population exposed to a specific weather-related hazard, to several extreme weather events and support for climate policies.
They found that in line with previous research, increasing carbon taxes received the lowest support, with only 22% and 29% of people, respectively, indicating they very much supported increased taxes on carbon-intensive foods and fossil fuels.
Protecting forested and land areas, by contrast, was a popular policy option, with 82% supporting it very much and only 3% not supporting it at all. The second-most supported policy was increasing the use of sustainable energy, with 75% supporting it very much, and only 5% not supporting it at all.
The research showed that not all climate policies are equally popular, revealing that people around the world, including in Africa, are far more supportive of clean energy and forest protection than carbon taxes.
'That's an important message for governments. If you want public buy-in, you have to focus on solutions that people understand and support,' Joubert said.
The study provides global evidence that subjective attribution of extreme weather events to climate change is associated with greater policy support for climate mitigation, the researchers said.
'Overall, different extreme weather events appear to have different relationships with climate policy support. This pattern highlights the importance of comparative analyses that consider different types of events,' the study said.
'In line with previous studies we also found that subjective attribution interacts with exposure to European winter storms, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and tropical cyclones to predict climate policy support.'
Mere exposure to extreme weather events might therefore not suffice to increase policy support unless individuals link these events to climate change.
While larger exposure to extreme events was not found to be related to policy support, except for wildfires, the researchers could not rule out that changes in the frequency of extreme weather events over time might be sufficient to shift support.
'Nevertheless, our data suggest that if individuals attribute extreme weather events to climate change, support for climate policies is higher regardless of whether the events are more frequent.'
The reverse causal relationship is also possible: people who are supportive of climate policies are more likely to attribute extreme weather to climate change, the study said, noting that longitudinal panel studies are needed to investigate the nature and direction of this relationship.
The research also found strong differences in support across countries and policies. Support for climate policies was particularly high in African and Asian countries, average in Australia, Costa Rica and the United Kingdom, and below the global average in several European countries, such as Czechia, Finland and Norway.
'Participants who identified as men, were younger, more religious, had higher education, higher income, left-leaning politics and who lived in urban areas were more likely to support climate policies,' the report said.
For some events, such as heatwaves and tropical cyclones, the effects of exposure on climate policy support were stronger for individuals who attribute extreme weather events to climate change more strongly.
'One possible explanation is that these types of extreme weather events allow for management strategies that can directly reduce the hazard itself, such as man-made flood protections, irrigation systems, prescribed burn-offs and land-use policies.
'Therefore, people may be more likely to support policies pertaining to law enforcement or economic regulations instead of climate change mitigation.'
The researchers however pointed out that exposure to most types of extreme events did not predict people's support for climate policies. The extent to which people attributed extreme weather events to climate change varied across regions of the world.
People in South America most strongly agreed that the occurrence of extreme weather events has been affected by climate change over the last decades, especially in Brazil and Colombia. This might be explained by the fact that belief in human-caused climate change and self-reported personal experience of extreme weather events are high in Latin America.
People in Northern Europe and Africa, on the other hand, were less likely to attribute extreme weather events to climate change. In Africa, this could be explained by low levels of climate change awareness and belief in human-caused climate change across the continent.
The researchers called for more studies about effective climate change communication on types of extreme weather events that are not typically associated with climate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
3 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
People back climate policy when weather events feel personal, new study finds
The effects of extreme weather events are disproportionately felt in countries in the Global South. Most people are more likely to support A few extreme weather events also seem to influence support for climate policies in different ways, according to the team of authors, which included Marina Joubert, an associate professor at the Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology at Stellenbosch University. The Nature Climate Change , found that although extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and intense because of climate change, little is known about how experiencing these events — and attributing them to climate change — affects support for climate policies, particularly in the Global South. The effects of extreme weather events are disproportionately felt in countries in the Global South. 'Even though the The study shows that when people connect extreme weather such as heatwaves, floods and droughts to climate change, they're much more likely to support climate action, Joubert said. 'This matters for countries like South Africa where climate impacts are already being felt. One surprising finding from our study is that people in Africa, especially in South Africa, are less likely to say that climate change is behind extreme weather events,' she said. 'That's not because the weather is not changing, but because climate change awareness is still low.' To build support for climate solutions, there is an urgent need for better public communication that explains to people what is happening and why, Joubert said. The researchers assessed support for the following five climate policies: increasing taxes on carbon-intense foods, raising taxes on fossil fuels, expanding infrastructure for public transportation, increasing the use of sustainable energy, and protecting forested and land areas. They used combined large-scale natural and social science data from 68 countries to develop a measure of how many people were exposed to extreme weather events — and to explore whether this exposure, along with people's beliefs about whether climate change has affected extreme weather events over the last decades, predict their support for climate policies. They also comparatively assessed the link between the size of exposed populations, defined as the average annual proportion of a country's total population exposed to a specific weather-related hazard, to several extreme weather events and support for climate policies. They found that in line with previous research, increasing carbon taxes received the lowest support, with only 22% and 29% of people, respectively, indicating they very much supported increased taxes on carbon-intensive foods and fossil fuels. Protecting forested and land areas, by contrast, was a popular policy option, with 82% supporting it very much and only 3% not supporting it at all. The second-most supported policy was increasing the use of sustainable energy, with 75% supporting it very much, and only 5% not supporting it at all. The research showed that not all climate policies are equally popular, revealing that people around the world, including in Africa, are far more supportive of clean energy and forest protection than carbon taxes. 'That's an important message for governments. If you want public buy-in, you have to focus on solutions that people understand and support,' Joubert said. The study provides global evidence that subjective attribution of extreme weather events to climate change is associated with greater policy support for climate mitigation, the researchers said. 'Overall, different extreme weather events appear to have different relationships with climate policy support. This pattern highlights the importance of comparative analyses that consider different types of events,' the study said. 'In line with previous studies we also found that subjective attribution interacts with exposure to European winter storms, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and tropical cyclones to predict climate policy support.' Mere exposure to extreme weather events might therefore not suffice to increase policy support unless individuals link these events to climate change. While larger exposure to extreme events was not found to be related to policy support, except for wildfires, the researchers could not rule out that changes in the frequency of extreme weather events over time might be sufficient to shift support. 'Nevertheless, our data suggest that if individuals attribute extreme weather events to climate change, support for climate policies is higher regardless of whether the events are more frequent.' The reverse causal relationship is also possible: people who are supportive of climate policies are more likely to attribute extreme weather to climate change, the study said, noting that longitudinal panel studies are needed to investigate the nature and direction of this relationship. The research also found strong differences in support across countries and policies. Support for climate policies was particularly high in African and Asian countries, average in Australia, Costa Rica and the United Kingdom, and below the global average in several European countries, such as Czechia, Finland and Norway. 'Participants who identified as men, were younger, more religious, had higher education, higher income, left-leaning politics and who lived in urban areas were more likely to support climate policies,' the report said. For some events, such as heatwaves and tropical cyclones, the effects of exposure on climate policy support were stronger for individuals who attribute extreme weather events to climate change more strongly. 'One possible explanation is that these types of extreme weather events allow for management strategies that can directly reduce the hazard itself, such as man-made flood protections, irrigation systems, prescribed burn-offs and land-use policies. 'Therefore, people may be more likely to support policies pertaining to law enforcement or economic regulations instead of climate change mitigation.' The researchers however pointed out that exposure to most types of extreme events did not predict people's support for climate policies. The extent to which people attributed extreme weather events to climate change varied across regions of the world. People in South America most strongly agreed that the occurrence of extreme weather events has been affected by climate change over the last decades, especially in Brazil and Colombia. This might be explained by the fact that belief in human-caused climate change and self-reported personal experience of extreme weather events are high in Latin America. People in Northern Europe and Africa, on the other hand, were less likely to attribute extreme weather events to climate change. In Africa, this could be explained by low levels of climate change awareness and belief in human-caused climate change across the continent. The researchers called for more studies about effective climate change communication on types of extreme weather events that are not typically associated with climate.
Mail & Guardian
4 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Africa's freshwater fish crisis: 26% of species threatened with extinction
Clanwilliam sand fish: Supplied: Jeremy Shelton From the tiny They are found in sediment-rich rivers, shallow ponds, the great lakes, caves, canyons, mountain streams and forests. Yet they are This is according to a The report reveals that 26% of Africa's assessed freshwater fish species are threatened with extinction, but there are large data gaps so the true number is likely to be much higher. Africa is a global hotspot of freshwater fish diversity, home to more than 3 200 species — more than a quarter of the world's total freshwater fish. It's also a 'hotspot of risk', said Eric Oyare, the freshwater lead for WWF Africa. 'When these fish disappear, we lose much more than species: we lose food security, livelihoods, ecosystem balance, and resilience to floods and droughts. These declines are a red flag for the broader health of Africa's freshwater ecosystems, which are the very life support systems for people and nature.' But these lifelines are collapsing under the weight of multiple threats. These include habitat Freshwater fish populations are in freefall across the continent. In the Zambezi floodplain, When people think of the continent's biodiversity, few consider Africa's astonishing diversity of freshwater fish, 'yet they have swum through the continent's communities and cultures for millennia, and are still critical to the daily lives of tens of millions of people — as well as to the overall health of their freshwater ecosystems', said the report. Africa's rivers, lakes and wetlands are home to at least 3 281 freshwater fish species — a figure that includes Madagascar and 'that is almost certainly a significant underestimate'. This is because so many species have not yet been described by science and new species are being discovered in Africa every year — 28 during last year alone. These fish are vital for people and nature, supporting ecosystem functionality and the provision of ecosystem services across the continent, enhancing food security and nutrition for millions. They support countless livelihoods, particularly in vulnerable communities and landlocked countries. More than three million tonnes of freshwater fish are caught each year on the continent, representing nearly 30% of the reported global freshwater fish catch. This figure, too, 'is 'definitely a major underestimate', the report said, again because of a lack of data, especially for small-scale fisheries. The continent boasts 12 of the top 25 inland fish producing countries in the world, with Uganda coming in highest in sixth place. The annual catch feeds the highest per capita consumption of freshwater fish of any continent in the world and employs more than three million people. It plays a central role in the cultures of many indigenous peoples. And some fishes are economically important either as the lure for recreational anglers or as dazzling aquarium fishes. Weird and wonderful The continent's freshwater fish are much more than just food or economic resources. The report cited how possibly the most famous of Africa's freshwater fishes are the incredibly diverse cichlids, with at least 1 600 endemic species found in the Great Lakes – Victoria, Tanganyika, and Malawi. 'These cichlids are one of the most spectacular examples of speciation in the world and provide scientists with a unique opportunity to better understand the drivers of species evolution.' Livingstone's cichlid or kalingono from Lake Malawi has developed a unique hunting style; it plays dead to attract other fish to eat it, then it turns the tables by 'coming alive' and eating the would-be predator. There are 'so many other weird and wonderful species to discover', the report said, like Africa's elephant fishes, which use electrical pulses to communicate with others about sex, size, predators and prey. The cuckoo catfish gorges itself on the eggs of cichlids in Lake Tanganyika. 'Like its famous avian namesake, this fish tries to palm off parental care on an unsuspecting species. The cuckoo catfish does this by creating chaos at spawning time and confusing unsuspecting female cichlids into scooping up its spawn, which the cichlids subsequently brood in their mouths.' The African tigerfish can leap from the water to catch barn swallows in flight while the African lungfish breathes air and can survive years buried in mud during droughts. The ancient bichirs are often referred to as 'living fossils' for their lineage that predates the dinosaurs. Under-reported, undervalued and under pressure But despite their dazzling diversity and critical importance, the continent's freshwater fishes have remained 'largely invisible' to decision-makers with the benefits they contribute 'hidden and ignored' — and are now facing increasing threats to their survival. Globally, freshwater species populations are in freefall – crashing 85% since 1970. Nearly a quarter of the world's freshwater fish species are threatened with extinction. Africa's freshwater fishes are no exception. The report noted that of the 3 281 freshwater fish species, 712 are classified as threatened — with 170 listed as critically endangered, 243 listed as endangered and 299 listed as vulnerable. But the true number is higher because 536 of the continent's assessed freshwater fish are classified as data deficient, 'which means they are so poorly known that their threat status can't be assessed'. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species classifies nine freshwater fishes as extinct — three from Morocco, two from Madagascar and one each from Kenya and Tanzania, Rwanda, Tunisia and Lake Malawi. 'However, the true number is likely to be significantly greater. For example, many species have almost certainly been lost in Lake Victoria alone.' The report said: 'When we tip the scales by drastically reducing freshwater fish populations, we undermine the functioning of freshwater ecosystems — our very life support systems. The decline in freshwater fish populations is the clearest indicator of the damage we have done — and are still doing — to Africa's rivers, lakes and wetlands. 'And that collapse of aquatic ecosystems across Africa only exacerbates the continent's freshwater fish crisis. Freshwater fishes need healthy freshwater ecosystems. And so do we. But we're losing them both far too fast.' Spawning protection The report said that very rarely are the full economic and social values of freshwater fishes and fisheries factored into decisions about hydropower dams, the draining of wetlands and dredging for navigation or sand mining, for example. 'However, there are indications that some decision-makers are finally starting to take the fate of freshwater ecosystems and fishes into account – and that the momentum for action is building.' African countries signed up to the The report said this ambitious agreement paves the way for a new approach to safeguard freshwater biodiversity, highlighted in the country-led Championed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon and Zambia, 20 countries on the continent have already joined the challenge — the largest freshwater protection and restoration initiative in history. Meanwhile, 51 countries are members of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. WWF is urging African countries to adopt the The plan outlines six urgent actions including letting rivers flow more naturally; improving water quality in freshwater ecosystems; protecting and restoring critical habitats and species; ending unsustainable resource use; preventing and controlling invasive non-native species; safeguarding free-flowing rivers and removing obsolete barriers.
Mail & Guardian
4 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Climate crisis puts older adults at high risk from extreme heat, Unep warns
Older people face increasing health risks from extreme heat as climate change intensifies, the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep) has warned. (Envato Elements) Older people face In the latest edition of its The report highlights other effects of climate change, including the melting of glaciers that reawaken ancient pathogens and floods that risk releasing dangerous chemicals, as well as potential solutions to these emerging environmental issues. Older people are The global population aged 65 and older is projected to increase from 10% in 2024 to 16% by 2050, primarily in low and middle-income countries, the report notes. Concurrently, climate change is exacerbating risks such as The world is also becoming 'A rising number of cities will therefore soon face the new reality of increasingly ageing urban dwellers. Maintaining good health and vitality is crucial at any age and minimising risk factors for diseases become even more critical as we age,' the report said. 'In addition to the genetic, physiological, behavioural and social influences, environmental conditions play a crucial role, especially in cities that bring together a high concentration of a variety of environmental health risks.' The risks of respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, and the increased risk of mortality, become particularly acute for frail people with reduced mobility and chronic health issues. Air pollution and chemical contamination increase the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, dementia, depression and anxiety. Poverty, crowded cities and social isolation also raise the vulnerability of older people. The report recommends transforming cities into age-friendly, pollution-free, resilient, accessible spaces with expansive vegetation through better urban planning. Investing in weather stations to monitor extreme heat is critical to protect lives while community-based disaster risk management and access to information are key approaches to help aging people adapt successfully to climate change, it said. The report follows the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution 58/13 to develop an 'international legally binding instrument on the human rights of older persons'. Zombie microbes It warns of the ' Should global temperatures rise more than 2˚C above pre-industrial levels, this would significantly reduce the cryosphere in mass, which includes glaciers, seasonal snow, ice sheets and shelves, sea ice, seasonally frozen ground, and permafrost. 'In a best-case scenario, it would take centuries for cryosphere conditions to return.' The cryosphere is surprisingly rich in ancient life, including fungi, bacteria, and viruses, of which some are pathogens. Much of this life is currently dormant. Warming could reactivate and remobilise modern and ancient microorganisms in cryospheric environments. 'Some might thrive, modifying existing microbial communities, while some might not survive resulting in a loss of microbial can enhance the powers of existing pathogens through natural gene transfers, resulting in heightened risk of antimicrobial resistance,' said the report. Cryospheric regions are home to 670 million people. This population could rise to 844 million by 2050, spanning the Alps, the Andes, Greenland, Hindu Kush Himalaya, Siberia, and the Tibetan Plateau as well as billions more who live in areas with water originating from those frozen areas. To slow down the decline of the cryosphere, the report recommends cutting greenhouse gas emissions — including black carbon emissions from diesel engines — open-field agricultural burning, and wildfires and limiting tourism in fragile frozen regions. Scientific research must also accelerate into the diversity of cryospheric microorganisms that will not survive the cryosphere's decline. Banned chemicals re-emerge Global climate change is contributing to longer, more severe, and more frequent floods. A flood can carry significant volumes of sediment and debris, the report said. Sediments and debris often include common inorganic When floods occur, these can re-enter cities or the food system. The persistent nature of these chemicals means even banned and phased-out chemicals can be remobilised. In recent years, extreme rainfall and subsequent flooding have demonstrated their ability to remobilise legacy pollutants accumulated in the environment. Extensive petroleum operations and incidences of oil spills in the Niger Delta of Nigeria over decades has led to severe contamination with ecological and human health consequences, the report said. A catastrophic flood event in the Niger Delta in 2012 mobilised sediments contaminated with After the worst flooding in more than 100 years The same flood also mobilised legacy radionuclides and heavy metal pollutants from former uranium-mining waste dumps and tailing ponds in the Elbe region. The Pakistan flood of 2010 inundated a fifth of the country's total land area. It, together with a series of smaller flash floods, swept away a significant but unknown portion of 2 835 metric tonnes of 'The release of these obsolete chemicals into the environment will likely cause further contamination in soils, water, and sediments, and the damage needs to be monitored and assessed,' the report said. Effective measures to reduce this imminent risk include traditional control measures like polders, dikes and retention basins, improved drainage systems, nature-based solutions like the sponge-city approach, regular monitoring of pollutants in diverse locations and products, and studying and tackling the economic impacts of this kind of pollution. The risk of ageing dams Another emerging threat the report addresses is the risk of ageing dams. It notes that alongside many benefits, dams can harm indigenous and fishing-dependent communities, as well as degrade ecosystems. There are about 62 000 large dams and millions of smaller barriers that exist worldwide, with expected effects on 90% of the world's river volume by 2030. Large ageing dams are increasingly being removed in Europe and North America, once they become unsafe, obsolete, or economically unviable. Greater natural river connectivity means healthier ecosystems and greater biodiversity, renewing species' access to tens or even hundreds of kilometres of upstream habitats. The report noted, however, that where urbanisation, industrial agriculture or deforestation are common, dam removal alone may not significantly improve a river's health. Large dam removals have the largest impact, though removing multiple small barriers may result in similar effects. Adhering to the UN's principles for ecosystem-restoration initiatives when considering the removal of river barriers is critical, the report said.
