Huawei's AI lab denies that one of its Pangu models copied Alibaba's Qwen
BEIJING/SHANGHAI: Huawei's artificial intelligence research division has rejected claims that a version of its Pangu Pro large language model has copied elements from an Alibaba model, saying that it was independently developed and trained.
The division, called Noah Ark Lab, issued the statement on July 5, a day after an entity called HonestAGI posted an English-language paper on code-sharing platform Github, saying Huawei's Pangu Pro Moe (Mixture of Experts) model showed "extraordinary correlation" with Alibaba's Qwen 2.5 14B.
This suggests that Huawei's model was derived through "upcycling" and was not trained from scratch, the paper said, prompting widespread discussion in AI circles online and in Chinese tech-focused media.
The paper added that its findings indicated potential copyright violation, the fabrication of information in technical reports and false claims about Huawei's investment in training the model.
Noah Ark Lab said in its statement that the model was "not based on incremental training of other manufacturers' models" and that it had "made key innovations in architecture design and technical features." It is the first large-scale model built entirely on Huawei's Ascend chips, it added.
It also said that its development team had strictly adhered to open-source license requirements for any third-party code used, without elaborating which open-source models it took reference from.
Alibaba did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Reuters was unable to contact HonestAGI or learn who is behind the entity.
The release of Chinese startup DeepSeek's open-source model R1 in January this year shocked Silicon Valley with its low cost and sparked intense competition between China's tech giants to offer competitive products.
Qwen 2.5-14B was released in May 2024 and is one of Alibaba's small-sized Qwen 2.5 model family which can be deployed on PC and smartphones.
While Huawei entered the large language model arena early with its original Pangu release in 2021, it has since been perceived as lagging behind rivals. It open-sourced its Pangu Pro Moe models on Chinese developer platform GitCode in late June, seeking to boost the adoption of its AI tech by providing free access to developers.
While Qwen is more consumer-facing and has chatbot services like ChatGPT, Huawei's Pangu models tend to be more used in government as well as the finance and manufacturing sectors. – Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
RM18 million Kian Kok building opens
Published on: Sunday, July 13, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 13, 2025 By: Crystal E Hermenegildus Text Size: Guests of honour and attendees pose for a group photo in front of the multi-purpose building. Kota Kinabalu: After a decade since its completion, Kian Kok Middle School's eight-storey multi-purpose building finally opened, marking a major milestone in the school's development journey. Designed as a comprehensive education and revenue-generating centre, the RM18 million building houses modern classrooms, a library, student entrepreneurship spaces and various income-generating facilities. The project embodies the school's vision of a self-sustaining institution and reflects the progressive spirit of 21st-century education. Despite facing multiple challenges, including the global pandemic, rising construction costs, material shortages and fundraising difficulties, the ambitious project was ultimately brought to fruition through unwavering perseverance and community support. The grand opening ceremony was held at the Huang Qin Nan Grand Hall within the school grounds and officiated by Datuk Dr Tan Siu Lin, Permanent Honorary Chairman of the Board of Governors. Chairman of the Board, Datuk Clement Yeh, expressed pride in the successful completion of the building, describing it as the result of tireless dedication from planning to execution. 'We never gave up because we knew this building represents more than just a physical structure—it reflects our mission and long-term commitment to the sustainable development of Chinese education,' he said. Yeh also paid tribute to the late Datuk Seri Panglima Sari Tan Nuar, the younger brother of Datuk Dr Tan Siu Lin, who played a pivotal role in the school's history. 'He dedicated his life to the school's growth — be it school affairs, administration, fundraising, or community engagement. 'He took on countless responsibilities, never seeking recognition. One of his greatest dreams was to see a comprehensive multi-purpose building built within the school grounds as a foundation for sustainability and long-term growth,' Yeh said. Yeh also acknowledged the major contributors whose generous donations made the building possible, including the Lee Foundation which contributed RM2 million and RM1 million donated in memory of his late father, Tan Sri Yeh Pao Tzu. Other significant contributions came from K2 Life Water Industries Sdn Bhd (RM500,000), Superwood Industries Sdn Bhd through PJ Tan who donated all the fire-rated wooden doors, Teck Guan Sdn Bhd which donated the entire roof structure, Yu Yang Chong who contributed all the standard steel materials and Dr Shim Kah Siong who donated the complete internal air-conditioning system. 'Each act of giving reflects not just generosity but a deep sense of responsibility towards education. These contributions will be forever etched in Kian Kok's legacy and serve as an inspiration for future generations,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Should lecturers use AI to grade papers?
JULY 13 — More and more educators are saying yes (albeit perhaps not out loud). I'm going to try to explain why it's not a problem ethically. But first of all, some clarification is in order. Setting aside the question of lecturers 'cheating' if they use AI to grade, not every form of assessment can be practically handled with AI. If your assignments or exams are hand-written you very likely aren't going to be using ChatGPT. Not unless you scan the papers one by one and upload them all to the system, which is hardly impossible but if you're expected to include marks or notes at the side this isn't going to be feasible. Also, if the assessment is multiple-choice (amazingly, this format still exists in undergrad studies) you'd probably be better off getting your assistant or family member or an optical mark recognition (OCR) system to perform the grading for you. More reliable and less hassle on your part. Setting aside the question of lecturers 'cheating' if they use AI to grade, not every form of assessment can be practically handled with AI. — Reuters pic What about soft-copy assignments? Sure, in that case CoPilot may help. But what about the grading rubrics? You're going to have to inform the AI regarding what counts as a Distinction, Pass and so on. And are you confident of the nuances the system picks up? You know, often the difference between one assignment getting two or three marks more than another is the way the student explained something. Would AI share your appreciation of these subtleties? This is also assuming the AI grades accurately and there are none of those nasty mistakes which we all know are made on more than a few occasions. Another issue arises if students later ask you why they received only this or that (usually low) grade. How are you going to explain the grade variations if AI read their papers on your behalf? So, am I suggesting there's no value in using AI to grade papers? Not at all. I think AI can be very helpful if you're required to read and give feedback on a 100-page post-graduate dissertation. I honestly cannot see the harm of running the paper through Grok, getting some instant criticism and commendations, before running your own human eyes through the paper. If you've attended the average Proposal Defence or Viva Voce session, you'll notice that most of the issues raised sound the same anyway. Eg, insufficient evidence when making an assertion, faulty research methodology, lack of citations on theory or history or what-not, glaring biases, the numerous spelling and grammar mistakes, and so on. These are all valid issues and can all be picked up by the likes of Gemini and, frankly, I can't see an ethical problem if an examiner is helped along the way by AI, especially if he or she is required to read and review half a dozen 100-pagers within a month. One could argue that by 'freeing' the professor from having to note down all these nitty-gritty errors and shortcomings, AI could thus enable him or her to provide 'deeper' and more profound theoretical criticisms and/or feedback. So, to go back to the original question, my answer is 'Yes, sorta'. Lecturers should be able to use AI to help them grade (some!) papers the way graphic designers use Adobe Illustrator to beautify their work or how Grab drivers use Waze to help get them to a destination faster. It gets less practical if your class has a hundred students but it can't hurt if your students are fewer and the work submitted is 'bigger'. Just gotta get the right balance, I suppose? * This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Asean's new role as middle ground
Analysts say meetings among top diplomats show the bloc's increasing relevance KUALA LUMPUR: The slew of unprecedented high-level meetings held between top diplomats at the just concluded Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM) underscores the relevance of Asean as a geopolitical middle ground, say analysts. They said these meetings, which involved diplomats from global powers, showed that Asean is becoming more credible. Political analyst Azmi Hasan said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had set the tone of Malaysia's chairmanship of Asean by pledging to raise other international issues aside from matters linked to South-East Asia. 'This means being involved in outside issues such as the conflicts in Gaza, Russia-Ukraine, Iran-Israel and India-Pakistan. 'So, credit should be given to the chairman, who tried to elevate Asean to be respected by other nations,' he said. Azmi said the joint communique issued at the end of the four-day AMM from July 8 to July 11 showed that Asean wants to exert influence on global issues. 'The side meetings held among these global superpowers on the sidelines of the AMM are very important,' he said. Among top diplomats present at the AMM were Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Among the important bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the conference was one between Lavrov and Rubio, which concluded after about 50 minutes. Rubio spoke with Lavrov here on Thursday evening, having already met with the 10-member Asean bloc. Great power dialogue: Rubio (left) meeting with Wang (right) at the sidelines of the Asean Foreign Ministers Meeting. — AFP Rubio, who was on his first Asia trip since taking over the State Department, also held a meeting with Wang and described it as 'positive and constructive'. In the joint communique issued on July 11, Asean foreign ministers said they are strengthening ties with global partners while maintaining their neutral and central role in the region. Asean also reaffirmed its commitment to an open and inclusive regional order, stressing that the regional group remains a platform for dialogue, not rivalry. Assoc prof Khoo Ying Hooi of Universiti Malaya International and Strategic Studies Department said Asean has long positioned itself as a neutral and inclusive regional convener. The AMM this year had underscored that role in an unprecedented way, as many bilateral meetings were held on the sidelines, she said. 'These engagements, especially the Wang Yi-Rubio dialogue, suggest that Asean is increasingly considered a geopolitical middle ground where rivalries can be managed diplomatically. 'That said, we should not romanticise this role too much. Asean's 'centrality' works precisely because it offers a low-stake platform, one that avoids tough commitments or binding rules,' she said. Khoo said global superpowers are showing up at the AMM because the presence reflects their desire to shape regional norms in their own terms. 'Asean may be hosting the table, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's controlling the menu,' she said. Khoo said US-China tensions and escalating trade disputes, as well as varying tariff rates announced by the United States, had dominated the headlines during the AMM last week. 'This placed Rubio in a challenging position during his visit, as he sought to reassure South-East Asian partners while Washington's economic policies threatened their interests. 'The regional reaction was mixed; some Asean countries expressed frustration, while others began exploring deeper trade ties with China as a counterweight,' she said. Khoo said Beijing capitalised on that moment and used the AMM's sidelines to present itself as a more stable partner. She noted that issues pertaining to Palestine, the South China Sea and Myanmar were also raised. 'But it was the broader structural clash between the US and China through economic tools like tariffs and diplomatic influence that shaped the tone and urgency of this year's AMM discussions,' she added. Khoo described the AMM as a diplomatic litmus test on managing rivalries and maintaining unity. 'The Asean Summit in October will be pivotal. Timor-Leste is expected to be formally admitted. Malaysia has been signalling a desire for renewal, not a radical overhaul, but a recalibration. 'The 47th Summit presents a potential opportunity for Asean to demonstrate greater confidence and cohesion. 'However, this will largely depend on the willingness of member states to transcend the usual practice of consensus and actively pursue structural reform,' she stated. Asia West East Centre director and co-founder Abdolreza Alami said Asean has emerged as a trusted platform due to its strategic geographical and economic position at the intersection of the East and West. 'The region sits at the heart of one of the world's most vital geopolitical crossroads – the Indo-Pacific – where the interests of major global players such as China, the US, the European Union and others increasingly converge. 'The growing interest in Asean, evident from the unprecedented number of high-level bilateral and multilateral meetings on the sidelines of the AMM, underscores how the organisation is seen as a valuable venue for diplomacy and strategic dialogue,' he said. Abdolreza also said the AMM is a clear precursor to a highly significant 47th Asean Summit in October, which will be potentially attended by heads of state from major powers. This, he said, is symbolically and strategically important, especially at a time when global polarisation is intensifying. 'The challenge for Asean will be to navigate these dynamics carefully, reinforcing its unity and ensuring that it remains a space for cooperation – not competition – between great powers,' he said. 'If managed wisely, Asean could play an increasingly critical role in shaping a stable and inclusive regional order,' added Abdolreza. The 47th Asean Summit will be held in Kuala Lumpur from Oct 26 to 28.
