
How US-Pakistan relations have turned around under Trump — to India's alarm
's chief of army staff Asim Munir smiled for the camera this weekend, arm in arm with a top American general – his second warm welcome this summer into the heart of the US establishment.
Munir travelled to Florida for the retirement of Gen Michael Kurilla, the commander of
US
military forces in the Middle East, who has previously praised the Pakistan strongman for a 'phenomenal partnership' in the fight against terrorism. To Gen Dan Caine, America's top military officer, Munir passed a plaque and an invitation to visit Pakistan.
Even more remarkably, in June Munir had a two-hour private lunch in Washington with
Donald Trump
, just a month after Pakistan and arch-rival India fought their bloodiest military confrontation for decades.
It was an astonishing reception for a man who, despite wielding the country's most powerful office, is not a head of government – and even more so for an official representing Pakistan. Relations with Washington were assumed to be heading for the rocks after the re-election of Trump, who once accused the nuclear-armed country of 240 million people of offering the US 'nothing but lies and deceit'.
READ MORE
Instead, the Trump administration's ties with Islamabad appear to be blossoming, while
India
– which was left seething by Munir's White House welcome – has faced scorn despite
Narendra Modi
's previous friendly bond with Trump.
'What's happening in US-Pakistan relations is a surprise. I would describe the relationship now as one that's enjoying an unexpected resurgence, even a renaissance,' says Michael Kugelman, a non-resident senior fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation. 'Pakistan has very successfully understood how to engage with such an unconventional president.'
India and Pakistan's contrasting diplomatic fortunes have the potential to upend geopolitics in volatile south Asia and are already feeding into trade, where the US gave Islamabad a relatively light 19 per cent tariff while hitting New Delhi with a punitive 50 per cent.
Trump also promised a deal to develop what he called Pakistan's 'massive Oil Reserves', while Pakistan is offering other investment opportunities to the US, hoping to revive its bailout-dependent economy.
The newfound US admiration for Pakistan is partly the fruit of a charm offensive concocted by Pakistan's senior generals, leveraging counterterrorism co-operation, outreach to business people close to Trump and deals covering energy, critical minerals and cryptocurrencies – all accompanied by a cascade of flattery for the White House.
Leaders in Islamabad believed they needed to urgently get into the good graces of the erratic president and some of his allies who had been deeply critical of Pakistan over its alleged support for the Taliban during Nato's war in Afghanistan.
Project 2025, a pre-election blueprint that has inspired many early Trump administration moves, lambasted Pakistan's military-dominated regime as an 'intensely anti-American and corrupt' client of China. Members of Trump's inner circle also targeted increasingly autocratic Pakistan's treatment of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan. A bipartisan group in congress began to draft legislation to impose sanctions on Munir over Khan's imprisonment.
'We had no idea what to expect with him, but the general consensus was that it was likely going to be rough,' said one senior Pakistani diplomat.
Pakistan's turnaround was helped early on by what the US saw as an important arrest. In March Asim Malik, the head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency, delivered a high-value Isis-K operative who the US said was behind a 2021 bombing in Kabul that killed more than 180 people, including 13 US soldiers. His capture earned Pakistan Trump's praise in his March State of the Union address, when the US president also lambasted India over high tariffs.
Crucially, too, Pakistan deployed a form of crypto diplomacy to make its way into Trump's inner circle.
World Liberty Financial, a Trump-backed cryptocurrency venture, signed a letter of intent with Pakistan's crypto council in April, when its co-founders visited Pakistan. Zach Witkoff, the son of US special envoy Steve Witkoff, said during the trip that Pakistan had 'trillions of dollars' of mineral wealth ripe for tokenisation.
Since then, Bilal bin Saqib, Pakistan's minister for crypto and blockchain, has emerged as a shadow diplomat, taking part in trade talks with Washington and pitching Pakistan's crypto potential to figures close to Trump's family and advisers.
Pakistani officials also point to their conduct during the May conflict with India as having bolstered their credibility with Trump. In their telling, Pakistan displayed a combination of strength and restraint, shooting down a handful of Indian jets but refraining from massive escalation, while the US and Gulf states worked the phones to secure a ceasefire.
Islamabad also gave credit to Trump for brokering the truce with New Delhi – to the point of
nominating the US president for the Nobel Peace Prize
. Trading his khakis for a suit and tie this weekend, Munir again heaped praise on the US president when speaking to a group of Pakistani-Americans in Tampa.
Munir said Trump's 'strategic leadership' had prevented 'many wars in the world', according to a Pakistani official.
'Trump needs success stories to proclaim and Pakistan is happy to give them to him,' says Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistan ambassador to the US now at the Hudson Institute, a think-tank in Washington.
By contrast, Modi has taken a more flinty approach. The day before the lunch with Munir in June, the Indian leader had a testy phone call with the US president about his role in the truce. Modi then publicly contradicted Trump by saying the agreement with Pakistan did not come about because of American intervention, but was at Pakistan's initiative and took place through existing channels of communication between the two countries' armed forces.
'Prime Minister Modi firmly stated that India does not and will never accept mediation,' India said in a summary of the call.
Munir's visit to see the president, which came as the US prepared military strikes on Iran, also helped Pakistan's military chief tout another facet of their relationship: military and intelligence co-operation.
Munir essentially offered Pakistan as a trusted back channel between the US and its adversaries Iran and China, a strategy that harks back to the Pakistan of the 1970s that facilitated Richard Nixon's opening of US relations with communist China.
While Pakistan rebuked Washington for the strikes against Iran, the country continued to try to cast itself as a mediator between the US and its foes. In late July, Munir flew to Beijing, where he toured the headquarters of the People's Liberation Army and promised Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi that he would protect Chinese workers in Pakistan from insurgent attacks.
And in between warm encounters with US Centcom commander Kurilla, who received military honours from Pakistan's government in late July, Munir has also welcomed Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian to Islamabad.
'Pakistan is a rare country that is friends with China, Iran, the Gulf states, to a lesser extent Russia, and now, again, the US,' said Marvin Weinbaum, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington. 'The US sees Munir as someone who can play a useful strategic role, and the Pakistanis keep their lines open to everyone but know to pull back when one relationship is clashing with another.'
[
Shattered Lands. Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia: Wonderful telling of a sad history
Opens in new window
]
For India, the burgeoning relationship between Trump and its arch-rival has caused deep irritation, aggravated by its own failure to fend steep tariffs on its far bigger economy. Trump first levied a 25 per cent tariff on India, then doubled it to 50 per cent because of Russian oil purchases. 'It will take some time to get over the lack of trust here,' said one person briefed on the events.
Indian officials are also irked at seeing military-ruled Pakistan rewarded after luring Washington with business deals. 'It's very easy to deal with dysfunctional systems,' the person said – a reference to the ease with which Pakistan turned what looked like a weak position at the start of Trump's term into a win.
Current and former Pakistani officials and analysts warn that Trump could still turn on Islamabad if it fails to deliver. Most of Pakistan's natural resource riches are either unproven or lie in volatile provinces beset by insurgencies that led to 2,000 deaths last year. Pakistan's economy relies on a $7 billion IMF bailout and debt rollovers from China and Gulf allies.
If Trump decides to patch things up with India again, he may lash out against Pakistan to please Modi, they say. Two diplomats said Trump is hopeful, for instance, that Islamabad will recognise Israel – a tall order for Islamabad given the strength of public opposition to such a move.
'Trump is playing the Pakistan card to try and gain more advantage with India, annoy the Indians, and see if this will make them talk to him and accept his term,' says Haqqani. 'It's a transactional improvement'.
'Unelected leaders and military officials are willing to overpromise to appeal to what they think is Trump's narcissism,' adds Hussain Nadim, a former policy adviser in Pakistan who is now a Washington-based critic of Munir's rule. 'Trump and his advisers may eventually run out of patience when they see that Pakistan is not delivering.'
Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, a former prime minister for the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party from 2017 to 2018 who left to start his own party, agrees that Pakistan should 'be wary of the volatility of the Trump administration'.
'Modi was once the good guy, now he's being beaten up. Zelenskiy got a public berating,' he said. 'Pakistan needs to protect both its interests and its dignity.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israel has ‘no choice' but to attack Gaza City, says Netanyahu, as hostage families call strike
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has insisted his country had 'no choice' but to approve a plan to attack Gaza City in order to topple Hamas's remaining stronghold. 'Our goal is not to occupy Gaza but to liberate it from Hamas,' he told a news conference on Sunday night. He also outlined the creation of a new governing body for the enclave. 'We will work to establish a civilian authority that is not affiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority,' he said. READ MORE Mr Netanyahu said on Monday that Israel is 'approaching the end of the campaign' against those who sought to destroy it. 'We are working to defeat the remnants of the Iranian axis and to free all our hostages,' he said. The plan to attack Gaza City will entail the forced transfer of more than 800,000 Palestinian civilians, many of whom have already been displaced multiple times over the past 22 months of fighting. The Israeli attack on Gaza City is planned to start on October 7th, leaving almost two months for the army to mobilise the required forces for the operation. The army has been authorised to call up more than 400,000 reservists, but it is not clear exactly how many extra soldiers will be required. The military says civilians will be moved to the Muwasi humanitarian zone over the next six weeks and, in parallel, Israel says it plans to significantly increase aid deliveries. It says daily lorry convoys carrying humanitarian aid will increase from 300 to 1,200, with intensified aerial drops and the setting up of additional distribution centres. Some commentators believe the plan to attack Gaza City is designed to exert pressure on Hamas to resume negotiations on a ceasefire and hostage-release deal. A Hamas delegation reportedly arrived in Cairo on Monday as efforts by international mediators to break the deadlock continue. [ What is behind Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City? Opens in new window ] Far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said he no longer believes Mr Netanyahu is willing to do what it takes to win the war in Gaza, calling the security cabinet's approval of a plan to conquer Gaza City a 'half-measure'. More than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed in the war, according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry. The war was triggered when 1,200 people were killed and 250 were taken hostage into Gaza during a Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023, according to Israeli tallies. Families of the hostages have declared a one-day general strike for Sunday, the first day of Israel's working week, as part of their campaign for a ceasefire aimed at bringing back all 50 hostages, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. However, the Histadrut trade union federation announced on Monday that it would not order its members to join the strike. After talks with business leaders and relatives of hostages, Histadrut leader Arnon Bar-David argued that joining the strike would politicise the question of the hostages. 'If I knew that a strike – not just for one day but longer – would end the matter, stop the war and bring back the hostages, I would go for it with full force,' he said. 'Unfortunately, and although my heart is bursting with anger, it has no practical outcome.' [ Trump should use influence with Netanyahu to stop war in Gaza, says Taoiseach Opens in new window ] He did, however, promise to encourage employers to allow workers to attend protests and rallies without risking their employment rights. Israeli police on Monday, meanwhile, arrested a 27-year-old Jerusalem man suspected of spray-painting anti-war slogans, including 'there's a holocaust in Gaza', on a section of the Western Wall in Jerusalem's old city and at the city's main synagogue. The action was condemned by politicians from across the political spectrum.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump to consult with European leaders before Putin summit, says Germany
Germany has said US president Donald Trump will consult European leaders before his summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin , amid fears that they want to agree a deal on Ukraine without its involvement when they meet in Alaska on Friday. German chancellor Friedrich Merz will host online talks on Wednesday involving Mr Trump, leaders of several European states, top EU and Nato officials and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy . Mr Merz's office said on Monday that the talks would focus on 'further options for action to put pressure on Russia' and 'preparations for possible peace negotiations and related issues of territorial claims and security'. The leaders of Germany, Finland, France, Great Britain, Italy and Poland are expected to take part, after saying in a joint statement on Saturday that Ukraine needed 'robust and credible security guarantees' and 'freedom of choice over its own destiny' and that an initial ceasefire should be a precondition for 'meaningful negotiations'. READ MORE Kyiv and European capitals see a risk that Mr Trump – who formerly claimed to be able to end the war in one day – is impatient with the issue and wants a quick deal with Mr Putin that would allow him to claim a diplomatic triumph and end support for Ukraine. 'We all know that Russia will pose a threat to the countries of the region, including Poland, for years to come. We cannot allow Russia to emerge from this conflict strengthened and convinced that it can violate borders or seize foreign territories with impunity and that the world will agree to this,' said Polish prime minister Donald Tusk on Monday. 'We also believe that any decision on a potential exchange of territories and other conditions for peace must be negotiated with Ukraine,' he added. Mr Trump has not revealed details of what a deal with Mr Putin could involve, but said on Friday that it would entail 'some swapping of territories [between Ukraine and Russia] to the betterment of both'. Mr Trump said his encounter with Mr Putin will be a 'feel-out meeting' aimed at urging Russia to end the war in Ukraine. 'I'm going in to speak to Vladimir Putin and I'm going to be telling him, you've got to end this war. You've got to end it.' Mr Trump also said a future meeting could include Mr Zelenskiy. Media reports have suggested that Mr Putin proposed to US envoy Steve Witkoff during his visit to Moscow last week that Russia would agree to a ceasefire at the current front line if Ukraine handed over permanent control of its Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Mr Tusk said such a suggestion 'boils down to Russia keeping what it already has, not giving back what it has captured, and Ukraine must agree to this. 'It is not surprising that for Ukraine ... this is unacceptable. Will this exchange of territories be the key to achieving lasting peace? So far, there is little indication of this. But let's wait and see – everything will become known on Friday,' he added. 'I will wait ... for the effects of the meeting between Presidents Trump and Putin. I have many fears and a lot of hope.' Since Mr Trump began his second stint in the White House in January, Russia has been extremely keen to discuss ways to end its invasion of Ukraine with his administration, while sidelining Kyiv and European states that it describes as obstacles to a peace deal. That has stoked concerns that Mr Putin may push for a final deal on Friday and prompted European leaders to frame the summit as only a starting point for negotiations. 'It will not be the final say on this. There will not be a final deal on this. Of course, Ukraine will have to be involved,' said Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who will also join the talks on Wednesday. 'What will happen on Friday is testing President Putin by President Trump. And I commend him for the fact that he organised this meeting,' Mr Rutte told US television.


Extra.ie
3 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Donald Trump deploys National Guard to Washington DC over 'public safety' emergency
US President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard to the nation's capital and taken federal control of the Washington police force to tackle what he believes is a rise in violent crime. Trump announced his decision on Monday to combat the supposed lawlessness, despite statistics showing that violent crime hit a 30-year low in 2024. He stated: 'This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back. Trump has deployed the National Guard to DC. Pic:'I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington DC. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' As he made the announcement at the White House, Trump was supported by administration officials including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi. Washington DC is just the latest Democratic city that Trump has targeted by exercising executive power over traditionally local matters. The 79-year-old similarly deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles in June to respond to protests over his administration's immigration raids. He has consistently dismissed criticism that he is manufacturing a crisis to justify expanding presidential authority. Hundreds of officers and agents from over a dozen federal agencies, including the FBI, ICE, DEA, and ATF, have already been deployed across Washington DC in recent days. The National Guard has been deployed to DC before. Pic:The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Trump's claims, explaining that the city is 'not experiencing a crime spike' and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime fell 26% in the first seven months of 2025 after dropping 35% in 2024 and overall crime dropped 7%, according to Washington's police department. However, gun violence does remain an issue in the capital. In 2023, Washington had the third-highest gun homicide rate among US cities with populations over 500,000, according to gun control advocacy group 'Everytown for Gun Safety'. The Washington Mayor's criticism of Trump is again similar to what happened in California earlier this summer. A federal trial was set to begin in San Francisco on whether the Trump administration violated US law by deploying National Guard troops and US Marines to LA without the approval of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Monday's deployment is different as the US President has broad authority over the 2,700 members of the DC National Guard. Trump has been targeting Democratic cities with executive power. Pic:In other states, Governors typically hold the power to activate troops. During his first term in the White House, Trump deployed the National Guard to Washington in 2020 as a response to the mostly peaceful demonstrations during nationwide protests over police brutality following the murder of George Floyd. Civil rights leaders denounced the deployment, which was also opposed by the Mayor. Another time Guard troops were deployed to DC was when a flock of Trump supporters attacked and invaded the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. The US military is generally prohibited under law from directly participating in domestic law enforcement activities.