Getty argues its UK copyright case does not threaten AI
Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI has begun at London's High Court, with Getty rejecting Stability AI's contention the case poses a threat to the generative AI industry.
Seattle-based Getty, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system which can generate images from text inputs.
Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion.
Stability AI - which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP - is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights.
Before the trial began on Monday, Stability AI's spokesperson said "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas".
"Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression," the spokesperson said.
In court filings, Stability AI lawyer Hugo Cuddigan said Getty's lawsuit posed "an overt threat to Stability's whole business and the wider generative AI industry".
Getty's lawyers said that argument was incorrect and their case was about upholding intellectual property rights.
"It is not a battle between creatives and technology, where a win for Getty Images means the end of AI," Getty's lawyer Lindsay Lane told the court.
She added: "The two industries can exist in synergistic harmony because copyright works and database rights are critical to the advancement and success of AI ... the problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment."
Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in the United Kingdom, the US and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago.
Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material.
Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists.
Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major effect on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI.
"Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said.
Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
More money to Moscow than Kyiv: Australia buying billions in fuel using Russian crude despite sanctions against Kremlin
Australia's dependence on imported oil—much of it refined from Russian crude—has handed the Kremlin billions of dollars in tax revenue from exporters, according to new research. While Australia has proudly pledged $1.5 billion in aid to support Ukraine against Russia's invasion, a new report found the country has funnelled even more money to the Kremlin. Data from the Europe-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) estimated Australia has imported more than AU$3.7 billion worth of oil products derived from Russian crude. The oil is refined overseas—including at the Jamnagar Refinery in India, which has not sanctioned Russian crude—before being legally imported into the Australian market. This would have handed Russian President Vladimir Putin about AU$1.8 billion in tax revenue, according CREA. CREA's EU Russia Analyst Vaibhav Raghunandan called it 'a significant failing of Western sanctions', exposing a glaring loophole that lets Russia bypass restrictions. 'Refineries in non-sanctioning countries buying Russian oil are… taking comfort in the knowledge that they will face no action from Western countries,' he said. Mr Raghunandan said countries like Australia 'look away and continue to import refined products', indirectly funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) warned this 'policy blind spot' was 'actively undermining our credibility' as a nation. ASPI's Director of National Security Programs John Coyne called Australia's dependence on Russian-linked fuel 'a serious national security failure and a strategic contradiction'. 'We cannot claim to support Ukraine and uphold a values-based foreign policy while simultaneously fuelling our economy with Russian-linked petroleum,' he told Sky News. 'According to reports, Australia has sent more tax dollars to the Kremlin through these imports than we've provided to Ukraine in aid. That's indefensible.' Resources Minister Madeleine King did not respond to questions asked by Sky News about the issue. Due to fuel security issues, Australia has continued to rely on imports in order to deliver its national energy demands. According to the latest Australian Petroleum Statistics, there are just 56 days of fuel supply on shore, well below the International Energy Agency's 90-day requirement. Mr Coyne said Australia's critically low domestic fuel reserves was a vulnerability. 'Our domestic fuel reserves remain critically low… Australia is dangerously exposed to global supply disruptions, conflict, or coercion,' he said. 'We are one maritime chokepoint or geopolitical flare-up away from a fuel crisis.' Mr Coyne urged the federal government to take immediate action to bolster sovereign energy capability and national resilience. 'The era of cheap energy and blind reliance on market forces to solve national problems is over. Governments can no longer outsource resilience,' he said. 'Right now, Australia is precariously vulnerable to any disruption in the global liquid fuel supply chain and that vulnerability cuts across defence, emergency response, agriculture, and logistics.' He said to address the problem, the Albanese government must close the refining loophole in its sanctions regime and improve sovereign refining and storage capacity. He added the government needed to 'embed fuel security in a coordinated, whole-of-government resilience strategy'. 'This is not just about economics. It's about whether Australia can function, respond and defend itself under stress,' Mr Coyne said.
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Shire of Shark Bay finishes building 12 social units for seniors, thanks to $4 million State Government grant
A $4 million State Government capital grant has been used to build a dozen social homes for seniors in the coastal Gascoyne town of Denham. The Shire of Shark Bay recently completed the 12 properties under the Shark Bay Aged Housing Project, which aims to meet the growing need for well-located, appropriate and affordable housing for seniors. The 12 one-bedroom independent living units were built by Carnarvon-based Northern Aspect Construction next to the recently established community hub. Housing and Works Minister John Carey said the units would allow current and future tenants to age at home and enjoy quality amenities and support services in Shark Bay. 'Since July 2021, our government has executed more than $200 million in capital grants contracts,' he said. 'The delivery of these homes is a great example of State and local governments working together to get a positive outcome for the community.' Overall, the State Government has invested $5.1 billion into housing and homelessness measures, adding more than 3000 social homes across WA. More than 1000 are currently under contract or construction.
The Age
11 hours ago
- The Age
For Trump, LA is just the beginning. Soon, he'll monitor every move Americans make
In real time, we are watching the United States of America slide further into authoritarianism. As the administration's response to protests in Los Angeles escalates, President Donald Trump's handling of the issue must be understood in the context of his broader assault on democracy and the rule of law. If deploying the National Guard and the marines to control citizens exercising their democratic right to protest was not a clear enough message, on Monday, Trump said that 'it would be a great thing' if Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of California, was arrested over his opposition to the federal government's intervention. Another alarming example of encroachment on citizen's rights is the recent news that the Trump administration is engaging the US-based tech company Palantir to merge government data to create one enormous mega-centre of personal information on citizens. Here, it joins China and Russia in the use of mass surveillance to monitor and control its people. The notoriously secretive tech company already has deep connections to the US government, particularly to the Central Intelligence Agency and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement – the agency that provoked the protests in California as it carried out raids and mass arrests of illegal immigrants across Los Angeles late last week. In its contract with ICE, Palantir is developing a surveillance platform that will allow the government to prioritise people for deportation, track deportations, and streamline 'deportation logistics'. And in yet another government contract revealed last month, Palantir will scrape, consolidate and analyse federal data on the health, finances and education of Americans for the Trump administration. This could give the government what the New York Times has described as 'untold surveillance power'. Critics of the project argue that providing Trump with what amounts to detailed portraits of civilians could be used to silence or punish critics of the administration. This mass surveillance program potentially encompasses all of American life. And unlike the phone and internet records secretly collected by the National Security Agency (as revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013), this technology is far more sophisticated, far more wide-ranging in scope, less understood, and less regulated. In J.R.R. Tolkein's Lord of the Rings, the word 'palantir' refers to powerful crystal balls. Made by ancient elves and used to see events of the past and future, the empire-building Sauron had one, which he could use to corrupt all others. In the real world, Palantir was co-founded by billionaire activist Peter Thiel, Elon Musk's erstwhile mentor and a long-term supporter of Vice President J.D. Vance, as well as one of the many far-right tech bros currently propping up and profiting from the Trump administration. Palantir is unapologetically ideological. The company's leaders frame its work as a defence of 'the West' in response to its decline – a decline driven, as they see it, by 'woke' agendas and efforts to redistribute wealth and power. Like Trump, they see oppression and violence as necessary to winning the war against such forces.
