For Trump, LA is just the beginning. Soon, he'll monitor every move Americans make
In real time, we are watching the United States of America slide further into authoritarianism. As the administration's response to protests in Los Angeles escalates, President Donald Trump's handling of the issue must be understood in the context of his broader assault on democracy and the rule of law.
If deploying the National Guard and the marines to control citizens exercising their democratic right to protest was not a clear enough message, on Monday, Trump said that 'it would be a great thing' if Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of California, was arrested over his opposition to the federal government's intervention.
Another alarming example of encroachment on citizen's rights is the recent news that the Trump administration is engaging the US-based tech company Palantir to merge government data to create one enormous mega-centre of personal information on citizens. Here, it joins China and Russia in the use of mass surveillance to monitor and control its people.
The notoriously secretive tech company already has deep connections to the US government, particularly to the Central Intelligence Agency and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement – the agency that provoked the protests in California as it carried out raids and mass arrests of illegal immigrants across Los Angeles late last week.
In its contract with ICE, Palantir is developing a surveillance platform that will allow the government to prioritise people for deportation, track deportations, and streamline 'deportation logistics'.
And in yet another government contract revealed last month, Palantir will scrape, consolidate and analyse federal data on the health, finances and education of Americans for the Trump administration. This could give the government what the New York Times has described as 'untold surveillance power'. Critics of the project argue that providing Trump with what amounts to detailed portraits of civilians could be used to silence or punish critics of the administration.
This mass surveillance program potentially encompasses all of American life. And unlike the phone and internet records secretly collected by the National Security Agency (as revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013), this technology is far more sophisticated, far more wide-ranging in scope, less understood, and less regulated.
In J.R.R. Tolkein's Lord of the Rings, the word 'palantir' refers to powerful crystal balls. Made by ancient elves and used to see events of the past and future, the empire-building Sauron had one, which he could use to corrupt all others. In the real world, Palantir was co-founded by billionaire activist Peter Thiel, Elon Musk's erstwhile mentor and a long-term supporter of Vice President J.D. Vance, as well as one of the many far-right tech bros currently propping up and profiting from the Trump administration.
Palantir is unapologetically ideological. The company's leaders frame its work as a defence of 'the West' in response to its decline – a decline driven, as they see it, by 'woke' agendas and efforts to redistribute wealth and power. Like Trump, they see oppression and violence as necessary to winning the war against such forces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
US senator dragged out of LA press conference, handcuffed
'It's disgusting … this is not what democracies do,' he said. Noem said immigration authorities had tens of thousands of people on their list of targets, and that millions of people were in Los Angeles illegally. She noted Trump had repeatedly said criminals were the primary targets, but said other people may be caught up in the raids as 'collateral' if they were associates of the targets. 'We're going to stay here and build our operations until we make sure that we liberate the city of Los Angeles,' Noem said. However, Trump indicated he was preparing to soften his approach after complaints from industry and farmers that they were losing important and irreplaceable labour because of the raids. California in particular is reliant on migrant workers, often undocumented, in the hospitality industry, in shops and car washes, and in its agricultural basin. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a TruthSocial post. 'In many cases the Criminals allowed into our Country by the VERY Stupid Biden Open Borders Policy are applying for those jobs. This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' Later, at a White House event, Trump said farmers were being 'hurt badly' as they had loyal, long-standing workers who may or may not be in the country legally, but might be replaced by criminals if they were deported. 'We're going to have to do something about that,' he said. 'We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have, maybe, what they're supposed to have. 'We can't do that to our farmers. And leisure too. Hotels. We're going to have to use a lot of common sense on that.' Trump critics immediately said it was another example of 'TACO' - or Trump Always Chickens Out – an acronym that initially circulated among Wall Street traders to describe the president's oscillation on tariffs, but has now become a popular descriptor for his policy backflips or compromises. 'Turns out, chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy,' Newsom said on X. After a quieter day of demonstrations in downtown Los Angeles – the second night of a curfew – police said they made 81 arrests overnight, mostly for failing to disperse. Two people were arrested for assaulting a police officer with a deadly weapon, and one person for resisting an officer. Numerous 'less lethal' weapons, such as rubber bullets, were used when dispersing the crowd.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Retired US General Jack Keane says lack of American submarines ‘real basis' for Trump administration's AUKUS review
Retired US General Jack Keane has said he believes American concerns over having enough submarines for their own fleet is underpinning the AUKUS defence pact review instigated by the Trump administration. A primary pillar of AUKUS, a trilateral security partnership agreed to in 2021, is to enable Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, as well as other advanced weapons. The newly announced review into the pact is being headed by Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of the submarine deal. Speaking to Sky News Host Andrew Bolt on Thursday, Mr Keane said he believed concerns over the US holding on to enough submarines is the 'real basis' for AUKUS coming under the microscope. 'I mean, we know for a fact, we don't have anywhere near all the submarines that we would like to have and it's the submarines where we have the advantage, the United States and our allies, over China itself,' the former general said. '(China) have decisive advantages in surface ships, in offence and defensive missiles, and also the number of aeroplanes that they have every day in the region. Submarines is something we want more of.' However, Mr Keane said he thought having Australian-operated American submarines in Indo-Pacific waters would be a 'real strategic plus'. The former general was asked whether the American popular opinion could swing away from thinking US submarines being operated under an Australian flag is good idea, but Mr Keane said he did not hold such concerns. 'I think the primary issue is the number of submarines. The United States knows we don't have enough. It takes us too long to build them, and we've got to get it right,' he said. The former general's remarks come as questions continue to be asked about whether the Albanese government has pledged enough of the nation's GDP towards defence, with pressure mounting from Washington for Canberra to boost its military spending. Sky New News Host Sharri Markson revealed on Thursday the Trump administration will use the AUKUS review as way to try and push Australia towards increasing its defence budget. Meanwhile, former prime minister Scott Morrison, who oversaw the formation of AUKUS, has declared he is not concerned about what the US-led review may mean for the future of the security partnership. 'It's totally within their remit… Incoming governments do reviews. Keir Starmer did a review and that resulted in the UK government being even more committed to AUKUS,' Mr Morrison told Sky News. His sentiments were echoed by Defence Minister Richard Marles, who downplayed anxieties while also confirming Australia knew about the review in advance. Former Australian Minister Alexander Downer has likewise said he does not think Australia should be concerned, asserting his belief the US will not scrap the agreement under President Trump's reign. 'I think there is going to be a debate within the American system about selling to Australia Virginia-class submarines,' Mr Downer told Sky News Host Chris Kenny on Thursday. 'Not because of the technology of the submarines, but because the American administration will argue that they haven't got enough submarines and they can't build them fast enough.' Mr Downer also said he thinks the US are concerned about Australia's defence spending in light of the review. "I think they would be concerned about our low level of defence expenditure and the way the Australian defence forces have become increasingly depleted," he said. "But I don't think in the end the Americans are going to cancel the AUKUS programme. You have to remember this is a trilateral programme, not a bilateral programme, and Britain is the, if you like, second player in it, certainly the second most important player in it."
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Millions of Aussie consumers ditching US-made products over Donald Trump's trade war, comparison site Finder reveals
Aussie shoppers are steering clear of United States brands as the stench of Donald Trump's trade war latches onto American-made products. New research from comparison site Finder, shared exclusively with revealed almost one in four Aussies (23 per cent) are avoiding buying US goods due to President Trump's tariff regime. Another 31 per cent said they plan on avoiding buying American products in the coming months, meaning 11.6 million Aussies are either avoiding or plan to avoid purchasing US-made goods. Finder's head of consumer research Graham Cooke said President Trump's trade war could hurt the US economy as he seeks to boost American manufacturing. 'This shift in shopping habits could deliver a multi-billion dollar blow to American brands fighting for a foothold in Aussie households,' Mr Cooke said. 'As trade tensions escalate, many Australians are voting with their wallets in a move that could redraw the retail map. 'The great Aussie Trump dump signals more than protest – it's a potential pivot in loyalty that local and alternative brands are poised to capitalise on.' Finder's research showed men and women were equally avoiding purchasing American-made products, however, more women were planning to avoid buying US goods. Almost two in five women (38 per cent) said they planned on avoiding US goods while 25 per cent of men said they plan to steer clear of products made in President Trump's America. Meanwhile, baby boomers and gen Z were the most likely to avoid purchasing US goods due to the trade war. Mr Cooke said shoppers could be tactful by supporting local industries while President Trump attempts to force manufacturing to American shores. "Every dollar you spend helps shape the economy. By choosing local alternatives, Aussies can support homegrown businesses,' he said. "This is a wake-up call to rethink our spending habits – ditch the brands that don't align with your values and back businesses that support local jobs and sustainable practices. "Consumers have more power than they realise. Audit your spending, shop smarter and hopefully save some money in the process.' Australian steel and aluminium exports now face 50 per cent tariffs after the Trump Administration doubled the levies earlier this month. Automotive parts face a 25 per cent tariff while the nation remains temporarily exempt from the US President's sweeping 10 per cent 'Liberation Day' tariffs until July 9. The US and China continue to undergo negotiations to avert a massive trade war after the two economic superpowers continually hiked tariffs on each other earlier in the year. China had a 125 per cent tariff on US goods at the peak of the trade war, while the US had a 145 per cent tariff on China before they mutually agreed to drastically lower the levies.
