logo
A-Body Brothers In Arms: The Buick GS 455 vs. Oldsmobile 442 W-30

A-Body Brothers In Arms: The Buick GS 455 vs. Oldsmobile 442 W-30

Motor Trend27-05-2025
[Editor's Note: This article first appeared in the Winter 2011 issue of MotorTrend Classic] Imagine the Indianapolis Colts playing the New York Giants in the Super Bowl. Payton versus Eli, Manning-a-Manning. It could have happened, but now it probably won't. It did happen with two other brothers, not in an NFL game, but on streets and dragstrips. Oldsmobile 4-4-2 W-30 versus Buick GS 455 Stage 1, A-body brothers each considered the 'gentleman's musclecar.' Sibling rivals from the era when GM divisions competed more with each other than with Ford, Chrysler, or AMC.
John Z. DeLorean started it all with a third brother, the 1964 Pontiac GTO. Olds dropped a 400-cube, four-barrel dual exhaust into the Cutlass to create the 4-4-2 a few months later. When the 1965 Buick GS arrived within a year, it technically violated GM's 400-cubic-inch-displacement limit for A-body cars. Badged as 400, its Wildcat V-8 was a 401-cube 'Nailhead' V-8.
GM replaced its 1964-'67 A-bodies with new 1968 models, with new sheetmetal scheduled for every two years. Through '69, the GTO was GM's preeminent musclecar, and the 4-4-2 was its more refined brother, with better handling. The subtle, more relaxed GS wasn't a contender.
GM did away with its 400-cube limit for the 1970 model year, and Buick was ready, especially after the 1969 Opel GT launch. 'The increase in showroom floor traffic when the GT went on display early in April was almost unbelievable,' reads the Buick Engineering Production Information Department's outline of the 1970 GSX. 'Some Buick dealers reported 5000 people through their showrooms in one weekend.'
Paul Haddock, owner of the 1972 Buick GS 455 Stage 1 on these pages, sent a copy of that report. He also owns a 1970 Stage 1 hardtop and a 1971 GS 455 convertible. The GSX, a 455-cubic-inch Buick A-body with 'mod' graphics typical of the era, would be the Skylark's halo model, which Buick hoped might help close the model's 50,000-unit annual sales gap relative to the Olds Cutlass.
When torque came to shove, it wasn't the GSX, with un-Buick-like flat black stripes on deep-yellow paint, that gave the GS street cred. It was the Stage 1 455. 'It's the car that beat the Hemi 'Cuda,' allows Mike Bivins, owner of the 1971 Olds 4-4-2 W-30 sharing these pages with Haddock's Stage 1.
Like Manning versus Manning, the Olds versus Buick musclecar rivalry would be short-lived. Car insurance rates were rising steeply by the late '60s, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, established in December 1970, enacted immediate restrictions on leaded premium fuel. Stricter regs were due in 1975. Olds and Buick lowered the compression ratio on their blueprinted 1971 W-30 and Stage 1 engines from 10.5:1 to 8.5:1 and complied with a mandated switch from SAE gross to net horsepower reporting. By 1972, the Hemi 'Cuda that Buick beat in '70 was gone, and the Plymouth pony's top engine was a 260-hp, 340 cubic-inch V-8. A year later, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries staged their first oil embargo.
0:00 / 0:00
'Despite the almost total demise of the high compression/premium fuel engine, the '71 Super Cars have managed to retain their essential vitality,' A.B. Shuman wrote in the October 1970 issue of Motor Trend. In Shuman's story, the Buick GS 455 Stage 1 edged a '71 W-30 prototype with a four-speed stick and '70 sheetmetal, recording a 6.5-second 0-60 run to the Olds' 6.6. It was quicker than the GTO, Chevy Chevelle SS 454, Camaro Z28, and Plymouth Road Runner. Shuman asked Olds for an automatic W-30 to see what effect its combo of torque converter and different valve timing would have. It beat the Buick with a 6.1 second 0-60.
Motor Trend's test of the '72 GS Stage 1 was a sidebar to a June 1972 comparison entitled 'Sayonara Supercar.'
'The amazing thing, considering all that's happened just in the area of emissions controls,' Shuman wrote, 'is that a car that runs like the GS Stage 1 could still exist.' It was faster than the manual GTO and W-30 automatic of 1972, beating the latter by 0.8 seconds in 0-60-mph times and by 0.4 second and 5 mph in the quarter.
Haddock's 1972 Stage 1 exists only because a 1971 United Auto Workers strike delayed GM's 'Colonnade' A-body replacements by one model year. Ad huckster 'Dr. Oldsmobile's' 4-4-2 was a separate model from 1967 to '71, then became an option package on Cutlasses again in 1972. The '72 face-lifts were minimal, with chrome headlamp surrounds as on Bivins' car on the '71 Olds and Buick, flat black surrounds as on Haddock's car on the '72s, and tweaked grille meshes. Bivins' Olds doesn't have the two vertical pieces that split the taillamps into thirds like the '72 models. Black rubber trim surrounds the taillamps on Haddock's 1972 GS, but not on his '71.
The Olds is the epitome of Bill Mitchell's organic 'fuselage' surfacing, with a large, split grille and a sleek fastback with strong, muscular rear shoulders. The Buick is sublime with two small ram air intakes near the center of the hood, where the W-30 has two gigantic golden scoops. Side surfacing is more creased, lending the GS a kind of abstract Coke-bottle shape.
Haddock has restuffed his driver's seat, so you sit high in the Buick. Both tachometers are hard to read behind thin-rimmed steering wheels. The Oldsmobile's tach is of the tick-tock variety, and Bivins' car features a Hurst dual-gate shifter, with a separate gate for 'manual' shifting. It's easier to simply set either Turbo-Hydramatic in 'drive' and put your foot to the floor. The steering in both cars has more play than a kindergarten gym. Neither has the kind of lean or wallow most contemporaries would display even on gentle turns. Though it feels slightly quicker, the GS has less squat and tighter, more refined body control. Those huge ram air intakes on the W-30 makes the Oldsmobile feel bigger from behind the wheel.
Its engine warmed, the W-30 starts immediately. The Stage 1 needs a quarter-throttle. Haddock put '70 Stage 1 10.5:1 pistons in his '72 because, 'Why wouldn't I?' Both are stronger cars than other '70s musclecars, their power coming on strong at the mid-range, with a NASCAR growl that would do a modern car proud.
Don't take my word for it. I ask Mike and Paul to trade keys.
'Are they going to be diplomatic, or truthful?' Mike's wife, Laurie, asks.
Mike Bivins: 'That one was right smooth going down the highway, smooth shifting. Seemed like it had a bit hotter cam. Good driving car. I didn't stand on it, because I didn't want to have to buy Paul a new motor. It has more brakes.'
Paul Haddock: 'I was surprised at the similarities between the cars. They both kind of feel the same. Set up the same. The hood feels awfully long on that W-30. I like the dual-gate shifter. I think Buick was playing to a more conservative customer. The Olds looks more aggressive.'
Diplomatic indeed. 'Well, we're gentlemen, right?' Haddock says. 'The Olds and Buick guys are gentlemen.'
1971 Oldsmobile 442 W-30
Ask The Man Who Own One
Mike Bivins owns Tri-Tech Incorporated, a handrail and metal fabrication manufacturer in Austell, Georgia (www.tri-tech-inc.com). He bought his W-30 in 2002, five years after he offered to purchase it from a fellow Oldsmobile Club of America member and has since sold his first collectible, a 1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme sport coupe.
Why I Like IT: 'Its sportiness. I like that it's a big-block car and a ram air car.'
Why It's Collectible: 'Only 920 were made, and probably half are gone. It shows what GM could do 40 years ago and how advanced they were, and when performance and sportiness were critical.'
Restoring/Maintaining: 'Drive it pretty regularly, especially with ethanol fuels. I use an additive to try to help with that. Change the oil regularly, and an Oldsmobile engine will last.'
Beware: Clones. Local Olds Club chapters can help tell if you've got an authentic W-30. Its carburetors have unique jets. Bivins has even found 'W-30' stamped on the end of his car's camshaft. 'Buy one that's all but done. You're going to save money in the long run.' GM A-bodies are known for leaky front and rear windows.
Expect To Pay: (W-30 coupe) Concours-ready: $39,950, Solid driver: $21,000, Tired runner: $11,550
Join The Club: Oldsmobile Club of America (oldsclub.org)
Our Take
Then: 'The car made top marks in standing start acceleration, though it couldn't match the four-speeds in the passing range.' —A.B. Shuman, MotorTrend, October 1970
Now: The 4-4-2 W-30 is a stylish Belle Epoch musclecar, a quick and refined step up from the Pontiac GTO.
1972 Buick GS 455
Ask The Man Who Own One
Paul Haddock owns Fairclough & Company, a men's fine clothing store in Charlotte, North Carolina (faircloughonline.com). His father drove LeSabre and Wildcat company cars in the '60s and '70s. Haddock bought the '72 Stage 1, one of his three GS models, about 15 years ago. He drove it unrestored 'just for fun,' then restored the car about eight years ago. Haddock repaired bodywork from front and rear window leaks, replaced the radiator support and battery box, rebuilt the engine and transmission, and replaced a front fender that had a rusted-out support. He traded a Chevy Suburban for the paint job.
Why I Like It: 'I love a Buick because it's a sleeper. People just don't really get it most of the time, and it's got all the horsepower and torque you need.'
Why It's Collectible: 'It was the underrated musclecar of the era. People are just beginning to understand in the last 10 or so years what they really are and were. Buick fans always knew.'
Restoring/Maintaining: 'Driving the car is the best thing you can do to maintain it. General use keeps the battery up and gas running through it; so use is your friend. I mix racing gas in, from time to time—gets the octane up.'
Beware: 'If you want a true, investment-grade Stage 1, get the documentation that it's a numbers-matching car. Make sure you have the correct engine, the correct transmission for the car. Guys drive a Stage 1 hard and blow a motor and throw another Buick motor in. Contact the GS club of America to check VIN codes. GM A-bodies catch stuff in the lower fender wells; the battery trays rust and corrode. All those can be fixed if it's not a totally right car.'
Expect To Pay: (Stage 1 coupe) Concours-ready: $44,450, Solid driver: $23,400, Tired runner: $12,850
Join The Clubs: Buick Club of America (buickclub.org), Buick GS Club of America (buickgsca.com).
Our Take
Then: 'In the final analysis, Buick builds a pretty good car, because, on top of everything else, it is quiet, smooth, and rattle free.'—A.B. Shuman, MotorTrend, June 1972
Now: It's a clean, trim, upper-middle premium intermediate with more power than more common contemporaries.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seven bold possibilities for 2025 college football season that aren't crazy
Seven bold possibilities for 2025 college football season that aren't crazy

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Seven bold possibilities for 2025 college football season that aren't crazy

If you're looking for crazy preseason takes on the 2025 college football season, cue up any of Diego Pavia's recent interviews. Vanderbilt's cocksure quarterback recently left Paul Finebaum of the SEC Network speechless after Pavia confidently declared Vanderbilt a national championship contender, on the heels of going 7-6 last season. Credit Pavia for managing that claim with a straight face. Amused though I am by Pavia's boasts, I'm drawing the line in this space short of crazy and offering some bold – but not crazy – possibilities that could happen this season, before issuing a verdict on whether each of these bold possibilities will come to fruition. Bold possibilities for 2025 college football season 1. A team ranked outside the top five will win the national title Why this counts as a bold take: Each of the past five national champions were ranked in the preseason top five of the US LBM Coaches Poll. Why this take isn't crazy: Potential party crashers populate the Nos. 6 through 10 spots in the coaches poll: No. 6 Clemson: The Tigers bring back one of the nation's best quarterbacks in Cade Klubnik, amid a swath of returning production. They're armed with an elite defensive line. No. 7 Oregon: The Ducks totaled 45 victories the past four seasons. They offer good value at this position in the rankings. No. 8 Alabama: It's Alabama. Need I say more? Never count out a program that consistently signs ballyhooed recruiting classes. No. 9 LSU: The Tigers will pair a top-shelf quarterback, Garrett Nussmeier, with the nation's most impressive transfer class. No. 10 Miami: If Carson Beck regains his 2023 form, the Hurricanes become dangerous. What I think will happen: No. 1 Texas will win the national championship behind Arch Manning. 2. A quarterback won't win the Heisman Trophy Why this counts as a bold take: A quarterback won the Heisman in 12 of the past 15 years, and there's no shortage of quarterback star power, from Nussmeier to Klubnik to Beck to Manning to Penn State's Drew Allar and beyond. Why this take isn't crazy: Good though the crop of quarterbacks is, Ohio State wide receiver Jeremiah Smith is the nation's most incomparable player. He'll captivate voters while starring for a team that will remain among the nation's elite. What I think will happen: I'm predicting this bold take will become reality. Smith will win the Heisman. 3. Arch Manning will not lead the SEC in passing yards Why this counts as a bold take: Few players have received as much hype as Manning, who possesses the talent to live up to his surname. Why this take isn't crazy: Texas likely will lean on a balanced offensive approach that incorporates running backs Quintrevion Wisner and CJ Baxter working behind a dependable offensive line. What I think will happen: Manning will enjoy a fine season. I like his chances to be among the Heisman finalists, but Nussmeier will lead the SEC in passing yards. He's the nation's only returning quarterback who passed for 4,000 yards last year, and LSU is loaded with standout wide receivers. 4. Three preseason unranked teams will make the playoff Why this counts as a bold take: This prediction depends on multiple dark horses emerging, like Indiana and Arizona State did in 2024. Why this take isn't crazy: Last year, four teams unranked in the preseason made the playoff, with Boise State and SMU joining Indiana and Arizona State. This bold take doesn't require 2025 to match the zaniness of last season, only for it to come close. Boise State is the only ranked Group of Five team, so if any team other than the Broncos claims the Group of Five's automatic bid, that's a start toward three unranked teams qualifying. The Big 12 remains unpredictable, and 12 of its 16 teams begin unranked. Unranked teams like Oklahoma, Baylor, Missouri and Nebraska intrigue me as playoff sleepers. What I think will happen: Two teams unranked in the preseason will make the playoff. 5. Four SEC schools will make coaching changes Why this counts as a bold take: SEC firings have tapered off the past few years after a particularly active coaching carousel in 2020. Large buyouts and schools' financial demands to pay athletes create more pause toward coaching changes. Why this take isn't crazy: A handful of SEC coaches are on the hot seat, from Arkansas' Sam Pittman to Auburn's Hugh Freeze. Oklahoma's Brent Venables and Florida's Billy Napier encounter pivotal seasons, while staring down the nation's two toughest schedules. Their teams could be better, but their rugged schedules might limit win-loss improvement. Kentucky has lost momentum under Mark Stoops, although he's among embattled coaches who enjoy the protection of an immense buyout. No SEC coaches were fired last season. That's groundwork for a much more active coaching carousel this year. What I think will happen: Two SEC coaches will be fired, but a few others will survive the heat. 6. The Big Ten will qualify more playoff teams than the SEC Why this counts as a bold take: The SEC has dominated the College Football Playoff era, and nine SEC teams are ranked in the preseason coaches poll, compared to six ranked Big Ten teams. Why this take isn't crazy: The Big Ten's cream the past two seasons proved sweeter than the SEC's. The SEC enjoys an edge in terms of quality depth, but the Big Ten touts national title contenders in Penn State and Ohio State. Also, Michigan should improve after the arrival of five-star quarterback Bryce Underwood. If last year serves as a guide to selecting the 12-team playoff, then it's a race to finishing 10-2 or better. The Big Ten's softer underbelly becomes an advantage to veteran teams like Illinois, which can pursue a playoff bid while facing only two teams ranked in the preseason poll. Compare that to Florida, which will face seven teams ranked in the preseason. If the playoff doubled in size to 24 teams, the SEC's depth would allow it to commandeer the playoff, but in the playoff's current form, the Big Ten is well positioned with a couple of elite teams and a few others equipped to chase 10-2. What I think will happen: The SEC will rebound after a bit of a down season and will qualify as many or more playoff teams as the Big Ten. 7. The national championship will be SEC vs. SEC Why this counts as a bold take: The SEC dominated the four-team playoff era, but the Big Ten has ruled the past two seasons, and the SEC accounted for just 25% of inaugural 12-team playoff bracket. The Big Ten possesses two elite teams in Ohio State and Penn State, and Clemson and Notre Dame profile as championship contenders, too. Why this take isn't crazy: The SEC features no shortage of playoff contenders. The preseason polls tell you that. The conference also includes more national championship contenders than any other league, with Texas, Georgia, Alabama and LSU headlining that list. The playoff's restructured bye rules will allow multiple teams from the same conference to receive first-round byes and make it easier for one conference to push two teams into the national championship. What I think will happen: The SEC will produce the national champion, but not the national runner-up. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

Sam Altman says there was a big reason OpenAI released its open-weight models
Sam Altman says there was a big reason OpenAI released its open-weight models

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Sam Altman says there was a big reason OpenAI released its open-weight models

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said China's open-source models drove the company to release its open-weight models earlier this month. "It was clear that if we didn't do it, the world was gonna be mostly built on Chinese open-source models," Altman said during a media briefing CNBC reported on Monday. "That was a factor in our decision, for sure. Wasn't the only one, but that loomed large," he added. OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. OpenAI released two open-weight models, gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b, on August 5. The former is designed for high-end computers, while the latter is meant to be run on "most desktops and laptops." The launch marked the first time OpenAI published an open-weight model since the release of GPT-2 in 2019. Unlike "closed" models, users can run and fine-tune an "open-weight" model locally. GPT-3, GPT-4, and the brand new GPT-5 are all closed models. Altman said in an X post on August 5 that OpenAI believes gpt-oss to be the "best and most usable open model in the world." The OpenAI CEO said that releasing the models aligned with OpenAI's mission "to ensure AGI that benefits all of humanity." AGI, or artificial general intelligence, refers to a theoretical form of AI that can think and reason like humans. "To that end, we are excited for the world to be building on an open AI stack created in the United States, based on democratic values, available for free to all and for wide benefit," he wrote in his X post. To be sure, OpenAI isn't the only American tech company that has made its models open. Social media giant Meta's Llama models are also open-weight, though its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, wrote in an essay last month that Meta will need to be "careful about what we choose to open source." In January, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek stunned the world with its high-performing but relatively cheaper R1 model. R1 is an open-source and open-weight model. President Donald Trump told GOP lawmakers then that he saw DeepSeek's success as a "positive" and a "wake-up call" for American tech companies. During a Reddit AMA in January, Altman said that OpenAI would follow DeepSeek's lead and release its model weights as well. "I personally think we have been on the wrong side of history here and need to figure out a different open source strategy," he said.

Global Immigration Partners PLLC Expands USA E2 Visa Services for International Entrepreneurs
Global Immigration Partners PLLC Expands USA E2 Visa Services for International Entrepreneurs

Time Business News

time7 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Global Immigration Partners PLLC Expands USA E2 Visa Services for International Entrepreneurs

Washington, D.C. – August 14, 2025 –Global Immigration Partners, a premier global immigration law firm with offices across multiple countries, is proud to announce the expansion of its E-2 Treaty Investor Visa services. This strategic initiative underscores the firm's commitment to empowering investors and entrepreneurs from treaty nations to build, acquire, and grow businesses in the United States. The E-2 Treaty Investor Visa offers a powerful pathway for foreign nationals to live and work in the U.S. while managing a business they own and control. With the recent surge in approvals—nearly 54,000 E-2 visa USA issued in FY 2023—demand for expert legal guidance has never been higher. Global Immigration Partners PLLC provides end-to-end support, including: Tailored investment strategies that meet the 'substantial' investment requirement while optimising business growth potential. that meet the 'substantial' investment requirement while optimising business growth potential. Full compliance and documentation to satisfy treaty country nationality, ownership, and active management criteria. to satisfy treaty country nationality, ownership, and active management criteria. Business planning and job creation guidance to ensure the enterprise meets viability standards. to ensure the enterprise meets viability standards. Renewal and family support services, enabling spouses and children under 21 to accompany the primary visa holder and, in most cases, granting spouses open work authorisation. 'Our global footprint allows us to guide clients seamlessly, no matter where they are in the world,' said the Press Secretary at Global Immigration Partners PLLC. 'The E-2 VisaUS is more than a legal process—it's the launchpad for building a thriving future in the U.S.' With headquarters in Washington, D.C. and offices across Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America, Global Immigration Partners PLLC delivers local expertise with a truly international perspective, helping clients navigate complex immigration systems efficiently and strategically. Contact: E2 Visa Lawyer Global Immigration Partners PLLC TIME BUSINESS NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store