
Has the stealthy F-35 met its match? Iran claims capture of Israeli pilots amid reports of third jet shoot-down
Colonel Avichay Adraee, IDF's Arabic-language spokesperson, said, 'This news being spread by Iranian media is completely baseless.'The F-35I Adir is Israel's customised variant of the US-made Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II—a fifth-generation multirole fighter jet developed under the Joint Strike Fighter programme. Designed for stealth, sensor fusion, and electronic warfare, the F-35 is considered one of the most advanced aircraft in the world.Israel's version integrates domestically developed modifications in five critical domains: command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence (C4I), as well as electronic warfare and weapons systems. These modifications allow the aircraft to carry out precision strikes in hostile environments and network seamlessly with IAF's legacy fighters.
Capable of flying long distances without refuelling due to added external fuel tanks, the F-35I has demonstrated this in past operations, including a 1,700-kilometre round trip to Yemen. The aircraft costs approximately US$100 million per unit and is equipped with features like a radar cross-section of just 0.0015 square metres—roughly the size of a golf ball—making it nearly undetectable on conventional radar.While the F-35 is marketed for its low observability and electronic warfare dominance, the idea that it is untouchable is not without precedent. The only confirmed instance of a stealth aircraft being shot down remains the 1999 downing of a US F-117 Nighthawk during NATO's campaign in Yugoslavia. Using a Soviet-era S-125 missile system, Yugoslav forces managed to track and hit the jet despite its stealth profile.In more recent years, a near-miss involving a Houthi-fired missile and a US-operated F-35 during operations over Yemen also sparked debate about the limits of stealth. Even the most advanced aircraft may be vulnerable to increasingly networked, radar-guided missile systems that exploit predictable flight paths or operate using unconventional detection methods.While Iran's semi-official news outlets, including Tasnim and IRNA, stated that the F-35 jets were neutralised and one female pilot captured after she ejected into western Iran, the global defence community remains unconvinced.Israel has categorically denied the reports.'This news being spread by Iranian media is completely baseless,' said Col. Avichay Adraee, spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). 'Fake Iranian media.'Despite the gravity of Iran's assertion, no visual confirmation has been released. Iranian media have not published footage of the pilot or the wreckage. Meanwhile, a widely shared image of the alleged F-35 remains unverified, with military analysts suggesting it may be AI-generated.International news networks such as Sky News Arabia and Al Jazeera have also been unable to confirm Iran's claims. No satellite imagery or third-party monitoring group has supported Tehran's version of events.ET has not been able to independently verify these claims. On June 13, Israel reportedly launched Operation Rising Lion, involving F-35I Adirs, F-15s, and F-16s in a coordinated assault on Iranian military and nuclear facilities, including the Natanz enrichment complex. According to defence reports, the operation involved the use of missiles, drones, and sabotage operatives within Iran to neutralise radar sites and air defences ahead of the main strike.
Following the attacks, Iran claimed at least 78 fatalities, including key members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and over 300 injuries. Tehran's retaliation has included ballistic missile launches and drone strikes, with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei vowing to 'bring ruin to the Zionist regime.' The possible loss of F-35I jets would be a significant setback for both the Israeli Air Force and Lockheed Martin. The aircraft's reputation as a near-invincible platform has been central to US and Israeli deterrence strategies in the region.
Israel was the first country to use the F-35 in combat in 2018. The stealth jet has flown high-risk missions before—including a 1,700-kilometre strike against Houthi forces in Yemen last year—often without needing mid-air refuelling thanks to additional modifications. Some analysts believe Tehran's announcement may be aimed at domestic audiences, intended to showcase strength and resilience after a high-profile attack on its soil.With mourning ceremonies now underway in Iran for the 78 reported victims of Israel's Operation Rising Lion, the narrative of shooting down Israeli jets and capturing a pilot could serve to reinforce unity and defiance.In contrast, Israel has continued its operations without indicating any loss of its aircraft fleet. The IDF maintains that all jets involved in the mission returned safely, and no pilot is missing.'Part of a disinformation campaign designed to save face after the heavy losses Iran suffered,' said the IDF spokesperson.If Iran's claim holds up, it would not only dent Israeli confidence but could trigger a deeper revaluation of stealth doctrine across global militaries.Without visual or technical evidence, Iran's claims remain unverified. No foreign media, international watchdogs, or satellite imagery have supported Iran's version of events. Yet Tehran insists that its forces have not only repelled Israeli attacks but scored a world-first: the downing of multiple fifth-generation fighters in a single operation.Should Iran's claims eventually be proven, it would not only mark the first combat loss of an F-35 worldwide but also deal a severe blow to Lockheed Martin and Israel's defence reputation. Until then, what remains clear is that both sides are now engaged not just in combat but in a high-stakes battle for narrative dominance.While both sides continue to trade accusations, missiles, and counterclaims, the real-world impact of the current exchange is already visible. Israeli air raid sirens continue to wail. Civilians remain in bomb shelters. Iranian state media is filled with triumphant coverage.The true test will come in the hours and days ahead—if independent confirmation emerges of the downed jets, and if the war spirals into further, deadlier escalation.For now, one thing is clear: the myth of the invincible stealth fighter is under the harsh spotlight of war.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bullets, bombs, starvation are killing Gaza's children
Today, I am angry. I am disappointed. I write because my children are dying. Your children are dying. Our children are dying in Gaza. I can hear their cries. I can feel their pain. Why can't you? Every day, around 30 children are killed — by bombs, missiles, and deliberate, systemic deprivation. Only two days ago, 83 Palestinians lost their lives in the Gaza Strip. Families are going days without food, leaving their orphaned children behind. Health systems have completely collapsed. Supplies have crumbled. Water is scarce. Fuel is gone. Hope is dying. Starving infants are perishing in their mothers' arms, while aid trucks sit blocked at borders. This is the gruesome face of a war that has no moral justification. This is not merely a tragedy — it is a moral apocalypse and a brutal crime against humanity. And the world's institutions? The UN? Governments? They are failing. Recent reports from the United Nations have been alarming and frightening. Gaza stands on the brink of a famine. A quarter of the population are already facing famine-like conditions and over 3,20,000 children, the entire population under five, are at risk of acute malnutrition. In Gaza City alone, child malnutrition rate has quadrupled in the last two months. I am not an expert on the historical conflict between Israel and Palestine, nor a scholar of geopolitics and neither an authority to propose a definitive solution. Certainly, the captivity and killing of innocent Israelis at the outset was unacceptable. But that does not justify the brutal retaliation on Gaza or any violence. In 2023, when Hamas had held innocent Israelis hostage and a war-like situation had just about begun, I knew that the repercussions would be worse than we could ever imagine. I couldn't sit back and immediately called my fellow Nobel Laureate friends, reminding them that the call for peace must come from us. On October 30, we 104 Nobel Laureates jointly made an appeal to every single Head of State and urged international organisations and governments to ensure the safety and well-being of all Israeli and Palestinian children. Our call to action undoubtedly had some impact. The international media covered it extensively and it echoed in the political and global discourse for a few months. We were hopeful. But sadly today, leaders are ignoring the grave situation and failing the children. Transcending borders The suffering of Gaza's children transcends borders, ideologies and conflicts. Children bear no responsibility for war. They do not drop bombs or launch rockets. They do not set policies. They hold no historical grievances. So why must they pay the ultimate price for the failures and hatred of adults? Is it their crime to be born in a particular piece of land or into a family of a certain faith? Why should these innocents suffer for the acts, right or wrong, of their ancestors? Why is the lens with which we are viewing people today, and our emotions and judgments so coloured by religious politics? This is the moment to speak out clearly. We must demand an immediate ceasefire to stop the killing of innocent civilians. Restrictions on food, water, fuel, and medical aid must be lifted immediately. Local food and grocery supply systems, bakeries, farms must be urgently restored and small vendors should be allowed to function without any fear of threats. Aid workers must be protected, never targeted or obstructed. Those weaponising starvation, blocking aid, or denying access to basics needed for survival must be held accountable under international law. The time for merely expressing concern, hosting seminars, showing sympathy, or issuing press statements is over. We must choose between complicity and compassion. And I mean compassion not as a soft emotion or a feeling, but a transformative force born from feeling the suffering of others as one's own and taking mindful action to end that suffering. Contrary to popular belief, compassion is not a moral ideal, but a practical and effective strategy for resolving conflicts. There is a sliver of hope when, last month, the UK, France, and 26 other countries issued a tough statement condemning Israel for depriving Palestinians of 'human dignity'. The streets are filled with protesters, shocked and enraged by the scale of violence and trauma being unleashed. Several countries including Australia, France, Turkey, and Tunisia, have held demonstrations in the past few weeks. Other governments must also come together to produce a systematic, comprehensive, and concrete response. The day is not very far when we will realise that power does not lie in firing missiles; power lies in compassion. The voices of the innumerable young war survivors from Iraq, Afghanistan, and other conflict zones who I have interacted with over the years haunt me. I vividly recall an incident from some years back when I met a 10-year-old wheelchair-bound boy in a Syrian refugee camp in Germany. He had taken shelter along with several other children, women and men, all bearing the scars of war. During our conversation, he told me that he had lost his legs — and his father — in a bomb blast. He was separated from his mother in the chaos that followed. Overcome with grief, I had asked the child what he wants to do in future. I will never forget the conviction in his voice as he replied, 'I want to study and become an engineer so that I can go back to my village that was destroyed in the war, and rebuild it.' There was hope in his eyes and his dream was alive. If we cannot save the children of Gaza from bullets, bombs and the slow death of starvation, how can we ever speak of nurturing their dreams and hopes for the future? Kailash Satyarthi is the founder of the Satyarthi Movement for Global Compassion; views are personal


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Slamming 50% Trump tariffs, farmer leader Chaduni urges ban on US firms in India
Haryana farmer leader Gurnam Singh Chaduni has called for a complete ban on American companies operating in India after US President Donald Trump announced steep tariffs on Indian week, Trump signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25% duty on Indian imports — on top of an earlier 25% hike — citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The combined 50% tariff will take effect from August to the move, Bharatiya Kisan Union (Chaduni) chief Gurnam Singh Chaduni said India must "hit back in a similar manner" by targeting US companies. "The US has imposed heavy tariffs on India and India must hit back in a similar way and ban American companies operating on Indian soil," Chaduni told India Today farmer leader argued that many American businesses in India, especially large fast-food and retail chains, earn substantial profits and repatriate them to the US."Why are we allowing this when the US is imposing tariffs on us? We must give a similar reply and ban all these companies," he said. "You travel on highways and one can spot the big food giants of the US spreading their business all over. This must stop," Chaduni farmer leader, who played a prominent role in the 2022 anti-farm laws protests, said the government must take a firm stand to deter future trade pressure from Washington."We cannot allow anyone to dictate things to us like this. If we don't take a stand now, America will continue to do this in the future too and threaten us regularly. The US-based companies should immediately be banned and not allowed to mint money," he demand also comes against the backdrop of a long-standing flashpoint in India–US trade of the contentious issues has been the proposed entry of US companies into India's dairy and agriculture sectors — a move New Delhi has consistently resisted, citing potential threats to farmers' livelihoods and to the country's self-reliance in these key Washington escalating trade tensions through higher tariffs, Chaduni's call to ban US businesses signals growing pressure on the Indian government to respond with stronger retaliatory measures.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-Pakistan ties may impact stability in Afghanistan
Pakistan-US counterterrorism cooperation could extend to Afghanistan, impacting stability of the Taliban regime in the country as well as of several neighbouring nations, experts said, citing lukewarm ties between the Pakistan Army and the Afghan government. India will be closely watching developments in Afghanistan, they said, especially since the Taliban regime has warmed up to India over the past year and has sought assistance in development projects and the health sector. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program The Taliban regime condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack, taking the Pakistan government as well as army by surprise, according to the experts. Subsequently, Pakistan launched an effort to improve ties with Afghanistan, they said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo This week, the United States praised Pakistan's role in curbing terrorist groups both regionally and globally. On Tuesday, both countries issued a joint statement after the Pakistan-US Counter-Terrorism Dialogue in Islamabad where they reaffirmed their "commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations". Pakistan and the US have agreed to deepen bilateral cooperation to tackle groups including the Balochistan Liberation Army and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan . The US applauded Pakistan's "continued successes in containing terrorist entities that pose a threat to the peace and security of the region and the world". Live Events