logo
Las Vegas driver hit with $417 ticket wants traffic laws changed: ‘When you're retired, that's a lot of money'

Las Vegas driver hit with $417 ticket wants traffic laws changed: ‘When you're retired, that's a lot of money'

Yahoo09-05-2025

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Pay first, fight later: If you get a traffic ticket in Nevada, you have to pay the penalty before you even go to court — $417 later, a Las Vegas couple learned that the hard way.
In January, a Clark County School District police officer pulled over Kim Ferguson for speeding.
'Hi, how are you doing?' the interaction began, according to body-camera video the 8 News Now Investigators obtained. But that quick, friendly greeting later gave Ferguson a not-so-pleasant feeling.
'I said, 'Oh my gosh. I've never had a ticket before. I don't know what to do,'' she said about the stop. Her ticket-free streak ended as the officer cited her for going over the speed limit in a 15-mile-per-hour school zone.
'The reason I'm stopping you is it's a 15-mile-an-hour school zone right now on Spencer,' the officer said. 'You're doing a 31 going through it.'
The officer would lower that speed to 20 for Ferguson's ticket, telling her it would cost several hundred dollars. Ferguson, who said she drives below the speed limit and was following the flow of traffic as it sped up at the end of the school zone, expected a $200 bill.
'We looked on the thing and I told my husband, 'Oh my god, it's $417,'' Ferguson said.
It's $417 a state law requires her to pay, whether she wanted to fight it or not.
'You're going to have to contact the court to pay the fine — if you want to go to court to court to contest it. All the information is right here,' the officer said before driving off.
'When you're retired, that's a lot of money,' said Kim's husband, Tom Ferguson, calling the system a revenue generator. 'Now maybe to some people it's not, but to us it is.'
The Fergusons paid the ticket and said there was no point in fighting it. They added that it would cost more money to hire a lawyer.
'The punishment doesn't match the crime,' Tom Ferguson said. 'If you were doing 50 miles per hour in a school zone, I would understand that, but 20? It doesn't make sense to me.'
It did not make sense to lawmakers either. Since 2021, Nevada lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, have changed most traffic infractions, like a speeding ticket, to be a civil infraction, not a criminal one. That means tickets no longer carry the threat of jail time, and missed court appearances do not really matter in the long run since the court may already have your money.
The way state law is interpreted now: 'The court shall require the person to post a bond equal to the amount of the full payment of the monetary penalty,' means ticketed drivers have to pay in full, no matter what.
'I think the bigger issue, especially among my colleagues here at the Legislature, is just the unfairness in having to pay the fine first and then be seen by a judge,' Democratic State Sen. Melanie Scheible said.
Her proposal, Senate Bill 359, would amend Nevada's traffic-ticket law to give courts flexibility to reduce that bond — that ticket payment.
'For many Nevadans, especially those with limited financial means, this upfront payment creates a financial barrier to their right to a hearing,' Scheible said during a recent legislative hearing. In Kim Ferguson's case, she paid the bond and lost faith in the system.
In addition, changes in Senate Bill 359 would combine civil and criminal infractions — minor speeding offenses versus driving without a license — and allow a judge to deal with both in one hearing.
'We have to continue to develop legislation that still allows for our enforcement agencies to hold people accountable when they violate traffic laws,' Scheible said.
The Fergusons feel the system is a money maker, adding that they paid an additional fee to pay online. Moving forward, Kim Ferguson, who said she always drives below the speed limit, said this was her first and final citation.
'I just go a lot slower now — there's no more tickets,' she said.
The 8 News Now Investigators discovered a potential error on the ticket, leading to questions about the validity of the entire case. The officer who wrote the ticket noted a registration lapse, however, the Fergusons said they always keep up with their payments. A spokesperson for the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles confirmed it did not appear the Fergusons ever had a lapse in coverage.
Scheible's proposal passed unanimously out of the state Senate. It was moving forward in the Assembly and would likely pass in that chamber as well.
8 News Now Investigator David Charns can be reached at dcharns@8newsnow.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats itching for fight over immigration
Democrats itching for fight over immigration

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Democrats itching for fight over immigration

Democrats are diving forcefully into the immigration fight, dismissing concerns about political backlash to confront President Trump directly on a polarizing issue that ranks among the president's strongest suits in the eyes of voters. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is leading the charge. Not only has he waged an animated defense of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.), who is facing federal charges following a recent scuffle with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents outside a migrant detention center in New Jersey, but he's also demanding that the masked ICE officers involved in the fracas — and Trump's broader mass deportation campaign — be publicly identified. 'Every single ICE agent who is engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'This is America,' he added. 'This is not the Soviet Union. We're not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will of course be identified.' The call drew immediate howls from officials with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other Republicans, who have long-accused Democrats of siding with people in the country illegally over the rule of law — a major theme of Trump's successful campaign last year. Many of the GOP critics are accusing Democrats of putting the safety of federal law enforcement officers in jeopardy. 'We take threats to law enforcement very seriously. As the state leading the nation in immigration enforcement, FL will not sit idly by and allow agents from DHS/ICE and/or state and local agencies to be targeted,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) posted on X, linking to Jeffries's comments. DeSantis said he's instructed Florida law enforcers to be on the lookout for any 'doxxing' campaigns aimed at law enforcers, and to respond quickly. 'Sabotaging the work of those in the immigration enforcement arena will not stand!' he wrote. Capitol Hill Republicans are piling on. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) this week introduced legislation designed to shield federal law enforcers from doxxing. Violators could face five years in prison. The pushback has done little to dissuade Jeffries, who on Thursday doubled down on his identification push, wondering why those involved in Trump's mass deportation campaign should enjoy privileges of anonymity that others in law enforcement don't. 'It seems to me that the officials at the Department of Homeland Security, including ICE, should be held to the same standards as every other part of law enforcement in terms of transparency,' he said. The strategy has its risks. Trump has built his political brand around an 'America First' message that helped propel him into the White House in 2016 and again in 2024. His 'big, beautiful bill' working its way through Congress includes, as a central feature, an immigration crackdown that helped usher the bill through the House last month. And while Trump's approval rating is underwater across almost every major issue, including the economy, recent polls indicate that his approach to immigration is the sole exception, winning more supporters than detractors. Still, the Democrats' aggressive pushback against Trump's policies is a clear sign that they're not shying away from the immigration issue, regardless of the potential pitfalls. And the de-masking of ICE agents is just one front of a much broader fight they're taking up this year. In recent weeks, Democrats have also rallied behind immigrants deported without due process, including a Maryland resident who was mistakenly sent to El Salvador. They've staged public protests outside migrant detention centers, like the one in Newark that led to McIver's arrest. And top Democrats are up in arms after DHS agents stormed into the district office of Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and handcuffed a staffer with accusations that aides were 'harboring' immigration 'rioters.' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, characterized the latter incident as 'intolerable.' 'I'm relieved this situation was resolved, but DHS's actions — first, in attempting to enter the office without a warrant or consent, and then proceeding to handcuff and detain a terrified young congressional staffer without cause — were the stuff of police in a banana republic or a gangster state,' Raskin said in an email. 'This outrageous behavior reflects an alarming disregard for the law and a shocking disrespect for the people's House and the lawmaking branch of government,' he continued. 'DHS does not have the authority to barge into congressional offices with vague demands and arrest or intimidate legislative staffers. We will not tolerate such lawlessness.' Raskin and Nadler are pressing Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, led by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), to stage hearings on the unusual incident. The most recent battleline of the partisan immigration war arrived this week, when Trump announced a travel ban affecting 12 countries. The makeup of the targets — largely African or Middle Eastern countries with mostly non-white populations — were not overlooked by Democrats, some of whom accused the president of using official policy to promote bigotry. 'Make no mistake: Trump's latest travel ban will NOT make America safer,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) wrote on X. 'We cannot continue to allow the Trump administration to write bigotry and hatred into U.S. immigration policy.' Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) delivered a similar warning. 'From his first Muslim Ban, Trump's travel bans have always betrayed … the ideals and values that inspired America's Founders,' Beyer posted on X. 'Trump's use of prejudice and bigotry to bar people from entering the U.S. does not make us safer, it just divides us and weakens our global leadership.'

Investigators looking at who sent Hegseth's Signal texts, sources say
Investigators looking at who sent Hegseth's Signal texts, sources say

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Investigators looking at who sent Hegseth's Signal texts, sources say

Pentagon investigators are looking into whether Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth personally wrote the text messages detailing the military's plans to strike Houthi targets in Yemen or whether other staffers typed out those details, according to two people familiar with the ongoing probe. The Defense Department's Office of Inspector General has spent several weeks interviewing Hegseth's current and former staff members to figure out how United States strike details taken from a classified system wound up in a commercial messaging app known as Signal. "Because this is one of the DOD IG's ongoing projects, in accordance with our policy we do not provide the scope or details to protect the integrity of the process and avoid compromising the evaluation," DOD IG spokesperson Mollie Halperin told ABC News. The details were relayed in two chat groups that included Hegseth - one with Vice President JD Vance and other high-ranking officials, and a second one that included Hegseth's wife, who is not employed by the government. MORE: Pentagon watchdog launches probe into Hegseth use of Signal chat ahead of Houthi airstrike It remains unclear how soon the findings will be released. Hegseth is scheduled to testify for the first time as defense secretary on Tuesday, where Democratic lawmakers are expected to question his handling of classified and sensitive information. The sharing of the details reportedly occurred around the same time in mid-March when key members of President Donald Trump's National Security Council, including Hegseth, inadvertently shared details about the March 15 missile strike in Yemen with the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. Much of the same content was shared in the second encrypted chat with family members and others -- a chat group that Hegseth had created on his personal phone during his confirmation process that included his wife, Jennifer Hegseth, the two officials told ABC News. MORE: What to know about Signal, which the Pentagon previously discouraged workers from using In addition to looking at whether the information was classified and who wrote it, investigators are also asking whether any staff members were asked by Hegseth or others to delete messages, according to one person familiar with the IG probe. The government is required under law to retain federal communications as official records.

ICE deportation blocked by Boston judge: Migrants now in shipping container in Djibouti
ICE deportation blocked by Boston judge: Migrants now in shipping container in Djibouti

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ICE deportation blocked by Boston judge: Migrants now in shipping container in Djibouti

By Lindsay Whitehurst Migrants placed on a deportation flight bound initially for South Sudan are now being held in a converted shipping container on a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the men and their guards are contending with baking hot temperatures, smoke from nearby burn pits and the looming threat of rocket attacks, the Trump administration said. Officials outlined grim conditions in court documents filed Thursday before U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston, who is overseeing a lawsuit challenging Immigration and Customs Enforcement efforts to swiftly remove migrants to countries they didn't come from. Authorities landed the flight at the base in Djibouti, about 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from South Sudan, more than two weeks ago after Murphy found the Trump administration had violated his order by swiftly sending eight migrants from countries including Cuba and Vietnam to the east African nation. The judge said that men from other countries must have a real chance to raise fears about dangers they could face in South Sudan. The men's lawyers, though, have still not been able to talk to them, said Robyn Barnard, senior director of refugee advocacy at Human Rights First, whose stated mission is to ensure the United States is a global leader on human rights. Barnard spoke Friday at a hearing of Democratic members of Congress and said some family members of the men had been able to talk to them Thursday. The migrants have been previously convicted of serious crimes in the U.S., and President Donald Trump's administration has said that it was unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The Justice Department has also appealed to the Supreme Court to immediately intervene and allow swift deportations to third countries to resume. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by the Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The legal fight became another flashpoint as the administration rails against judges whose rulings have slowed the president's policies. The Trump administration said the converted conference room in the shipping container is the only viable place to house the men on the base in Djibouti, where outdoor daily temperatures rise above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius), according to the declaration from an ICE official. Nearby burn pits are used to dispose of trash and human waste, and the smog cloud makes it hard to breathe, sickening both ICE officers guarding the men and the detainees, the documents state. They don't have access to all the medication they need to protect against infection, and the ICE officers were unable to complete anti-malarial treatment before landing, an ICE official said. 'It is unknown how long the medical supply will last,' Mellissa B. Harper, acting executive deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations, said in the declaration. The group also lacks protective gear in case of a rocket attack from terrorist groups in Yemen, a risk outlined by the Department of Defense, the documents state. Associated Press writer Rebecca Santana contributed to this story. AG Andrea Joy Campbell: Know your rights when it comes to ICE (Viewpoint) White House says Mayor Wu calling ICE 'secret police' is 'disgusting' and 'dangerous' Milford High student released from ICE detention: 'Nobody should be in here' 'He's going to be set free' — supporters of Milford teen arrested by ICE cheer release Judge orders Milford teen arrested by ICE to be released on bond Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store