logo
Air-con is a fever dream in boiling Britain

Air-con is a fever dream in boiling Britain

Telegraph01-07-2025
How much is a good night's sleep worth?
That's the question a growing number of Britons are pondering as they grapple with the sweltering heat. For many, the answer is the price of an air conditioner.
Between 2011 and 2022, the number of households using the cooling devices leapt from 3pc to 20pc, according to a study published by researchers this year.
Chris Michael, chief executive of Meaco, a British company that sells portable air conditioners, says the story is always the same: demand comes in dribs and drabs for most of the year, then suddenly the phone rings off the hook after a few days of scorching heat.
'If you go back to last year, where the temperature hardly went above 23C, no one was interested,' he says.
'Whereas this year, more or less by Friday, everything had sold out after two weeks. Once you get these sorts of 30C temperatures, it's like turning a tap on.'
Since he founded Meaco in 2008, the company's sales have surged from hundreds of units to more than 30,000 per year.
'To put that into context, when we started, a company was seen as a big player if they had done 1,000,' Michael adds.
As the country braces for even more heatwaves like the one seen this week, sales are likely to keep going up.
Powering up
In 2022, the mercury rose above 40C for the first time and the Met Office has warned such incidents will only become more frequent due to global heating.
Without big changes, that means more heat deaths and more weeks of discomfort, experts warn.
And with many families turning to air conditioners for relief, it also means more strain on Britain's creaking electricity grid during the summer months.
The Government is right to be nervous about the impact that rising air conditioner use could have on the electricity system.
According to one study, the devices are expected to increase power demand by 45pc by 2050.
This is likely to be most concentrated in cities, where the 'heat island' effect caused by concrete surfaces, heat-absorbing materials and the density of buildings means temperatures are a degree or two higher than elsewhere.
Worryingly, a government-backed piece of research published in 2021 pointed out that Britain's electricity system has traditionally been designed to meet peak demand during the winter months, with nuclear power stations typically having down-time for maintenance in the lower-demand summer months.
But with summers getting hotter, the research warned that national peak demand from cooling during a heatwave could be twice as high as that of an average summer week – putting considerable pressure on the grid.
'Although the UK has not yet experienced blackouts due to peak energy demand related to cooling in the summer, such peaks have occurred and have led to coal-fired power stations being brought into service,' a report by MPs on the environmental audit committee warned last year.
'Passive' cooling
The Government has responded by adopting policies designed to encourage use of 'passive' cooling measures in buildings.
In London, Labour mayor Sir Sadiq Khan's local planning rules argue that 'passive ventilation should be prioritised' and that the increased use of air conditioning is 'not desirable as these have significant energy requirements and, under conventional operation, expel hot air, thereby adding to the urban heat island effect'.
One particular headache the country has, as temperatures creep higher, is that most of our homes are not designed for the kind of cooling provided by most air conditioners.
Air conditioners come in different types, from the portable kind sold by Meaco to the fixed affairs that can be fitted to windows or mounted on walls, the latter typically connected to an outside condenser unit.
But while in other parts of the world, heating and cooling systems typically blow air into rooms, most British homes are instead fitted with central heating systems that pump water around through pipes and radiators.
These can be repurposed for cooling down houses when the mercury creeps up in summer but this can cause condensation, says Richard Lowes, a heating expert at the University of Exeter.
Instead, many homeowners get blower air conditioners installed, which typically do not require planning permission.
Heat pump headache
There are also air-to-air heat pumps that can provide cold air. But unlike air-to-water and ground-to-water heat pumps, these are not currently eligible for the Government's boiler upgrade scheme grants, worth £7,500 each.
Officials are currently consulting on whether to change this.
Historically, they have been reluctant to do so because of fears that it will result in taxpayer-funded grants paying for cooling systems that can theoretically function as heaters as well but are never used that way by owners.
'The worry is that the Government doesn't want to be subsidising air-con, which is an additional energy demand, if it isn't providing any sort of energy system value,' Lowes explains.
'If you fit a heat pump, you're reducing emissions, you're reducing demand, all of that sort of stuff.
'But the risk is that you just end up subsidising air-con systems that can, in theory, do heating and cooling but the household instead keeps their old gas or oil boiler and just uses the air conditioner for cooling.'
However, it's futile to try to stop people adopting these technologies, according to Kathryn Porter, an independent energy consultant who has air conditioning installed in her home.
'If people are getting heat pumps, they'll be able to run them in cooling mode as well,' she adds.
'It might not be ideal, because it can cause condensation, but you can't stop them from doing it. And you can't stop people just installing air conditioning either if it doesn't require planning permission.
'I think it's also worth noting that if you're telling people that the weather is an apocalypse, then in the next breath saying, 'You can't have air conditioning', I mean, it's kind of nonsense, really, isn't it?
'You can't have it both ways. This is the difference between being able to sleep and not being able to sleep, when it's weather like this.
'But as soon as people realise they can do it, you are going to have much higher [electricity] demand during the summer. And I don't think we've really thought that through.'
However, while Lowes agrees there's 'no barrier stopping you from getting it', he says it may be sensible for the Government to advocate passive cooling measures first, given that air-con units are expensive for households to run.
'The reason why governments are focusing on fabric first is because if they didn't, housebuilders would simply build buildings that were not very efficient and then throw in a very cheap air-con unit,' he adds.
'So you end up in a situation where you have a maybe a slightly cheaper house, but you have much higher bills because you need to keep it cool with electricity. Overall I don't think the Government is against air-con, but they are certainly passive about it.'
While demand for air conditioning might be new, however, one thing remains constant each summer, says Meaco boss Michael.
'What we always see is people don't prepare,' he says. 'We've seen that in all the years we've been doing it. The sales always spike once the weather has come.
'Why do people wait? There's something going on there, but I don't quite understand it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK hedge fund Marshall Wace posted mixed returns for July, source says
UK hedge fund Marshall Wace posted mixed returns for July, source says

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK hedge fund Marshall Wace posted mixed returns for July, source says

LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - British hedge fund Marshall Wace returned mixed results in two of its funds in July, a source close to the matter told Reuters on Monday. Co-founded by British financier Paul Marshall, the $76.9 billion firm returned 1.6% in July culminating in a 6.1% performance for 2025 so far in its Eureka Fund, the source said. The hedge fund's Market Neutral Tops fund returned -0.22% for July and is up 10.99% year to date the source added. Systematic stock trading hedge funds, like Marshall Wace, are up roughly 10% for 2025 so far, said Goldman Sachs on Monday.

Why has Kemi Badenoch fallen out with Liz Truss?
Why has Kemi Badenoch fallen out with Liz Truss?

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why has Kemi Badenoch fallen out with Liz Truss?

Dearie me, they're at it again. Former Tory leader Liz Truss and current Tory leader Kemi Badenoch are involved in another nasty spat, mainly about the infamous mini-Budget introduced by then Prime Minister Truss in September 2022. Badenoch has invoked that calamitous – and deeply Conservative – fiscal event in an otherwise routine attack on the government. Truss, ever ready to defend her record, because no one else will, has hit back and told Badenoch she's wrong and needs to do some more thinking, a particularly hurtful jibe when Badenoch thinks herself one of the brainier kids in the Westminster playground. Amusing and mildly diverting as it may be, this minor row also tells us some much bigger things about the Tory dilemma. What did Badenoch say? That Labour is even more incompetent than Truss was: 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-Budget and are making even bigger mistakes. They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Is that new? Not really. Only a few weeks ago, the shadow chancellor, Mel Stride, evicted from ministerial office by Liz Truss when she formed her short-lived government, laid into the mini-Budget and apologised for it. Badenoch, meanwhile, has said she doesn't know whether Truss is still in the Conservative Party, and implied she doesn't really care either way. She's long let it be known she'd prefer Truss to just go quiet for a while. Badenoch has also been disobliging about the Sunak administration 'talking right but acting left'. But Sunak, like Johnson, May and Cameron, has, so far, preferred to ignore the present controversies and policy shifts, such as Badenoch's 'net-zero sceptic' stance. What's the Truss defence? The usual – her supposedly brilliant plan to turbocharge the British economy was thwarted by a terrible econo-bureaucratic blob and those, to the visionary Truss, idiots at the Bank of England. But increasingly she is having to adapt her line because of attacks from her own party (if she is indeed still in it), which means slagging off the administrations that came before her – Cameron, May, Johnson – and after, Sunak and now Badenoch's performance as leader of the opposition: 'It is disappointing that instead of serious thinking like this, Kemi Badenoch is instead repeating spurious narratives. I suspect she is doing this to divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.' Er... weren't they both members of these dreadful governments? Yes. Truss continuously from 2012 to her ousting in 2022, and Badenoch from 2019 to 2024. Indeed, it was Truss who promoted Badenoch to the cabinet as international trade secretary. Neither showed much dissent, publicly or privately. Why are they scrapping? Neither wants to take responsibility for their own failures as a party leader, and that can inevitably lead to blame throwing for their disastrous showing at the election, and subsequently. But all politicians in all parties who find themselves thrashed by the voters are faced with this excruciating dilemma as they enter the wilderness of life in opposition: Do they denounce the record and policies of the government they were apparently happy to be a part of? Or do they defend their record instead? Do they agree with the voters' verdict or not? And if they want to, or have to, admit 'mistakes', are they going to be big or smaller ones? How to play it? By ear – there are no hard rules. Back in the 1970s, Margaret Thatcher, as leader of the opposition, did well out of renouncing most of what the Heath government had done because it ended in such chaos, and Thatcher was (like Badenoch today) a relatively junior cabinet member who could claim some innocence. In due course, because public opinion had shifted during the Blair years, David Cameron found that he'd have to criticise Thatcher herself, so he declared that 'there is such a thing as society' and told his fractious party to 'stop banging on about Europe'. Ed Miliband, after Labour's defeat in 2010, never seemed able to make up his mind about whether the Brown administration (in which he served) had failed, and, if so, how and why. Try as he might, Nick Clegg could never grovel sufficiently for what he did on tuition fees in the coalition government, and the Lib Dems were so punished at the 2015 general election that they were left with eight MPs compared to the 56 elected in 2010. At the moment, the Conservative-led government of 2010 to 2024 has few friends and many critics, the most vociferous being some of its leading lights. In this respect, the party is behaving more like Labour traditionally does after a defeat. Thus, after the 1974-79 Labour government fell from power, it was attacked by the Bennites on the Labour left for being too right-wing, and by the social democrats on the right for being too left-wing. Eventually, the long passage of time made arguments about pay policy, union power and unilateralism irrelevant. One day, when people have forgotten who Truss and Badenoch were, they may be ready to give the Tories a hearing. But, with Farage on their right flank, with no qualms about slagging off the last government, the Conservatives may not have the luxury of time to settle their differences and focus their attacks on him.

Bank ‘must cut rates six times' over next year to boost ailing economy
Bank ‘must cut rates six times' over next year to boost ailing economy

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Bank ‘must cut rates six times' over next year to boost ailing economy

Andrew Bailey must slash interest rates six times over the next year to bolster flagging growth, economists have warned. The Bank of England Governor and his colleagues on the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) are expected to cut borrowing costs from 4.25pc to 4pc this Thursday. But a growing cohort of economists predict Bank officials will be forced to go much further over the next 12 months. Six cuts would take the base rate to 2.75pc next year – the lowest level since late 2022. Peder Beck-Friis, an economist at Pimco, an investment company, said higher taxes, slower growth and the weakening jobs market will all push the Bank to cut rates further next year. 'While inflation has been surprisingly firm, we see good reasons to expect a slowdown. Regulatory price hikes, including in employment taxes, have pushed prices up, but wage growth is softening and the labour market is weakening,' he said. Companies are passing the £25bn increase in employers' National Insurance contributions on to customers, but 'once this tax shock fades, we expect inflation to ease, as seen in other developed countries'. 'We expect the Bank to accelerate rate cuts later this year, with the policy rate settling near 2.75pc next year,' he said. Michel Nies, from Citi, predicts rate cuts in August and November before an acceleration from December in the wake of 'very likely tax increases in the autumn Budget', taking the base rate to 2.75pc. He cites the weakening jobs market as the critical factor. The economy has lost 178,000 employees on payroll over the past year. Businesses in particular are taking a beating: 'The divergence between public and private sector employment growth continues to widen with the former still masking a sustained contraction in the latter,' Mr Nies said. Bruna Skarica, at Morgan Stanley, also expects cuts to 2.75pc because unemployment has risen to 4.7pc, the highest rate in four years. 'The build-up of slack in the labour market ... can only result in pay and price disinflation over time,' she said. 'The laws of economic gravity can be delayed, but not denied.' These economists remain in the minority, and even this week's anticipated rate cut will not be entirely uncontroversial. Policymakers are cutting interest rates even though inflation, at 3.6pc and rising, is well above its 2pc target. However, monetary policy takes as long as two years to feed through to consumer prices, meaning this week's rate decision will only fully pass through to inflation in mid-2027 - and will have little effect on the rise in living costs this year. Jack Meaning, a former Bank of England economist now at Barclays, forecasts a three-way split on the MPC. He anticipates that two policymakers will vote to hold rates, two for a double cut to 3.75pc, and the majority of five backing a move to 4pc. 'Despite these divergent views on both sides, we think the centre of the committee, and ultimately the decisive bloc, will continue on a gradual and careful quarterly rate cutting path, until it reaches 3.5pc in February 2026,' he said. The most recent three-way split came in May, when external MPC members Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor voted for a half percentage point rate cut to 4pc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store