Liberal Party paid $1.5m for polling that failed to predict election result
EXCLUSIVE
Furious Liberals have revealed the party paid about $1.5 million to Freshwater Strategy for polling that was still telling them on the day of the election they would pick up seats.
The amount paid for the polling project can be revealed as some strategists push back on criticism insisting Peter Dutton made captain's calls.
As angry donors prepare to close their cheque books and complain about the millions of dollars handed over to make Mr Dutton prime minister, party strategists are counting the cost of the disastrous campaign.
High on the list of regrets is the money spent on the political research project designed to get Mr Dutton elected.
Liberal director Andrew Hirst and the pollster Freshwater have flatly refused to comment on the confidential contract but senior Liberals have told news.com.au that the final figure will be around $1.5 million.
'I understand the final would be north of $1 million. I don't know the exact amount but $1.5m would be around the mark at least, depending on any outgoings he has incurred,'' a Liberal source said.
The contract is known to be particularly expensive as it included focus group research with voters as well as quantitative poll research.
Peter Dutton's 'big surprise'
In the final week of the campaign, Mr Dutton said he was hopeful of a 2019 result when Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison triumphed over predictions of a Labor victory.
'I think we're seeing a 2019 situation, where you've got a lot of interesting contests playing on the ground, where we've had a very significant effort by great candidates.
'And I think there'll be some big surprises on election night, because people have had enough.'
He was right on the big surprises prediction but not on where their votes would land.
Liberal MPs insist polling was not accurate
'We had bad numbers, way off the mark, totally out of line with all of the published polling,' Liberal Senator Johnathon Duniam said.
'Our own polling here in Tasmania pointed to the wipe-out we ultimately got and so there are some people in our campaign headquarters who are going to have to answer some questions for us around what went wrong here.'
Hitting back at attempts to blame polling for the Liberal Party's woes however, some strategists insist that's simply 'not fair'.
'At no stage was anyone saying to Peter Dutton, 'you're going to win,'' a campaign insider insisted.
'I'll be absolutely honest with you, the polling definitely did not show us going backwards, either.'
The Freshwater poll never predicted a seat count for the Liberals in the 70s. At the highest point of the campaign, it predicted a count in the high 60s.
By the end of the campaign, Liberal Party director Mr Hirst expected, based on the polling, a seat count in the low 60s and the Labor Party with a slim majority.
Mr Dutton's constant suggestions that he could win the election and secret Liberal polling was at odds with published polls was nothing more than political spin.
Liberals want to dump pollster
A blame game has now erupted with the Liberals preparing to dump the pollster when his contract runs out in June and blaming the research for convincing Mr Dutton the situation wasn't as bad as it turned out to be on election night.
News.com.au understands there was a greater reliance on focus groups than there was in previous campaigns.
The focus groups are a room of around 10 people held in key electorates multiple times a week.
'The jury is still out on the efficacy of the polling. There are some MPs who weren't that close to the polling complaining about it,'' a Liberal strategist said.
'Did the track tell Peter Dutton to go out there and campaign for nuclear policy? No.
'Was it telling him to campaign to cut 41,000 public servants? Far from it. Was he advised not to do that? Of course. So, there's a little bit of corporate warfare here.'
The polling was overseen by Freshwater Strategy's Dr Mike Turner and involved a tracking poll that was conducted every second night in 15 key electorates across Australia in key marginal seats with 1200 votes.
'The starting point was really that our internal data was wrong,'' a Liberal strategist said.
'If we knew that was the situation we would have spent much more time and resources defending seats rather than trying to win seats.
'Clearly, then there's just a broad rejection of what we were offering Australian people.'
Freshwater Strategy
A pollster and strategist, Dr Turner has worked as a senior adviser on several pivotal election campaigns in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.
The polling company also provided a two-party preferred national poll for The Australian Financial Review that predicted before the election that the Albanese government faced a hung Parliament or around 76 seats.
With 80 per cent of the vote counted the Labor Party is currently on 89 seats and the Liberal Party 40 seats.
But as insiders point out, the tracking poll that political parties rely on is never a hard count of seats.
That formal work on modelling the seat estimation was actually contracted to a different company.
Nevertheless, Liberals who worked in the inner sanctum thought that some of Mr Dutton's predictions were based on Freshwater data.
'That would be guesstimates from (Freshwater), absolutely,'' a source said.
What is the tracking poll and what does it do?
What voters and the media sometimes fail to understand is that the political research for elections known as a tracking poll do not provide a hard count of seats or a two-party preferred prediction in the same way published polls do in newspapers.
The polling is also tightly controlled and only provided to the leader, the leader's office and Liberal Party directors which means many of the people complaining about the polling have never seen it making it difficult to analyse in a fair way.
A post-mortem will now be held into the result, with an experienced Liberal Party loyalist such as Brian Loughnane tasked with analysing where it all went wrong.
What did Freshwater's polling say?
Just days before the election, a Freshwater Strategy poll predicted in the Australian Financial Review that Labor was likely to form a minority government at Saturday's federal election.
The polling conducted predicted a 1.5-point swing towards Labor in a fortnight on a two-party preferred basis, with the government leading the Coalition by 51.5 per cent to 48.5 per cent.
The current estimated two-party preferred vote is 54.8 per cent for Labor and 45.2 per cent for the Liberals.
The figures in the poll just before the election represented a swing of 0.6 per cent since the 2022 election, and if applied across all electorates, the number of seats Labor holds would fall to 76 – the figure required to form majority government – down from the 78 it held at the start of the campaign.
The company, which includes a number of staff from the Liberal Party's previous pollster Crosby-Textor or CT, was established in 2022.
In a post-election opinion piece for the Fin, the pollster blamed a few factors.
'Like most other polls, Financial Review-Freshwater Strategy polling picked the trend, accurately estimated Labor's primary vote, but we underestimated its final TPP. After some initial analysis, we put this down to three main factors,'' the pollster Dr Turner said.
'First, polling appears to have over-estimated Labor 'defectors' to the Coalition. Particularly, those who voted No at the Voice referendum. Early indications suggest that 'Labor-No' voters just didn't switch over to the Coalition in the big numbers estimated.
'Second, for all the noise about the preference flows being different in a way that would substantially benefit Coalition performance, it appears that the outcome simply did not materialise. The primary vote collapse for the Coalition was too much for any benefit from additional preference flows.
'Third, the late swing. Given that all pollsters seem to have underestimated the swing to Labor, and everyone's fieldwork would have been over the earlier days in that week, it strongly suggests that there was a late swing among 'soft' or undecided voters in the final days that was very hard for pollsters to pick up.
'The Financial Review/Freshwater Strategy poll has a strong track record of calling election outcomes. We were the closest pollster for the Voice to Parliament referendum, we accurately called recent Victorian, NSW, Queensland and West Australian state elections. But this time some others were closer to the mark.'
Why the election swung so much
Dr Turner argued that Labor's strategy to move quickly to frame Mr Dutton, was highly effective.
'Every pollster showed the same trend of Dutton's net approval collapsing throughout the campaign, and Albanese's lead as preferred PM increasing,'' Dr Turner said.
'Labor timed its move well, characterising Dutton as someone who would cut essential public services if elected. The consequence of voting for your local Coalition candidate was getting a Dutton-led administration that was a 'risk' to services that people already had, and valued.
'In times of uncertainty people tend to stick with what they know. No doubt Trump's global tariff interventions played some part in creating greater hesitation about the future, particularly as the sharemarkets went flying.
'But when most of the 'soft' or undecided voters chose Albanese's Labor in 2022, as our polling suggested, it's easy to see how the final stages of a campaign could be so impactful to the final result.
'With former Labor voters considering switching to the Coalition but breaking back home to Labor in strong numbers, it's likely that some of the seats that Labor was hoping to pick up only materialised in the final days of the campaign.'
The Voice referendum and the 2025 election
As the post-mortem begins into how it all went wrong, Liberal strategists have told news.com.au that they believe they know three reasons why the polling did not predict the result.
The first reason is that the Voice referendum results were factored into the Liberal polling methodology over-inflating support for Mr Dutton among Labor's 'No' voters.
The second reason is that Gen Z and millennial voters are notoriously difficult to poll because many don't answer unknown numbers on mobile phones.
The third reason was that the Liberal Party didn't poll in Mr Dutton's seat in the final weeks of the campaign as it was thought it wasn't necessary as they were 'throwing everything' at the seat anyway.
After 24 years in parliament, voters in Dickson then hit the eject button on Mr Dutton's political career on Saturday night.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
21 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Really upsetting': Couple's $252k nightmare
A Melbourne couple's dream home renovation to allow them to become foster carers has turned into 'big black hole' with a bitter dispute emerging, involving an alleged bucket of poo, and the house uninhabitable after more than a year of works. Lucy* and Leo* claim their renovation has turned into 'a disintegration of the house', ballooning costs and a disgusting find on the home's doorstep. '(Somone) took a bucket into our home and defecated in our house and then left it outside our front door in the garden,' Lucy told The couple claimed they were later locked out of their property after the building company did not return to open the locks when the contract was terminated. 'There was a huge lock and a huge chain. Leo had to get a grinder to get the lock off,' Lucy said. 'We shouldn't have to break into our own house.' But surprisingly, while the couple who are in their mid 40s, are furious with the building company – they have also criticised National Australia Bank for what they see as its contribution to the nightmare scenario. The bank advised reducing the construction payment schedule from 11 to six instalments resulting in what the couple claim was an alarming overpayment to the company. 'The bank made us change the payment schedule, which allowed the building company to access more money upfront,' Lucy claimed. 'It means the building company were being overpaid at each stage.' In a letter to the building company in March this year, the couple's lawyers stated the value of the work completed sat at $168,000, despite the couple already paying out $252,000. Demolition of part of the home began in 2023 and yet the house still resembles a building site, said Lucy, forcing the couple to end the contract at the end of March this year. 'It's so disheartening,' she said. In March, a building surveyor made directions to the building company to fix a number of works. Defects had also been identified in an expert's report from last year with 10 issues yet to be rectified, the couple's lawyers claimed. 'My partner had to pull out the installation in the roof as the builder had allowed birds to nest and plastered over it and did not remove the bird's nest,' Lucy noted. The couple requested immediate repayment of $87,000 from the building company earlier this year. Now the couple's lawyers are preparing a case to take to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The building company did not respond to request for comment. Do you have a story? Contact MORE: Tradie's colossal 5.5m find in Aus backyard Lucy is worried they can't finish the house and will be forced to sell with a loss of $700,000. Before the renovation the house was worth $1.1 million with the valuation set to jump to $1.25 million to $1.3 million after works were completed. 'We had a real estate agent come through to tell us what we can get now if we sell it incomplete and he told us we would be lucky to get $800,000,' she said. 'So we would lose $400,000 for our principal place of residence and lose $300,000 paid out on legal fees and the builder. That is a $700,000 loss and I can't do that to Leo when he has worked his arse off to pay the mortgage. 'It's a really terrible situation and it's highly stressful.' Meanwhile, the couple claim they felt unsupported by NAB when making the second last payment of $84,000. 'I rang them and said 'I just want to pay half as we don't have what we are paying for here',' she said. But she was told by NAB that if she didn't want to pay the full amount that an option was to either to go through an assessment with the credit team as to whether the payment schedule could be changed. Otherwise, they could terminate the building company's contract, reapply for a loan and 'start again'. Lucy is critical that NAB touts flexibility when it comes to the loan but said that isn't the case and said terminating wasn't an option. 'In that situation, we would have half a house and would be faced with getting sued by the builder and the suing part would have exceeded us making the payment, as it could have been over $100,000,' she said. When the couple eventually terminated the contract earlier this year they claimed the house was already more than 290 days overdue. 'We can't live there. We have to live in my one bedroom apartment as newlyweds but we've got two little dogs and have to take them out five to six times a day and it's just not fair,' Lucy said. The couple are now paying the mortgage on the apartment and house, as well as the construction loan, with their request to remain on interest only payments rejected by NAB. 'We are typical Aussie battlers – we don't have lucrative jobs,' Lucy noted. Meanwhile, Leo believes banks should introduce more inspections before payments are made. 'We are in debt for a house that should have been completed in May last year,' he said. 'It's been compounded by the bank giving us only one option, which was a construction loan of six repayments. If it was a broader range of say 11 repayments and proper inspections we wouldn't be in this situation.' Lucy said the couple felt like they were 'fobbed' off after lodging complaints with NAB over the handling of the construction loan and have taken the matter to dispute resolution service, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). The couple knocked back an initial offer from NAB of two months repayment of interest, Lucy said. They then declined an offer made during the AFCA proceedings, which are continuing, with another meeting being held on Tuesday. 'We are in a housing crisis and we have an empty house and have one we could offer up for rent and we can't do it. It's terrible. We would love to be in position to put our friend, who is a pensioner in the unit, but I can't help. I can't help children as I can't have foster kids in a one-bedroom apartment,' Lucy said. 'I mourn and cry about our freedom of choice as it's so limited. Our life is on hold until we can sort out the bank and the building company.' Lucy wants to raise more awareness about construction loans, sounding the alarm that she believes consumers are being put at a disadvantage with reduced payment stages, which are generally seen as standard in the industry. 'The banks may think its efficiency or streamlining but it's actually to the detriment to the customer,' she said. 'If I was able to keep the 11 progress payments as per the original contract, I would pay interest on $56,000 for the work completed to date. But because of NAB's product design limitation, I am paying interest on $252,000 and funded the building company for 90 per cent of the work in a house we cannot occupy.' She believes many other Aussies are also impacted by the same scenario. NAB would not comment on the specific customer issues. 'Customers have control over releasing payments to a builder as a project progresses under a construction loan. They do this when they are satisfied with the progress of each stage the builder has reached,' said NAB executive Megan Bond. 'It is industry standard for these payments to be made in five stages. This structure ensures customers are entering into an agreement with financially solvent builder. 'Any request to deviate from the agreed payment schedule needs to go through a review process.' Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Victorian Building Authority (VBA) said they had received three complaints regarding the building company over the last two years. 'Two of the three have been dealt with,' they noted. 'The VBA is waiting on more information from the third complainant before progressing the matter.' The VBA has sent out an inspector to examine the building work and complete a report. The couple did not want to name the building company publicly as the dispute is ongoing.

ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Look back on memorable moments from Q+A's 18 years
Q+A was a rarity in Australian television news history — a show led in part by its audience where anything could happen, live on air. The panel show, which the ABC has announced is being discontinued, regularly set the agenda and made headlines. Here are just some of the memorable moments from its 18 years on the ABC. When John Howard was on the panel in October 2010, an audience member hurled a pair of shoes in his direction in protest against the former PM's stance on the Iraq War. "I remember jumping up and I tried to catch the shoes," host Tony Jones said in an interview on Conversations with Richard Fidler in 2019. "And John Howard in the most brilliant way, so calm, grabbed my elbow and said, 'Just calm down, Tony. It's alright,' and pulled me back down and we went on with the show. "Later we learnt that [the man who threw the shoes], Peter Gray, had terminal cancer and was in hospital close to death. "We heard he'd like to auction them off and give the money to charity and we did that with John Howard's agreement. "He actually signed a document certifying that these were the shoes that were thrown at him by Peter Gray from Newcastle and many thousands of dollars ended up going to the Red Crescent, which is the Islamic version of the Red Cross." In May last year, Vincent Hurley was listening to politicians debate family violence after a series of deaths that shocked him and the nation. And he couldn't stay silent. "How dare you go into politics, in an environment like this, when one woman is murdered every four days, and all you … can do is immediately talk about politics? That is just disgraceful," he said, in a plea that went viral. In 2016 Victorian man Duncan Storrar found himself on the receiving end of a media barrage when he appeared on Q&A to ask politicians why he wasn't getting a tax cut. The Geelong man asked the election panel why Australians earning more than $80,000 got a tax cut while low-income workers received nothing. "If you lift my tax-free threshold, that changes my life," he said to applause. "That means I get to say to my little girls, 'Daddy's not broke this weekend. We can go to the pictures.' "Rich people don't even notice their tax-free threshold lift. Why don't I get it? Why do they get it?" In her reply, then-Liberal minister Kelly O'Dwyer said company tax cuts would help businesses, like a cafe whose owner she spoke to who needed to buy a $6,000 toaster to boost business. Storrar later received $60,000 in donations via a GoFundMe campaign. But within days of appearing on the show he was attacked by various media outlets, who commented on his criminal history and revealed he paid no net tax. The media's treatment of him was questioned given he had raised his mental health concerns. Q+A courted controversy by inviting former terror suspect Zaky Mallah on to ask a question in 2015. Mallah was the first man charged with terrorism under laws introduced by the Howard government. He was found not guilty of preparing a 2003 suicide attack on a Sydney Commonwealth building after being held for two years in Goulburn jail, but was acquitted two years later. He asked then-parliamentary secretary to the minister for foreign affairs, Steve Ciobo, a pre-approved question regarding his detention. "I had done and said some stupid things, including threatening to kidnap and kill, but in 2005 I was acquitted of those terrorism charges," Mallah said from the live audience. "What would have happened if my case had been decided by the minister himself and not the courts?" Ciobo said he thought Mallah was acquitted on a technicality and would be happy if he was removed from the country. Mallah later responded: "The Liberals now have just justified to many Australian Muslims in the community tonight to leave and go to Syria and join ISIS because of ministers like him". Host Tony Jones said the comments were completely out of order. Prime minister Tony Abbott banned his frontbench from appearing on the show over the incident. ABC management later made a statement that it was wrong to allow Mallah onto the program. The Q&A executive producer was given a formal warning and the program was moved into the News division. When Simon Sheikh, then national director of the lobbyist group GetUp!, collapsed at the desk mid-show in July 2012, his fellow panellists rushed to help him — except one. Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella was sitting next to Sheikh on the show but looked on in surprise as panellist climate change minister Greg Combet rushed over to help. Mirabella was criticised on social media for her reaction to her co-panellist's collapse. She later said she was taken by complete surprise. "I didn't know what it was," she said. "I thought initially he was just bent over laughing because that's what you see, and [I] turned around to try and get a better look and I — like everyone else on the panel — was just stunned." GetUp! took to Twitter to defend Mirabella, urging people to go easy on the Liberal MP. "Folks, please don't criticise @SMirabellaMP — it was an extraordinary circumstance and everyone was shocked," it tweeted. Sheikh was taken to hospital and fully recovered. In an emotional final appearance in May 2023, Q+A host Stan Grant spoke directly to the people who sent him hateful messages during his time in the chair. "To those who have abused me and my family, I would just say — if your aim was to hurt me, well, you've succeeded," he said. "I'm sorry. I'm sorry that I must have given you so much cause to hate me," he said. Grant had announced the week before that he was stepping away from Q+A, and he accused the ABC of "institutional failure", saying the organisation did not publicly defend him amid a storm of racist abuse. Grant said he feared the media did not have the love or the language "to speak to the gentle spirits of our land". Yassmin Abdel-Magied appeared on Q&A in 2017 and was involved in a heated exchange with senator Jacqui Lambie over sharia law. The pair was asked by an audience member if it was time to define new rules surrounding migration to avoid community conflict, to which Lambie replied: "Anyone that supports sharia law should be deported." Abdel-Magied questioned if she even knew what that meant before getting into a heated defence of feminism and Islam. "My frustration is that people talk about Islam without knowing anything about it and they're willing to completely negate any of my rights as a human being," Abdel-Magied said. "Islam to me is the most feminist religion. We got equal rights well before the Europeans. We don't take our husbands' last names because we ain't their property." One of Q+A's real strengths every week was everyday Australians showing the human side of government policies. In March last year, Charlotte Kaye told her personal story of trying to survive on Jobseeker and pension payments and facing ageism in the workforce, which touched a nerve with the panel and Australians alike. Conservative independent Bob Katter and comedian Josh Thomas must have been one of the show's most unlikely double acts. But when they were sitting together on an October 2014 episode about mental health, sparks flew. When Katter was asked by an audience member about how his public statements on homosexuality impacted mental health, he tried to change the topic to mental health in his electorate, and Thomas couldn't take his comments sitting down. He said it was clear Katter cared about his community. "But then you go out and you deny the existence of homosexuals in north Queensland. They exist. There's an app called Grindr. I'll put it on your phone." Dylan Storer was just 15 when he appeared on the program in 2018, and blew Australia away with his take on the Voice to Parliament. The West Australian appeared on the panel alongside other high schoolers who were invited to speak about issues affecting their communities. He revealed how he came from a school with a majority Indigenous population and questioned the lack of focus on Australia's black history. "We had eight weeks of term focused on the American civil rights movement, and in the last two weeks, we crammed in Australian Aboriginal history," he told the panel. "We have the opportunity to be a part — and be a good part — and acknowledge cultures that have been in this country, on this land, for 65,000 years. "It could be such a large part of our country and such a large part of our identity." Storer, who is now a journalist, went on to say he believed more education about our First Nations people could not only help address racism but also misunderstanding, which came from a lack of education. Only comedian Barry Humphries would answer a call on air and tell host Tony Jones to "shoosh".

ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Qantas shuts down Jetstar Asia, eliminating flights from Broome to Singapore
Flights between the West Australian town of Broome and Singapore will cease next month following Qantas' sudden announcement of the closure of Jetstar Asia. On Wednesday the airline announced flights on the route would cease from July 29. The announcement was part of the broader closure of the discount airline, which has operated out of Singapore for more than 20 years. Qantas said about 500 jobs would be lost in Singapore as a result of the closure, but redeployment of aircraft to Australia would create 100 positions domestically. The service operated twice weekly between April and October for two years and was expected to bring in more than 6,500 passengers to Broome in its first year and boost tourism in the region. The ABC understands the Jetstar service was significantly underperforming and that flights were half-full. Booking data showing most passengers using the service were locals from Broome. The route was the successor to a trial service briefly operated by now-defunct Singapore Airlines subsidiary Silk Air, which ran flights in 2018. A Jetstar Asia spokesperson said shutting down the service was a "difficult decision". "We regret any impacts to the local tourism industry due to the flying season ending earlier than expected," they said in a statement. The flights offered Kimberley residents a direct international route out of WA, negating the need to transfer at Perth.