
Hawkish Fed could inflict markets' biggest 'pain trades'
ORLANDO, Florida, June 26 (Reuters) - As the first half of the year closes, financial markets are in limbo, waiting to see how the kaleidoscope of global trade deals will – or won't – come together after July 9, when Washington's pause on its "reciprocal tariffs" expires. But if investors are wrong-footed, which trades will be the most vulnerable?
The state of suspended animation in today's markets is remarkably bullish. U.S. growth forecasts are rising, S&P 500 earnings growth estimates for next year are running at a punchy 14%, corporate deal-making is picking up, and world stocks are at record highs.
The uncertainty immediately following President Donald Trump's April 2 "Liberation Day" tariffs seems a distant memory. The relief rally has ripped for nearly three months, only taking a brief pause during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran.
It's a pretty rosy outlook, some might say too rosy. If we do see a pullback, what will be the biggest "pain trades"?
The major pressure points are, unsurprisingly, in asset classes and markets where positioning and sentiment are most overloaded in one direction. As always with crowded trades, a sudden price reversal can push too many investors to the exit door at once, meaning not all will get out in time.
To identify the most overloaded positions, it's useful to look at the Bank of America's monthly global fund manager survey. In the June survey, the top three most-crowded trades right now are long gold (according to 41% of those polled), long "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks (23%), and short U.S. dollar (20%).
This popularity, of course, means these three trades have been highly profitable.
The "Mag 7" basket of Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet and Tesla shares accounted for well over half of the S&P 500's 58% two-year return in 2023 and 2024. The Roundhill equal-weighted "Mag 7" ETF is up 40% this year, and the Nasdaq 100 index, in which these seven stocks' make up more than half of the market cap, this week hit a record high.
Meanwhile, the gold price has virtually doubled in the last two-and-a-half years, smashing its way to a record high $3,500 an ounce in April. And the dollar is down 10% this year, on track for its worst first half of any year since the era of free-floating exchange rates was established more than 50 years ago.
In some ways, these three trades are an offshoot of one fundamental bet: the deep-rooted view that the Federal Reserve will cut U.S. interest rates quite substantially in the next 18 months, a scenario that would make all these positions money-spinners.
Even though the Fed's revised economic projections last week were notable for their hawkish tilt, rates futures markets have been upping their bets on lower rates, largely due to dovish comments from several Fed officials and a sharp fall in oil prices. Traders are now predicting 125 basis points of rate cuts by the end of next year.
Economists at Morgan Stanley are even more dovish, forecasting no change this year but 175 basis points of cuts next year. That would take the Fed funds range down to 2.5%-2.75%.
Lower borrowing costs would be especially positive for shares in companies that can expect high future growth rates, like Big Tech. Low rates are also, in theory, good for gold, a non-interest-bearing asset.
But, on the flip side, it's difficult to construct a scenario in which the economy is chugging along, supporting equity performance, while the Fed is also slashing rates by 175 bps.
Easing on that scale and at that speed would almost certainly signal that the Fed was trying to put out a raging economic fire, most likely a severe slowdown or recession. While risk assets may not necessarily collapse in that environment, over-extended positions would be exposed.
Granted, this isn't the first time investors have banked on Fed cuts in the past three years, and we have yet to see a major blow-up as a result. Markets have handled "higher-for-longer" rates much better than many observers warned, soaring to new highs in the process.
Still, if "pain trades" do emerge in the second half of the year, it will likely be because of one sore spot: a hawkish Fed.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Firm part owned by mega rich UK family wants taxpayer cash to save factory
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds hit out at conglomerate Associated British Foods as it launches closure plans while talks continue An industry giant part owned by one of Britain's richest families yesterday ratcheted-up pressure on the government for taxpayers' money to save one of its factories. Associated British Foods, better known for owning high street fashion chain Primark, kicked off a consultation to close its Vivergo Fuels plant near Hull, with the loss of 160 jobs. The site makes bioethanol, which is used in petrol. ABF says the plant is losing £3million a month and blamed the government for failing to tackle an influx of cheap bioethanol from abroad, which to set to worsen under Labour 's trade deal with US President Donald Trump. But the move to an 'orderly wind-down' drew criticism from Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, given negotiations are ongoing. Speaking to reporters at the British Chambers of Commerce annual conference in London, he said: 'We are willing to engage with them and potentially put government money into a restructure. I regret Vivergo's decision to start consultations as to let the workforce go and close the plant. It is premature because we are in good faith in those negotiations.' The plea for government money comes despite ABF having a stock market value of £14.6billion, and making more than £1.9bn profit last year. The Weston family was ranked sixth in this year's Sunday Times Rich List, worth £17.7bn. They own a just under 21% stake in conglomerate ABF's majority shareholder. George Weston is chief executive of ABF. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said last week "the answer can't always be yes" when industries request support. But it comes days after the government revealed its flagship Industrial Strategy to boost investment in the UK. Insiders said the timing of the consultation was that ABF wanted to conclude the process, if needed, by the end of its financial year. Bioethanol is a "green" alternative used in fuels such as petrol and diesel. It is a plant-based material that is produced by fermenting and distilling crops such as wheat and corn. The Vivergo plant began operating in late 2012. The future of Britain's other major bioethanol producer, German-owned Ensus in North Yorkshire, is also unclear. In a statement, ABF later added: 'ABF cannot continue to absorb losses at the plant. That is why a timely solution is vital. Our clear preference is to find that solution through this process and to get back to running a business that can thrive in the long term."


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How Buy Now, Pay Later schemes could affect your credit score soon
FICO announced a new model that will factor Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) loans into consumer credit scores, marking a significant shift in creditworthiness assessment. The new scores, available to lenders from autumn, aim to provide increased visibility into consumers' repayment behavior and responsibly expand credit access, especially for those with limited credit histories. A joint study with Affirm indicated that consistent on-time BNPL repayments could lead to improved credit scores, potentially enhancing access to traditional loans and rentals. Consumer advocates raised concerns about 'loan stacking' and 'phantom debt,' warning that integrating BNPL into scores could have unforeseen negative effects on 'credit vulnerable' communities. While not expected to be an immediate 'game-changer' for consumers with established credit profiles, the change could create a more accurate picture of consumer debt, potentially preventing over-extension.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fed's Barr says banks must manage climate risk
June 26 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr on Thursday said the U.S. central bank needs to ensure that banks are measuring and managing climate-related risk as they do other risks. "I think climate risk is a real risk for us as a society and is likely to be a risk for the financial system unless we pay attention to it now," Barr said in answer to a question at a community development conference at the Cleveland Fed. "We don't make climate policy. We don't want to make climate policy. But our role is to make sure that the institutions we supervise are operating in a safe and sound way. And that means paying attention to how they're measuring and managing climate-related risks."