logo
Coping with summer childcare a ‘dicey hodgepodge' of annual leave and magnanimous grandmothers

Coping with summer childcare a ‘dicey hodgepodge' of annual leave and magnanimous grandmothers

Irish Times15-07-2025
'We have only one child specifically because we could not imagine being able to meet the costs of a bigger family,' says Marie, a manager from North County Dublin.
'We are spending €525 for our five-year-old to attend five weeks of summer camps that vary between three to four hours a day. The rest of the day being covered by a dicey hodgepodge of annual leave, parental leave, magnanimous grandmothers, and sheer miracles,' she says.
Marie was one of a number of people who responded to a callout from The Irish Times for stories from parents about their experience with sending children to camps during the summer.
'Jane', who did not want to reveal her name, is a parent to 12-year-old twins in Limerick city. 'Each summer is a nightmare, with trying to find ways to work and keep children occupied,' she says.
READ MORE
'Neither I nor my partner can work from home. In previous summers, I have spent the bones of €1,000 on camps. They start late, 9.30 or 10am and finish early, so you are late to work, leaving early, trying to get grandparents to help.
'This summer I am taking extra unpaid leave and only sending the kids to two camps, costing me about €600 for two children, but not everyone can afford to do that. It's very stressful and far from ideal.
'The holidays are too long for how families are set up now. And the cost is ridiculous. The quality of camps varies hugely and you are stuck, so have to pay.'
Irish primary school holidays run from the last week of June until the week in which September 1st falls. Post-primary schools have a longer break due to the start of State exams in June, closing before the first Monday of that month.
This arrangement means working parents must find alternative childcare arrangements for up to 12 weeks of the summer, when the statutory minimum is four weeks paid annual leave per year.
Grace Healy, a chemical engineer from Co Cork, has devised a spreadsheet filled with art, sports, horse riding, gymnastics, singing and acting for her nine- and 10-year-olds. 'This is how we're surviving the summer when we both work full time. We take a two-week holiday. The rest are camps,' she says.
Grace Healy's two sons aged nine and 10. Photograph courtesy of Grace Healy
However, not everyone is happy with how the camps are run. Carol, mother to a six-year old boy in Co Wicklow, says when compared to the European approach where 'whole afternoons a few times a week are given over to extracurricular activities and sport, the summer camps here are a huge missed opportunity to introduce and instil sport skills. A camp that's 9am-12pm is impossible to make work and offers less value for money.
'We are limited to a private childcare provider through the school, that granted, does a full day. But when I asked my six-year-old if he was looking forward to playing in the fields, trips and trying different sports, he said no. It would be the same as Easter and Halloween camps – sitting down doing theme crafts, in the yard running around with pals a bit.
'Parents are now usually older and both working full time. It's hard to really put in the time and effort and it pains me to see another aspect of parenting where I feel I am letting my child down.'
Another parent, Marie, notes how 'Ireland has now been set up to require that two full-time earners are needed to cover basic living costs for families in all but the most exceptional cases. The reality today is that summer camps are an absolute necessity for families with young children.'
Niamh from Westmeath, who has three children between nine and 17 years old, says: 'I used to dread the summer holidays. Thankfully, we're out the other side now with the oldest aged 17, but I agree that some form of State-sponsored childcare on school grounds would be ideal.'
Many of the parents agreed that publicly funded or delivered childcare during the summer months would ease a lot of the pressure on working families.
Jane suggests 'primary schools should provide organised subsidised camps for July, just leaving August free'.
Family photograph courtesy of Carol.
Carol's vision is of 'a school-run camp for three or four weeks when school wraps up to focus on all the extracurricular life skills. It could include trips, a hike, a beach day, a pool day.'
She adds that 'a national extracurricular summer scheme attached to the school would also greatly help the less advantaged of this country. Where weeklong holidays are provided by charities in some cases, extracurricular summer courses would benefit children for life, and their parents.'
Maria Quintanilla, from the Canary Islands in Spain says, 'the problem is not that summer camps are expensive or the holidays are too long, it's the system'. She sees the solution from the Spanish civil service, which organises childcare in the office and relies on a 'summer and winter core times arrangement which means 'during summer, the hours are reduced and there is no lunch break, so staff finish their shift at lunchtime. During winter, the hours are made up.'
But is public or organisational childcare over the summer holidays a realistic prospect? Parents are despondent: 'If change comes, it will be long after the problem is no longer mine to contend with,' says Marie.
Niamh adds: 'I wouldn't hold my breath. As long as the Catholic Church continues its stranglehold on Irish educational facilities, such logical and, dare I say it, women-friendly arrangements, can only be a pipe dream.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family that rejected six housing offers fails in court bid for emergency accommodation
Family that rejected six housing offers fails in court bid for emergency accommodation

Irish Times

time18 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Family that rejected six housing offers fails in court bid for emergency accommodation

A mother and their children, who turned down six offers of houses by Clare County Council, have failed in their High Court bid to force the council to provide them with emergency accommodation. Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger ruled that Clare County Council had lawfully discharged its statutory duties regarding the provision of emergency accommodation to the family, which includes seven children. The judge said the family members are not entitled to require the council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing. Martina Sherlock Mongans and her seven children, who are members of the Travelling community, sought to bring proceedings against Clare County Council, the Minister for Housing, the Attorney General and Ireland, claiming they should be allocated emergency accommodation in a three-bedroom unit that is part of the council's social housing stock. READ MORE The family now lives in a single room in a relative's house. 'Undoubtedly, the situation in which they are currently living in one room in a relation's house is appalling,' the judge said. However, she found that the council acted 'reasonably and lawfully' in making six separate offers of emergency accommodation to them. She, therefore, could not find the circumstances required to interfere in how the council exercised its discretion. The family was evicted from a rented council house in Lahinch, Co Clare, in July 2024 and deemed homeless by the local authority. Hotel accommodation was arranged for several weeks from July 31st, 2024. Setting out the background to the case, the judge said that, since August 2024, six different own-door accommodation options have been offered as emergency accommodation. She said each had been refused for various reasons, including concerns about safety, suitability and distance from the children's schools. The judge said it is surprising that this 'entirely unsatisfactory arrangement prevails in preference to the six houses offered to the family'. She said this is perhaps indicative of how strongly the family feels about the conditions and location of each of the houses offered. The judge said the family did not establish any cause of action or grounds for her to permit them to bring their case against the State parties. The judge said the family wanted accommodation in Ennistymon or Lahinch, largely because of one of their children's educational needs. The judge said she was satisfied Clare County Council assessed the particular needs of the family in a manner that was reasonable, rational and lawful when offering them six of the accommodations. The judge said that, in effect, the family asserted a right to emergency accommodation in a house that the council has earmarked for social housing on the basis of exceptional circumstances in which they are currently living. The family's refusal of six separate offers of reasonable own-door accommodation means the family is no longer homeless within the meaning of the Housing Act, the judge found. 'The family are living in extremely difficult circumstances and no one could be anything but sympathetic and concerned at that. However, they do not have rights over and above what is provided for in legislation or any enhanced rights to determine subjectively what is or is not a reasonable accommodation for them,' the judge said.

Master brewer who died in Cork house fire remembered as ‘gentle giant with big heart'
Master brewer who died in Cork house fire remembered as ‘gentle giant with big heart'

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Master brewer who died in Cork house fire remembered as ‘gentle giant with big heart'

A master brewer who died in a house fire in Cork city last week knew the importance of time and 'put more into the life of others than he took out,' his requiem Mass has heard. Peter Lyall, who was remembered as a 'gentle giant with a big heart,' died when a fire broke out at his home in Hollyhill in the early hours of July 21st. The 57-year-old, who worked at the Franciscan Well brewery in Cork for over two decades, was pronounced dead at the scene. His beloved dog Charlie also died. His partner Anna Neville managed to get out of the property and was transferred to hospital. Fr Sean O'Sullivan told mourners at St Mary's on the Hill Church, in Knocknaheeny on Monday that Mr Lyall learned a lot about life from the brewing process which he said involves 'choosing the finest ingredients', blending them in the right proportions and then giving them the time to ferment. READ MORE 'Family, friendship, his passion for work, his love of basketball and coaching, his love of fun and a bit of craic – they were the ingredients of his life he blended them into something that, like his beer, will last long beyond them.' Mr Lyall had also been a coach at Fr Mathew's Basketball club in the city. Shane Long, founder of The Franciscan Well bar and brewery, said Mr Lyall was a modest man. He said Mr Lyall was 'instrumental in producing a beer called Sunbeam' and that he never took any credit for it. 'And when everybody else is gone from here, his beer will still be there, a lasting memory for the amazing man he was.' He also said Mr Lyall met Ms Neville, 'the love of his life', over three decades ago and adored her, their children and grandchildren. Mr Lyall's grandson Paul said he had an infectious laugh which could be 'heard across a room and maybe even through the walls'. Chanice and Kia said he was a 'magical' grandfather who made them feel safe and loved and always told them how proud he was of them. Mr Lyall is survived by his partner Ms Neville, his daughters Sarah and Johann, his five siblings, grandchildren, relatives, neighbours and friends.

Dispute over elderly Wexford man's will leaving estate to 38 nieces and nephews should be decided in Circuit Court, judge rules
Dispute over elderly Wexford man's will leaving estate to 38 nieces and nephews should be decided in Circuit Court, judge rules

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Dispute over elderly Wexford man's will leaving estate to 38 nieces and nephews should be decided in Circuit Court, judge rules

A dispute over the estate of a deceased Co Wexford man whose will left it to his 38 nieces and nephews is not appropriate for hearing in the High Court and should be heard in the Circuit Court, a judge has ruled. The dispute concerns the estate, including his home at Iskabeg, the Ballagh, Enniscorthy, of Michael Redmond (98), a widower with no children who died in a nursing home in December 2021. In a will dated June 22nd, 2015, Mr Redmond left his estate to his nieces and nephews and there are 38 beneficiaries, aged between 50 and 79, the judge said. In late 2022, the estate executors issued proceedings against the deceased's nephew, Michael Corrigan (76), and Mr Corrigan's daughter, Shinéad , seeking possession of the farmhouse property. The executors say the house was previously valued at €230,000, but this may have increased. READ MORE The defendants issued a defence and also counterclaimed for orders, including for specific performance of an alleged agreement by Mr Redmond the property would be left to Mr Corrigan, and damages of €60,000. In late 2023, Mr Corrigan issued separate High Court proceedings against the executors, seeking orders including payment of €286,000 quantum merit damages, which are damages for provision of goods or services without a formal contract. Mr Corrigan, who is among the beneficiaries of his uncle's will, claims Mr Redmond, his godfather, promised him the farmhouse property and, on foot of that, he had left Achill Island and has lived in it since 2017. He claims he has carried out extensive renovation and upkeep works to the house and curtilage and is the rightful owner. In her recently published High Court judgment, granting an application by the executors to have the dispute decided in the Circuit Court rather than the High Court, Ms Justice Cahill said the orders sought in the High Court claim are almost identical to those sought in the counterclaim to the Circuit Court case. The 'only noticeable' difference is between the sums of damages claimed, she said. There was 'no justification' stated in the court papers for this 'significant' jump on the amount of damages, she said. However, because the executors had consented to the Circuit Court having 'unlimited monetary jurisdiction' in a claim of the type advanced in the existing proceedings in that court, the monetary difference in both claims was not a material matter. For those reasons, and to avoid unnecessary and undesirable multiplicity of proceedings seeing substantially the same orders, and dealing with the same claims and the same property, she was satisfied it was appropriate to remit the High Court proceedings to Wexford Circuit Court. The imperative must be to have all disputes related to the estate resolved so it can be administered without further undue delay or unnecessary costs incurred, she said. Earlier in her decision, the judge noted Mr Corrigan had not attended the hearing of the executors' application. Ms Corrigan did attend but did not identify any 'exceptional circumstances' to justify her attempts to advocate for her father. The judge had ruled there was no basis established for adjourning the hearing of the application and Ms Corrigan had no right to make submissions to the court on the matter. The executors, the judge noted, refuted allegations, including of wrongdoing, made against them by Ms Corrigan in an affidavit which related mainly to the merits of the underlying dispute.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store