Buoyed by the Supreme Court, Trump to press forward on firings and social agenda
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media in the Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo
Buoyed by the Supreme Court, Trump to press forward on firings and social agenda
WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump's team is moving quickly to challenge injunctions that thwarted implementation of his policies on social issues and firing federal workers after the Supreme Court limited lower courts' powers to block them.
Friday's ruling was widely viewed as a victory for the president because it shifted power from the judicial to the executive branch. But Trump opponents said they still have legal options to impede his agenda.
One White House official told Reuters the administration was moving immediately to go back to the lower level courts to seek changes, citing layoffs at federal agencies driven by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as one example of a top priority that an injunction had blocked.
DOGE and government efficiency were "extremely important" to the president, the official added.
Since coming into office in January, Republican Trump has sought to remake American society by enacting reductions in the federal workforce, harsher immigration rules and funding cuts to programs he does not like in both the public and private sectors. Lower courts have stymied those efforts in a number of areas by issuing nationwide injunctions to block them.
The Supreme Court's ruling will largely put a stop to that practice, pleasing Trump.
During a press conference at the White House on Friday, the president listed overhauling birthright citizenship, ending funding for sanctuary cities, suspending resettlement of refugees and stopping taxpayer-funded surgeries related to gender transitions as his top goals after the Supreme Court's move.
"Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis," he said.
Strategists said they expected Trump to press forward with a right-leaning social agenda, including eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs and curbing care for transgender youth.
"I expect the White House to take advantage of this by being even more aggressive on the culture issues where they believe the public is strongly behind them: immigration, gender identity and DEI," said Carlos Curbelo, a Republican former U.S. congressman from Florida.
OPTIONS STILL ON THE TABLE
The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Trump administration's request to narrow the scope of three so-called "universal" injunctions issued by federal judges.
But Democratic state attorneys general and groups challenging Trump's efforts to slash spending, ramp up deportations and restrict treatment for transgender youth said that while the decision was a disappointment, it did not bar them from obtaining any nationwide ruling.
The ruling still allowed for nationwide injunctions in certain situations, including some class action cases brought on behalf of a group of people. It also allowed lower courts to strike down actions nationwide when they violate administrative law, which governs work by federal agencies.
Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown predicted the decision would have minimal impact on the various rulings Democratic-led states have already won in cases challenging Trump's agenda, saying "it's only been a small handful where we've asked and received nationwide injunctions."
Just hours after the Supreme Court ruled, lawyers in two different lawsuits challenging Trump's birthright citizenship order seized on that opening by seeking to have their cases treated as class actions covering children who would be denied citizenship if Trump's order took effect.
Initial reactions to the Supreme Court decision reflected a widespread misunderstanding of its scope, said Norman Eisen, a lawyer involved in challenges to several Trump policies, including the elimination of birthright citizenship.
"The court leaves a place for nationwide orders using other vehicles," Eisen said.
Others said the decision will deter "forum shopping," in which plaintiffs file lawsuits in courts where they believe a quick win is more likely, and allow more policies to be implemented even as they are challenged in court.
"Usually in these highly politicized lawsuits, someone wants relief instantly. That's no longer available," said Judd Stone, who as the solicitor general of Texas from 2021 to 2023 represented the Republican-led state in challenges to Biden administration policies. "It's a major, major paring back of universal relief." REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
29 minutes ago
- CNA
US Senate strikes AI regulation ban passage from Trump megabill
WASHINGTON: The Republican-led US Senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday (July 1) to remove a 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence from President Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. Lawmakers voted 99-1 to strike the ban from the bill by adopting an amendment offered by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn. The action came during a marathon session known as a "vote-a-rama," in which lawmakers offered numerous amendments to the legislation that has now passed through the upper chamber of Congress. The Senate version of Trump's legislation would have only restricted states regulating AI from tapping a new $500 million fund to support AI infrastructure. The AI clause is part of the wide-ranging tax-cut and spending bill sought by President Donald Trump, which would cut Medicaid healthcare and food assistance programs for the poor and disabled. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate to pass the bill, which now moves back to the House for consideration. Major AI companies, including Alphabet's Google and OpenAI, have expressed support for Congress taking AI regulation out of the hands of states to free innovation from a panoply of differing requirements. Blackburn presented her amendment to strike the provision a day after agreeing to compromise language with Senate Commerce Committee chair Ted Cruz that would have cut the ban to five years and allowed states to regulate issues such as protecting artists' voices or child online safety if they did not impose an "undue or disproportionate burden" on AI. But Blackburn withdrew her support for the compromise before the amendment vote. "The current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most," the Tennessee Republican said in a statement.
CNA
41 minutes ago
- CNA
Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal
WASHINGTON :President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he was not thinking of extending the July 9 deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the U.S., and continued to express doubt that an agreement could be reached with Japan. "We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from a trip to Florida. Trump suggested he could impose a tariff of "30 per cent or 35 per cent or whatever the number is that we determine" on imports from Japan - well above the 24 per cent tariff rate he announced on April 2 and then later paused.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Zohran Mamdani officially secures nomination for New York City mayor
Self-described democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani (centre) will be the US Democratic party's nominee for New York's November mayoral election. NEW YORK - The New York City Election board on July 1 confirmed a stunning victory by mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary, clearing the way for the political upstart to be the party's nominee for the November mayoral election. The ranked-choice voting results released on July 1 showed Mr Mamdani, who started his campaign as little-known New York state assembly member, clinched 56 per cent of votes in the third round of the voting, where over 50 per cent of votes are required for a winner. As the Democratic nominee, Mr Mamdani will face current mayor Eric Adams in the general election. Mr Adams, who won as a Democrat in his first mayoral race in 2021, is running as an independent candidate after his indictment on corruption charges and the subsequent decision by the Department of Justice to drop the case. In a new video on X, Mr Mamdani compared his victory in the primary to the election campaign Mr Adams had in 2021. 'We have always thought our victory would come after multiple rounds of ranked-choice voting. When we got more votes in the first round than Eric Adams got in the seven rounds in the last election, it was astonishing,' he said. An unexpected victory of 33-year-old Mr Mamdani, a Uganda-born Muslim, who describes himself as a democratic socialist, over veteran politician Andrew Cuomo, a moderate, caused unease among Democrats, worried that his political views may make them a convenient target for Republican attacks. The day after Mr Mamdani's victory, President Donald Trump called him a '100% Communist Lunatic' while the Republican party's congressional campaign arm promised to tie him to every vulnerable Democrat in 2026's midterm elections. In the new video, Mr Mamdani said that his objective was 'to win people back to the Democratic party' and noted that he prevailed in some of New York City neighbourhoods that voted for Mr Trump in the presidential election in 2024. After the election board confirmed Mr Mamdani's victory, Mr Trump, asked how he would deal with Mr Mamdani if he wins the election and tries to block arrests of immigrants, said: "Well then, we'll have to arrest him. Look, we don't need a communist in this country. But if we have one I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation." Mr Mamdani earlier said that the immigrant raids were 'terrorising people' and agents who carry them out have no interest in following the law. Mr Cuomo, who received 44 per cent of votes in the final tally, called Mr Mamdani to concede the race after early results of the primary were announced on July 24. The former governor could enter the race as an independent candidate, but he has not said publicly whether he will. Along with Mr Adams, Mr Mamdani will face Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, a radio host best known as the founder of the Guardian Angels anti-crime patrol, and attorney Jim Walden, who is running as an independent. The ranked-choice voting system that New York City adopted in 2021 allowed voters to rank up to five candidates in the order of preference. Ballots are tabulated in what may best be described as a series of instant runoffs, where the candidates who trail are gradually eliminated and their votes are re-distributed among frontrunners until one of them reaches 50 per cent. REUTERS
