logo
Is Donald Trump making Europe great again? – DW – 06/25/2025

Is Donald Trump making Europe great again? – DW – 06/25/2025

DW6 hours ago

The US president's erratic trade policy is unnerving investors in the US, while at the same time opening up opportunities for European businesses to capture their attention. Will they seize the moment?
Time is running out for American and European trade negotiators working to cut a tariff deal before a July 9 deadline set by US President Donald Trump.
So far, it remains unclear whether or not Trump's threat of imposing a 50% levy on nearly all European Union imports will materialize — a move that could escalate the dispute into a full-blown transatlantic trade war.
Given Trump's erratic trade policy, global investors have grown increasingly wary of the US economy — and at the same time, are beginning to turn their attention toward Europe, especially Germany, the continent's largest economy.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
While the American S&P 500 stock market index has seen big ups and downs since Trump became US president in January, Germany's blue-chip DAX index has risen steadily, and is up more than 15% now.
In addition, the US dollar has lost 10% of its value against the euro, with the British pound and the Swiss franc also rising against the US currency.
Joachim Nagel, the president of Germany's central bank, the Bundesbank, cautioned about fresh turbulence in global financial markets if the trade conflict with the US isn't resolved.
Speaking at a May 14 event in Madrid, Nagel said that "disruptive" was the word that jumped to his mind as he listened to Trump's April 2 announcement of sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" on many countries, adding the move caused a global-stock slump and a weakening dollar that brought financial markets "close to a meltdown."
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) already sees "signs of strain" in the US economy amid Trump's policies, warning in its April 2025 Fiscal Monitor that US debt could spiral out of control.
In an interview in May, IMF's First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath told the that the US's budget deficits were "too large" and that Washington needed to address its "ever-increasing" debt burden.
According to the US Treasury Department, America is now saddled with over $36 trillion (€31.6 trillion) in debt — more than 120% of its GDP as of last year and nearly twice Germany's debt-to-GDP ratio. In 2025, the US's budget deficit is expected to exceed 6.5%, adding to the debt burden.
German economist Hans-Werner Sinn sees little room left for the US to continue on its current fiscal path.
"The Americans need to tighten their belts. This lifestyle, this world of endless malls and few factories, can't be sustained indefinitely," the former president of the ifo Institute in Munich told DW.
Ralph Ossa, chief economist at the World Trade Organization (WTO), shares the view that Washington needs to reduce its trade deficit with the EU and the rest of the world. But like most economists, he sees tariffs as a misguided tool to achieve that.
"From an economic standpoint, there's a broad consensus that tariffs are not the right instrument to address trade deficits," he told DW.
Ossa likens the US strategy to a person who spends more than they earn and accumulates debt. "If I, Ralph, have a debt problem — because I buy too many cars, for example — then one way to tackle it is to tax the cars so I buy fewer. But that's obviously not the most direct way to address the issue."
Stefan Wintels, CEO of Germany's state-owned development bank, KfW, believes Donald Trump's aggressive trade and tariff policies have spooked investors and driven them to reassess Europe.
"During my roadshows in New York, London, and Zurich, I see rising interest from international investors in Germany as a location. Many institutional investors are overexposed in the US and want to invest more in Europe, especially in Germany," Wintels said in a recent interview with German business daily
In just a few months, sentiment toward Europe and Germany among global investors has "completely shifted," he said, adding: "In over 30 years in this business, I've never seen such a rapid change in investor mood. We must do everything we can to harness this momentum for Germany and Europe."
Even global financial heavyweights like US investment firm Blackstone are being drawn to Europe. The company's CEO, Steve Schwarzman, has announced plans to invest up to $500 billion in the continent over the next decade.
In an era of geopolitical volatility, Europe is becoming increasingly attractive to investors — thanks in part to Germany's multi-billion-dollar infrastructure and defense investment packages that were adopted by parliament in March.
"We see a major opportunity here," Schwarzman told Bloomberg TV in early June. "They're changing their approach, which we believe will lead to higher growth rates."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The European Commission has also acknowledged the need to strengthen the EU's single market of nearly 450 million consumers.
In response to global trade tensions, the EU Commission is preparing to tackle what it calls the "ten biggest obstacles" to internal EU trade.
According to a leaked strategy paper obtained by German media platform Table Briefings, "all it takes to make up for a 20% fall in the goods exports to the US, is a 2.4% increase in intra-EU goods trade."
One key plank in the strategy is cutting the EU's massive bureaucracy to the benefit of particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, making it easier for them to operate across borders within the EU.
There's also growing consensus in Brussels that the pace of free trade agreements with countries like India and Indonesia needs to accelerate. Negotiating over decades — as happened with the Mercosur trade deal with Latin America — is no longer viable.
But already now, Europe, and particularly Germany, is reaping the benefits of investors' heightened awareness.
The so-called SuperReturn International conference held annually in Berlin, drew thousands of top investors this year, including from pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds managing around €46 trillion ($53.2 trillion) in assets.
Touted as the world's largest private equity and venture capital conference, the event attracted representatives from firms like BC Partners, Permira, and Brookfield Asset Management, for example, who all showed an interest in Europe as an investment destination.
New York-based Apollo Global Management — already managing about $100 billion of its $800 billion portfolio in Europe — said it intends to focus even more heavily on Germany over the next decade.
"We see in this country [Germany] alone the opportunity to put $100 billion in the ground in the next decade," Apollo President Jim Zelter told the , adding that this is "a number that would be hard to match around the globe."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran: Is the cost of closing the Strait of Hormuz too high? – DW – 06/25/2025
Iran: Is the cost of closing the Strait of Hormuz too high? – DW – 06/25/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

Iran: Is the cost of closing the Strait of Hormuz too high? – DW – 06/25/2025

Iran has struck back, but the Strait of Hormuz remains open. Why hasn't Tehran carried out its threat?China and Iran's neighbors may have affecte the decision? For a few days, the world held its breath. It seems the conflict between Israel, the US and Iran is not going to escalate any further, at least for now. Iran opted to save face by launching an attack on a US military base in Qatar, which the stock market interpreted as a de-escalatory gesture. This retaliatory strike by Tehran was "loud enough for headlines, quiet enough not to shake the oil market's foundations," Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management commented to Reuters. Immediately after the strike on Monday evening, the oil price fell again sharply. And yet Iran holds a powerful trump card. It could do immense damage to the global economy by blockading the Strait of Hormuz. But would this really be to its advantage — or would it be more of an own goal? The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) says that "Iran's economy is relatively diversified compared with many other Middle Eastern countries." However, the goods produced by the country's industry are primarily sold on the domestic market. The export of oil and petroleum products is therefore an important source of income for the government. These constitute more than 17% of the country's total exports, with natural gas at 12%. According to the EIA, Iran was the fourth-largest producer of crude oil among the OPEC countries in 2023, and in 2022 it was the world's third-largest producer of dry gas (natural gas that is at least 85% methane, containing only negligible quantities of condensable gases such as hydrogen). Although it has been subject to sanctions for many years, this has not prevented the Iranian regime from exporting oil. China in particular has benefited: In 2023, it took almost 90% of the oil exported by Iran. In March 2024, the Financial Times quoted Javad Owji, Iran's Minister of Petroleum at the time, saying that Iran's oil exports "generated more than 35 billion dollars" in 2023. According to the World Bank, between April and December 2023 the oil sector represented more than 8% of Iran's GDP. And based on estimates from the data analysis company Vortexa, it is believed to have exported even more the following year. Iran would therefore damage itself if it blocked the Strait of Hormuz. Not only would its own oil revenue be affected, it would also upset its trading partner China, which profits from buying the oil at low cost. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The London-based TV station Iran International estimates that Tehran sells its oil at a 20% discount on the world market price, because its buyers risk getting into trouble on account of the US sanctions. The broadcaster explained that Chinese refineries are the biggest buyers of Iran's illegal consignments of oil. Intermediaries mix it with deliveries from other countries, and the oil is then declared in China as having been imported from Singapore or other countries of origin. According to Rystad Energy, an independent energy research company based in Norway, China imports a total of almost 11 million barrels of crude oil per day, around 10% of which comes from Iran. A blockade would also have caused trouble for Iran's neighbors. Kuwait, Iraq and the United Arab Emirates also transport their oil through the passage. In a post on Linkedin, the economist Justin Alexander, a Gulf region analyst, commented that if Tehran were to close the strait, this would "undermine remaining alliances" it still has with countries in the region. Whether Iran could actually maintain a blockade is also doubtful. Homayoun Falakshahi from the analytics firm Kpler told German TV that he believed a blockade would provoke a swift and forceful military response from both the US and European countries, and that Iran would only have been able to close the strait for a day or two. Furthermore, if Iran's economic situation were to deteriorate even further, it would go down very badly with the Iranian people. Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, professor of economics at Virginia Tech in the US, told DW that the standard of living in Iran had already dropped to the level of 20 years ago as a result of sanctions. These apply not only to the oil industry, but also to international payment transactions with Iran, which drives up inflation. This has been rising steeply since the beginning of the year, to more than 38.7% in May 2025 compared with May 2024. The combination of sanctions and the low exchange rate is making daily life ever more expensive for people in Iran.

NATO members step up spending, but doubts about US remain – DW – 06/25/2025
NATO members step up spending, but doubts about US remain – DW – 06/25/2025

DW

time4 hours ago

  • DW

NATO members step up spending, but doubts about US remain – DW – 06/25/2025

Most NATO allies promised to ramp up defense spending and reaffirmed their "ironclad" commitment to mutual defense. But there are lingering concerns over the scale and scope of US engagement. From the perspective of European NATO allies, it all went to plan: A short, one-page and five-point declaration, a nice group photo and even dinner with the Dutch king and queen. At the NATO summit at The Hague, US President Donald Trump was also in good spirits. When he addressed the press, Trump claimed credit for ending the war in Iran and for getting NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5% of their national GDPs by 2035. He praised European members of the alliance for "the love and passion they showed for their countries," but also said they needed the US. He hailed the new pledge as a "big win for Europe and for western civilization." The declaration says the allies will spend 5% on defense, split into two parts. At least 3.5% of GDP will be spent on hard defense – that includes purchase of weapons – and up to 1.5% will go towards other defense-related investments that enhance military mobility and protect against cyber attacks. The trajectory and balance of spending will be reviewed in the next four years. Yet not all NATO members are fully on board. President Trump called out Spain for refusing to increase spending and warned he would make the country pay more through trade. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Spain is the lowest NATO spender at less than 1.3% and has only recently agreed to meet the 2% target that was made a decade ago. Observers said that political turmoil at home made it nearly impossible for Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to agree to the 5% goal. Tens of thousands protested in Madrid last week after a senior leader of Sanchez' socialist party was accused of corruption and the opposition called for the prime minister to resign. Sanchez asked NATO for an exemption and said Spain would achieve the military capabilities that NATO had asked for but that 2% of GDP would be enough for that. Poland, which is leading in defense spending and already this year announced plans to increase it to 4.7% of its GDP, was not happy. "We believe that any deviation from this principle by any member country is a bad example," Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said. He may have had a point. Slovakia soon piggybacked on Spain and also refused to meet the target. "The Slovak Republic has other priorities in the coming years than armament," Prime Minister Robert Fico posted on X. "The Slovak Republic must, similarly to Spain, reserve the sovereign right to decide at what pace and in what structure it is prepared to increase the budget." Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot told the local press his country "may not have done so by making a noisy statement like Spain, but I can assure you that for weeks our diplomats have been working hard to obtain the flexibility mechanisms that could help to lighten the burden of the Belgian effort.' But even if most allies do reach the 5% target, there is lingering uncertainty over the US' commitment to the alliance. On his way to the summit, President Trump said there were "numerous definitions" of Article 5 – NATO's mutual defense clause. After his arrival, however, he reassured NATO allies that the US was with them "all the way." Still, some damage control was required. "Stop worrying," NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said at the press conference. "The United States is totally committed to NATO." In the summit declaration the allies then reaffirmed an "ironclad commitment" to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5, "an attack on one is an attack on all." Kristine Berzina, Washington DC-based managing director of the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Geostrategy North, who is currently at The Hague to attend the summit, told DW that in a way, President Trump was right. But that this was hardly the perfect time to deliberate on the nuances of the clause. She said while it was left on individual members to choose the extent of their support to an ally under attack, the only time Article 5 has been invoked was following the 9/11 attacks on the United States. "The US has been the beneficiary of Article 5 and that's the part that President Trump should remember," she said. There are also concerns that over time, the US may dial down its support to NATO. "Later this year we can expect the US to consult allies on its global force posture – that will likely be reduced military presence in Europe and then focus on how the Europeans can fill those gaps," Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told DW. But he added that the good news was that the US wasn't "dumping everything on the Europeans suddenly." Berzina of the GMF said there was already a conversation about how to compensate Europe for a reduction in troops and assets. "It's possible the US might deploy more nukes in allied countries as a deterrent against adversaries."

NATO allies pledge 5% on defense to keep US on board – DW – 06/25/2025
NATO allies pledge 5% on defense to keep US on board – DW – 06/25/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

NATO allies pledge 5% on defense to keep US on board – DW – 06/25/2025

Most NATO allies promised to ramp up defense spending and reaffirmed their "ironclad" commitment to mutual defense. But there are lingering concerns over the scale and scope of US engagement. From the perspective of the European NATO allies, it all went to plan: A short, one page and five point declaration, a nice group photo and even dinner with the Dutch king and queen. US President Donald Trump was in good spirits at the NATO summit at The Hague. When he addressed the press, Trump claimed credit for ending the war in Iran, and for getting the NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5% of their national GDPs by 2035. He praised the European members of the alliance for "the love and passion they showed for their countries," but also said they needed the US. He hailed the new pledge as a "big win for Europe and for western civilization." The declaration says the allies will spend 5% on defense but split it in two parts. At least 3.5% of GDP will be spent on hard defense – that includes purchase of weapons – and up to 1.5% will go towards other defense-related investments that enhance military mobility and protect against cyber attacks. The trajectory and balance of spending will be reviewed in the next four years. Yet not all NATO members are fully on board. President Trump called out Spain for refusing to increase spending and warned he would make the country pay more through trade. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Spain is the lowest NATO spender at less than 1.3% and has only recently agreed to meet the 2% target that was made a decade ago. Observers said the political turmoil at home made it nearly impossible for Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to agree to the 5% goal. Tens of thousands protested in Madrid last week after a senior leader of Sanchez' socialist party was accused of corruption and the opposition called for the prime minister to resign. Sanchez asked NATO for an exemption and said Spain would achieve the military capabilities that Nato had asked for but that 2% of GDP would be enough for that. Poland, which is leading in defense spending and already this year announced plans to increase it to 4.7% of its GDP, was not happy. "We believe that any deviation from this principle by any member country is a bad example," Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said. He may have had a point. Slovakia soon piggybacked on Spain and also refused to meet the target. "The Slovak Republic has other priorities in the coming years than armament," Prime Minister Robert Fico posted on X. "The Slovak Republic must, similarly to Spain, reserve the sovereign right to decide at what pace and in what structure it is prepared to increase the budget." Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot told the local press his country "may not have done so by making a noisy statement like Spain, but I can assure you that for weeks our diplomats have been working hard to obtain the flexibility mechanisms that could help to lighten the burden of the Belgian effort,' But even if most allies do reach the 5% target, there is lingering uncertainty over the US' commitment to the alliance. On his way to the summit President Trump said there were "numerous definitions" of Article 5 – NATO's mutual defense clause. After his arrival however, he reassured the US was with the NATO allies "all the way." Still, the European allies had to do some damage control. "Stop worrying," NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said at the press conference. "The United States is totally committed to NATO." In the summit declaration the allies then reaffirmed an "ironclad commitment" to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5, "an attack on one is an attack on all." Kristine Berzina, Washington DC-based managing director of the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Geostrategy North, who is currently at The Hague to attend the summit, told DW that in a way, President Trump was right. But that this was hardly the perfect time to deliberate on the nuances of the clause. She said while it was left on individual members to choose the extent of their support to an ally under attack, the only time Article 5 has been invoked was following the September 11th attacks on the United States. "The US has been the beneficiary of Article 5 and that's the part that President Trump should remember," she said. There are also concerns that over time, the US may dial down its support to NATO. "Later this year we can expect the US to consult allies on its global force posture – that will likely be reduced military presence in Europe and then focus on how the Europeans can fill those gaps," Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) told DW. But he added that the good news was that the US wasn't "dumping everything on the Europeans suddenly." Berzina of the GMF said there was already a conversation about how to compensate Europe for a reduction in troops and assets. "It's possible the US might deploy more nukes in allied countries as a deterrent against adversaries."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store