
India-Pakistan: Conflict with no clear winner
No clear winner
Both South Asian countries claim to have achieved their goals in their worst conflict since 1999, without admitting significant losses.
Four days of intense fighting began last Wednesday when India launched strikes against what it described as "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistan.
India claims Pakistan backs the militants it says were behind an April attack in which 26 people were killed in Kashmir -- a charge Islamabad denies.
"If victory is defined by who lost the most manned aircraft, then India certainly lost this one," said Ashley Tellis of the Carnegie think tank.
"But India also succeeded in effectively interdicting a range of Pakistani surface targets and imposing significant costs on Pakistan," Tellis told AFP.
"Both sides continue to claim air-to-air kills, but clear evidence remains unavailable at the time of writing," said Fabian Hoffmann from the University of Oslo.
"What stands out is the extensive use of conventional long-range strike systems by both sides to target military infrastructure deep within enemy territory, including sites near their capitals," he added.
Nuclear powers
While slow to begin with, the international community, including the United States, eventually intervened, alarmed by the possibility of further escalation.
Hoffmann said the bitter foes showed little restraint despite the absence of "deliberate strikes on critical civilian infrastructure".
"Any shift in that direction would... potentially bring the conflict closer to the threshold of nuclear use," said Hoffmann.
The global trend towards violence, especially by states facing internal turmoil, demands greater international vigilance, according to Tellis.
The fact that both countries are nuclear powers "makes the conventional balances all the more important. But the fact remains that neither side has a decisive conventional edge in a short war," said Tellis.
Drones on the frontline
Like other modern conflicts, this one confirmed the "widespread" use of drones for warfare, according to Oishee Majumdar from British intelligence firm Janes.
Israel Aerospace Industries' exploding drones Harop and Harpy, as well as reconnaissance drone Heron were used by India, Majumdar told AFP.
According to specialist site Military Balance, India also deployed Indian drones Nishant and Drishti.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
18 minutes ago
- United News of India
US did not play any role in halting India's military action during Operation Sindoor : Jaishankar
New Delhi, July 30 (UNI) External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar today reiterated that US President Donald Trump had no role in stopping India's military operation against Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. Speaking in Rajya Sabha while resuming the discussion on Operation Sindoor he said there was no conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump to halt the military action. 'There was no telephonic conversation between the two leaders from April 22 to June 16,''.' Rejecting opposition allegations of diplomatic failure during Operation Sindoor, the External Affairs Minister said Indian diplomacy was perfectly on track given that the BRICS summit condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack. 'BRICS countries condemned the conspirators behind the Pahalgam attack and cross-border terrorism, whereas in the BRICS summit statement after the Mumbai attacks, cross-border terrorism was not mentioned,' he said. He also highlighted that Germany, France, Russia and the European Union had condemned the Pahalgam attack. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) had also issued a statement on April 25 condemning the Pahalgam terrorist attack when Pakistan was a member of the Council and India was not. Praising the valour of Indian armed forces during Operation Sindoor, he said the military struck terrorist hideouts in Bahawalpur and Muridke with precision. 'These were strongholds of terrorism in Pakistan. Several Pakistani airports were also targeted. This was a major success of Operation Sindoor.' For those demanding proof of the Operation's success, he suggested watching videos on YouTube showing terrorists' funerals after they were killed, which would reveal the nature of the Indian Army's action. He acknowledged the closeness between Pakistan and China and said both countries have come closer over time, not overnight. Referring to incidents during Congress governments, he pointed out that Pakistan-China relations have had moments of proximity in the past as well. He said that by suspending the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) Prime Minister Modi had corrected the wrongs committed by former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. "Blood and water will not flow together," he said, providing reasons for India's decision to suspend the IWT. Dr Jaishankar recalled that during the Indus Waters Treaty, Nehru was more concerned about Pakistani farmers than Indian farmers. Nehru had stated in Lok Sabha that the water agreement would benefit farmers in West Punjab which was then part of Pakistan. Jaishankar also appreciated the role of Members of Parliament who were part of the all-party delegations sent to different countries to clarify India's position on Operation Sindoor. India's delegation visited 33 countries with MPs like Shashi Tharoor, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sanjay Jha, Supriya Sule and Srikant Shinde effectively presenting India's viewpoint to the world. UNI AJ RB


India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
No leader asked India to stop Operation Sindoor: S Jaishankar in Rajya Sabha
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by US President Donald Trump. Jaishankar asserted, "there was no leader, nobody, anywhere in the world, who asked India to stop its operations." It was also clarified there was no linkage to trade in any talks and no phone call between the Prime Minister and President Trump. He further said on May 9, the US Vice President warned the Prime Minister of an impending massive Pakistani attack, to which the response was that it would be met with a 'fitting and appropriate response'. Following India's counter-move which disabled Pakistan's air defence system, India stipulated that any halt in fighting required a formal request from Pakistan through the DGMO channel.


Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
EAM Jaishankar roasts Oppn over India's ‘new normal' policy
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Wednesday lashed out at the Opposition over feigning ignorance over the term 'India's new normal' and coined a new name 'Modi normal' to elucidate the new defining strategy of the country in responding to acts of terror and crushing terrorists as well as their masterminds, irrespective of their location. Joining the Operation Sindoor debate in Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said that some members raised hue and cry over the term 'new normal' and hence he was explaining India's new security doctrine via 'Modi normal' and 'Congress normal'. He said that the 'Modi normal' has clearly laid out guidelines and principles on matters of national security that remain steadfast and non-negotiable. 'Terrorists will not be treated as proxies, cross-border terror will get an appropriate response, talks and terror won't go together, we won't give into nuclear blackmailing, and blood and water won't flow together,' he told the House, outlining the redefined national strategy under the Modi government. Notably, the 'new normal' policy came into being after the Modi government gave full operational freedom to the forces during Operation Sindoor and stated that any act of terror on Indian soil will now be seen as an attack on India's sovereignty and therefore will be responded to by the armed forces in the strongest possible manner. EAM Jaishankar further said that India's Operation Sindoor did a global service by destroying hubs of global terror in Pakistan. 'Bahalwapur and Muridke remain the biggest centres of nurturing terrorists and spreading terrorism in India and abroad. Our forces reduced it to dust; they did a global service and are being suitably applauded by all,' he said. Lambasting the 'sceptical' Opposition, he said that there are ample examples of Pakistani military establishments facing the fury of Indian forces, but there are some who continue to undermine our security forces for certain political motives. The Minister said that Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif made a candid confession about Indian military strikes pulverising its military installations, but this fails to convince those who continue to remain sceptical of the Army's accomplishments. 'Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif admitted that General Munir called him, saying that Indian ballistic missiles hit their Noor Khan air base and missiles like Brahmos targeted their provinces like Rawalpindi,' he said and lamented that the political parties back home are decrying the great achievements of the Indian Armed Forces for scoring political points.