Kendall defends welfare reform plan after Government forced to ditch key parts
Ms Kendall insisted the reforms had not been motivated by the Treasury's desire to cut spending but were driven by a desire to end a situation where people became dependent on benefits rather than working.
The Universal Credit Bill cleared the Commons after elements to restrict eligibility to Pip were scrapped, with any changes postponed until after a review led by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms.
We are spending, I believe, too much on the costs of failure and not enough on the better health, better jobs, better skills that we need Liz Kendall
Ms Kendall said: 'I know, always, how anxious people are when they hear about proposed changes in the benefits system.
'I think we've ended up in the right place now and I think we have a really positive story going forward about how we will work with disabled people, the organisations that represent them and other experts to make sure we get a system that's fit for the future.'
She denied the proposals were motivated by the almost £5 billion they were due to save.
Ms Kendall said: 'I've never started with pound signs or spreadsheets. I've always started with what I believe can help people with long-term health conditions and disabled people build a better life for themselves and our reforms are based on helping those who can work to do so, instead of writing them off and then denying them any support.'
She told MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee her department 'ends up picking up the pieces of the problems that are deep-rooted from many other government areas'.
She said: 'Poor health, poor opportunities, low skills, not enough jobs – those are the problems we have to tackle together.'
Her department was 'at the sharp end of it' and after 'admittedly, a bumpy ride over the welfare legislation' the Government has to 'start shifting resources into the things that really help create better lives for people'.
'We are spending, I believe, too much on the costs of failure and not enough on the better health, better jobs, better skills that we need,' she said.
'That is extremely difficult to shift, because people rely on those benefits, and they've built their lives around them.'
But, she added: 'Benefits alone is not the solution to a better life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
11 hours ago
- North Wales Live
The DWP lists 87 medical conditions which would qualify claimants for £749 benefit
Claimants are being urged to check their eligibility for a regular support payment of up to £110 a week. Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is intended to help people living with long-term physical or mental health conditions, disabilities, or learning difficulties. And it is especially beneficial for those of State Pension age who wish to maintain their independence at home. Run by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), PIP is a non-means-tested, tax-free benefit that will pay either £73.90 or £110.40 per week during the 2025/26 financial year, depending on the level of support required. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now These rates were increased by 1.7 per cent in line with inflation on April 7 this year, aiming to help households manage rising living costs. Payments are typically made every four weeks, meaning eligible claimants will receive either £295.60 or £441.60 per pay period, reports WalesOnline. Over the course of a year, this could amount to a maximum of £5,740.80. Earlier this year, the DWP announced proposed changes to PIP expected to come into effect from November 2026, impacting both new and existing claimants. Under the new rules, thousands of people are anticipated to lose their entitlement to PIP - a decision that has attracted widespread criticism. But the decision was later mostly reversed and no changes will take place next year, with a review to take place instead. This is everything you need to know about PIP, including eligibility criteria and the health conditions that qualify. What are Personal Independence Payments (PIP)? Personal Independence Payments (PIP) are designed to support individuals with long-term illnesses, mental health conditions, or physical or learning disabilities. The payments are typically made every four weeks. The eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not based on National Insurance contributions and it's not means-tested. This implies that you can still qualify even if you're employed, have savings, or are receiving other benefits. PIP is divided into two components - a daily living rate and a mobility rate – and you could be eligible for one or both simultaneously. Both these rates offer a standard rate and an enhanced rate. This benefit is tax-free and the amount you receive is not affected by your income or savings. What is the value of PIP? Here are the new weekly rates, but remember that PIP is paid every four weeks: Daily living component: £73.90 (lower weekly rate) £110.40 (higher weekly rate). Mobility component: £29.20 (lower weekly rate) £77.05 (higher weekly rate). These rates mean that if, for example, you qualify for both the enhanced daily living and enhanced mobility components of the payments, you will receive a total of £749.80 every four weeks. If you qualify for both the standard daily living and standard mobility components, you will receive £412.40 every four weeks. Which medical conditions make you eligible for PIP? As reported by the Daily Record, there are 87 musculoskeletal conditions that could make you eligible for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) support. This aid can assist with daily living, mobility needs or both. It's crucial to remember that this list isn't exhaustive, so if your condition doesn't feature, don't be put off from making a claim. The PIP award is based on how your condition affects you, not the condition itself. Here's the list: Osteoarthritis of Hip. Osteoarthritis of Knee. Osteoarthritis of other single joint. Primary generalised Osteoarthritis. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Fibromyalgia. Pain syndromes - Chronic - Other / type not known. Ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis - Psoriatic. Arthritis - Reactive. Inflammatory arthritis - Other / type not known. Juvenile chronic arthritis (Still's disease). Rheumatoid arthritis. Crystal deposition disorders - Other / type not known. Gout. Pseudogout. Osteochondritis. Osteonecrosis. Osteomalacia. Osteoporosis. Other metabolic and endocrine disorders of musculoskeletal system. Paget's disease. Rickets. Achondroplasia. Epiphyseal dysplasia - multiple. Genetic disorders, dysplasias and malformations - Other / type not known. Hereditary multiple exostosis (diaphyseal aclasis). Hypermobility syndrome. Marfan's syndrome. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Tumours of bone - benign. Compartment syndrome (Volkmann's ischaemia). Fracture complications - Other / type not known. Sudek's atrophy. Generalised musculoskeletal disease - Other / type not known. Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Rotator cuff disorder. Shoulder disorders - Other / type not known. Shoulder instability. Elbow disorders - Other / type not known. Golfers elbow (medial epicondylitis). Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Carpal tunnel syndrome. Dupuytren's contracture. Tendon lesions. Tenosynovitis. Wrist and hand disorders - Other / type not known. Cervical disc lesion. Cervical spondylosis. Neck disorders - Other / type not known. Whiplash injury. Back pain - Non specific (mechanical). Back pain - Specific - Other / type not known. Kyphosis. Lumbar disc lesion. Lumbar spondylosis (OA spine). Schuermann's disease. Scoliosis. Spinal stenosis. Spondylolisthesis. Dislocation of the hip - congenital. Hip disorders - Other / type not known. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Bursitis. Chondromalacia patellae. Knee disorders - Other / type not known. Ligamentous instability of knee. Meniscal lesions. Osgood schlatters disease. Osteochondritis dissecans. Patellar dislocation - Recurrent. Ankle and foot disorders - Other / type not known. Club foot (talipes). Fore foot pain (Metatarsalgia). Hallux valgus /rigidus. Amputation - Lower limb(s). Amputation - Upper limb(s). Amputations - Upper and Lower limb/s. Abdomen - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Lower limb - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Multiple - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation. Pelvis - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Spine - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Thorax - Injury/Fracture/Dislocation of. Upper limb - Injury/Fracture/Dislocation of. Musculoskeletal disease - Regional / Localised - Other / type not known. How to apply for PIP To qualify for the benefit, an assessment by an independent healthcare professional is required. This helps the DWP determine the level of help you need. Assessments can be conducted face-to-face, via video call, over the phone, or through paper-based evaluations. The DWP decides the method of assessment and you won't have a choice in this matter.
The National
19 hours ago
- The National
SNP threaten to force Palestine recognition vote at Westminster
Stephen Flynn, the party's Westminster leader, said he would table a 'Palestine Recognition Bill' in the Commons when Parliament returns from recess unless the Prime Minister changes his position. It comes after 221 MPs – the majority Labour, along with Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, [[SNP]], Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP and Independents – signed a letter calling on the Government to take the step. Starmer has faced mounting pressure after French President Emmanuel Macron announced France would formally recognise [[Palestine]] at the UN General Assembly in September, amid global anger at starvation in Gaza. READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech The SNP said it would table the Bill to coincide with the gathering of world leaders, and Flynn said the Government could not 'stand idly by in the face of what is happening'. The Prime Minister has committed to recognising Palestinian statehood but said it must be part of a peace process in the Middle East. 'Unless Keir Starmer stops blocking UK recognition of Palestine, the SNP will introduce a Palestine Recognition Bill when Parliament returns in September and force a vote if necessary,' Flynn said. (Image: PA) He added: 'Keir Starmer must stop defending the indefensible, finally find a backbone and demand that Israel ends its war now.' Close attention will be paid to how any potential vote plays out, after the Commons descended into chaos last February when the SNP used one of its Opposition Day Debates to press for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Labour, then the official opposition, responded by tabling an amendment to the motion with different wording, and the then-Tory government put forward a separate one calling for an 'immediate humanitarian pause'. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle came under fire at the time for breaking with convention to select both the Labour and Government, which he said was to give MPs the 'widest range' of options to consider. The SNP said they were being denied an opportunity to have a vote on their motion, which was originally meant to be the focus of the debate, and the Speaker later apologised.
Daily Mail
19 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anthony Albanese dodges huge tax question every Aussie wants answered after Treasury accidentally released secret advice telling the PM to raise it
Anthony Albanese has refused to say whether or not he will raise taxes after Treasury advised a hike to fix the federal Budget deficit. Insiders host David Speers grilled the prime minister on the topic on Sunday following revelations Treasury had made the suggestion. In an extraordinary blunder, bureaucrats mistakenly released parts of a secret briefing document given to the incoming Labor government in response to an ABC Freedom of Information request. In the briefing notes, officials told Treasurer Jim Chalmers that 'tax should be raised as part of broader tax reform' to make the federal Budget 'sustainable' as Treasury forecasts years of Budget deficits. The officials suggested the government 'build on' its superannuation tax and raise 'indirect taxes', such as those on alcohol and tobacco, with personal income taxes now making up more than half of Commonwealth revenue. 'Is Treasury right? Do we need to increase the tax take?' Speers asked Albanese. 'Well, what we need to do is to make sure that our tax system is fair, and we will always do that,' the prime minister replied. Speers repeated his question, before Albanese avoided answering for a second time. 'Well, what we need to do is get fiscal policy right,' he said. Speers asked what that meant for voters, and if it directly translated to increasing the total amount of taxation. 'What it means is what we've done, which is we produced two budget surpluses and we've reduced the budget deficit going forward, compared with what it was anticipated to be before we were elected,' Albanese said. The prime minister reasoned Treasury advice was not government policy, and said he encouraged departments to put forward their advice. He said his Labor government would keep a close eye on the budget and 'be responsible'. 'But surely you have an idea, as to when you look at the budget, whether you agree that tax needs to go up and spending needs to go down to fix it?' Speers asked a third time 'What I agree to is what we do in the Expenditure Review Committee, that's already begun meeting... [and] examine each policy to make sure that there's value for money,' Albanese said. He also said other policies like his superannuation tax changes would 'come in time'. The Treasury advice was accidentally provided to the ABC along with other documents in response to a Freedom of Information request. While the document featured the typical redactions, a Treasury official forgot to black out sensitive headings and subheadings, disclosing secret and politically damaging information. The advice forecast years of budget deficits. Officials suggested the government 'build on' its superannuation tax and raise 'indirect taxes', such as those on alcohol and tobacco, with personal income taxes now making up more than half of Commonwealth revenue. The document also shows officials bluntly told Labor that the party's pledge to build 1.2million homes over five years in response to the housing crisis 'will not be met'. Labor is already seeking to increase taxes on super balances above $3million. Chalmers at the time declined to rule out any new tax hikes ahead of the August economic roundtable.
