Challenge to Springs Rules Rejected
The Florida Springs Council filed the challenge in January, after the department proposed the rules, which are designed to carry out a 2016 law.
The challenge made a series of arguments, including that the proposed rules largely mirrored already-existing rules and that the Legislature intended for increased protections for Outstanding Florida Springs from water withdrawals.
The proposed rules affect what are known as consumptive use permits.
But in a 30-page order dismissing the case, Judge E. Gary Early wrote that the proposed rules 'meet the facial requirements established by the Legislature' in a section of state law. 'Petitioner (the Florida Springs Council) argues that the proposed rules do not go far enough, and that they may be applied so as to allow harm to OFSs (Outstanding Florida Springs),' Early wrote. 'However, whether the rules as applied may harm OFSs is a matter for consideration on a case-by-case basis as CUPs (consumptive use permits) undergo review and, potentially, challenge.'
The state has 30 designated Outstanding Florida Springs, including such spring systems as Wakulla Spring south of Tallahassee; Ichetucknee Springs in North Central Florida; Silver Springs in Marion County; De Leon Springs in Volusia County; and Weeki Wachee Springs in Hernando County.
Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan
Republican state legislators in California filed suit on Tuesday to block a mid-year redistricting plan meant to counter Texas's effort to redraw congressional district lines. The emergency petition argues that the process being used in the California assembly violates laws requiring a 30-day period between the introduction of legislation and voting on it. 'Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented instead with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature,' states the filing on behalf of senators Tony Strickland and Suzette Martinez Valladares, assemblymember Tri Ta and assemblymember Kathryn Sanchez. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, announced his state's redistricting plan last week in terms on social media mocking Donald Trump's flamboyance, intent on using the voting power of the US's most populous state to counteract Texas's redrawn map, which would be expected to deliver a net gain of five congressional seats to Republicans in 2026. Newsom praised the California effort on Monday, calling it a necessary response to Trump's influence over redistricting in Texas and other Republican-led states. 'We are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power,' Newsom said, adding that the proposal gives Californians 'a choice to fight back'. To do so in time for a special election in November, the state assembly must pass the plan this year. As has been a common practice near the end of legislative terms, California lawmakers took an existing bill introduced earlier in the session and gutted it of its language, replacing it with legislation that overrides the state's neutral redistricting commission to present maps to voters. On Tuesday, a spokesperson for Newsom said the governor was unconcerned with the legal challenge seeking to blunt his redistricting effort. 'Republicans are filing a deeply unserious (and truly laughable) lawsuit to stop Americans from voting?' Brandon Richards, the spokesperson, said. 'We're neither surprised, nor worried.' The Mandeep Dhillon law firm filing the suit was previously owned by Harmeet Dhillon, who is now assistant attorney general overseeing the US Department of Justice civil rights division. Dhillon was known for her efforts to sue California's university system to overturn policies which barred controversial conservative speakers from appearing. She sold her firm to her brother Mandeep Singh Dhillon after Trump nominated her to take over civil rights enforcement in his administration. The suit does not challenge 'gut and amend' in principle, but rather asks the court 'to enforce an external constitutional constraint against the Legislature to protect the people's rights'. Internal polling presented to lawmakers showed voters favored the measure 52% to 41%, with 7% undecided, according to the local television station KCRA. Republicans in California condemned the proposal as an assault on the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission and said they plan to introduce legislation that advocates for creating similar map-drawing bodies in all 50 states. 'Governor Newsom, this is nothing more than a power grab,' Strickland said during a Monday news conference in Sacramento. He warned the redistricting tit-for-tat sets a dangerous precedent that will not be easily undone. 'The Golden Gate Bridge toll was supposed to be temporary,' he added. 'You're still paying the toll.' The legislature could hold floor votes to send the measure to voters for approval as soon as Thursday, KCRA reported. House Republicans currently hold a razor-thin three-seat majority in the US House and Trump has pushed to redraw district boundaries ahead of next year's midterm elections, in which the president's party typically loses seats. Republicans are also poised to redraw congressional districts in Ohio, Missouri and Florida, as well as potentially Indiana.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here are the Republicans targeted by California's proposed redistricting
Democrats have proposed a new congressional map for California that could offset Republican efforts to redistrict in Texas, giving the party a chance at five new Democratic House seats in the Golden State. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is leading a charge to put a redistricting ballot measure before voters in a special election this fall, a play to bypass California's independent redistricting commission and redraw lines mid-decade. State lawmakers introduced related legislation Monday and are expected to move quickly to set the plan in motion. The map, proposed by the Democrats' House campaign arm, needs to work its way through the Legislature — then survive legal challenges and get the green light from voters. But in its current form, it's expected to endanger five House Republicans and give Democrats a boost in some competitive seats. The GOP currently holds nine of California's 52 House seats. Here are the Republicans at risk in the new proposal. Rep. Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District Rep. Kevin Kiley (R) has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Newsom's redistricting plan, and he would be one of the lawmakers most impacted if the proposed maps move forward. Kiley's 3rd Congressional District would pick up some of the blue Sacramento while losing Death Valley, according to analysis from Cook Political Report, changing the seat from one that went to President Trump by 4 points to one that sided with former Vice President Kamala Harris by 10 points. 'Newsom is so desperate to get rid of me he's gerrymandered my district in the shape of an elephant. The 'trunk' captures as many Democrat voters as possible,' Kiley wrote on social media. 'Like all his attempts, this will fail. We'll keep beating him at the ballot box and the Capitol.' Kiley has proposed federal legislation that would ban mid-decade redistricting nationwide and nullify any new maps approved before the 2030 census. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District Rep. Doug LaMalfa's (R) 1st Congressional District would make a similarly drastic shift, jumping from a district Trump won by double digits to one that would have gone to Harris by more than 10 points, according to Cook Political Report. By shifting Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman's 2nd Congressional District in Marin County to take on more of California's northern border, LaMalfa's district would pick up parts of blue Santa Rosa. The seats held by Kiley and LaMalfa would both become 'likely' or even 'safe' Democratic seats, 'depending on the candidates and campaigns,' analysis from Sabato's Crystal Ball predicts. 'If you want to know what's wrong with these maps – just take a look at them. How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge?' LaMalfa wrote on X. The Congress member, who has held his seat for more than a decade, also sounded alarms that Newsom's efforts in California will 'set off a series of retaliation in other states across the country,' pointing to mid-decade chatter about redistricting in red Florida, Missouri and Indiana. Rep. Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District Rep. Ken Calvert's (R) 41st Congressional District in Riverside County, which went to Trump by 6 points last fall, could be effectively replaced with a new seat in central Los Angeles County. The new Latino-majority seat would make for another solid Democratic pickup opportunity in the midterms — though Sabato's Crystal Ball notes it may be less so in future cycles, if Hispanic voters continue the rightward shift seen in the last election. Calvert, who has represented California in Congress for more than three decades, has stressed the popularity of California's existing independent redistricting commission, which voters approved in 2008 and 2010, as he pushes back on the Democrats' effort. 'A bipartisan majority of Californians oppose efforts to eliminate our Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. It only adds insult to injury to ask taxpayers to pay hundreds of millions of dollars on a special election power grab that would wipeout the Commission's work,' Calvert has written on social media. Newsom has stressed that the redistricting measure would only bypass the commission through the 2030 election, then revert back to the commission's typical redraw timelines after each census. Rep. Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District Democrats have long targeted Rep. Darrell Issa's (R) 48th Congressional District, where the incumbent won by double digits in November. Issa retired from Congress in 2018 but returned with a win in 2020. Under the map proposal, Issa's district would pick up Palm Springs, while other parts shift to nearby Democrats. That would flip his seat, according to Cook Political Report, from one that went to Trump by 15 points to one that would have gone to Harris by 3. Sabato's Crystal Ball suggests that Issa's seats would 'probably' become a toss-up if the map takes effect, along with Rep. David Valadao's (R) seat. Analysis from CalMatters, citing registration data in the district, dubs it 'the biggest reach' for Democrats. Rep. David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District Valadao, one of the two remaining House Republicans to have voted for Trump's impeachment after Jan. 6, 2021, would see his already competitive 22nd Congressional District in Central Valley get even more so under the new maps. Cook Political Report forecasts that Valadao's would shift from its current 'lean Republican' rating to toss-up territory — from a district that went to Trump by 6 points to one that would have favored Trump by a single digit — becoming 'the most tenuous for Democrats to flip' among the targeted districts. 'Neither political party should have the authority to rig maps to protect their own power,' Valadao said in a statement late last month, calling Newsom's effort a 'blatant power grab.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
California Republicans sue to pause Newsom's redistricting effort
California Republicans asked the state Supreme Court to pause Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) redistricting legislation to give the public time to review the proposal. Why it matters: The Monday lawsuit escalates the nationwide partisan redistricting battle, kicked off by President Trump pushing for redistricting in Texas. Newsom's office did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Driving the news: The lawsuit argues that the legislation's timeline undermines the state constitution's 30-day rule for public review. "Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature," the lawsuit said. The legislators are represented by Dhillon Law Group, a conservative law firm. State of play: Democratic lawmakers planned to pass a package of bills in the "Election Rigging Response Act" on Thursday, ahead of a Nov. 4 special election. The lawsuit argues that the legislature can't act on the bills until Sept. 18.
