All eyes on Yunus' London meeting with BNP leader Tareq Rahman to discuss Bangladesh crisis shortly
Dhaka [Bangladesh], June 13 (ANI): Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh, is set to meet BNP Acting Chairman Tarique Rahman in London to discuss the political crisis ahead of the national election likely to be held in early April next year.
BNP and interim government officials say all preparations have been completed to start the two-hour meeting at a local hotel at 9 a.m. London local time. The meeting comes amid an ongoing cold war between the BNP and the interim government over the election schedule.
Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus announced that the national election will be held in the first half of April next year. But BNP demanded it must be held by December this year. Army Chief General Waker-uz-Zaman also expressed his opinion to hold the election by December.
Yunus argues that his government wants to bring about some institutional reforms in Bangladesh before the elections. In addition, it also needs time to prosecute Awami League leaders, including Sheikh Hasina. BNP, however, says that if the elections are held in April, the candidates will not have the opportunity to campaign because the holy month of Ramadan will begin in mid-February in Bangladesh, which has a Muslim-majority population of 170 million.
Many are considering the London meeting between Muhammad Yunus and Tarique Rahman as a game changer for Bangladeshi politics.
Right now, former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia's BNP is the largest political party in Bangladesh, as Sheikh Hasina's Awami League is banned from running.
Tarique Rahman, the son of Khaleda Zia, seems set to return soon to Bangladesh after 16 years in exile in London.
Muhammad Yunus is now in London on a four-day official visit. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer declined to meet Yunus after Awami League concerns.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was ousted in a student-led uprising in August last year. She is now living in India in self-imposed exile. After Sheikh Hasina's fall, an interim government was formed under the leadership of Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel Laureate. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘It's our responsibility to apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre': UK MP Bob Blackman
Bob Blackman, a five-time Conservative MP from Harrow East, London says it is the responsibility of the UK government to apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Punjab's Amritsar on April 13, 1919. In an interview with The Indian Express via web conferencing, Blackman also accepts the presence Khalistani separatists in UK, but adds that are a small minority. Excerpts: Time and again, you have demanded from successive governments in your country that the UK must apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. As a Britisher, why do you feel that the apology must come? What came as an eye-opener for me was a visit to the (Jallianwala) Bagh in Amritsar. Of course, we can talk about the massacre, about terrible events that took place, from afar but I have to confess, I was ignorant about several things before I actually visited the Bagh. And when you see the site of the massacre, where those innocent people had gathered on the auspicious day of Baisakhi, just to be with family and friends– you realize how tragic it was. They were not a threat to anyone. And then, the troops marched in, literally shooting at them till they ran out of ammunition. For us, as Britishers, to pretend that it never happened, is not right. So why do you think that despite your repeated demand, the apology hasn't come even after more than a century. I led a debate on the centenary of the massacre in our Parliament in 2019, urging the then government to issue an apology to India. The then PM, Theresa May, 'regretted' the massacre and called it a 'shameful scar' in British-India history but stopped short of issuing a formal apology which I think was extremely regrettable. Had we apologized then, it would have been far better. I reiterated that demand earlier this year as well on the massacre's 106th anniversary. Whatever wrong things were done in the name of the British Empire around the world, they should be apologized for. We can't be responsible for actions taken by our forebears, but what we can do is to say, look, it was wrong, and we are sorry. So what convinces you to consistently ask your own country for an apology to India even as it hasn't happened yet? Is it some guilt as a Britisher? No, I don't carry any guilt as I wasn't the one to order that firing. But I do not feel any hesitation in saying that what was done was wrong, absolutely wrong, it should not have been done and we should apologize. It is equally regrettable to see the length of time that it has taken to drag out an apology, given the huge number of people who lost their lives. At the Bagh, when you see that well, where so many people jumped inside to escape firing, you realize it was a terrible way to die. So for me, it's not a feeling of guilt, this is our responsibility. It was one of those incidents that if you don't apologize, it will continue to be a running sore. We can't bring those people back but can say that what happened to them was utterly wrong. Coming to the recent developments between India and Pakistan, you met the Indian Parliamentarians' delegation post Operation Sindoor. Your views on the meeting. We absolutely condemn the heartrending terrorist attack that took place in Pahalgam. We were given to understand that India's recent military action against terror bases in Pakistan was not just about Pahalgam, but several terrorist attacks that have taken place in the past. The sad reality however is, that no one's quite sure of who's incharge in Pakistan, whether it's their so-called elected government or their generals and military who seem to be literally calling the shots. It was made clear to us by the visiting delegation that India is, and will react proportionally to the attacks from the Pakistani side, if any. So what do you think Pakistan can do to stop fostering terrorism on its soil? First, Pakistan should remove the terror bases that exist along the line of control, whether for training terrorists or facilitating the entry of terrorists into sovereign India. It is pretty clear that Pakistan is, at the very least, not just tolerating the terrorist camps, but probably almost certainly encouraging them, because anything that destabilizes India seems to be good news for Pakistan, which I think is regrettable. Equally, there are reports of Pakistan linked terrorists tunneling into the Kashmir Valley. Pakistan has even attacked in the Punjab and the Indian forces had to thwart attacks on the Golden Temple, for example, which is a direct threat to religious places of worship, which is outrageous. The second thing that Pakistan can do is to withdraw their military forces from Jammu and Kashmir, end the illegal occupation and allow it to be part of India, as was always intended back in 1947. The US President, Donald Trump, has been regularly trying to portray that he was the one who got this ceasefire done, whereas India has denied that and they said that it was Pakistan, which had requested the ceasefire. Your comments. As we know, the Americans have been strong supporters of Pakistan for quite a long time. Indeed, during the Bangladesh war of independence 1971, the Americans were on the Pakistani side. I think India takes a very strong stance on these things and quite rightly so. India has suffered at hands of terrorism and was going to make sure that the terrorists understood that they will not be allowed to gain ground, they will not be allowed to terrify the people of Kashmir and there would be grave consequences of any such act in future. I know that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has built a good relationship with the Americans, quite rightly too, that's good news for India. It's good news for world trade. And indeed, we want India to be part of the democracies of the world that encourage justice and peace. But I think we should be very clear that the initiative for a ceasefire came from Pakistan, not from India. Because basically India was saying, if you attack us, we're going to attack you back, but we are not going to be the aggressors. The separatist Khalistani elements have been flourishing on UK soil. India has raised this several times. Your take. Yes. And I've called them out. We've had these pro-Khalistan demonstrations outside the Indian High Commission in London. And indeed, when Prime Minister Modi or other key visitors from India have been on official visits to the UK, there have been such demonstrations. But this is a very small minority. I think we should be very clear that in the UK, the vast majority of British Sikhs do not agree with a so-called independent Khalistan. The vast majority of Sikhs are loyal to Britain now and indeed maintain their loyalty to India and don't want to see this misguided campaign. I've called on the police to take firm action outside the Indian High Commission when Khalistanis have demonstrated. I've called them out for what they are, thugs and potentially terrorists. And we need to ensure that the police and the security services take every action necessary to ensure they can't cause problems. There's nothing wrong with people demonstrating peacefully on what they have to say as long as they're not causing criminal damage or intimidating people.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
History Today: How US Army was founded 250 years ago
On this day in 1775, the Continental Congress, the governing body of the 13 American colonies and later the United States, set up the US Army. The newly formed force was given the job of protecting the colonies against British troops during the Revolutionary War. Now, 250 years on, a grand military parade is set to take place today to honour the Army's founding and celebrate US President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Army officials expect around 200,000 people to attend the evening event read more This move marked the start of America's first national institution. AP/File Photo On June 14, 1775, the US Army came into being after the Continental Congress approved to recruitment of skilled riflemen to serve the United Colonies for a year. This move marked the start of America's first national institution, and it happened a year before the Declaration of Independence was issued on July 4, 1776. Also on this day in 1940, the first group of Polish political prisoners reached Auschwitz. The site later became the largest concentration and death camp run by Nazi Germany. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Further, on this day in 1949, Albert II became the first monkey to go to space. However, he died while returning to Earth due to a problem with the parachute. If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today, is your one-stop destination to explore key events. Now, let's take a look at the events: The establishment of US Army On this day in 1775, the Continental Congress, which acted as the governing body for the 13 American colonies and later the United States, established the US Army. The Congress took control of the New England Army of Observation, officially turning it into the Continental Army. These troops were tasked with defending the colonies from British forces during the Revolutionary War. A day after passing the resolution, it chose George Washington, who had a strong background in military service, to lead the new army as its commander-in-chief. We have a lot to celebrate at 250 years of service! Join us for the Army Birthday Festival and Parade on the National Mall! 🕤 Festival starts @ 9:30 a.m. 🕡 Parade starts @ 6:30 p.m. 👉 Details and registration link here: — U.S. Army (@USArmy) June 9, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Now, 250 years later, a large military parade has been planned to honour the Army's founding and to celebrate President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Army officials estimate that around 200,000 people are expected to attend the evening event. For security, 175 magnetometers will be placed at checkpoints leading to both the daytime birthday celebration and the parade later in the evening. The Army's birthday event had been months in the making. But earlier this year, Trump shared plans to turn it into a grand military parade, featuring 60-ton M1 Abrams tanks and Paladin howitzers on the streets of the capital. The parade will pass in front of Trump's viewing platform on Constitution Avenue, just south of the White House, around sunset. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A large military parade has been planned to honour the Army's founding. Reuters Members of the Army's Golden Knights parachute team will land on the Eclipse and present the president with an American flag. Trump will then oversee a ceremony where 250 soldiers will take their enlistment and reenlistment oaths. The parade route will run along Constitution Avenue NW, starting at 23rd Street and ending at 15th Street, close to the National Museum of African American History and Culture on the National Mall. First mass transport to Auschwitz concentration camp On this day in 1940, the first group of Polish political prisoners arrived at Auschwitz, which later became Nazi Germany's largest concentration and extermination camp. Auschwitz was made up of three parts: a prison camp, a death camp, and a forced labour camp. It is estimated that between 1.1 and 1.5 million people died there, with about 90 per cent being Jewish. The first camp, known as Auschwitz I, was set up on April 27, 1940, after an order from Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS. On June 14, the first transport of Polish political prisoners arrived. Auschwitz I remained mainly for political detainees throughout the war, most of them Poles and Germans. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Image: The National WWII Museum Another section, Auschwitz III, was turned into a forced labour camp in May 1942. It provided workers for the nearby chemical and synthetic rubber plants run by IG Farben. Notably, German companies put major investments into these industries using forced labour near Auschwitz. IG Farben alone put over 700 million Reichsmarks into its site at Auschwitz III in 1942. Albert II became the first monkey in space Before humans went into space, there were doubts about whether people could survive weightlessness for long periods. To study this, scientists in the US and the Soviet Union sent animals, mostly monkeys, chimpanzees, and dogs, into space to observe the effects. On this day in 1949, Albert II became the first monkey to reach space, hitting an altitude of 83 miles (134 km) aboard a V-2 rocket. He was part of the US 'Albert' Programme, which launched monkeys from New Mexico to gather information on how space travel might affect living beings. Scientists sent animals, mostly monkeys, chimpanzees, and dogs, into space to observe the effects. Image: X Albert II did not survive the return trip, as the parachute on the capsule failed. However, data about his body's response to space was successfully recorded and sent back during the mission. Before Albert II, a rhesus monkey named Albert I had also been launched into space on a V-2 Blossom rocket. But due to limited documentation and attention, he remained one of the lesser-known figures in the early days of space travel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This Day, That Year 1940: German forces marched into Paris and took control of the city during World War II. 1946: Donald Trump, the 45th and 47th president of the United States, was born. 1985: TWA Flight 847, travelling from Athens to Rome, was hijacked by Shiite Hezbollah militants, who at once began asking for passengers with 'Jewish-sounding names.'
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nippon Steel–US Steel deal approved: Trump signs executive order; contingent on compliance with security agreement
Image used for representative purposes US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order enabling Japanese firm Nippon Steel's investment in US Steel, contingent upon compliance with a government-mandated "national security agreement". The joint statement from both companies confirms $11 billion in new investments by 2028 and the provision of a "golden share" to the US government, ensuring protection of national security interests regarding steel production. They expressed gratitude to Trump's administration, highlighting the partnership's significance for American manufacturing. Following completion of regulatory approvals and Department of Justice review, the partnership awaits prompt finalisation. US Steel shares increased by $2.66 to $54.85 in Friday's afterhours trading, compared to Nippon Steel's initial bid of $55 per share in late 2023. The acquisition concludes the long-time uncertainty regarding international control of a crucial state resource that started when US Steel and Nippon Steel disclosed their intentions for a $14.9 billion merger in December 2023. Details regarding the golden share mechanism, national security agreement provisions and investment allocation remain limited. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos Portal Saúde do Homem Clique aqui Undo White House spokesman Kush Desai emphasised the order's role in maintaining US Steel's presence in Pennsylvania. Legal expert James Brower noted that such agreements typically remain confidential, particularly from the government's perspective. The transaction, originally valued at nearly $15 billion, faced delays due to national security concerns during Biden's presidency. American officials now value it at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and plans for a new electric arc furnace post-2028, reported AP. Nippon Steel committed to maintaining Pittsburgh headquarters, establishing an American-majority board, protecting plant operations and trade interests, while avoiding steel slab imports that would compete with US blast furnaces. Trump, initially opposing the purchase, later showed willingness to negotiate. He claimed "total control" through the golden share, though Nippon Steel maintains its intention for full ownership. The order acknowledges potential national security risks but suggests adequate mitigation through the security agreement. The Treasury Department and CFIUS agencies must approve the agreement's execution by the transaction's closing date, with Trump retaining authority for further actions. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
