
By land and sea, rising oil stocks are bad news for prices: Bousso
LONDON, May 21 (Reuters) - Inventories of oil stored on land and at sea have risen sharply in recent weeks, an early warning sign of deteriorating market conditions that could put oil prices under pressure for years.
Oil prices have dropped to about $65 a barrel from a recent high of $82 in January due to rising concerns about the potential economic impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war and the surprise decision by OPEC+ to ramp up production.
Yet, until now, no data has shown a marked drop in oil consumption. Refining profit margins are holding strong and demand continued to grow by nearly one million barrels per day (bpd) in the first quarter of 2025 compared with a year earlier, according to the International Energy Agency.
Recent oil storage data, however, suggests conditions have started weakening as inventories are building up around the world. While this trend has multiple causes, both economic and geopolitical, it clearly suggests that demand is not keeping up with supply.
In the IEA's latest report published on May 15, it said that total global oil inventories rose for a second consecutive month to 7.7 billion barrels in March. While this is still below the five-year average, the direction of travel appears clear. The energy watchdog expects oil inventories to rise by an average of 720,000 bpd this year and accelerate to 930,000 bpd next year.
Meanwhile, analysis of near real-time satellite data by Kayrros showed oil stock building has accelerated in recent weeks.
Global onshore inventories of crude oil rose by more than 100 million barrels to 3.127 billion barrels between mid-April and mid-May. That's the highest reading for onshore inventories since the COVID-19 pandemic, with the exception of a seasonal peak in July 2023, according to Kayrros analyst Augustin Prate.
Importantly, China, the world's top oil importer, saw storage hit a record high of 1.127 billion barrels in May, the Kayrros data showed. This development may partly reflect a concerted effort by the government and refiners to stockpile while oil prices are low. But the global trend of rising onshore inventories remains bearish nonetheless.
The recent increase in oil stored in tankers at sea is another negative signal. Storing oil at sea is more expensive than on land, so when floating storage volumes rise, it means producers and refiners are taking longer to find buyers and discharge cargoes, indicating slowing demand or rising supplies, or both. Under extreme market conditions, traders store oil in tankers when onshore tanks have filled up.
The volume of crude, condensate oil and refined fuels that has been in floating storage on tankers for seven days or longer has risen over the past month by 14% to more than 160 million barrels, the highest in two years, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
In the case of refined products, volumes have risen to around 86 million barrels, the highest since the depths of the pandemic in late 2020.
On the crude side, floating storage reached 74 million barrels this week. Iran and Russia are largely responsible for this figure, accounting for 29 and 11 million barrels, respectively, the Kpler data shows.
Rising Iranian stocks could be partly explained by the recent tightening of U.S. sanctions on Iran and several of China's so-called teapot refiners and port operators, as these restrictions led to a sharp drop in buying from China, the biggest importer of Tehran's oil in recent years.
And the rise in Russian crude oil in floating storage may reflect the recent drop in oil prices. Western sanctions cap Russian crude at $60 a barrel, but this price becomes a lot less attractive when global benchmarks are only slightly higher.
High-frequency data obviously can change quickly, and the full oil demand picture will only be determined once official data is published by the IEA and other government agencies around the world in the coming months.
But for now, the apparent acceleration in inventory increases on land and at sea suggests oil demand is falling behind the increases in supply – just as OPEC+ is preparing to increase production even more. If this trend continues, today's oil prices may have to fall quite a bit further before the market rebalances.
** The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. **
Want to receive my column in your inbox every Thursday, along with additional energy insights and trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
25 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Elon Musk turns on Trump and blasts ‘outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill
Elon Musk has turned on President Donald Trump by blasting his 'big beautiful bill' as an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' The denunciation comes just days after the mogul exited the White House. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X Tuesday. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The billionaire took a significantly stronger tone than his previous criticism of the spending bill now he has left Washington, D.C. He previously said the bill 'undermines' the Department of Government Efficiency. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk said over the weekend.


Belfast Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'