logo
Corbyn and Sultana use same crowdfunder as Tommy Robinson

Corbyn and Sultana use same crowdfunder as Tommy Robinson

Spectator3 days ago
You'd think two botched party launches would have chastened Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn somewhat. Not so. The duo continue to heap praise on the number of sign-ups their new group has seen – reaching 550,000 in the last 24 hours – while Sultana uses the rising figure to barb Reform, boasting at the weekend that it had overtaken Nigel Farage's party membership. But, as Reform figures were quick to point out, a free sign-up is a rather different thing than being a paid-up party member…
And Mr S has spotted another amusing feature of the dynamic duo's freshly-formed website. YourParty – which Sultana rather confusingly insists is not the long-term name of the new group – uses a plugin from a US company called Donorbox to crowdfund for its lefty cause. Eagle-eyed observers might have heard of this organisation before – after it gained publicity through none other than far-right activist Tommy Robinson. As previously reported by BuzzFeed, Robinson raised money to cover £20,000 legal fees via the plugin after better-known payment platforms like PayPal cut off payments to some controversial right-wingers. Small world, eh?
When quizzed on Donorbox's decision to allow Robinson to use the plugin at the time, CEO Charles Zhang remarked that he didn't want to get into 'opinions on [Tommy Robinson]', and added:
We are not a platform or a social network that spreads information. Donorbox is a basic financial tool that allows people to give out of their free will. We hosts donation forms for socialists, conservatives, Muslims, Christians, and the LGBTQ community. It's often that their views clash dramatically.
Given the politics of the Corbynista pair, Steerpike wonders exactly what the duo will make of using a platform with such a libertarian philosophy – and its links to a decidedly non-left-wing activist…
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact

Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact

Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'

‘Millennial dictator' opens door to ruling forever
‘Millennial dictator' opens door to ruling forever

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

‘Millennial dictator' opens door to ruling forever

Fireworks erupted in the main square of the capital San Salvador, as lawmakers ratified the reform in a second late-night plenary session. 'Thank you for making history, colleagues,' said Assembly President Ernesto Castro of Bukele's party. Bukele enjoys enormous support at home for his heavy-handed campaign against criminal gangs, which has reduced violence in the country to historic lows. However, he has also drawn sharp criticism from international rights groups. The reforms came shortly after a wave of arrests targeting human rights defenders and government critics, prompting dozens of journalists and humanitarian workers to flee the country. A close ally of Donald Trump, Bukele's international image has been dented by his handling of detainees. His government held 252 Venezuelans for four months in a mega-prison he built for gang members. Many later alleged torture and abuse. Emboldened by its relationship with Trump, the Bukele administration detained human rights defenders in May and June, including prominent lawyer Ruth Lopez, who had denounced alleged cases of government corruption. 'Democracy has died' Under the ongoing emergency regime, roughly 88,000 people have been arrested on gang-related charges. Rights groups say thousands were detained arbitrarily, and more than 400 have died in custody. Bukele's 2024 re-election had already sparked concern, with critics arguing it violated the constitution and was enabled by a ruling by loyalist judges. Ruling party lawmaker Ana Figueroa, who introduced the reform, said Salvadorans 'can now decide how long to support their president'. However opposition lawmaker Marcela Villatoro denounced the move. 'Today, democracy has died in El Salvador,' she said, criticising the reforms' approval just as the country enters a week-long vacation. 'They've taken off the masks... They're shameless.' Juanita Goebertus, Human Rights Watch's Americas director, said El Salvador is 'following Venezuela's path'. 'It begins with a leader who uses his popularity to concentrate power, and ends in a dictatorship,' she wrote on social media. Miguel Montenegro of the nongovernmental Human Rights Commission said the reforms 'completely dismantle what little democracy remained'. In a speech marking the first year of his second term, Bukele said he does not care if people call him a dictator, brushing off international criticism over the arrest of humanitarian activists.

Nigel Farage throws support behind campaign to stop introduction of racing tax
Nigel Farage throws support behind campaign to stop introduction of racing tax

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nigel Farage throws support behind campaign to stop introduction of racing tax

The Reform leader said he would fight against the tax proposal during an interview at Goodwood where he was a guest of leading racehorse owners Dr Jim and Fitri Hay Nigel Farage has thrown his support behind racing's campaign to stop the government carrying out a tax raid which the industry claims will threaten the sport's future. ‌ The Treasury last month completed a public consultation over plans to harmonise remote gambling duties which would treat horse racing on the same level as other forms of gambling. The British Horseracing Authority has launched a petition and urged participants and punters to lobby their MPs to argue that racing should be taxed at a lower rate. ‌ The BHA has produced economic analysis which has estimated that racing could lose at least £66 million if the tax is set on a par with online games of chance, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk. ‌ Reform leader Farage was at Goodwood on Friday where he was attending as a guest of leading racehorse owners Dr Jim and Fitri Hay. Last year former Prime Minister Liz Truss was among their entourage. Speaking to ITV Racing, Farage said: 'I love racing, be it Flat, be it jumps. It's a really important part of what we do as a country, and there are some concerns around it. 'I think there is an ignorance here. There is an an assumption from members of Parliament that all gambling is bad, all gambling leads to ruin, and look, some of those machines where you can go and lose your entire money in an afternoon are pretty addictive. 'I do think horse racing is different. You are making an individual decision each time to have a bet. There are checks and safeguards in place.' Asked if he thought that was the majority view in government, he replied: 'No. I think I'm in a minority. 'It's worrying for the racing industry because what they are proposing to put in is going to do the most enormous amount of damage. 'And I see this again and again and again, people with little understanding of what they are legislating on making decisions for everybody else. I will certainly be fighting. Don't miss a FREE £2 William Hill shop bet inside your Mirror every day of Glorious Goodwood Festival Pick up your Mirror every day of the Goodwood festival to get your hands on 12 page pullouts packed with insight from the punters you trust, plus FREE William Hill shop bets every day of the festival from Tuesday July 29 until Saturday August 2, 2025. Find out more here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store