Nigel Farage throws support behind campaign to stop introduction of racing tax
Nigel Farage has thrown his support behind racing's campaign to stop the government carrying out a tax raid which the industry claims will threaten the sport's future.
The Treasury last month completed a public consultation over plans to harmonise remote gambling duties which would treat horse racing on the same level as other forms of gambling. The British Horseracing Authority has launched a petition and urged participants and punters to lobby their MPs to argue that racing should be taxed at a lower rate.
The BHA has produced economic analysis which has estimated that racing could lose at least £66 million if the tax is set on a par with online games of chance, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk.
Reform leader Farage was at Goodwood on Friday where he was attending as a guest of leading racehorse owners Dr Jim and Fitri Hay. Last year former Prime Minister Liz Truss was among their entourage.
Speaking to ITV Racing, Farage said: 'I love racing, be it Flat, be it jumps. It's a really important part of what we do as a country, and there are some concerns around it.
'I think there is an ignorance here. There is an an assumption from members of Parliament that all gambling is bad, all gambling leads to ruin, and look, some of those machines where you can go and lose your entire money in an afternoon are pretty addictive.
'I do think horse racing is different. You are making an individual decision each time to have a bet. There are checks and safeguards in place.'
Asked if he thought that was the majority view in government, he replied: 'No. I think I'm in a minority.
'It's worrying for the racing industry because what they are proposing to put in is going to do the most enormous amount of damage.
'And I see this again and again and again, people with little understanding of what they are legislating on making decisions for everybody else. I will certainly be fighting.
Don't miss a FREE £2 William Hill shop bet inside your Mirror every day of Glorious Goodwood Festival
Pick up your Mirror every day of the Goodwood festival to get your hands on 12 page pullouts packed with insight from the punters you trust, plus FREE William Hill shop bets every day of the festival from Tuesday July 29 until Saturday August 2, 2025. Find out more here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Bessent says US has 'makings of a deal' with China
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that he believed that Washington has the makings of a deal with China and that he was "optimistic" about the path forward. "This week's negotiations in Stockholm have advanced our talks with China, and I believe that we have the makings of a deal that will benefit both of our great nations," Bessent said in a post on X that was subsequently deleted. "I am optimistic about the path forward," he added. A Treasury Department spokesperson said the post was being reposted because the images attached to it had not uploaded correctly. The spokesperson also noted that the language in the post was in line with what Bessent had said in various media interviews this week. In an interview with CNBC on Thursday, Bessent said the United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal with China, but it is "not 100% done." U.S. negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Bessent told CNBC. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's Civil Service proposals are unfair and misguided
That the Civil Service is in dire need of a shake-up is accepted, at this point, across much of Westminster. The frustrations are justified. The public sector is, as George Staunton found Imperial China, felt to be staffed by those who feel that 'everything is excellent' and 'proposals for improvement would be superfluous'. This agreement stretches only as far as the sense that something must change, however. The proposals on the table for reform are deeply contested, and potentially harmful. Labour's proposal to limit Civil Service internships to those from ' lower socio-economic backgrounds ' is a retrograde step which would impoverish the pool of talent available to ministers by restricting entry based on family circumstance, and would represent another blow to the idea that parents should work for their children's futures. The Government would be better advised to hark back to the Northcote-Trevelyan report, which attempted to address a Civil Service which attracted the 'unambitious', 'indolent' and 'incapable' who did not fancy 'the competition of their contemporaries', but were attracted by 'the comparative lightness of the work'. The solutions put forward included, among other things, entrance examinations open to all, merit-based promotion, and ensuring that civil servants were fully employed to the full extent of their abilities. Such an embrace of meritocracy would surely be morally and practically preferable to further clumsy attempts at social engineering.
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
What car finance ruling means for YOU - and why you could still get compensation
The Supreme Court has largely sided with banks in a ruling involving a car finance scandal - but the issue is far from over, with huge implications for more than 20 million drivers The Supreme Court has partially overturned a landmark ruling on car finance commissions. The move will have huge implications for banks that may have faced tens of billions of pounds in compensation payouts. However, experts are poring over the ruling to assess what it means for the up to 23 million drivers who were expecting a payout. The Treasury said: 'We respect this judgment from the Supreme Court and we will now work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted. That is why we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act. These reforms will deliver a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment for businesses and consumers, while ensuring that products are sold to customers fairly and clearly.' Like all these things, the ruling was far from straightforward and is still being pored over in detail. But essentially the judges largely sided with the finance firms in the case, with all other banks breathing a sigh of relief because of what it could have meant for them too. It centred on commissions that were paid by finance firms to dealers when selling, in these cases, second hand cars. As the ruling said, there was 'either no disclosure to the customer of the existence of the commission or partial disclosure to the effect that a commission (of unspecified amount) might be paid'. The three customers involved claimed that the commissions amounted to 'bribes', or to 'secret profits' received by the dealers. Essentially, the Supreme Court was looking at whether hidden commission payments to dealers - even when the interest rate on the finance deal was set in advance - were unlawful. It could have seen compensation paid to almost all people who had bought a car on finance. Some estimates had put the potential bill at up to £45billion. However, in one of the cases the court did decide the level of commission was unfair, with all the interest to be paid back. So is that the end of it? Yes, and no. It reduces the number of people who could have potentially received compensation, and lowers the possible bill to banks and finance houses. But there is a separate - though linked - issue around how some dealers were paid bigger rewards if buyers were charged higher interest rates. These so-called discretionary commission arrangements were banned by regulators in 2021. Around 40% of all car finance deals arranged between 2007 and 2021 had this discretionary - rather than fixed - element to them. It is these cases that first led to concerns by regulators and which will now be of focus. What happens next? The Financial Conduct Authority launched an investigation into discretionary commission arrangements early last year. It had put the matter on ice until the outcome of the Supreme Court cases. It has acted swiftly by announcing it will confirm over the weekend if it will launch a scheme for victims of car finance mis-selling to get compensation. Whether there will be such a redress scheme and how it will work will be part of any consultation that takes place. How might it work, and what might I get back? These are key questions for any consultation, if such a scheme is announced. One option is for banks to go back through their records to assess which customers were affected, although this industry-led approach may well be seen as flawed. Another is almost like the PPI scandal, where firms would be forced to pay out to anyone where the discretionary commission applied. There is a good chance it will be automatic - and free - which is why people are being warned about using claims management firms that may end up taking a big chunk of any payout. Then there is the question of how much the compensation would be. It could that customers receive back the same amount as the dealer got in commission. Alternatively, it could be that the interest rate charged is compared with what it would have been had the commission not applied. The customer could then receive the over-payment, in other words the additional interest that was charged. Or it could be all the interest is paid back. Consumer champion Martin Lewis, founder of estimated the level of refunds could now be anything from £5billion to £15billion, but 'rather than the up to £45billion if the Supreme Court had upheld all of it.' He added: "My biggest message is while we wait is, don't do anything. Don't sign up to a claims form. You don't need to do anything right now. Take you hands, sit on them."
