California legislation would allow victims to sue oil and gas companies over disasters
The Affordable Insurance and Climate Recovery Act, authored by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco and Sasha Renée Pérez, D-Pasadena, accuses fossil fuel companies of misleading the public about the impact of their products on climate change.
The bill comes during the very early recovery stages of the devastating wildfires in Southern California earlier this month which have killed at least 28 people and burned more than 35,000 acres. If the measure passes, California would be the first state in the U.S. to allow for such legal action, Wiener told reporters at a news conference Monday in Sacramento.
"We are all paying for these disasters, but there is one stakeholder that is not paying: the fossil fuel industry, which makes the product that is fueling the climate change," said Wiener, flanked by consumer protection and environmental group advocates. "The fossil fuel industry has endless resources, its profits just continue to spiral and spiral into the stratosphere. And we are left holding the bag in terms of paying for these disasters."
The source: 'Hotter, drier, and more flammable': Scientists say climate change fueled LA fires
Due to the spike in climate-driven natural disasters, seven of the top 12 insurance companies in California have paused or limited new business in the last year and a half, despite rate increases approved or pending with the state's insurance department.
Under the proposed measure, people insurance businesses impacted by natural disasters may be able to recoup losses from fossil fuel corporations. Among the insurance companies would be those under California's FAIR Plan, the state insurance option for those who can't get private insurance and are considered by some as a last resort.
Wiener said fossil fuel companies need to be a part of the solution for home and business owners who lose their properties.
"By forcing the fossil fuel companies driving the climate crisis to pay their fair share, we can help stabilize our insurance market and make the victims of climate disasters whole," Wiener added in a statement announcing the bill.
Pérez pointed to the devastating impact of the wildfires, including the Eaton Fire, which burned more than 14,000 acres alone and destroyed more than 9,000 structures in her district.
"The reality is that climate change is here, and the fossil fuel industry has known this for decades," Pérez said in a statement. "Now, communities like mine are paying the price, and it's time for Big Oil to take responsibility."
Amid the tragedy: 'What America should look like:' loss in the Altadena fires, and a hard road to recovery
The suit already has its detractors. The Western States Petroleum Association, which represents oil and gas companies in five states, said it will oppose it. In a statement, president and CEO Catherine Reheis-Boyd said state lawmakers are using the wildfires to "scapegoat" the industry. The state's economy heavily depends on oil and gas, even as California looks to reduce its carbon footprint, she said.
"We need real solutions to help victims in the wake of this tragedy, not theatrics,' Reheis-Boyd said. "Voters are tired of this approach."
California State Sen. Roger Niello, R-Roseville, the vice chair of the Senate's Insurance Committee, told reporters at Monday's news conference that he takes exception to the bill.
"This furthers the false narrative that this is all about climate change. It is of course much more complicated than that," said Niello, noting he believes the state's Democratic leaders underfund forest management projects statewide and Los Angeles leaders cut funds from the fire department's budget.
"Do those issues have anything to do with the conflagration that we've seen in Southern California? I think so," Niello said. "So will Senator Wiener and Perez include in their bill the ability to sue those entities for their role in this, too?" Niello asked.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Calif. lawmakers want oil, gas companies to pay for natural disasters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
7 in 10 say false information online ‘major threat' to US: Survey
The large majority of Americans think that the spread of false information online is a 'major threat' to the U.S., topping terrorism, the state of the global economy and climate change, according to a new survey. The Pew Research Center survey, which was published on Tuesday, found that 70 percent of U.S. adults view the spread of false information online as a 'major threat' to the country. Another 24 percent said it is a 'minor threat,' while 5 percent argued it is not a threat. Many Americans also see terrorism (61 percent), the condition of the global economy (60 percent), climate change (51 percent) and the spread of infectious diseases (50 percent) as major threats to the country, the poll showed. The perception of these threats depends on the respondent's age and personal politics, pollsters found. The majority of self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents see all five issues as a major threat to the U.S., while Republicans and GOP-leaning voters do not have as much concern about the issues, apart from terrorism, according to the poll. The stark divide is on climate change, where 78 percent of Democrats say it is a major threat to the country, compared to just 24 percent of Republicans. Democrats are more likely to argue that the spread of infectious diseases, false information online and the condition of the economy are major threats to the nation compared to GOP respondents. When it comes to terrorism, Republicans are more likely to say that it is a major threat to the U.S. (69 percent to 53 percent). Americans ages 65 and older are more likely to say that the spread of false information online, infectious diseases and terrorism are major threats to the country, compared to those under the age of 30, according to the survey. The poll was conducted from March 24-30 among 3,605 U.S. adults.
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump calls Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and adds: ‘I guess I am too'
Israel in mid-June launched waves of airstrikes against Iran, hitting important nuclear facilities in Natanz and Isfahan. It killed much of the country's military chain of command along with several nuclear scientists. Then, on June 22, the United States used large bombs to strike the Iranian nuclear site at Fordo, which is buried under a mountain. A recent U.S. assessment described Fordo as badly damaged, although it is difficult to precisely gauge the extent without access to the site. Advertisement During the interview, Trump also took credit for the return of hostages held in the Gaza Strip who have been freed since his election victory in November. Hamas freed around 30 hostages during a ceasefire that began just before Trump's inauguration in January, and another captive was released in May on the eve of the president's visit to the Middle East. They were among 240 hostages taken during the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, that set off the war in Gaza. About 105 hostages were freed during an earlier ceasefire, while Joe Biden was president. Advertisement 'I'm the one that got all the hostages back,' Trump said. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, Israel's former defense minister, in November 2024, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Israel has rejected the accusations, and the State Department in June imposed sanctions on four of the court's judges in response to the warrants. Since taking office in January, Trump has frequently taken credit for resolving conflicts including those between Rwanda and Congo, between India and Pakistan, and between Thailand and Cambodia. He also announced the ceasefire between Iran and Israel that ended the nearly two weeks of back-and-forth strikes in June. In the interview with Levin, Trump said: 'I've settled six wars, and we did Iran, and I wiped out their total nuclear capability, which they would have used against Israel in two seconds if they had the chance.' He compared that record favorably with those of his Democratic predecessors. Iran has long said that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes. Though its ability to enrich uranium, which is needed for a nuclear weapon, was set back significantly by the U.S. and Israeli attacks, some experts believe Iran could eventually resume enrichment at other sites. In response to the interview, Iran's Tasnim news agency, which is affiliated with the country's Revolutionary Guard, on Wednesday described Trump's remarks on Iran as 'incoherent.' This article originally appeared in .
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
House Democrat clashes with activists over Israel 'genocide' as pro-Palestinian protests derail town hall
A moderate House Democrat's town hall devolved into chaos minutes after it began on Tuesday night, with pro-Palestinian activists clashing with both the congressman and fellow attendees in what became a near-constant torrent of interruptions and protests. Rep. Wesley Bell, D-Mo., who defeated far-left "Squad" member Cori Bush in the Democratic primary last year, repeatedly pleaded with protesters to allow him to speak while defending his position on Israel and Hamas. "Stop talking. This is not your town hall. You can leave," Bell told protesters roughly 20 minutes after he began speaking. He said soon after, "While we're sitting here being divided and fighting one another, we've got other folks out there who are taking our democracy from us." At another point, his assertions that Hamas' initial attack on Israel "was not just a terror attack, October 7 was an invasion" was met with boos and jeers from the crowd. Even calls to "surge aid" to Gaza were drowned out by demonstrators, prompting Bell to respond, "You disagree with that?" Despite repeated pleas for calm from both Bell and his moderator, protesters continued to call him a "war criminal" and accuse him of supporting genocide. The event grew more heated as the hour went on, reaching a fever pitch toward the end when Bell disputed a questioner labeling Israel's invasion of Gaza a "genocide." "You don't get to set the genocide definition," an activist yelled. Bell responded, "No, I don't…and here's the thing, people can disagree, that's what makes our country great." "When it comes to the word genocide, I kind of disagree with Israel was attacked by an openly genocidal terrorist group," he said while protesters attempted to drown him out. "Hamas said openly that they want to destroy so you're accusing somebody of genocide, you're standing with an organization that says they want to commit genocide. You don't see that?" He continued over boos, "We need to see a surge in humanitarian aid into Gaza, we need to see an end to the war. We need to see every single hostage returned, and we need to see a viable future for Gaza without Hamas." And while pro-Palestinian protesters took up a majority of the attention, there did appear to be a significant number of attendees who were supportive of Bell, particularly when he attempted to bring the conversation back to local issues. "The number one killer of kids in St. Louis between [ages] 1 and 17 is gun violence, and there's people who want to talk about that too," he said, earning applause. At one point, a woman attempted to confront the demonstrators directly. "Shut up with your White privilege," the woman could be heard yelling. "You've never been hungry, you've never had a child be hungry, and yet you want to stand here and diminish the work he's doing?" It's not clear how or if the activists responded. The town hall's moderator tried to deescalate the situation early on, calling security to escort an unruly demonstrator out minutes after it began. "Let's do this the Democratic way, the democracy way. You can't hear anyone yelling. I hear you. As a mixed-race person, I hear you," she told activists. "We can't get through this if you are yelling and barking and acting like you want to get physical." At the end of the night, however, Bell released a statement thanking all attendees for coming. "I want to thank everyone that came out to our town hall this evening – yes the conversations were passionate at times, but Democracy is messy and we have to passionately defend it," Bell wrote on X. "At the end of the day we're going to continue to fight for the ST. LOUIS region and for our country." Fox News Digital reached out to Bell's office for further comment.
