Leslie Buckley questions way that corporate enforcer investigated INM saga
Independent News & Media
(INM) chairman
Leslie Buckley
has hit out at the State's corporate watchdog after it quietly closed the file on long inquiries into the governance scandal in the company.
The
Corporate Enforcement Authority
(CEA), led by chief executive Ian Drennan, on Thursday ended 12 months of silence on a High Court report into INM, now
Mediahuis Ireland
, by saying it had resolved not to take enforcement action over the affair.
At issue was an unlawful breach of company data relating to 19 named individuals, among them journalists and former company officials. Some had come into conflict with the main INM shareholder at the time, Denis O'Brien. Mr Buckley was a close business associate of Mr O'Brien and represented his interests as chairman of INM.
Mr Buckley said there were 'serious questions' over the investigation because the CEA's predecessor – the
Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement
(ODCE) – heard only one side of the story before seeking the High Court inspection.
READ MORE
'It is regrettable that the director did not offer me the opportunity of a meeting or an interview prior to initiating the High Court inspection process,' Mr Buckley said in response to questions from The Irish Times about the CEA decision.
[
Leslie Buckley files court action against Allianz
Opens in new window
]
'This is a highly questionable approach, to say the least, from an organisation that holds itself out as a custodian of good corporate practice.'
INM was the publisher of the Irish Independent and Sunday Independent, among other titles. The affair was highly damaging to its reputation, culminating in IMM's takeover by Mediahuis of Belgium in 2019.
INM blamed Mr Buckley for the affair and started court action against him but he always denied any wrongdoing.
His statement said the then ODCE never met him before seeking the inspection, but met with former INM chief executive Robert Pitt and former chief financial officer Ryan Preston. The CEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr Buckley's remarks.
'I was not afforded an opportunity to meet with the ODCE in relation to that or any other matters, so the ODCE did not hear both sides of the story,' Mr Buckley said.
'Had the director done so, that may have given him pause for thought. The ODCE may well have received advice not to proceed with a High Court-appointed inspection process and in doing so, saved the taxpayer in excess of €5.6 million and €40 million overall in legal costs.'
Senior counsel Seán Gillane and UK solicitor Richard Fleck were appointed in 2018 by then High Court president, Mr Justice Peter Kelly, to investigate INM after confidential disclosures from Mr Pitt and Mr Preston.
The court was told INM backup computer tapes went to third parties for 'data interrogation' relating to 19 people.
Among them were journalists Sam Smyth, Brendan O'Connor and Maeve Sheehan, and former INM chief executive Vincent Crowley.
The 19 also included two Moriarty Tribunal barristers during its investigation into the award to Mr O'Brien of the State's second mobile phone licence 30 years ago.
The inspectors made their final report last July, saying 'technical breaches of the Data Protection Acts by INM were established' and that inside information was disclosed to Mr O'Brien by Mr Buckley. However, they found such matters did not amount to the affairs of INM being conducted in breach of the Companies Acts.
They said it would not be appropriate to 'speculate' on how the interrogation of data came to include the 19 names.
Mr Drennan's office published the report on July 31st, 2024. But in the months since then it repeatedly declined to say what action, if any, would be taken on foot of the conclusions.
The CEA finally set out its stance on Thursday in its 2024 annual report: 'Having considered the matter with great care and deliberation, the CEA ultimately determined that enforcement action will not be taken arising from the report.'
There was no comment from Mediahuis Ireland. Mr O'Brien's spokesman also declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
State on course for high end of multibillion EU fines as emissions reductions slow
The decline in Ireland's greenhouse gas emissions has slowed, according to fresh data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data, putting the State's likely compliance costs at the higher end of estimates, Provisional figures released on Friday by the EPA increase the likelihood that legally binding 2030 climate targets will be missed by a large margin after momentum achieved in 2023 was lost. Ireland could have to pay out between €8 billion and €26 billion to its EU partners if it does not step up climate action swiftly, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council said in February. Ireland's greenhouse gas emissions decreased by just 2 per cent in 2024, down from a 6.8 per cent figure the previous year. READ MORE The EPA warned meeting national and EU commitments will be 'extremely challenging'. Ireland's national target is to reduce emissions by 51 per cent in 2030 compared with 2018. In 2024, greenhouse gas emissions were 12 per cent below 2018 levels. Separate EPA projections in May indicated a 23 per cent reduction by decade end. Minister for Energy and Climate Darragh O'Brien told the Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy on Thursday that the latest forecasts showed the country would at best cut emissions by only half the amount required by 2030. But he accepted there was a legal requirement to meet science-based targets and to adhere to carbon budgets, adding he was not 'raising the white flag' yet. 'We have to redouble our efforts to get as close as possible to our 2030 targets,' he added. EPA director general Laura Burke said that although 2024 data is moving in the right direction, 'it is not at the necessary scale and pace'. She added: 'If Ireland is to meet our first carbon budget, a further 10 per cent reduction in emissions is needed in 2025, which will be extremely challenging.' The EPA figures show a reduction of 1.1 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2eq) compared with 2023, with reductions in most sectors – except for heating of homes and buildings. Energy including electricity continues to be the exception, with sustained reductions in line with targets. Transport and agriculture, however, reversed positive 2023 trends with modest declines compared with targets in the Government's climate plan and strict carbon budgets. In total, 54Mt CO2eq were emitted last year – excluding substantial emissions from land use and forestry. Energy industry emissions decreased by 8.9 per cent in 2024 to an all-time low of 7.2 Mt CO2eq. This was due to power generation using renewables (39.6 per cent) and increased imported electricity via interconnectors. It was also the first year that peat was not used in generation. Agriculture emissions decreased by 1.7 per cent (0.3 Mt CO2eq), primarily due to a 2.9 per cent reduction in cattle numbers. In contrast, there was a 10.6 per cent increase in nitrogen fertiliser use. Last year saw the first post-Covid decrease in transport emissions but that was only by 1.2 per cent decline, having increased by 6 per cent in both 2021 and 2022 and by 0.3 per cent in 2023. Industrial emissions decreased by 4.6 per cent due to declines in coal and oil usage. Emissions from buildings (residential, commercial and public) increased by 5.6 per cent due to a colder winter and increased use of fossil fuels. EPA senior manager Dr Tomas Murray said: 'Both agriculture and transport each require significant reductions of 5.6 and 15.5 per cent, respectively, in 2025 to meet reduction targets.' The 51 per cent reduction by 2030 target 'will be unattainable unless every sector meets their reduction target and sectoral ceiling', he added.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Student accommodation developer challenges decision to rezone land near UCD to open space
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Council's decision to rezone lands owned by a student accommodation developer from residential to open space was done for valid planning reasons, the High Court has been told. The council made the argument in defending an action brought by developer Colbeam Ltd, which is challenging the local authority's 2022-2028 county development plan arising from the rezoning decision. Colbeam has sought to build a 698-bed student accommodation complex at Our Lady's Grove, Goatstown Road, Dublin 14, which is about 850 metres from University College Dublin (UCD). The developer previously secured planning permission from An Coimisiún Pleanála for the development, but this decision was quashed following a separate, successful High Court challenge. READ MORE Colbeam had bought the site in 2017 from the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary for €13 million. The land – which had been part of a wider campus that includes Our Lady's Grove primary and secondary school – was zoned residential under the council's 2016-2022 county development plan, which was in effect at the time of the purchase, Colbeam has said. But before adopting the 2022-2028 county development plan, councillors adopted motions to rezone Colbeam's land from residential to open space. On Thursday, David Browne SC, for the council, said councillors adopted motions to rezone primarily for planning-based reasons. These included consideration for open space at the Our Lady's Grove campus and concerns about incremental development on that space. Colbeam has argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. But Mr Browne said that if the principal reason for the rezoning decision was a planning one then that was a valid decision. Mr Brown said certain remarks made by councillors in debating the rezoning motions were indicative of 'marginal' considerations in the decision to rezone and should not invalidate the decision. On Wednesday, Neil Steen SC, for Colbeam, had argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. One of these irrelevant considerations arose from purported comments made at the meeting by Fine Gael councillor Barry Saul, one of the members who initially proposed to rezone the land. In advancing the argument to rezone the lands, Cllr Saul referred to 'a failure of moral obligation' on the part of the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary to maintain a required level of open space on their lands, Mr Steen said. The open space requirement arose from an 'institutional land' designation. Mr Steen said Mr Saul made it explicit that part of his intention in supporting the rezoning was to address this 'failure'. Counsel said moral obligation was an irrelevant consideration in the decision to rezone. Mr Steen said his clients were entitled under legislation to a decision uncontaminated by irrelevant considerations. He said if the court found councillors took an irrelevant consideration into account in making the decision to rezone then the decision should be quashed. Mr Justice David Holland will give his ruling at later date.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Teacher at Dublin school and ex-partner's relationship deteriorated during alleged romantic involvement with student
Evidence was heard of the severe deterioration in relations between a teacher, who was allegedly romantically involved with a student , and her ex-partner, during the second day of a fitness-to-teach inquiry. The inquiry concerns allegations that the woman, who taught English in Dublin school, was in a romantic relationship with a Leaving Certificate student during the summer of 2018. It is further alleged that she and the student exchanged messages on the social media app Snapchat on a daily basis from June 14th to June 20th, 2018, while he was sitting his Leaving Certificate examinations and subsequently until August 14th, while he awaited his results. The teacher denies these allegations. The director of the Teaching Council also alleges that the teacher had a sexual encounter with the student on a date unknown in early August 2018, to which the teacher has admitted. READ MORE Under cross-examination by Eoghan Cole SC, for the teacher, her ex-partner alleged that the teacher cut the wires to security cameras at their home so that he could not see the student coming to the property, which he said neighbours told him they saw. He also said that the teacher damaged the handles of doors in their home, which he reported to the gardaí, and that she set up a fake account on a dating app from which she messaged him. He also said that he considered the Snapchat messages from the teacher to the student as amounting to grooming. Mr Cole provided evidence of email exchanges between the witness and the teacher from May 2019, involving the payment of bills. The witness made threats that he would put pressure on the Teaching Council and the Board of Management of the school and indicated he would organise a rally outside the school. 'You are evil and greedy. What goes around comes around,' he wrote in one email. The witness responded: 'You must remember things were difficult in the house, I was trying to buy her share in the house, there was bitterness and acrimony.' Mr Cole also put it to him that he had not been consistent regarding the dates he attributed to certain incidents in written statements he provided to the Teaching Council. The incidents included an alleged conversation between the teacher and her ex-partner in which he alleged that she admitted on the day she returned from a post Leaving Cert results trip organised by the school that she spent that night with the student. Mr Cole, who repeated the denial of the teacher that this conversation took place, further put it to the witness that his lack of consistency regarding the dates when these events took place was a basis for contending that they did not take place. The witness replied that the events did take place but that he could not be certain regarding some dates. Further evidence of the emotional toll of the inquiry became apparent when another former colleague of the teacher at the west Dublin school, and who was 'quite' close to her, gave evidence. The witness, along with another colleague who gave evidence on Wednesday, were told in October 2018 by the teacher's then partner that the teacher was or had been having an affair with the student. The witness recalled how she and her colleague then phoned the teacher from a car outside the school building. 'We were concerned for [the teacher's first name]. She answered but she was quite incoherent,' the witness said, and who after trying to compose herself before the panel, was allowed to leave the room for a time, before resuming her evidence. The chairman, Fergal McCarthy, reassured the witness: 'We understand how emotionally charged this is.' The witness, whose relationship with the teacher was now 'over', further outlined how she and her colleague, after finding out that the teacher had not informed the principal of the sexual encounter with the student in early August 2018, went to the principal with this information. 'We couldn't sit on the information, we thought we'd get into trouble. We were very naive as regards whether he was still a student in the school,' she said. The inquiry continues on Friday.
