
Teacher at Dublin school and ex-partner's relationship deteriorated during alleged romantic involvement with student
allegedly romantically involved with a student
, and her ex-partner, during the second day of a fitness-to-teach inquiry.
The inquiry concerns allegations that the woman, who taught English in Dublin school, was in a romantic relationship with a Leaving Certificate student during the summer of 2018.
It is further alleged that she and the student exchanged messages on the social media app Snapchat on a daily basis from June 14th to June 20th, 2018, while he was sitting his Leaving Certificate examinations and subsequently until August 14th, while he awaited his results. The teacher denies these allegations.
The director of the Teaching Council also alleges that the teacher had a sexual encounter with the student on a date unknown in early August 2018, to which the teacher has admitted.
READ MORE
Under cross-examination by Eoghan Cole SC, for the teacher, her ex-partner alleged that the teacher cut the wires to security cameras at their home so that he could not see the student coming to the property, which he said neighbours told him they saw.
He also said that the teacher damaged the handles of doors in their home, which he reported to the gardaí, and that she set up a fake account on a dating app from which she messaged him. He also said that he considered the Snapchat messages from the teacher to the student as amounting to grooming.
Mr Cole provided evidence of email exchanges between the witness and the teacher from May 2019, involving the payment of bills. The witness made threats that he would put pressure on the Teaching Council and the Board of Management of the school and indicated he would organise a rally outside the school. 'You are evil and greedy. What goes around comes around,' he wrote in one email.
The witness responded: 'You must remember things were difficult in the house, I was trying to buy her share in the house, there was bitterness and acrimony.'
Mr Cole also put it to him that he had not been consistent regarding the dates he attributed to certain incidents in written statements he provided to the Teaching Council.
The incidents included an alleged conversation between the teacher and her ex-partner in which he alleged that she admitted on the day she returned from a post Leaving Cert results trip organised by the school that she spent that night with the student.
Mr Cole, who repeated the denial of the teacher that this conversation took place, further put it to the witness that his lack of consistency regarding the dates when these events took place was a basis for contending that they did not take place.
The witness replied that the events did take place but that he could not be certain regarding some dates.
Further evidence of the emotional toll of the inquiry became apparent when another former colleague of the teacher at the west Dublin school, and who was 'quite' close to her, gave evidence.
The witness, along with another colleague who gave evidence on Wednesday, were told in October 2018 by the teacher's then partner that the teacher was or had been having an affair with the student.
The witness recalled how she and her colleague then phoned the teacher from a car outside the school building.
'We were concerned for [the teacher's first name]. She answered but she was quite incoherent,' the witness said, and who after trying to compose herself before the panel, was allowed to leave the room for a time, before resuming her evidence.
The chairman, Fergal McCarthy, reassured the witness: 'We understand how emotionally charged this is.'
The witness, whose relationship with the teacher was now 'over', further outlined how she and her colleague, after finding out that the teacher had not informed the principal of the sexual encounter with the student in early August 2018, went to the principal with this information.
'We couldn't sit on the information, we thought we'd get into trouble. We were very naive as regards whether he was still a student in the school,' she said.
The inquiry continues on Friday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Eight men sentenced to jail over Ireland's biggest ever drug seizure
The six men caught on board the MV Matthew with 2.2 tonnes of cocaine and two others who attempted to take the illicit load on board a second vessel in the Irish Sea have been jailed for a combined 129 years. Ukrainians Mykhailo Gavryk (32) and Vitaliy Vlasoi (33); Iranians Soheil Jelveh (52) and Saeid Hassani (39); Filipino Harold Estoesta (31); and Dutch national Cumali Ozgen (50) previously pleaded guilty that between September 24th and 26th, 2023, both dates inclusive, at locations outside the State, on board the vessel MV Matthew they possessed cocaine for sale or supply contravention of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations. The drugs have been valued at €157 million. Ukrainian national Vitaliy Lapa (62), with an address at Rudenka, Repina Str in Berdyansk, and Jamie Harbron (31) of South Avenue, Billingham in the UK pleaded guilty that on dates between September 21st and 25th, 2023, at a location within the State, he attempted to possess cocaine for the purpose of selling or otherwise supplying to another, in contravention of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2017 to 2023, made under section 5 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 and at the time when the controlled drug was in his possession, the market value was €13,000 or more. [ 'Go like f**k mate': How the MV Matthew ship and a €157 million drugs haul was seized Opens in new window ] Ms Justice Melanie Greally today sentenced Ozgen to 20 years in prison; Estoesta to 18 years; Jelveh to 17.5 years; Vlasoi to 16.5 years; Hassani to 15 years; Gavryk to 14 years; Lapa to 14.5 years and Harbron to 13.5 years. READ MORE The court previously heard that while the MV Matthew was sailing under the flag of Panama, it was owned by a Dubai-based company known as Symphony Marine'. It departed from Curacao, off the Venezuelan coast and sailed across the Atlantic before arriving in Irish territorial waters. The court also heard that an organised crime group in Dubai instructed the crew of the MV Matthew as it attempted to evade law enforcement and deliver the drugs to an Irish vessel. Despite repeated warnings from the Irish Navy, including warning shots fired from the LE William Butler Yeats, the person overseeing the operation told the crew to keep going and head for a safe port in Sierra Leone. The original plan was that the MV Matthew would deliver the drugs to a second ship, the Castlemore, but rough seas and technical difficulties caused the Irish vessel to miss the connection and later to run aground. More to follow . . .


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish in Germany are caught between starkly different perspectives on the war in Gaza
There was plenty for Tánaiste Simon Harris to discuss on Friday in Berlin with his new German foreign minister colleague, Johann Wadephul. After a chilly meeting of Irish and German foreign ministers last year, no joint press conference was planned this time around. Berlin and Dublin, traditionally close partners on EU and foreign policy, have found themselves far apart following the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7th 2023, which claimed at least 1,200 lives. In his January 2024 visit, then-tánaiste Micheál Martin suggested Berlin's view of the Gaza conflict was constrained 'by the historical prism of the Holocaust', though 'evolving'. Germany's position has evolved quite a bit further since then, with growing public outrage here over Israel's Gaza blockade, settler violence in the West Bank and a Palestinian death toll nearing 60,000. A more critical tone towards Israel from the new German government, however, has yet to be matched in any significant policy shift. The current Israel-Hamas conflict, for many Irish people living in Germany, resembles what John le Carré once called a 'looking glass war'. In their daily lives here and during visits back to Ireland, the German-Irish negotiate two separate minefields with one common denominator: dissent from the majority opinion – or attempts at differentiation in the public debate – are often denounced. READ MORE The most visible sign of tension surrounds two Irish citizens who face expulsion from Germany in connection with their alleged role in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, including a violent confrontation at a Berlin university. Their precise role in what happened there has yet to be established and, in an emergency injunction, a Berlin court has halted expulsion proceedings until after trial, likely in the autumn. That didn't stop Berlin's governing mayor Kai Wegner prejudging them, in a national newspaper, as 'anti-Semitic criminals'. Many Irish people here who join Gaza solidarity marches, as they would if they were in Ireland, report harassment in their workplace and police violence. Some face charges they view as spurious and – after 18 months and counting – the charges have neither come to trial nor been dropped. That keeps them flagged in police databases, making every re-entry to Germany a stressful business of arbitrary delays and border police questions. For them, this is official Germany's intentional chilling effect for holding the 'wrong' views on Gaza. (A similar chilling effect, critics of Israel's Gaza war say, follows German efforts since November 2023 to outlaw every public utterance of 'from the river to the sea' as an illegal slogan supporting the proscribed Hamas group. In May a Berlin court dismissed one such prosecution as a politicised endeavour lacking evidence and any legal standing.) The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict All of this is attracting outside attention. Last month the Council of Europe, the continent's leading human rights body, sent a two-page letter of concern to the Berlin federal government. Police violence, limits to freedom of assembly and 'the blanket classification of criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism', the letter warned, do a disservice to democracy and may even endanger it'. While German officials dismiss such concerns, campaigners are already collating information about the crackdown they see. And writer Maxim Biller has even devised a diagnosis for the motivation: Morbus Israel, Germany's Israel disorder. 'At the core of [this] neo-German Orient neurosis is, very loosely: Germans' disappointed love for their former victims,' he argued in a column for Die Zeit weekly. His polemical text was later removed from the Zeit website following protests over his description of the 'strategically correct but inhumane hunger blockade of Gaza'. [ An Irishman in Berlin: 'For Germans, everything is forbidden unless it allowed' Opens in new window ] As the conflict drags on, though, some Irish in Germany wonder – quietly and cautiously – if Ireland has a disorder of its own. Earlier in the conflict, before everything was eclipsed by the real and justified horror over children being starved – or shot dead by Israel soldiers – one Irish acquaintance asked: where was the Irish protest over Hamas contempt for – and human rights violations of – its own people? Given the unprecedented degradation in Gaza, such questions may seem like cynical what-aboutery. Yet another middle-aged Irish acquaintance, living in Germany as long as the Belfast Agreement, wondered aloud recently how Irish people, who resented the IRA killing people on their behalf, feel about Hamas doing the same for Palestinians? The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict. After a strange start, Germany's debate has shifted radically in recent months. The popular Bild tabloid still ignores the reality in Gaza and denounces Palestinian solidarity marchers as 'Jew haters', but other outlets offer a broader and more challenging range of views. [ Israeli foreign minister finds shifting moods as he visits Berlin Opens in new window ] On Wednesday, the Süddeutsche Zeitung daily printed a harrowing 5,000-word report on the starve-or-be-shot reality in Gaza. A day later, it ran a full-page essay by French-Israeli sociologist Eva Illouz, asking 'Is anti-Zionism a form of anti-Semitism?' With large Jewish, Israeli and Palestinian communities, Germany's Israel-Gaza-Hamas debate is messy, emotional, confused and conflicted. A diverse range of voices compete to be heard, airing grievances which not all share but are nonetheless real. Two conflicts are playing out, as Berlin arms one side and tries to feed the other. Attempting to meet two non-negotiable postwar obligations – to Israel and human dignity – has created a domestic conflict of conscience with an equally unpredictable outcome. By comparison, many Irish living in Germany perceive Ireland's debate as Irish people telling other Irish people, at no personal cost and from a safe distance, how terrible things are for the Palestinians. A recent public television poll here asked who respondents feel is responsible for the plight of the civilian population in Gaza. Some 69 per cent said the Israeli government was fully or partly to blame while 71 per cent said the same of Hamas. How would a similar poll look in Ireland? Ireland and Germany hold competing views on the conflict, yet both have considerable credibility among Palestinians and Israelis respectively. How can our two countries leverage that good will for a better future in the Middle East? That is a debate worth having.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Tour de France's version of VAR? Get ready for yellow card controversy
The 2025 Tour de France could see yellow cards issued for bad behaviour by riders thanks to cycling's answer to VAR. Every touch of shoulders, switch of wheels, dramatic acceleration and multilingual insult in the peloton will be scrutinised by a growing number of in-race cameras and UCI commissaries. As part of the UCI's bid to expand its repertoire of disciplinary and investigative tools, cards can be awarded for everything from celebrating a team-mate's win to riding on the pavement. The card system was trialled last year and is now being integrated into World Tour racing. If, during this year's Tour, a rider is given two yellow cards during the race, he may be disqualified and suspended for seven days, while any rider accumulating three cards in 30 days is liable to be suspended for 14 days. The first rider to be suspended under the new system was the Dutch rider Oscar Riesebeek, of the Alpecin-Deceuninck team, who received two yellow cards in three days in May. 'Looking back, I realise my behaviour in the race was not only wrong, but also put fellow riders at risk,' he said. READ MORE Although there are not yet referees brandishing cards in riders' faces, they are, just as in other sports, subject to a degree of interpretation. An overlong 'sticky bottle' – a rider holding on for too long to drinks bottles passed up from his team car – may also be sanctioned, although the exact time allowed remains unclear. Oscar Riesebeek. Photograph: David Stockman/BELGA MAG/AFP via Getty Images In the past high-profile riders such as the 2014 Tour winner, Vincenzo Nibali, and the former British national time trial champion, Josh Tarling, have fallen foul of race commissaries and been evicted from races for protracted 'sticky bottles'. More seriously, assault, intimidation, insults, threats, improper conduct, including pulling the jersey or saddle of another rider, or hitting them with a helmet, knee, elbow, shoulder, foot or hand, will also be sanctioned. But there have also been some accusations of over-zealous rule-making on the part of the UCI, particularly when it comes to riders raising their arms at the back of a finish line sprint, in celebration of a team-mate's success. 'What is yellow and what isn't yellow?' the sprinter Jasper Philipsen, Riesebeek's team-mate and winner of three stages in last year's Tour, said, after a crash in the Baloise Belgium Tour led to fellow rider Davide Bomboi being punished. 'He had done nothing wrong,' said Philipsen. 'Yellow was unjust and unnecessary.' But while cameras will be used to punish aggressive, dangerous or unsporting behaviour, they will also play a role in detecting any other signs of technical fraud, such as motor doping, during the race. During each stage, the UCI will run an 'incident and performance monitoring programme', effectively watching the peloton through a battery of lenses, not just for unsporting behaviour but also for unusual or suspicious body language while riding. 'Anything that arouses suspicion will be identified, enabling better targeting of checks,' the UCI said. The UCI will have multiple cameras watching the race, according to the UCI jury member and commissaire Kenneth Simonsson. UAE Team Emirate riders cycle through Lille city centre during the team presentation day on Thursday ahead of this year's Tour de France. Photograph: Anne-Christine Poujoulat/AFP via Getty Images 'We have five motorbike cameras, two helicopters and fixed cameras in the finish area, totalling 14 different feeds, during the stage. We record any incidents and share it with our jury colleagues, to discuss after the race.' This is in addition to the usual post-race bike checks on the stage winner, the leader of each classification, a selection of random riders and 'any rider who gives rise to suspicion, for example following the pre-stage control or as a result of events identified during in-race monitoring'. The UCI says this heightened strategy enables it to 'continuously monitor changes and anomalies in bike equipment and configuration,' through 'pre-race magnetometer scans, incident and performance monitoring, and post-race X-ray inspections'. The man leading the fight on motor doping, a former US homeland security investigator, Nick Raudenski, remains keen to keep a low profile at major races, but says monitoring rider behaviour is an increasingly important tool in his efforts to prevent technological fraud. The American has likened the threat of motor doping to a 'technological arms race'. The UCI president, David Lappartient, was more blunt. 'If we have a case of cheating with a motor in the bike – sorry, but it will destroy our sport,' Lappartient said in 2024. Raudenski sees VAR as an essential component for 'watching how performances happen, watching biomechanical behaviour, watching how riders are acting and how they react to us, when we do a bike check'. Aligned with the greater scrutiny is an appeal to the consciences of those working within the sport, after the UCI launched an informant reward programme last year to further accelerate investigation of technological fraud. 'We want people who have an interest in doing the right thing,' Raudenski said. 'We have to move towards a culture of integrity.' – Guardian