
Nature restoration will need farmers, family farms, and grazing animals, so where is the funding?
Bryan, Gail, and their three children have 250 dairy cows, high bushy hedgerows, lots of buzzing insects, and interestingly have not used chemical nitrogen for almost two decades. Gail brings added value to their farm income with her range of dairy soaps, Bó Bar.
They want to pass on to their children a farm that is resilient, nature-positive and productive.
Like all farm families, they are conscious of the impact of dairying in particular on climate, nature, and water.
They tell me that many of their peers knew things had to change long before the threat of the removal of the nitrates derogation had become real.
Earlier this month, the Government launched its public participation process for Ireland's first national nature restoration plan, and with it an online portal ( restorenature.ie) where they are seeking public and stakeholder views on how we might collectively and collaboratively realise this big and exciting challenge.
Much of the innovation brought about by the Daniels on their farm was achieved quietly and without much tangible recognition or reward for its co-benefits for nature and water quality.
Like me, they are more than a bit miffed with some of the commentary around the notion of ' rewilding', the idea that nature can be restored by simply abandoning land and allowing natural succession to take place.
The reality in Ireland is that most of our land is privately owned and actively managed.
During my time as minister, I visited many farms and saw our National Parks and Wildlife Service itself move more and more into the space of conservation grazing.
With forestry, we hear much now about 'the right tree in the right place', but perhaps less acknowledgement that 'the right animal in the right place' can have immense benefits for nature; on our semi-natural grasslands, on the Burren, in clearing scrub and maintaining coastal sites.
As minister, I was able to provide the NPWS with money to acquire land for nature; to extend existing national parks, buy two new ones, create new nature reserves and build a portfolio of land that is simply of value for nature.
But the State can't become the default buyer of such land, or land that is being abandoned due to lack of succession in farming.
It doesn't currently have the resources to manage an ever-expanding portfolio.
This is why we need a resourced nature restoration plan that not only informs the next CAP Strategic Plan but is embedded into it.
The NRP must also get into the belly of our Water Action Plan, our Climate Action Plan and crucially, our National Development Plan.
The State and the EU must put in place funding to provide long-term incentives for farmers to implement bespoke farm-scale measures that will benefit nature, water quality, and carbon sequestration and help us meet what are now mandatory nature restoration targets.
Nature portion of the fund raided by State
Already the signs are not good.
In its review of the National Development Plan, announced in July, it transpired that the Government had raided the nature portion of the €3.15bn Climate and Nature Fund for other purposes. Nature wasn't even mentioned.
At the same time, in the draft EU Budget for 2028 to 2034, the Commission is proposing a 20% reduction in CAP funding, with money being diverted instead towards increased spending on weapons.
One of the greatest challenges to reaching our nature restoration targets over the next decade will be abandoned land, in our uplands, on peaty soils and in coastal areas.
All of the farmers I have met want to be part of the solution, but they see little by way of the certainty they would need to have the confidence to participate in new schemes.
European Innovation Partnerships like Farming for Water and the Breeding Waders EIP, and EU LIFE Projects like Wild Atlantic Nature, are fantastic as they offer results-based payments to farmers to make improvements for nature and water.
Farmers like Bryan and Gail Daniels want to hand on a farm that is profitable and works with nature. File picture
But they cease after five to seven years, leaving no incentive to continue these actions.
Only long-term funding schemes, coupled with good advice and support, will help us achieve our collective ambition.
Back on the Daniels farm, I talk to Bryan and Gail over a cup of tea, and they tell me their wish is to hand on to their children a farm that works with nature, is profitable, and offers a good quality of life to whoever is farming it.
Whether farming in Co Kilkenny or on less productive land, farmers need to feel that they are part of the nature restoration journey; they need to be paid for their work for nature and know that generational renewal goes hand in hand with the renewal of nature.
The Government must part-fund this work and fight in Europe to rescue the next EU budget from the arms industry and put money instead into the pockets of the farm families and rural and coastal communities who will be on the front line in restoring nature on land and at sea.
Our food security and resilience from extreme weather events is surely more important than drones and missiles.
Read More
Landowners must be rewarded in State's nature restoration plan
Senator Malcolm Noonan is a Member of Seanad Éireann on the Agricultural Panel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nature restoration will need farmers, family farms, and grazing animals, so where is the funding?
A few weeks ago, I visited the Daniels dairy farm near Kilmoganny in Co Kilkenny. Bryan, Gail, and their three children have 250 dairy cows, high bushy hedgerows, lots of buzzing insects, and interestingly have not used chemical nitrogen for almost two decades. Gail brings added value to their farm income with her range of dairy soaps, Bó Bar. They want to pass on to their children a farm that is resilient, nature-positive and productive. Like all farm families, they are conscious of the impact of dairying in particular on climate, nature, and water. They tell me that many of their peers knew things had to change long before the threat of the removal of the nitrates derogation had become real. Earlier this month, the Government launched its public participation process for Ireland's first national nature restoration plan, and with it an online portal ( where they are seeking public and stakeholder views on how we might collectively and collaboratively realise this big and exciting challenge. Much of the innovation brought about by the Daniels on their farm was achieved quietly and without much tangible recognition or reward for its co-benefits for nature and water quality. Like me, they are more than a bit miffed with some of the commentary around the notion of ' rewilding', the idea that nature can be restored by simply abandoning land and allowing natural succession to take place. The reality in Ireland is that most of our land is privately owned and actively managed. During my time as minister, I visited many farms and saw our National Parks and Wildlife Service itself move more and more into the space of conservation grazing. With forestry, we hear much now about 'the right tree in the right place', but perhaps less acknowledgement that 'the right animal in the right place' can have immense benefits for nature; on our semi-natural grasslands, on the Burren, in clearing scrub and maintaining coastal sites. As minister, I was able to provide the NPWS with money to acquire land for nature; to extend existing national parks, buy two new ones, create new nature reserves and build a portfolio of land that is simply of value for nature. But the State can't become the default buyer of such land, or land that is being abandoned due to lack of succession in farming. It doesn't currently have the resources to manage an ever-expanding portfolio. This is why we need a resourced nature restoration plan that not only informs the next CAP Strategic Plan but is embedded into it. The NRP must also get into the belly of our Water Action Plan, our Climate Action Plan and crucially, our National Development Plan. The State and the EU must put in place funding to provide long-term incentives for farmers to implement bespoke farm-scale measures that will benefit nature, water quality, and carbon sequestration and help us meet what are now mandatory nature restoration targets. Nature portion of the fund raided by State Already the signs are not good. In its review of the National Development Plan, announced in July, it transpired that the Government had raided the nature portion of the €3.15bn Climate and Nature Fund for other purposes. Nature wasn't even mentioned. At the same time, in the draft EU Budget for 2028 to 2034, the Commission is proposing a 20% reduction in CAP funding, with money being diverted instead towards increased spending on weapons. One of the greatest challenges to reaching our nature restoration targets over the next decade will be abandoned land, in our uplands, on peaty soils and in coastal areas. All of the farmers I have met want to be part of the solution, but they see little by way of the certainty they would need to have the confidence to participate in new schemes. European Innovation Partnerships like Farming for Water and the Breeding Waders EIP, and EU LIFE Projects like Wild Atlantic Nature, are fantastic as they offer results-based payments to farmers to make improvements for nature and water. Farmers like Bryan and Gail Daniels want to hand on a farm that is profitable and works with nature. File picture But they cease after five to seven years, leaving no incentive to continue these actions. Only long-term funding schemes, coupled with good advice and support, will help us achieve our collective ambition. Back on the Daniels farm, I talk to Bryan and Gail over a cup of tea, and they tell me their wish is to hand on to their children a farm that works with nature, is profitable, and offers a good quality of life to whoever is farming it. Whether farming in Co Kilkenny or on less productive land, farmers need to feel that they are part of the nature restoration journey; they need to be paid for their work for nature and know that generational renewal goes hand in hand with the renewal of nature. The Government must part-fund this work and fight in Europe to rescue the next EU budget from the arms industry and put money instead into the pockets of the farm families and rural and coastal communities who will be on the front line in restoring nature on land and at sea. Our food security and resilience from extreme weather events is surely more important than drones and missiles. Read More Landowners must be rewarded in State's nature restoration plan Senator Malcolm Noonan is a Member of Seanad Éireann on the Agricultural Panel


RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Why the debate around school uniforms is far from simple
Analysis: School uniforms bring together conversations about cost, comfort, sustainability, tradition and identity that warrant closer examination This time of year brings a flurry of conversations around school uniforms, their affordability and even their purpose. For the remainder of the year, uniforms receive little media or parliamentary attention. Yet, within the walls of schools, uniforms can be central to the demands and reprimands of daily life throughout the school year. The concept of school uniforms often evokes images of shirt collars, ties, and polished shoes, a staple in Irish education and beyond. But school uniforms also bring together conversations about cost, comfort, sustainability, tradition and identity that warrant closer examination. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, discussion on the need for the school uniforms When did uniforms become a staple in Irish schools? With a long history of secret schooling (such as hedge schools) and non-school attendance, it wasn't until the early 1900s that Irish school-going children became more visible. Indeed, it was probably the arrival of free post-primary education in 1967 that truly visibilised the Irish school-going population. At that time, school uniforms were adopted by individual schools to varying degrees. Fee-paying post-primary schools were the first to introduce uniformed dress, with a style closely resembling that of private schools in the UK. Ties, collared shirts, pleated skirts, tailored trousers and woolen jumpers introduced then, remain consistent with uniform styles today. By the late 20th century, uniforms had become a feature of all post-primary schools and to a significant extent in primary schools too. Today, uniforms are commonplace across almost the entire Irish primary and post-primary landscape, a practice matched only by the UK, Cyprus and Malta in European terms. The view that uniforms somewhat 'level the playing field', is a commonly presented argument underpinning the Irish embrace of school uniforms. However, 'getting onto the playing field' has cost implications that are more affordable for some than others. From RTÉ Archives, fashion students Orla Langan, Louise Elliot and Cynthia Stewart give their old school uniforms a design makeover in a 1990 epsiode of Head to Toe The hidden cost of 'free' education While education is publicly funded, school uniforms represent an unavoidable expense for many families. The Government's Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance (BTSCFA) provides financial support to some families, but even then it often falls short of actual clothing expenses. In 2017 the Department of Education issued guidelines to reduce uniform costs by encouraging the use of generic uniforms with sew-on crests. But implementation has been inconsistent, with many schools continuing to insist on expensive, branded uniforms. When schools mandate crested or branded items from exclusive suppliers, costs increase further, undermining the principle of equitable access to education. Alongside the egalitarian argument favouring school uniforms lies the argument for sheer convenience. Uniforms provide busy parents with much needed respite from decision making and fashion pressures. While uniforms might be known for their convenience, comfort is a critical dimension, where they may not rate as highly. The material and structural compositions of uniforms are generally at odds with the types of clothing typically worn by children, making uniform clothing feel 'unusual'. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, do school uniforms lead to children getting less exercise? The rigidity of traditional uniform with shirt and tie, and stiff or irritable fabrics, may exacerbate anxiety and discomfort for some students. School uniforms are worn for long hours, yet many policies overlook this comfortability aspect and students' sensory needs. The sustainability question Fast fashion's environmental toll has thrust sustainability into the spotlight, and school uniforms are no exception. Textiles account for a significant portion of landfill waste, but initiatives such as uniform banks and recycling schemes are making strides in promoting reuse. In recent years, uniform banks have gained significant momentum at school and community level throughout Ireland. They provide a model that demonstrates the longevity of certain fabrics, the power of sharing resources and the benefits of putting those resources back into the community in a circular fashion. Uniform banks give schools and communities opportunities to become leaders in sustainable practices while also addressing school uniform affordability. From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, dealing with dirty school uniforms Uniforms as symbols of identity and control Uniforms are more than garments and some believe they symbolise belonging, discipline and even professionalism. Policies often cite benefits like reducing bullying, enhancing safety and fostering a sense of community. Yet, these same uniforms can also become tools of exclusion. Not wearing the correct uniform, or not wearing the uniform correctly, can be a source of tension between students and teachers. Equally, variations like special ties for sports teams or badges for prefects can create visible hierarchies between students. On one hand, uniforms level the playing field by mitigating the pressure to wear trendy or expensive clothes. On the other hand, strict enforcement of uniform policies can stigmatise students who are not complying, often due to financial constraints. For example, when teachers call out students for 'wearing the wrong shoes', are they simultaneously amplifying socio-economic divides? The future In Scotland, national guidance on school uniforms was issued in 2024, prioritising affordability, comfort, and sustainability. This marked a significant step in rethinking the role of uniforms in education there. Ireland, with its similar tradition of uniforms, has an opportunity to rethink the place of uniforms in its schools. The debate around school uniforms is far from simple. It raises critical questions: why has the style of uniforms remained largely unchanged for decades? Why do we persist in dressing students in attire reminiscent of bygone office cultures? Is it about maintaining control, or is there a deeper cultural attachment at play? Have we simply not thought creatively about designing modern day uniforms? Ultimately, reimagining school uniforms is about aligning them with contemporary values and ensuring that they are affordable, inclusive, and sustainable. As schools shape the citizens of tomorrow, it's time for uniforms to reflect the priorities of today.


RTÉ News
5 days ago
- RTÉ News
Concerns over proposed wind project on Laois-Kilkenny border
Two communities on the Laois-Kilkenny border say they are concerned about the environmental and health impacts of a proposed wind project in their area and are appealing to the Government to urgently update guidelines around wind energy projects. The 'NoToSeskinWindFarm' Group say they were blindsided just months ago by plans to build eight "mega turbines", stretching from Ballyragget to Durrow, impacting on the communities and people who live there. The action group, which is made up of people from the communities of Durrow, Co Laois and Ballinaslee, Co Kilkenny is one of a number of groups across the Midlands who are protesting against large wind farms in their communities. "This is an area of protected views under the Laois County Development plan, and it strictly says there should are no wind turbines in this area" said Walter Foyle from the group. "Yet this company are persisting with a planning application to build eight wind turbines, which measure 175 metres, or 576 feet," he said. "This is a very beautiful area, and it will totally blight the landscape." The planning notice by Seskin Renewable Energy Limited outlines plans for the construction of the eight turbines with a tip height of 175m , a rotor blade diameter of 150m; and hub height of 100m along with a substation and a 100m meteorological mast. The company says the project will power 36,000 homes. They are seeking a ten year planning permission and a 35 year operational life from the date of commissioning. Locals say they also have safety concerns and are worried about disruption to facilitate turbine traffic, if the proposed planning application gets the green light. A giant crane will be required to facilitate moving each turbine over houses as the road through the village is not wide enough. At public meetings they have raised concerns around the practicality of transporting and hoisting 25 tonne turbine blades over homes in the town. They have also highlighted Tae Lane, an historical area in Durrow, which will effectively be turned into a construction site. The 'NoToSeskinWindFarm' group believes the project will see native trees removed and infrastructure dismantled. "It's a hugely important historic area in Durrow and the plan for this is to fill it up with chippings, to cover the green grass, take away all the trees and the pump that's there for as long as I can remember," said Evelyn Clancy, Chairperson of Durrow Development Forum. "While they bring the turbines in, there's going to be no electricity from eight at night until six in the morning and the traffic, it's going to be mayhem," said Ms Clancy. "It's devastating for the beatifical village and it will have no benefit for any of us here at all," she added. Group say guidelines need to be updated There is also considerable concern around the size of turbines and the group say guidelines around wind energy projects need to be updated and published. "In the last 18 months, but more so in the last 12 months, the turbines being brought to rural Ireland are 175m to 200m in height," explained Walter Foyle. "In our case they are 700m from people's dwellings. If these were at sea, they would have to be placed a minimum of 15km from the shore," he said. Last year, the Government promised that new planning guidelines for wind farms would be introduced by the end the year but that hasn't happened. Guidelines pertaining to wind farm energy date back to 2006, pending finalisation of an ongoing review. "We're hoping this will not go ahead, and we're hoping to set a precedent for other areas throughout the country," said Mr Foyle. "There's a bill going through the Dáil at the moment and we are looking for support for that. "What we want is to pause this and get the guidelines updated to reflect the industrial sized turbines that are now being foisted on rural Ireland." In its planning application Seskin Renewable Energy Limited said that the development of the sites viable for wind energy development is "essential" to meet European, national and local climate targets. "Ireland needs to scale up onshore wind energy development at an unprecedented rate to achieve our 9GW target and 80% RES-E target set out in the Climate Action Plan 2025," it said. "The reality of achieving these targets requires the installation of over 600MWs of wind energy per year until 2030." "If permitted, the Proposed Development will be installed and operational before the end of the decade, adding approximately 48MW of renewable, clean energy to our national wind energy capacity," the company stated. Submissions to both Laois County Council and Kilkenny County Council against the proposed windfarm closed on Tuesday evening. A decision is due in September.