Serial petitioner seeks 'MP vote-buying' inquiry
Mr Srisuwan described this as a grave threat to democracy and the party system, urging the EC to summon those People's Party (PP) MPs who had exposed the scheme.
He said tracing phone records could quickly uncover the woman's identity, her political connections, and who directed her actions. If proven, he said, offenders could face up to five years in prison, fines of up to 100,000 baht, revocation of voting rights, and possible party dissolution under the Political Party Act of 2017.
The allegations originated from the PP's deputy leader, Sirikanya Tansakul, who disclosed that MPs had been approached with offers to sell their votes.
Khon Kaen MP Chutchawan Apirukmonkong, from the same party, later said he had been offered 10 million baht to back the 2026 budget bill and an upcoming entertainment complex bill. Payment, he claimed, was to be made in three instalments: 3 million baht upfront, 4 million after the entertainment complex vote and 3 million after the budget bill vote.
Mr Chutchawan said the offer came from a woman who first contacted him via Facebook on June 23, asking for his phone number and later inviting him for coffee.
Suspicious of the unusual approach, he engaged in conversation. The woman eventually revealed her purpose. Mr Chutchawan rejected the offer.
Despite his attempts to find out who she represented -- a specific political party, an MP, or a minister -- he said he received no clear answer.
Fellow Khon Kaen MP Weeranan Huadsri reported receiving a similar call on June 22 from a woman using the same name.
Both MPs believe the operation was orchestrated by a figure of influence and could possibly be part of a political manoeuvre to tarnish either the government or opposition.
A third MP from Nonthaburi allegedly received a comparable offer, even being presented with a contract, which he declined. All three MPs say they are prepared to cooperate with investigators and provide the phone number as evidence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
30 minutes ago
- Bangkok Post
PT rejects 'secret deal' rumours
The Pheu Thai Party (PT) denies claims that former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra struck a secret deal with Constitutional Court judges to influence the upcoming ruling in suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's case over a leaked audio clip of her conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. Prompong Nopparit, a former Pheu Thai spokesman, on Saturday dismissed the reports as a "groundless fabrication" designed to discredit both Thaksin and Ms Paetongtarn, as the courts prepare to hand down verdicts in two politically sensitive cases this month. The Criminal Court has scheduled Aug 22 for its verdict in the lèse majesté and computer crime case against Thaksin, widely perceived as the de facto leader of the ruling Pheu Thai Party. A week later, on Aug 29, the Constitutional Court will rule on whether Ms Paetongtarn breached ethical standards in connection with the audio recording. Opponents are exploiting the timing to stir distrust and confusion, Mr Prompong said, adding that dragging judges into politics could also damage the credibility of the judiciary. "Just think about it. Who would ever do such a thing? As for Thaksin's case, there's nothing there; it's not a cause for concern," he said. Regarding Ms Paetongtarn's case, he said the witness testimony, documents and explanations presented to the court were comprehensive and complete, and that all allegations could be addressed. "The prime minister has acted transparently, and nothing in the leaked clip undermines the nation's security," said Mr Prompong. The controversy stems from a recording circulated online on June 18 of a conversation allegedly between Ms Paetongtarn and Hun Sen. In it, Ms Paetongtarn appeared to make critical comments about the commander of the Second Army Region and repeatedly sought to appease Hun Sen, even expressing her willingness to yield to his demands. The complaint to the court accuses her of violating ethical standards for political office-holders. In a written clarification submitted to the court on Thursday, Ms Paetongtarn addressed a particularly contentious remark in the clip: "If there's anything you want, just let me know. I'll take care of it." She claimed the words were part of her negotiating technique, not an improper offer of favours as she sought to appease Hun Sen, a personal friend of her father's. The two families have since fallen out over the clip row. Former senator Somchai Swangkarn also refuted the rumours in a Facebook post, saying the Aug 4–9 trip by certain Constitutional Court judges to India was an official study programme, not a secret negotiation. He dismissed the claims as "completely untrue", citing clear evidence published on the court's official website about the judges' India visit. The site confirms the president of the court, along with several judges, travelled to India as part of the Executive-Level Constitutional Court Officials Training Programme (Batch 1). The delegation, he said, met India's chief justice, visited the Supreme Court and Delhi University's law faculty and paid a courtesy call on the Thai ambassador in New Delhi. Tourism and Sports Minister Sorawong Thienthong, the party's secretary-general, said Ms Paetongtarn intended to appear in court in person on Aug 21 -- her birthday -- when the inquiry session is scheduled. When asked whether Pheu Thai had prepared a contingency plan in case the prime minister faced a political mishap, Mr Sorawong responded: "Not at all. We have full confidence in the prime minister's integrity, and everything will be dealt with based on the facts. Whatever will be will be. We'll just have to wait and see." Asked about possible successors, he said veteran nominee Chaikasem Nitisiri was always prepared if circumstances required. Mr Chaikasem has previously said that anyone stepping in as a prime ministerial candidate must be fully ready.
Bangkok Post
17 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Serial petitioner seeks 'MP vote-buying' inquiry
Political activist Srisuwan Janya petitioned the Election Commission (EC) to investigate a suspected vote-buying scheme targeting MPs, following the circulation of an audio clip in which a woman is allegedly heard negotiating payments for their support on key government bills. Mr Srisuwan described this as a grave threat to democracy and the party system, urging the EC to summon those People's Party (PP) MPs who had exposed the scheme. He said tracing phone records could quickly uncover the woman's identity, her political connections, and who directed her actions. If proven, he said, offenders could face up to five years in prison, fines of up to 100,000 baht, revocation of voting rights, and possible party dissolution under the Political Party Act of 2017. The allegations originated from the PP's deputy leader, Sirikanya Tansakul, who disclosed that MPs had been approached with offers to sell their votes. Khon Kaen MP Chutchawan Apirukmonkong, from the same party, later said he had been offered 10 million baht to back the 2026 budget bill and an upcoming entertainment complex bill. Payment, he claimed, was to be made in three instalments: 3 million baht upfront, 4 million after the entertainment complex vote and 3 million after the budget bill vote. Mr Chutchawan said the offer came from a woman who first contacted him via Facebook on June 23, asking for his phone number and later inviting him for coffee. Suspicious of the unusual approach, he engaged in conversation. The woman eventually revealed her purpose. Mr Chutchawan rejected the offer. Despite his attempts to find out who she represented -- a specific political party, an MP, or a minister -- he said he received no clear answer. Fellow Khon Kaen MP Weeranan Huadsri reported receiving a similar call on June 22 from a woman using the same name. Both MPs believe the operation was orchestrated by a figure of influence and could possibly be part of a political manoeuvre to tarnish either the government or opposition. A third MP from Nonthaburi allegedly received a comparable offer, even being presented with a contract, which he declined. All three MPs say they are prepared to cooperate with investigators and provide the phone number as evidence.
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Thailand's agriculture spending faces probe
Opposition MPs have raised concerns over the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives' budget allocation, questioning a 41-million-baht investment in the development of a central agricultural market in Phayao. The comments were made during a special House session, convened to deliberate on the second reading of the budget bill for fiscal year 2026, amounting to 3.78 trillion baht. The session, chaired by House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, continued into its second day following review by the special budget scrutiny committee. During the deliberation of Section 14 of the budget bill concerning the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives' 62-billion-baht expenditure, Kittiphon Panphrommas, an MP for Nakhon Pathom from the People's Party (PP), proposed a reduction in budget allocations related to training and seminars totalling 56.27 million baht. He argued that such initiatives lacked measurable outcomes in terms of improving agricultural productivity or increasing the value of farmers' produce. Witwisit Pansuanpluk, an MP for Lamphun, also from the PP, questioned the rationale behind allocating 41 million baht to the Marketing Organisation for Farmers (Or Tor Kor) for constructing a single central market in the northern province of Phayao. He noted that this amount accounts for nearly half of the organisation's overall marketing budget. The project, he said, is part of a three-year financial commitment totalling 168 million baht. However, during a field visit on Sunday, it was found that the site -- allocated 32 million baht this year -- remains undeveloped and vacant. Mr Witwisit warned that, should the project succeed, it could lead to market monopolisation, disadvantaging farmers in neighbouring provinces. Conversely, if it fails, the facility risks becoming an abandoned "ghost market". "Why has Phayao been granted a higher investment budget than larger provinces in the North?" he asked. "The economic data shows that the value of Phayao's agricultural exports to Laos is three times lower than that of Chiang Rai and Nan. This raises a critical question about the selection of the location -- who stands to benefit from this? Was this decision driven by economic reasoning, or was it politically motivated?" he asked. Chetawan Thuaprakhon, a PP MP for Pathum Thani, queried the disproportionate allocation of funds for senior army officers' personal vehicle allowances compared to the budget for defence equipment intended to safeguard the Thai-Cambodian border. "In fiscal 2026, the Royal Thai Army has allocated 240.39 million baht for lump-sum payments in lieu of official vehicles for 694 senior officers," Mr Chetawan said.
