The real G7 story is the quiet reassertion of Canadian energy
The most surprising image from this weekend's G7 summit wasn't the formal handshakes or choreographed photo ops – it was U.S. President Donald Trump, famously allergic to multilateralism, wearing a USA-Canada lapel pin. In a world fraying under the weight of war, economic instability and geopolitical tension, this is a quiet symbol of something deeper – Canada's long-practised capacity to forge compromise amid global disorder. Our long-touted middle-power status, diminished in recent decades by falling productivity and declining military investment, has quietly reasserted itself in the Alberta Rockies.
It is fitting that the summit was held in the beating heart of Canada's energy industry. If Canada is to re-emerge as a global voice of reason and calm, there is no more powerful tool than our energy sector – a sector capable of attracting investment, creating prosperity and responsibly supplying a world increasingly hungry for secure, low-emissions energy.
So it should come as no surprise that Canadian civil society, energy executives and politicians of all stripes are suddenly aligned in recognizing both the regulatory bottlenecks that have long stalled progress – and the urgency of clearing a path to build again.
Alberta, Saskatchewan premiers push for port-to-port corridor as Carney touts energy security at G7
It's been more than a decade since Bay Street, Parliament Hill and Stampede City have danced in step like this. A new national energy consensus is in the making. By making it easier for the private sector to invest in Canada's conventional energy industry, we can build projects that will generate the revenues needed to drive innovation and reduce global emissions. In essence, we increase energy revenues today to fund the technologies of the future.
This moment of alignment is more than inspiring – it's transformative. But turning this chorus of consensus into lasting harmony requires recognizing the current global energy landscape.
Increasingly volatile commodity prices are pushing investors around the world to demand that energy companies – both conventional and clean – return capital to shareholders, rather than risking it on new long-horizon projects.
Public purses across the developed world have been strained to the point that there is little appetite to subsidize emerging energy technologies that have up until now only driven up the price of energy. And the euphoria of the Silicon Valley-style of energy venture capital born out of the pandemic has ended with a five-year hangover of lower-than-expected returns with little ability for follow-on investments into even the most promising technologies.
Opinion: For the G7, natural gas is destiny. Let's embrace it as the bridge to energy security
The trick, it would seem, would be to figure out how to mobilize private capital back into the energy industry. This is where the hard work begins for Canada to ensure that this springtime of consensus can turn into a lasting era of energy prosperity.
The good news is that Canada can leverage this unique moment to become a global model for energy investment with fresh ideas on investing in the future of energy.
As we move from overhauling the regulatory regime into driving investment, we can learn from our past to supercharge private investment in new energy projects. Taken together, the following initiatives would leverage Canada's abundant and world-class energy resources and expertise to become the world's leading hub for science and innovation, while encouraging investors to take bigger risks for bigger returns. And none of these require a single dollar of government spending.
In the 1970s, Canada implemented a flow-through share tax regime that enabled junior mining and oil and gas companies to raise large amounts of private capital while transferring their tax credits to the investors buying their shares. This resulted in several of Canada's junior resource companies expanding and unlocking generational wealth for resource communities from Sudbury to British Columbia's Highland Valley. A flow-through share program focused on Canadian energy technologies and corporate venture capital that reduce global emissions could similarly enable private capital to flow into new energy projects that drive innovation.
Opinion: Free the market for renewable energy in Alberta
In 2007, Alberta became Canada's first carbon market by establishing the Specified Gas Emitters Regulation. While flawed, it enabled Canadian energy companies to start thinking about how to drive returns in their investments by lowering emissions. Modernizing and simplifying Canada's carbon markets to allow capital to flow through could drive the next wave in Canadian emissions-reduction technologies.
In 2013, the Government of Canada introduced the Venture Capital Action Plan allocating $400-million to stimulate venture capital investment. This initiative supported four private-sector-led funds, which collectively attracted more than $900-million in private capital and invested in more than 100 Canadian startups between 2013 and 2016. Recognizing the moment of reckoning that is confronting the global energy venture-capital sector, we can similarly unlock a new wave in Canadian energy technology innovation by creating a risk-return-adjusted energy technology investment fund.
Finally, amendments to Canada's Scientific Research and Experimental Development credits could benefit technology developers and arrest Canada's frequently cited innovation problem. If these developers – typically relatively small enterprises – could transfer their tax credits to adopters of their technology, large energy companies would be incentivized to take on the risk of adopting new technologies.
What's clear now is the choice before us isn't between supporting traditional energy and embracing innovation – it's about leveraging our current strength to build future leadership. In short, we can build the new energy system by powering the existing energy one.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
6 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Guatemalan prison guards freed after being held hostage by gang members
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — Guatemalan authorities on Saturday freed nine prison guards who had been held hostage since Thursday by rioting inmates in Guatemala City, an official said. Members of Guatemala's two largest gangs — Barrio 18 and Mara Salvatrucha — began rioting Tuesday in two prisons, demanding the return of 10 leaders who had been transferred to another facility and placed in solitary confinement. José Portillo, Deputy Minister of Security, told The Associated Press that the guards released Saturday had been held by members of Mara Salvatrucha. One prison official died Friday after being shot, authorities said, without providing further details. Local media reported the shooting occurred at one of the prisons involved in the riots. Earlier this year, U.S. President Donald Trump designated Mara Salvatrucha as a terrorist organization, placing it on a list of criminal groups that he said operate in the region and threaten public safety across the hemisphere. In another similar incident, anti-kidnapping teams freed 11 guards on Wednesday who were also held hostage by gang members in two Guatemalan prisons. ___ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at
CTV News
6 minutes ago
- CTV News
Some grocery stores could stop selling alcohol ahead of new Ontario recycling program rules
A person carries in empty cans to The Beer Store in Ottawa on Aug. 16, 2025. (Kimberley Johnson/CTV News Ottawa) Some grocery stores could soon stop selling alcohol in response to a looming rule. Stores that sell liquor will be required to start accepting empty liquor bottles and cans through the Ontario Deposit Return Program starting Jan. 1, 2026, but the Retail Council of Canada is warning that some members say they aren't equipped to do that. In a statement to CTV News Ottawa, Michael Zabaneh, vice-president of sustainability with the council, says the current compensation model, which gives retailers two cents for every container, isn't enough to offset costs. 'Given the cost and operational complexities of managing alcohol returns, some retailers are reassessing whether it remains viable to continue selling alcohol at all under current or proposed deposit-return conditions,' he writes. He says the plan poses health and safety risks and is costly. Some stores also don't have the space and staff to accept beer and wine bottles. 'While retailers support improving collection and recycling rates, this must be done through well-funded and scalable alternatives,' reads the statement. Returning a few dozen beer bottles to The Beer Store on Saturday morning, Peter Finnie says he often sees firsthand how much workers handle. 'I can't think of any stores that would be set up to do what these people do,' he said. He brings cans multiple times a week to raise money for the charity he works with, the Bytown Association for Rescued Kanines – or B.A.R.K. He says the job does not look easy for those inside. 'You have people who professionally collect bottles, and they'll show up and maybe have a couple of thousand beer cans and hundreds and hundreds of wine bottles,' he said. 'Now, if they showed up at some other place, it would jam them up pretty quickly and then you got the awful smell.' In a statement to CP24 this week, the Ontario Ministry of Finance says more than 400 grocery stores and convenience stores are already participating in the recycling program with more expected to join in the coming months. The Beer Store has an agreement with the provincial government to keep at least 300 locations open until the end of 2025. It will be allowed to close an unlimited number of stores starting in the new year when the new recycling rules take effect. Those like Martha Fenton say they hope it remains easy to bring back empty bottles and cans. 'If it does close, then I don't know what I would do,' she said. 'Might have to go in my recycle bin if grocery stores or corner stores don't offer that option.'
Globe and Mail
6 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump tells Zelensky that Putin demands more control of Ukraine, urges Kyiv make a deal
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not', after a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land. After the two leaders met in Alaska on Friday, Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Putin had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said. Zelensky rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies, until now with U.S. support, have demanded. Zelensky said he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday, while Kyiv's European allies welcomed Trump's efforts but vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. Analysis: Despite Trump's impatience to broker a settlement in Russia-Ukraine War, Putin presents some obstacles to peace Trump's meeting with Putin, the first U.S.-Russia summit since Moscow launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, lasted just three hours. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up,' Trump posted on Truth Social. His various comments on the meeting mostly aligned with the public positions of Moscow, which says it wants a full settlement - not a pause - but that this will be complex because positions are 'diametrically opposed'. Russia has been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts. Before the summit, Trump had said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. Ukrainian women give birth in bomb shelters as country faces plummeting population But afterwards he said that, after Monday's talks with Zelensky, 'if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin'. Those talks will evoke memories of a meeting in the White House Oval Office in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance gave Zelensky a brutal public dressing-down. Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance. He made no mention in public of meeting Zelensky, which the Ukrainian leader said he was willing to do. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said a three-way summit had not been discussed. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, Trump signalled that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had 'largely agreed'. 'I think we're pretty close to a deal,' he said, adding: 'Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'.' Asked what he would advise Zelensky to do, Trump said: 'Gotta make a deal.' 'Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not,' he added. Zelensky has consistently said he cannot concede territory without changes to Ukraine's constitution, and Kyiv sees Donetsk's 'fortress cities' such as Sloviansk and Kramatorsk as a bulwark against Russian advances into even more regions. Zelensky has also insisted on security guarantees, to deter Russia from invading again. He said he and Trump had discussed 'positive signals' on the U.S. taking part, and that Ukraine needed a lasting peace, not 'just another pause' between Russian invasions. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed what he described as Trump's openness to providing security guarantees to Ukraine under a peace deal. He said security guarantees were 'essential to any just and lasting peace.' Putin, who has opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be 'ensured'. 'I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine,' Putin told a briefing on Friday with Trump. For Putin, just sitting down with Trump represented a victory. He had been ostracized by Western leaders since the start of the war, and just a week earlier had faced a threat of new sanctions from Trump. Trump spoke to European leaders after returning to Washington. Several stressed the need to keep pressure on Russia. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said an end to the war was closer than ever, thanks to Trump, but added: '... until (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions.' A statement from European leaders said, 'Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees' and no limits should be placed on its armed forces or right to seek NATO membership as Russia has sought. Some European politicians and commentators were scathing about the summit. 'Putin got his red carpet treatment with Trump, while Trump got nothing,' Wolfgang Ischinger, former German ambassador to Washington, posted on X. Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, a daily occurrence, while fighting raged on the front. Trump told Fox he would postpone imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but he might have to 'think about it' in two or three weeks. He ended his remarks after the summit by telling Putin: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.' 'Next time in Moscow,' a smiling Putin responded in English.
