
New threats, new protection: Rising cyberattacks push Korea to rethink digital insurance
A string of high-profile cyber incidents — from SK Telecom's data breach to a ransomware attack on Seoul Guarantee Insurance — has raised alarm over digital vulnerabilities and spurred Korean insurers to ramp up cyber coverage.
Leading the response is Hanwha General Insurance, which in November launched its Cyber Risk Management Center, the first dedicated cyber risk division established by a Korean insurer.
As part of its strategy, Hanwha formed a three-way partnership with global cybersecurity firm Theori and leading Korean law firm Shin & Kim, which operates a team specializing in digital and IT-related legal issues.
Samsung Fire & Marine has also stepped up, establishing a cyber risk team last year and launching a policy in May tailored to small- and mid-sized firms — those with under 100 billion won ($72 million) in revenue and fewer than 3 million data subjects.
Still nascent market
Despite rising threats, Korea's cyber insurance market remains underdeveloped. A 2024 report by Munich Re estimated Korean cyber premiums at just $50 million, only 0.3 percent of the global total and placing it among the smallest in Asia.
Domestically, cyber insurance accounts for just 1 percent of Korea's non-health accident insurance market.
Awareness is also low. A 2024 Korea Internet & Security Agency survey showed only 14.5 percent of companies were aware of cyber insurance, while just 2.7 percent had purchased a policy.
Yet threats are mounting. Reported incidents in Korea more than doubled from 630 in 2020 to 1,277 in 2023, then rose another 48 percent to 1,887 in 2024. In just the first half of 2025, major breaches hit SK Telecom, GS Retail, Olive Young, SGI and Yes24, exposing gaps in corporate defenses across sectors.
In Korea, many companies still downplay cyber risks, viewing insurance as a supplementary response measure rather than an essential preventive safeguard.
A KISA survey reflected worsening awareness. In 2024, only half of 6,500 companies had a data security budget, down from 68 percent in 2022. Of those, just 0.6 percent spent over 100 million won, while 75 percent spent less than 5 million.
The only mandatory policy is liability insurance for data breaches, required of firms with over 1 billion won in revenue and more than 10,000 data subjects. As of last year, only 10 percent of eligible firms — about 7,800 — were enrolled.
Even among the insured, coverage is often inadequate. SK Telecom, whose USIM breach affected 23 million subscribers, was covered for just 3 billion won, including the 1 billion won legal minimum. With USIM replacement alone estimated at 170 billion won, most of the burden remains uninsured.
Regulators are starting to take notice. At a parliamentary hearing on the SKT breach, Rebuilding Korea Party lawmaker Lee Hai-min said, 'The 1 billion won coverage under personal data compensation insurance falls far too short to meaningfully compensate consumers in large-scale hacking cases,' calling for higher limits and stronger mandates to drive preventive investment.
'Cyber risks are mostly intangible and hard to quantify, and firms tend to avoid costs tied to abstract risks. On the other end, insurers face challenges in underwriting due to their interconnectedness and large-scale losses," stated Kwon Soon-il of the Korea Insurance Research Institute, urging policy incentives such as tax benefits and premium subsidies, along with clearer terms and broader coverage for broader adoption.
The insurance industry is seeing growing demand. 'Until now, most firms subscribed only to basic liability policies, but the SK Telecom and SGI breaches have prompted many to reassess their coverage,' said an industry official.
Newer comprehensive policies are particularly gaining attention for their flexibility. They allow companies to tailor plans, such as adding emergency response coverage or avoiding overlaps with existing policies, the official added.
At Hanwha General, cyber insurance revenue doubled from November to May.
Meanwhile, Munich Re expects the global cyber insurance market to grow 37 percent to $21 billion by 2027. In Korea, it's projected to rise 80 percent to $90 million — still modest, but showing clear momentum.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Too close to Seoul to stand out? Gyeonggi bets on independent travelers to revive tourism
Gyeonggi Province, which surrounds Seoul and is home to over 13 million people, is rolling out a new strategy in hopes of attracting more international tourists. Despite being one of South Korea's most accessible regions from the capital, trouble navigating often keeps foreign visitors away. In an attempt to address the situation, the province announced its '3.3.5.5 Strategy." Despite its size, access to the DMZ, and proximity to Incheon Airport, Gyeonggi Province's share of foreign visitors dropped from 14.9 percent in 2019 to around 10 percent in 2024, according to data from South Korea's Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Seoul's share has long held at around 80 percent. Meanwhile, the country's tourism landscape has changed. Over 80.5 percent of foreign tourists in 2024 were Free Independent Travelers — those who plan trips on their own rather than booking through a group tour. In 2019, FITs made up 77.1 percent. Gyeonggi now wants to target this growing segment. The strategy sets four measurable goals: Boost international visitor share from 10 to 30 percent. Increase average stays from 2.13 days to 3 days. Raise spending per tourist from 350,000 won to 500,000 won (about $215 to $360). Improve the repeat visitation rate from 34 to 50 percent. Why Gyeonggi gets overlooked The paradox is that Gyeonggi is geographically convenient, but functionally inaccessible. Booking regional buses and trains often requires Korean-language apps or domestic credit cards. Car rentals are available, but GPS systems and maps are primarily designed for local users. Google Maps still lacks turn-by-turn navigation in Korea. Korean apps like Naver Map and Kakao Map support English, Chinese and Japanese, but often fall short for tourists unfamiliar with Korean signage or cultural context. These barriers help explain why South Korea, despite ranking No. 14 overall in the World Economic Forum's 2023 Travel and Tourism Development Index, landed at No. 60 in tourism services and infrastructure. What the province plans to fix To address this, Gyeonggi Provinceworked with national tourism agencies, universities, and research institutes to develop a four-part action plan. It includes: Improved transportation: more shuttle buses, FIT-friendly day tours, a new tourist taxi system, and a dedicated Gyeonggi tourism center in Seoul. Better digital tools: smarter booking platforms and information services for foreign users. Expanded experiences: DMZ tours, regional food programs, and new outdoor and industrial tourism offerings. Targeted marketing: a global tourism brand and campaigns focused on younger travelers. Officials say implementation will begin in 2026, starting with high-impact projects. The province also plans to work with Seoul and Incheon to create a regional tourism network and is pushing the national government to ease lodging and transportation regulations. 'Our goal is to make Gyeonggi Province a place where international visitors can explore freely and comfortably,' said Jang Hyang-jeong, the province's tourism policy director. 'We want them to discover that Korea is more than just Seoul.'


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Hyundai's US tariff headache, explained in 2 minutes
The new 15 percent tariff deal between South Korea and the US is forcing Hyundai Motor Group to fundamentally rethink its strategy in its second-largest market. With the loss of its zero-tariff edge under the South Korea-US free trade agreement, the Korean auto giant is now grappling with tough choices — from adjusting vehicle prices to relocating production of key models from Korea to the US. Tariff impacts New 15% US tariff on Korean car exports replaces previously threatened 25% duty. Hyundai Motor and Kia export 1.5 million vehicles to the US annually — about 25% of total global sales. Estimated 3-4% hit to overall profit margin, prompting strategic overhaul. No room for big price hikes Raising prices by over 3% would be needed to offset losses. But Hyundai risks losing competitiveness if it increases prices more than rivals like Toyota, which has already raised prices by $200–$270. Hyundai's pricing strategy likely to focus on regional customization, option flexibility, including removal of some standard features. Production shift on the table Hyundai is in talks with labor unions to shift production of high-demand models — especially hybrids and SUVs — from Korea to the US. All Hyundai Motor and Kia hybrid models are currently made in Korea despite surging US demand. Labor union hurdle A 1999 labor agreement requires union approval for any overseas production shift. Experts say this will need to be renegotiated due to what's described as a 'life-or-death threat' to Hyundai's export-driven business model. What's at stake Hyundai sold 28,733 hybrid vehicles in the US in July, up 38% year-on-year. Shifting hybrid production could help avoid tariffs and protect market share, but labor resistance could delay plans.


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
SK Group sells off entire Vingroup stake to secure W1tr cash
SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, has sold its entire stake in Vietnam's Vingroup, securing about 1 trillion won ($710 million) in cash, according to industry sources on Wednesday. From January through early August, SK offloaded its entire 6.05 percent stake in Vingroup via a series of block trades on the Vietnamese stock exchange, prearranged with institutional investors. Though the buyer and exact terms of the deal were not disclosed, the transaction is expected to have recouped more than its initial investment. In January, SK sold the first 22 percent of its stake for about 120 billion won, when Vingroup shares were trading at around 39,000 Vietnamese dong ($1.50). By early August, the stock price had surged 2.6 times to 104,000 dong, suggesting the remaining 78 percent was sold at a significantly higher valuation. SK had originally invested $1 billion (around 1.1 trillion won at the time) in Vingroup in 2019, becoming its fourth-largest shareholder. Analysts estimate that total proceeds could exceed 1.3 trillion won, given the share price increase and volume sold. SK is believed to have benefited from favorable currency exchange movements, as the Korean won depreciated more than the Vietnamese dong against the US dollar since the initial investment. The divestment is part of SK Group's ongoing portfolio rebalancing strategy launched last year, aimed at strengthening financial stability and reallocating capital toward future growth areas. The group has already sold its 7.1 percent stake in WinCommerce, a retail subsidiary of Vietnam's Masan Group, for $200 million in September 2024, followed by a 5.05 percent stake in Masan Group for another $200 million in November of the same year. SK is also expected to ramp up investment in new growth areas, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and semiconductors. 'Separate from the equity sales, we will maintain a strategic partnership with Vinn Group in the future growth sector,' an SK official said. SK Group has engaged in various forms of collaboration with Vingroup, the largest conglomerate in Vietnam that operates across diverse sectors including real estate development, retail, smartphones and automobiles.