Multiple Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders had received a total payout of $2.4 million after accusing a former VP of inappropriate sexual conduct
I
n 2022, the Dallas Cowboys had found themselves in a huge mess related to their former senior VP for PR and communications, Richard Dalrymple, and a number of their cheerleaders.
What followed after had sent shockwaves across the NFL community and had sparked a conversation over the safety of women in the team.
Four cheerleaders had accused Dallas Cowboys' former Senior VP Richard Dalrymple of recording them secretly while they were changing their clothes in 2015
As per reports, the Dallas Cowboys paid a whopping sum of $2.4 million to four cheerleaders who had accused the team's former senior VP for PR and communications, Richard Dalrymple of voyeurism in 2015.
Dallas Cowboys paid cheerleaders $2.4 million settlement after executive accused of inappropriate be
According to documents accessed by ESPN, in 2015, one of these four women had found Richard Dalrymple trying to record the cheerleaders changing in their locker room on his iPhone by hiding behind a partial wall.
The four cheerleaders had then approached the Dallas Cowboys' human resources department and then brought in lawyers to get justice for themselves.
With the Dallas Cowboys paying a total of $2.4 million, each of the four women had received $399,523.27.
However, the Dallas Cowboys had not fired Richard Dalrymple immediately, as he only retired in 2022.
What did the Dallas Cowboys say about the whole incident after it was revealed that the team paid millions to the four cheerleaders?
The team's spokesperson, Jim Wilkinson, had spoken to the NBC Dallas-Fort Worth about what had happened.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
These 11 Everyday Foods Might Be the Key to Knee Pain Relief
lovemyfamilymag.com
Undo
Dallas Cowboys settle allegations of locker-room voyeurism | Pro Football Talk | NBC Sports
Jim Wilkinson had said, "The organization took these allegations extremely seriously and moved immediately to thoroughly investigate this matter. The investigation was handled consistent with best legal and HR practices and the investigation found no evidence of wrongdoing.'
Wilkinson added: "If any wrongdoing had been found Rich would have been terminated immediately. The cheerleaders are a vital part of the Dallas Cowboys family...Everyone involved felt just terrible about this unfortunate incident.'
Dallas Cowboys' former Senior VP Richard Dalrymple had slammed such speculations and had maintained his innocence about entering the locker room in 2015 'by mistake'.
Also Read:
'Get off Trump's d*ck': Antonio Brown slammed for controversial take on Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom's $4 billion feud
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pahalgam terror attack: How India took down the terrorists who killed 26 civilians
A month after the Pahalgam terror attack sent shockwaves across India, Indian security forces launched 'Operation Mahadev' on May 22 to hunt down the masterminds and killers behind the Baisaran Valley massacre that claimed 26 civilian lives. The mission was launched with the specific objective of tracking and eliminating the terrorists responsible for the April 22 attack, Union Home Minister Amit Shah told the Lok Sabha on Tuesday. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Design Thinking Project Management MBA Data Analytics Digital Marketing Degree Technology PGDM Data Science Data Science Product Management Operations Management Others Finance Cybersecurity others Leadership MCA CXO healthcare Artificial Intelligence Management Healthcare Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details After weeks of coordinated intelligence and tactical operations, the mission culminated on July 28 with the killing of all three terrorists in a major breakthrough. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dhoni's Exclusive Home Interior Choice? HomeLane Get Quote 'In a joint Operation Mahadev, the Indian Army , CRPF and J&K Police have neutralised three terrorists who were involved in the Pahalgam terror attack,' Shah said, confirming the success of the mission. Shah described the Pahalgam massacre, in which 26 civilians were killed, as an act of "barbarism" and extended his condolences to the victims' families. Live Events 'Firstly, the cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians in Pahalgam, who were killed with barbarism — I condemn that attack. To the surviving family members of the victims, I extend my heartfelt condolences,' he said. India avenges Pahalgam horror: Security forces kill all 3 terrorists behind attack, confirms Amit Shah How India identified the terrorists Shah said that security forces went to great lengths to establish that the three terrorists killed on July 28 were the same individuals who carried out the Pahalgam attack. Their identities were confirmed as Suleman, Afghan, and Jibran. 'Security forces went to great extent to establish that identity of terrorists was same as those responsible for Pahalgam attack,' Shah said. Notably, the government possessed even more granular evidence. 'All three terrorists were Pakistani and we have their voter ID numbers as well. The chocolates recovered from them were also made in Pak,' he told the House. Arrests and identification Soon after the April 22 attack, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and other security agencies began making arrests of those believed to have assisted the terrorists. Individuals who sheltered or fed the attackers were either arrested or detained. These individuals later played a key role in confirming the terrorists' identities. 'NIA had already arrested those who gave them shelter. Those who fed them were detained. When the terrorists' dead bodies reached Srinagar, they were identified as the three people who carried out the terror attack in Pahalgam,' Shah said. 'The people who used to supply food to them were detained earlier. Once the bodies of these terrorists were brought to Srinagar, they were identified by those who were kept detained by our agencies,' he added. Forensic confirmation Indian agencies also relied heavily on forensic evidence to establish the link between the dead terrorists and the Pahalgam attack. The cartridges recovered from the April 22 attack site had already undergone analysis. On July 28, after the terrorists were killed, their rifles were recovered and sent for ballistic comparison. 'The FSL report of the cartridges from the terror attack was already ready... Yesterday, the rifles of the three terrorists were seized and matched with the FSL reports,' Shah said. Further confirmatory tests were conducted at a lab in Chandigarh, and the ballistic match was confirmed. 'Further tests were carried out in Chandigarh yesterday, after that it was confirmed that these three were those who carried out the terror attack,' he said.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG: 'Why not declare after Ben Stokes' hundred?' - Sunil Gavaskar slams England's 'loud talk'
Sunil Gavaskar, Shubman Gill and Ben Stokes (Images via Getty Images) India's gritty draw in the fourth Test at Old Trafford sparked a heated exchange between the two teams and now, Sunil Gavaskar has added fuel to the fire with a scathing assessment of England's tactics and attitude. The veteran India batter and commentator praised India's resilience after they were reduced to 0/2 in the second innings, eventually finishing the final day with just four wickets lost thanks to centuries from Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "I'm enormously proud of this team for what they've done. Just four wickets down. Yes, whatever the pitch might have been — good pitch, flat pitch, whatever it is — to stick around there under pressure,' Gavaskar said on Sony Sports Network. The Indian batters' decision to bat on even after the result was clear evidently irked England. Skipper Ben Stokes handed the ball to Harry Brook, who was hit for a six by Jadeja as he celebrated his hundred. When Brook offered a handshake to Sundar soon after, the batter appeared to ignore it. Ben Stokes press conference: On handshake controversy, India fightback, his own fitness England players were seen taunting the Indian duo, reportedly questioning whether Jadeja wanted to get to his hundred against Brook and Duckett. Gavaskar, however, turned the tables. He questioned England's own tactics, especially their delayed declaration. 'The question can be asked — did England bat too long before they declared?' Gavaskar said. 'When India gave them 600-plus to chase in Birmingham, some England players said they were scared. But in India, they said 'Give us 600, we'll chase.' So what happened now? India gave you 600, and you fell 336 short. That was just bravado. Just loud talk.' He also took a dig at Stokes' post-match defence that he was resting his bowlers ahead of the final Test at The Oval. Poll Do you think England's tactics were questionable during the fourth Test at Old Trafford? Yes, they were poorly planned. No, they had a solid strategy. 'So now, Shubman Gill — if he's at the media conference — I'd like him to ask: Why did you take a lead of 311? Why not declare at 240 or 250 after Stokes got his hundred? Give your bowlers an extra hour to take wickets. I hope he asks that,' Gavaskar said. 'I know he won't. He's too nice a guy. He's not like this SG (Sunil Gavaskar). That SG (Shubman Gill) is different. But this SG 100% would have asked at a media conference. And I'm asking now. ' Gavaskar's fiery words only add to the charged atmosphere between the two sides and the pointed challenge to England's approach ahead of the series decider. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Doesn't reflect well on Ben Stokes' team': Ex-England batter on antics vs India in Manchester
India batters Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar refused to shake hands with England captain Ben Stokes. (Screengrab) Former England cricketer Mark Ramprakash has criticised the English cricket team's behaviour during the final moments of the Manchester Test match against India, where stump microphone caught exchanges between players regarding Indian batters Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar 's decision to continue batting for their centuries despite England's offer to end the match in a draw. The incident occurred in the last 30 minutes of play when England captain Ben Stokes approached the Indian batters to propose ending the match early. At that time, Jadeja was batting on 89 and Sundar on 80. The Indians declined the offer and continued batting, with Jadeja going on to score his second Test century and Sundar achieving his maiden Test hundred before agreeing to conclude the match in a draw. India stay alive, England frustrated after draw; handshake drama at Old Trafford and more The stump microphone captured Stokes saying to Jadeja, "Jaddu, do you want to get a Test 100 against Brook & Duckett?" To which Jadeja responded, "What do you want me to do, just walk off?" England's Zak Crawley was also heard adding, "You can, just shake your hand." "The stump microphone and words don't reflect well on Ben Stokes' team, who, let's be fair, are doing a fantastic job of reinvigorating Test cricket. They are playing wonderfully well. The cricket has been on such high class that it is a shame to dwell on it," Ramprakash told Sky Sports. Ramprakash questioned the fairness of England's approach, suggesting a double standard might exist. "You have to wonder if England had a player on 90 not out, would we have continued. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like My Brows Look Fuller Looking Now [See Results] NULASTIN Learn More Undo We hear about England players being very proud on being on the honour boards at Lord's and other grounds because those milestones are huge achievements. I can understand where India were coming from," he said. "I think Ben was possibly a bit premature going up (to the Indian batters) in the way he did. It has to be agreed by the opposition captain," Ramprakash added. Ramprakash defended the Indian players' decision to continue batting, particularly highlighting the significance of the moment for Washington Sundar. "India had one player, Washington Sundar, who hadn't got a hundred before and I know that England side like to not think about milestones but for that player, he may never get there again. It was quite a big moment for him. And equally for Jadeja to try and get another Test hundred. They kind of earned the right to stay on, I suppose, from their point of view," he said. The match ultimately ended in a draw after both Indian batters reached their respective centuries, with Jadeja hitting a six off Harry Brook's bowling to reach his milestone. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
