Formula 1 and Lenovo trial AI-powered PC to boost technical operations
and Lenovo have conducted a successful trial of Lenovo's AI-powered
ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition
laptop at the
Event Technical Centre
(ETC) during the Formula 1 Heineken Chinese Grand Prix 2025. The trial marks a new phase in their ongoing partnership, which aims to explore advanced computing technologies in motorsport operations.
The AI-enabled device, tested on-site, supported data processing and operational efficiency during the event. Further trials are now underway, focusing on how AI-enhanced computing can assist in streamlining race-related functions and contributing to Formula 1's broader sustainability goals.
Technology deployment at F1 venues
The ETC is a temporary, portable facility set up at every F1 race venue, responsible for acquiring data and media feeds, which are transmitted to the Media & Technology Centre (M&TC) in the UK. Lenovo's hardware—including laptops, servers, tablets, and smartphones—is integrated into ETC operations to assist race personnel in monitoring and managing real-time data.
Roberto Dalla
, Chief Technical and Engineering Officer of Formula 1, stated: 'The Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition marks a significant advancement in smart technology. With
Intel Lunar Lake Platform
and Copilot+ features, the AI-enabled device is designed for high performance and energy efficiency—qualities that align with our goal of becoming net zero carbon by the end of the decade.'
Operational efficiency and environmental impact
According to Lenovo, the ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition may help reduce Formula 1's reliance on extensive hardware shipments by offering higher capability in a compact form. This could cut down on transport-related emissions, onsite power usage, and air-conditioning needs.
Dr. Tolga Kurtoglu, Chief Technology Officer at Lenovo, added, 'Through our partnership with Formula 1, we're able to push the boundaries of technological innovation in motorsports—not just to support race operations, but also to help bring fans closer to the action.'
Formula 1 and Lenovo plan to continue testing AI-driven devices throughout the 2025 season, focusing on their impact on content creation, remote collaboration, data sharing, and broadcast enhancement. The broader objective remains to improve race operations while advancing sustainable practices in the sport.
Formula 1 and Lenovo have conducted a successful trial of Lenovo's AI-powered ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition laptop at the Event Technical Centre (ETC) during the Formula 1 Heineken Chinese Grand Prix 2025. The trial marks a new phase in their ongoing partnership, which aims to explore advanced computing technologies in motorsport operations.
The AI-enabled device, tested on-site, supported data processing and operational efficiency during the event. Further trials are now underway, focusing on how AI-enhanced computing can assist in streamlining race-related functions and contributing to Formula 1's broader sustainability goals.
Technology deployment at F1 venues
The ETC is a temporary, portable facility set up at every F1 race venue, responsible for acquiring data and media feeds, which are transmitted to the Media & Technology Centre (M&TC) in the UK. Lenovo's hardware—including laptops, servers, tablets, and smartphones—is integrated into ETC operations to assist race personnel in monitoring and managing real-time data.
Roberto Dalla, Chief Technical and Engineering Officer of Formula 1, stated: 'The Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition marks a significant advancement in smart technology. With Intel Lunar Lake Platform and Copilot+ features, the AI-enabled device is designed for high performance and energy efficiency—qualities that align with our goal of becoming net zero carbon by the end of the decade.'
Operational efficiency and environmental impact
According to Lenovo, the ThinkPad X9 Aura Edition may help reduce Formula 1's reliance on extensive hardware shipments by offering higher capability in a compact form. This could cut down on transport-related emissions, onsite power usage, and air-conditioning needs.
Dr. Tolga Kurtoglu, Chief Technology Officer at Lenovo, added, 'Through our partnership with Formula 1, we're able to push the boundaries of technological innovation in motorsports—not just to support race operations, but also to help bring fans closer to the action.'
Formula 1 and Lenovo plan to continue testing AI-driven devices throughout the 2025 season, focusing on their impact on content creation, remote collaboration, data sharing, and broadcast enhancement. The broader objective remains to improve race operations while advancing sustainable practices in the sport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
AI tools not for decision making: Kerala HC guidelines to district judiciary on AI usage, ETCISO
In a landmark move, the Kerala High Court has come out with an Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policy which specifically prohibits usage of such tools for decision making or legal reasoning by the district judiciary. The High Court has come out with the 'Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary' for a responsible and restricted use of AI in judicial functions of the district judiciary of the state in view of the increasing availability of and access to such software tools. According to court sources, it is a first-of-its-kind policy. It has advised the district judiciary to "exercise extreme caution" as "indiscriminate use of AI tools might result in negative consequences, including violation of privacy rights, data security risks and erosion of trust in the judicial decision making". Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETCISO industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETCISO App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. "The objectives are to ensure that AI tools are used only in a responsible manner, solely as an assistive tool, and strictly for specifically allowed purposes. The policy aims to ensure that under no circumstances AI tools are used as a substitute for decision making or legal reasoning," the policy document policy also aims to help members of the judiciary and staff to comply with their ethical and legal obligations, particularly in terms of ensuring human supervision, transparency, fairness, confidentiality and accountability at all stages of judicial decision making."Any violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, and rules pertaining to disciplinary proceedings shall prevail," the policy document issued on July 19 new guidelines are applicable to members of the district judiciary in the state, the staff assisting them and also any interns or law clerks working with them in Kerala."The policy covers all kinds of AI tools, including, but not limited to, generative AI tools, and databases that use AI to provide access to diverse resources, including case laws and statutes," the document AI examples include ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Deepseek , it also said that the new guidelines apply to all circumstances wherein AI tools are used to perform or assist in the performance of judicial work, irrespective of location and time of use and whether they are used on personal, court-owned or third party policy directs that usage of AI tools for official purposes adhere to the principles of transparency, fairness, accountability and protection of confidentiality, avoid use of cloud-based services -- except for the approved AI tools, meticulous verification of the results, including translations, generated by such software and all time human supervision of their usage."AI tools shall not be used to arrive at any findings, reliefs, order or judgement under any circumstances, as the responsibility for the content and integrity of the judicial order, judgement or any part thereof lies fully with the judges," it further directs that courts shall maintain a detailed audit of all instances wherein AI tools are used."The records in this regard shall include the tools used and the human verification process adopted," it in training programmes on the ethical, legal, technical and practical aspects of AI and reporting any errors or issues noticed in the output generated by any of the approved AI tools, are the other guidelines mentioned in the policy High Court has requested all District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates to communicate the policy document to all judicial officers and the staff members under their jurisdiction and take necessary steps to ensure its strict compliance.
NDTV
21 hours ago
- NDTV
Kerala High Court Bans Use Of AI Tools In Judicial Decision-Making
Kochi: In a landmark move, the Kerala High Court has come out with an Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policy which specifically prohibits usage of such tools for decision making or legal reasoning by the district judiciary. The High Court has come out with the 'Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary' for a responsible and restricted use of AI in judicial functions of the district judiciary of the state in view of the increasing availability of and access to such software tools. According to court sources, it is a first-of-its-kind policy. It has advised the district judiciary to "exercise extreme caution" as "indiscriminate use of AI tools might result in negative consequences, including violation of privacy rights, data security risks and erosion of trust in the judicial decision making". "The objectives are to ensure that AI tools are used only in a responsible manner, solely as an assistive tool, and strictly for specifically allowed purposes. The policy aims to ensure that under no circumstances AI tools are used as a substitute for decision making or legal reasoning," the policy document said. The policy also aims to help members of the judiciary and staff to comply with their ethical and legal obligations, particularly in terms of ensuring human supervision, transparency, fairness, confidentiality and accountability at all stages of judicial decision making. "Any violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, and rules pertaining to disciplinary proceedings shall prevail," the policy document issued on July 19 said. The new guidelines are applicable to members of the district judiciary in the state, the staff assisting them and also any interns or law clerks working with them in Kerala. "The policy covers all kinds of AI tools, including, but not limited to, generative AI tools, and databases that use AI to provide access to diverse resources, including case laws and statutes," the document said. Generative AI examples include ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Deepseek, it said. It also said that the new guidelines apply to all circumstances wherein AI tools are used to perform or assist in the performance of judicial work, irrespective of location and time of use and whether they are used on personal, court-owned or third party devices. The policy directs that usage of AI tools for official purposes adhere to the principles of transparency, fairness, accountability and protection of confidentiality, avoid use of cloud-based services -- except for the approved AI tools, meticulous verification of the results, including translations, generated by such software and all time human supervision of their usage. "AI tools shall not be used to arrive at any findings, reliefs, order or judgement under any circumstances, as the responsibility for the content and integrity of the judicial order, judgement or any part thereof lies fully with the judges," it said. It further directs that courts shall maintain a detailed audit of all instances wherein AI tools are used. "The records in this regard shall include the tools used and the human verification process adopted," it said. Participating in training programmes on the ethical, legal, technical and practical aspects of AI and reporting any errors or issues noticed in the output generated by any of the approved AI tools, are the other guidelines mentioned in the policy document. The High Court has requested all District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates to communicate the policy document to all judicial officers and the staff members under their jurisdiction and take necessary steps to ensure its strict compliance.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Kerala High Court's new guidelines to district judiciary: 'AI tools shall not be used to...'
Representative Image. Credit: Canva The Kerala High Court has issued new guidelines for the district judiciary. These new guidelines explicitly prohibit the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to make decisions or conduct legal reasoning. This policy, which is said to be the first of its kind, marks a significant development in regulating AI tools within judicial functions. The "Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary" was introduced to ensure a responsible and restricted use of AI in judicial functions across the state, as it acknowledged the increasing availability and access to such tools. The policy advises the district judiciary to "exercise extreme caution" as "indiscriminate use of AI tools might result in negative consequences, including violation of privacy rights, data security risks and erosion of trust in the judicial decision making." The guidelines will apply to judicial officers, staff, interns, and law clerks in Kerala, and any violation may lead to disciplinary action. What Kerala High Court said in its guidelines for AI tool usage In its policy document (as seen by the Economic Times), the Kerala High Court said: 'Al tools shall not be used to arrive at any findings, reliefs, order or judgement under any circumstances, as the responsibility for the content and integrity of the judicial order, judgement or any part thereof lies fully with the judges.' 'The objectives are to ensure that AI tools are used only in a responsible manner, solely as an assistive tool, and strictly for specifically allowed purposes. The policy aims to ensure that under no circumstances AI tools are used as a substitute for decision making or legal reasoning,' the document highlighted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The document also mentioned examples of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Deepseek to note: 'The policy covers all kinds of AI tools, including, but not limited to, generative AI tools, and databases that use AI to provide access to diverse resources, including case laws and statutes.' 'The records in this regard shall include the tools used and the human verification process adopted,' the document further added. Boat Smart Ring Active Plus: DON'T BUY A SMARTWATCH AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
