logo
GFG Alliance workers across Australia face an uncertain future as Sanjeev Gupta's financial woes worsen

GFG Alliance workers across Australia face an uncertain future as Sanjeev Gupta's financial woes worsen

Months after British industrialist Sanjeev Gupta was effectively stripped of ownership of his South Australian steelworks, hundreds of workers at his New South Wales coal mine remain stood down, and those at his Tasmanian smelter are about to be.
The uncertainty is causing anger and frustration.
"The future looks grim," said Jimmy Baker, who has worked at the Tahmoor coal mine in NSW for the past 20 years.
"I hope we're back and cutting coal in no time at all. But the longer it drags on, that looks grimmer and grimmer."
Mr Baker is one of 560 workers affected by the indefinite shutdown.
While workers have been stood down with pay since February, he says he's feeling the financial strain after having to forego hundreds of dollars in bonuses.
"People think we're sitting at home [and] we're rich … [but] we're on basic pay," he told 7.30.
"By the time I pay the mortgage, child support, you're down to $60 some weeks.
The prolonged shutdown has also taken a significant toll on Mr Baker's mental health.
"My biggest fear going forward is being 52 and jobless ... what company is going to hire a 52-year-old?" he said.
"I find myself walking around the house or walking inside to outside. There are days where I really do struggle."
Sanjeev Gupta is struggling to keep his global empire afloat amid poor economic conditions and the collapse of his major financier, Greensill Capital, in 2021. His credibility has also taken a massive hit.
In February, the South Australian government took the extraordinary step of placing Mr Gupta's Whyalla steelworks into administration because bills weren't being paid. Trade and other creditors were found to be owed more than $1 billion.
The South Australian and federal governments have pledged $2.4 billion to help secure the steelworks' future.
Bob Timbs from the NSW Mining and Energy Union told 7.30 the Tahmoor mine shutdown was only meant to last weeks, not months.
"We were of the understanding that it was only going to take a couple of weeks for them to realise the further capital investment from prospective investors and that never occurred," Mr Timbs said.
Mr Timbs said government intervention was needed.
"The coal produced at Tahmoor is a high-grade coal used for steel production," he said.
"It's widely used in Port Kembla and for export and it's completely necessary for us to have the likes of washing machines, clothes dryers, cars; anything that's made out of steel is made with coal.
"We need to get it operating again. For that reason, I call on the state government to intervene and arrange a tripartite meeting between Mr Gupta, the department and myself and other stakeholders to clearly explain when he's going to start that operation back up."
The NSW government is owed royalty payments and the mine is in arrears with its water bills, a similar situation to what was faced by the SA government.
In a statement, NSW Natural Resources Minister Courtney Houssos said she had been monitoring the situation at Tahmoor closely and that it was in "everyone's best interests for GFG to quickly resolve their financing" and end the uncertainty.
7.30 understands Ms Houssos has written to Mr Gupta demanding to know the progress of refinancing and when the mine will reopen, after a previous assurance that operations would restart by May 24 wasn't met.
A spokesperson for GFG Alliance said it was working hard to secure the "funding required for a resumption of normal operations at Tahmoor Colliery".
It said the "complex process has taken longer than expected" but it would "continue to work towards finalisation of this funding" and was hopeful it would be completed soon.
In Tasmania, Mr Gupta's Liberty Bell Bay manganese smelter will stop operations for at least four weeks from the middle of this month.
Most of the 250 workers there won't be required and are expected to use their leave entitlements.
The company is largely blaming ore supply challenges after a cyclone affected its main supplier, South32 GEMCO, in the Northern Territory last year. Ore shipments have since resumed.
Independent MP Andrew Wilkie told 7.30 he was very concerned another of Mr Gupta's operations was facing problems.
"So why isn't (GEMCO) shipping ore out to Tasmania, or — and I just floated this as a genuine question — is there doubt in the mine owner's mind about the future capacity of Liberty Bell Bay or GFG Alliance more broadly to pay its bills for that ore?" Mr Wilkie told 7.30.
GFG's statement said Liberty Bell Bay had made a "declaration for ore with South 32 GEMCO for the remaining six months of the year" and was "now working through the contractual process".
"We are continuing to work closely with the federal and Tasmanian governments through a joint taskforce as we deal with the residual impact of inventory and market challenges over the last several months," the statement said.
Andrew Taylor worked at the manganese smelter for 43 years before retiring 18 months ago. He's worried about his former colleagues.
"They're salt of the earth people. It's not right," Mr Taylor told 7.30.
He said people were nervous given what they'd seen happen at Whyalla and Tahmoor.
"It is extremely stressful for people in the community, extremely stressful."
University of Sydney corporate law and insolvency professor Jason Harris told 7.30 that since the collapse of Greensill Capital, Mr Gupta's GFG Alliance has faced increasing difficulty securing finance.
"He's having to turn to second, third and fourth tier lenders," Professor Harris said.
The UK's Serious Fraud Office is investigating the relationship between GFG Alliance and Greensill Capital over suspicions of fraud, fraudulent trading and money laundering.
GFG Alliance has denied any wrongdoing.
"One of the features of Mr Gupta's global empire is that it is very opaque ... so lots of companies that have dealings with each other and often not a lot of independent, transparent reporting of financial results," Professor Harris said.
"We're seeing multiple entities in different group structures in often very different businesses that are all experiencing significant financial distress at the same time.
"It certainly seems to be a house of cards.
Professor Harris said Australian authorities like ASIC should be asking questions.
"At some point, I think we're entitled to ask, where were the gatekeepers here? Why weren't more questions asked?" he said.
"Because the media has certainly been asking questions about the sustainability of Mr Gupta's empire for years and yet creditors keep lending him money, governments keep giving him handouts, and I think the public is entitled to ask why."
A spokesman for ASIC said it was aware of the situation regarding the Whyalla Steelworks and GFG Alliance and was "continuing to monitor and evaluate the situation".
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Second Festival Plaza tower receives planning approval despite heritage concerns
Second Festival Plaza tower receives planning approval despite heritage concerns

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Second Festival Plaza tower receives planning approval despite heritage concerns

A 38-storey office building with shops, restaurants and a public plaza is set to tower over South Australia's Parliament House, after the concept was granted planning approval despite a number of concerns raised by the government's heritage agency. The State Commission Assessment Panel (SCAP) granted planning consent to developers Walker Corporation on Wednesday to build a 160-metre-tall skyscraper in the Festival Plaza precinct, directly behind Parliament House. The tower, scheduled for completion in 2027-28, is expected to accommodate up to 5,000 office workers and will stand alongside Walker Corporation's 29-storey "Festival One" office tower which opened in 2024. The new 38-storey building will feature outdoor dining areas and retail tenancies on the ground-floor, an elevated plaza space on level one, commercial office space from levels six to 16 and 19 to 35, and a restaurant on level 36. The SCAP — a panel of planning experts appointed by the State Planning Commission to assess major CBD development applications — determined the Festival Tower plan was not "seriously at variance" with the planning code, according to minutes of its meeting published on Thursday. The panel granted the project planning consent subject to nine conditions, five of which were heritage matters concerning the relationship between the tower and Parliament House. The Malinauskas government strongly backed Walker Corporation's proposal after asking the company to revise its earlier plan for a three-storey retail hub that would have stretched across the northern facade of Parliament House. Planning Minister Nick Champion said the SCAP approval was "unambiguously good news for the state", adding that the Festival Plaza will be "vibrant and teeming with people" once the tower is finished. "We want to activate this plaza and office workers will do that," Mr Champion said. "They will provide the customers for food and beverage, they'll wander down to the theatre after work, they'll have drinks in bars in the train station and in town. "This will bring vibrancy to the square and activity to the square, it will make this beautiful place even more vibrant and welcoming." The second Festival Tower has not been without controversy, particularly due to its size and location on public land between the Adelaide Festival Centre and Parliament House. A self-described coalition of 125 eminent South Australians, headlined by former Labor premier Lynn Arnold, campaigned against the tower and argued the Festival Plaza should be "open and civic in character". The SCAP's approval also comes despite a number of concerns raised by the government's heritage agency, Heritage SA, about the impact the tower would have on Parliament House, a national heritage place. In a submission to the SCAP, Heritage SA raised concerns that the "visual dominance" of the proposed tower would leave views of Parliament House's northern facade "compromised". "The currently open setting to the north of Parliament House will be enclosed by the tower, compromising the historic landmark scale of Parliament House along the North Terrace boulevard," Heritage SA's principal heritage architect Michael Queale wrote. Government planning officer Ben Scholes, who prepared a summary report for the SCAP on the development, noted Heritage SA's concerns but said the agency had "not directed refusal of the application". "Instead, through detailed conditions to be assigned to any Planning Consent granted, Heritage SA has recommended design amendments to mitigate the concerns raised," Mr Scholes wrote. "This position from Heritage SA, while highlighting significant impacts, indicates that these impacts may be considered manageable and would be capable of resolution through design adjustments, rather than representing a fundamental incompatibility with policy expectations." Mr Scholes said the Walker Corporation proposal represented a "delicate balance" between the strategic vision for the precinct and heritage impacts. He added that the proposal was "not considered to be so fundamentally inconsistent or materially detrimental to the heritage and cultural values of Parliament House" to be "seriously at variance" with the planning code's heritage policies. "The circumstances of this application are consistent with this precedent, where a balance between strategic aspirations and heritage values was implicitly accepted." Mr Champion said the heritage conditions imposed on the planning consent primarily relate to the building materials that "will be used to match the features of Parliament House". "Every indication that we've had from Walker [Corporation] is that they care about complimenting the … heritage features of Parliament House," he said. "That was one of the things that was worked on a lot by the Government Architect and the Design Review Team … a lot of thought going into that as we blend the old and the new." The ABC has contacted Walker Corporation for comment. The SCAP's approval marks one of the final stages of the redevelopment of the Festival Plaza precinct — a process that began in 2014 when Walker Corporation entered a partnership with the state government to redevelop the Festival Plaza car park. That preceded a public-private partnership to upgrade the Festival Plaza's public realm, followed by construction on the 29-storey Festival One tower, which is now home to Flinders University and Deloitte. Early works behind Parliament House are already underway to prepare for the construction of the second tower, which is planned to hold 1,354 car parking spaces and around 47,000 square metres of office space. The second Festival Plaza building will rank among Adelaide's tallest buildings when completed. At 160-metres in height, the tower would eclipse the city's current tallest building, Frome Central Tower One, which stands at 138-metres-tall in the east end of the CBD. An even taller 180-metre, 37-storey hotel was given planning consent last year for construction behind the Freemasons Lodge at 254 North Terrace.

NSW auditor-general Bola Oyetunji warns NSW failing to reduce harm from gaming machines
NSW auditor-general Bola Oyetunji warns NSW failing to reduce harm from gaming machines

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

NSW auditor-general Bola Oyetunji warns NSW failing to reduce harm from gaming machines

The NSW government is failing to reduce harm from the pervasive gaming machines that fill out the state's pubs and clubs, a troubling new report has found, with punters losing a massive pot of $8.4bn in just one year. Auditor-general Bola Oyetunji's Regulation of Gaming Machines report, released on Thursday morning, also reveals that the number of gaming machines across the state has increased in the past two years despite an explicit legislative push to reduce the number of machines. 'NSW had 87,749 gaming machines in operation in clubs and hotels at June 2024,' the report states. 'This means the total number of machines operating in clubs and hotels could increase by almost 8000 and remain within the current legislative cap. 'The total number of gaming machines operating in clubs and hotels has increased in each of the last two financial years by a total of 958 machines.' The push to reduce the number of machines comes from the passage of the Gaming Machines Act in 2001. At that time, there were more than 100,000 machines in operation. Despite the fall to about 88,000 machines today, NSW continues to far outstrip other jurisdictions in the number on offer to punters and the decline rate is slow at about 598 machines per year. 'At this rate, it will take more than 55 years for NSW to reach parity with the national average for gaming machines per 1000 adults,' the report states. In 2023-24, the machines generated $8.4bn in profit for pubs and clubs, with the patron losses 'disproportionately concentrated' in lower socio-economic areas in Greater Sydney. The Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority and the Department of Creative Industries, Tourism, Hospitality and Sport are responsible for regulating machines, and the auditor-general found the agencies were failing to effectively support 'harm minimisation' outcomes. 'The department's strategy for regulating gaming machines is not based on a clear understanding of current levels of gambling harm and it does not set any targets for reducing harm associated with gaming machines,' the report states. 'The department does not have benchmarks, targets or other performance measures in place to assess outcomes against key measures of harm minimisation. 'There have been no evaluations of its compliance programs to measure their impact on harm minimisation outcomes. 'As a result, the department does not know whether its regulatory strategy is effective in minimising gambling harm.' In one example, the auditor-general found regulators had not conducted 'frequent inspections' of regional venues. 'The majority of gaming machines and gaming machine losses are in the Greater Sydney region but there is also a high risk of gambling harm in some regional and rural areas,' the report states. The state has 12 inspectors, all of whom are based in Greater Sydney. Gambling harm levels were not falling, the report also stressed. 'For example, calls to the GambleAware Helpline increased by 8.5 per cent in 2023-24 and gaming machine losses have increased in each of the last three years,' the report states. 'The results of the 2024 NSW Gambling Survey did not indicate a reduction in the level of gambling harm in NSW.' The auditor-general recommends several changes to improve compliance and reduce harm, setting a June 2026 deadline for the government. For the department, the report recommends 'establishing baselines and targets' for gambling harm minimisation. It also calls for a review into the state's gaming machine forfeiture scheme to ensure it is achieving the legislative objective of reducing the number of machines in the state. The scheme requires the compulsory forfeiture of some gaming machine entitlements when they are transferred between venues. For the Liquor and Gaming Authority, the auditor-general recommends it begin periodic reviews of licence conditions for venues that host machines in the highest risk locations to make sure they align with gambling harm minimisation.

Tasmanian election called for July 19, but both Liberals and Labor hamstrung on key issues
Tasmanian election called for July 19, but both Liberals and Labor hamstrung on key issues

ABC News

time11 hours ago

  • ABC News

Tasmanian election called for July 19, but both Liberals and Labor hamstrung on key issues

After a nail-biting few days of "will they, won't they, could they, should they," Tasmania's very, very early election is full-steam ahead. Except this one can't exactly be full steam, can it? After all, it's an election that nobody wanted brought on for a variety of reasons, including the dire state of Tasmania's budget situation. That was one of the reasons for Labor's successful no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff. Imagine making that a sticking point and then throwing cash at a bunch of bowls clubs (they're always on the funding list). If the major parties want to look like they're serious about getting Tasmania's finances back on track, they are going to need to avoid any form of pork barrelling. No matter how tempting. The Liberals have been accused of it the past three elections. Their response is to deny it's happening and insist they're simply listening to the community. Labor also made promises to sports clubs last election, but the plan was to have government departments "rigorously" assess them all before the funds were handed out. On top of that, Labor has said it wants to ban pork barrelling as part of its plan to fix the budget, it would be rather hypocritical to engage in it itself. But it's not just pork barrelling that arguably needs to go. Even a competitive sports grants process, which would otherwise be welcomed, could be a little on the nose, given the state barely has a cent to spare. And we all know that pool of money would not be up for grabs if it were not for an election. The other issue is the Liberals have just put out a budget. We know what they were planning to spend the money on, and where. Sure, they can change some things up — but how many sweeteners can they really surprise us with? So if they can't focus it on all the cash they want to drop, or their savings plans, that leaves policy. The Liberals have already begun to rethink theirs. Starting with privatisation. The premier announced just last Saturday the Liberals will not privatise any state-owned companies, and will in fact legislate so a two-thirds majority of parliament is required to sell them. Clearly they know going to an election with a "we want to explore privatisation" agenda is unlikely to win them many fans. It was also one of the reasons listed on the no-confidence motion. But how many other unpopular policies can they really rethink? The May decision to walk away from a treaty process was deeply unpopular among some Aboriginal groups, but there's no policy fix for the bungled process around the new Spirit of Tasmania ferry terminal, for example. The party's most unpopular position, an undying support for the almost billion-dollar Macquarie Point stadium, is unlikely to change. Lucky for the Liberals, Labor has taken the same stance, so it can't be used against them by the only other party viable to form government. But while the Liberals are trying to reconsider policies, Labor is going to need to come up with some (more). The party has been grappling with being stuck in the political wilderness for over a decade now. It lost the last election just 15 months ago. Badly. So, naturally, all policies are under review. With a little more notice of this election, it might have spent some time polishing them off, but it is partially responsible for this mess after all. When it comes to offering up something fresh, Labor's got the advantage of having a new leader, and as Dean Winter likes to remind everyone, "Labor has changed under me". Now is his time to really prove it. He certainly gained some kudos from the public for bringing the Spirit of Tasmania saga to light and has made it clear that the party backs workers. His mantra is almost "jobs, jobs, jobs". But the party still needs to figure out its position on a lot of issues. For example, just last month Mr Winter could not say if Labor was for or against a treaty. His argument was he could not take a side without consultation, but the issue is not exactly new. And Mr Winter has to transition from criticism to having solutions — fast. And answer questions such as whether Labor still wants to pause new permits for whole-home short-stay accommodation. Unclear. Or, what the plan is to cut the amount the state pays on locum doctors? Or, how it would go about closing the Ashley Youth Detention Centre if it's suddenly thrust into power. It is also a rare day when the party talks about what used to be some of its core issues — health, housing and education. And while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese talks about the need to balance industries and the environment, Mr Winter's pro-industry mantra can come across as "jobs at any cost". But where there is a void, there is always someone else happy to fill it. In this case, that is the Greens and other environmentally conscious crossbenchers. The same goes for the stadium. It is the crossbench who will be rewarded for their anti-stadium stance, and if the polls are anything to go by, it is a large crowd to capitalise on. But for how many Tasmanians will the stadium be their number one issue? Considering the Liberals' stuff-ups are fresh in people's minds, and Labor is copping a lot of the blame for the early election, the crossbench could very well benefit from voters' frustrations. But Tasmanians annoyed about the election also have a reason to take their anger out on the crossbench. Because, as much as the Greens and other independents like to spruik the power and benefits of minority parliament, most of them played a hand in blowing up that parliament less than halfway through its term. How can voters trust that won't happen again soon? Little about this election is going to be normal. But like it or not, in just over a month's time we're being dragged to the polls. No-one is coming into this unscathed and the end result is still anyone's game. Whatever the result, those 35 politicians owe it to Tasmanians to make it work for longer than 15 months, whatever it takes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store