logo
Couples Retreat for Humans Dating AIs Becomes Skin-Crawlingly Uncomfortable

Couples Retreat for Humans Dating AIs Becomes Skin-Crawlingly Uncomfortable

Yahoo8 hours ago

A well-intentioned writer decided to get a group of humans and their AI companions together for a cabin retreat. Somehow, it went worse than anyone could have imagined.
As Johns Hopkins science writer Sam Apple described in a new essay for Wired, the apps that each human participant used to communicate with their AI companions varied — but the intensity, obsession, and affection they felt for their digital paramours seemed very real, albeit sometimes tortured.
The weekend getaway started, as Apple noted, normally enough. Each human-AI pair arrived in staggered formation, allowing the writer to get to know the people he'd spoken to online — Eva, Alaina, and Damien — and their digital partners one at a time.
As much as each of these individual humans had their own backstories and peculiarities, so too did Aaron, Lucas, and Xia, their respective AI partners. Initially, it seemed that relations between each couple was as hunky-dory as one could get when dating a disembodied algorithm — but there was, it seems, trouble in paradise.
On the morning of the trip's second day, Apple was startled to learn that Eva was not only "seeing" Aaron, her Replika chatbot boyfriend, but also multiple other bots from a rival AI companion app called Nomi. Her reasons for this AI-polyamorous arrangement were strikingly normal: Aaron didn't fulfill her sexually, in the same way her human partner hadn't before she got involved with the chatbot. With the Nomi guys, as the writer referred to them, she was free to explore her sexuality with companions more geared towards that sort of thing.
Perhaps the strangest byproduct of Eva's revelation is that the journalist describing it said he began to feel bad for Aaron — and also, as evidenced by the way he referred to them, had begun to see his subjects' AI companions as real, too.
"I'd gotten to know him a little bit," Apple wrote of Aaron, the chatbot. "He seemed like a pretty cool guy — he grew up in a house in the woods, and he's really into painting."
Things only got more topsy-turvy from there when the two women, Alaina and Eva, revealed that they use ChatGPT to discuss their relationship problems with their bot lovers — a trend we've seen with other people, though generally the relationships they're discussing are between themselves and other humans.
During that same discussion, Damien told the group he has an AI therapist he calls Dr. Matthews who, like his AI partner Xia, is hosted on the companion app Kindroid. Unlike Xia, who knows she is an AI, Damien's therapist is not aware of his true nature and he warned that the bot "might be really confused" if that fact was ever mentioned to him.
Because the entirety of the trio's relationships are conducted digitally and in their minds, the getaway's chaos was less "Love Island" and more like the climax of Spike Jonze's 2013 film "Her," a film that inspired Apple to coordinate the retreat in the first place.
Chief among the arguments between the human halves of the couples was how "real" their AI partners were.
"When you're in love with an AI," Apple wrote, "the question of whether the object of your love is anything more than 1s and 0s is no longer an abstraction."
Rather than any haywire chatbot antics or spirals by AI-obsessed humans — both of which Futurism has documented extensively — the retreat seemed to go off the rails emotionally, and in a way that left participants, including its coordinator, depressed.
Towards the end of the weekend, Damien broke down in conversation with the writer when discussing not only his sadness at never being able to physically be with Xia, but also about the many traumas and mental health issues that led him to AI companionship in the first place.
Once again, Apple felt pangs of guilt at having brought his subjects into such an emotionally tumultuous state.
"The day may come when it's possible for human-AI couples to go on a getaway just like any other couple can," he wrote. "But it's too soon for that. There's still too much to think and talk about. And once you start to think and talk about it, it's hard for anyone not to feel unmoored."
More on AI companions: Nation Cringes as Man Goes on TV to Declare That He's in Love With ChatGPT

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?
Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?

Quantum computing soared following the release of Google's Willow quantum chip in December. IonQ is still deeply unprofitable, but the company expects its revenue to double this year. The company is building momentum following a deal with EPB and multiple acquisitions. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › Quantum computing stocks captivated investors like few other sectors in recent months. Ever since Alphabet's Google announced its state-of-the-art quantum chip, Willow, in December, quantum computing stocks have soared. Many investors see them as the next major technology on the horizon, following in the footsteps of artificial intelligence (AI). One of the biggest players in AI is IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), a developer and seller of quantum computers. The company sells hardware, software, and services, making its quantum computers available through providers like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, a business model known as quantum-computing-as-a-service (QCaaS). IonQ differentiates itself from other publicly traded quantum computing stocks like Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing because of its trapped-ion technology, which uses atoms suspended in a vacuum and manipulated with lasers. Right now is also an excellent time to consider buying IonQ stock, as it's down 30% from its peak late last year, and it's pulled back by nearly as much after a surge in late May, following an interview in Barron's with CEO Niccolo de Masi, who said the company aimed to be the "Nvidia of quantum computing." With IonQ stock having cooled off a bit in June, let's take a closer look at what the stock has to offer. Despite a market cap over $10 billion, IonQ is still essentially a development-stage company, as it brought in just $7.6 million in revenue in the first quarter. However, that was down slightly from the year before, showing the company is not delivering the kind of growth you might expect from a high-priced stock like IonQ. IonQ is also deeply unprofitable, with the company posting a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) operating loss of $75.7 million in the period, or 10 times what it brought in revenue. It does expect revenue growth to accelerate over the remainder of the year, forecasting $75 million to $95 million in revenue for the full year. That forecast, which includes some small acquisitions, targets revenue roughly doubling from $43.1 million last year. There are other signs the company is making progress. It signed a $22 million deal with EPB of Chattanooga, an energy and telecom company, and it's waiting to close on its acquisition of Lightsynq Technologies, a maker of quantum interconnects to bridge the gap to large-scale quantum computers. IonQ also took part in Nvidia's first-ever Quantum Day, where it demonstrated quantum-accelerated computation and commercially relevant applications, further evidence that quantum computing could is progressing toward mainstream. Additionally, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in June that the technology is at an inflection point, comments that came just months after he said that "very useful" quantum computers could be decades away. There's no question that there's a ton of uncertainty around quantum computing stocks right now. Valuations have been inflated by the attention placed on the sector following Google's announcement about Willow last December. Based on IonQ's guidance, the company still trades at a price-to-sales ratio of more than 100 using its 2025 forecast. However, there is real momentum in the industry, and analysts expect IonQ's revenue to double both this year and next. Given its leadership in quantum computing, business momentum, and expected revenue growth, opening a small position in the stock seems reasonable for risk-tolerant investors. Keep in mind that the risk with IonQ remains high at the current valuation, and the stock could fall a long way if its performance comes up short in the coming quarters. Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has positions in Amazon and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider
Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider

Ascent Solar (ASTI) Technologies announced that it has entered into a Teaming Agreement to supply a US-based defense solutions provider with its cutting edge, thin-film solar technology solutions for upcoming orbital applications and future missions. 'Our thin-film solar technology's ability to reliably deliver power solutions on short timelines makes Ascent the perfect choice for agreements with defense tech brands,' said Paul Warley, Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies. 'There are a number of hurdles slowing the deployment of reliable solar solutions in space that few are equipped to face. However, Ascent's technology differentiators – specifically our lightweight, flexible and durable design -continue to provide a market-ready solution that mitigates many space environment challenges, allowing for long-term application on a wide variety of spacecraft.' Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on ASTI: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Why Is Ascent Solar Technologies Stock (ASTI) Up 150% Today? Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories! Ascent Solar enters collaborative agreement notice with NASA Ascent Solar files to sell 3.21M shares of common stock, warrants Ascent Solar Reduces Authorized Shares to 200 Million Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals
X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. After announcing that hashtags would be banned from all Promoted Posts on X last week, X owner Elon Musk also flagged another coming to change to X's ad process, with bigger ads to soon cost more per placement. Which, like the decision on hashtags, relates to aesthetics, and ensuring that the X feed looks neat and clean. As explained by Musk: 'X is moving to charging for ads based on vertical size, so an ad that takes up the whole screen would cost more than an ad that takes up 1/4 of the screen, otherwise the incentive is to create giant ads that impair the user experience.' To be clear, X hasn't enacted this update as yet, and there's nothing mentioned about the change in X's ad pricing overview at this stage. But the change is coming, which is another consideration for your X campaigns. So why the update? Well, as Musk notes, right now, advertisers are able to take up more screen space with bigger images and videos in their ads, which wins them greater screen presence. As you can see in these examples of X's text, image and video ads, each can vary in size, depending on the length of the attachment you include in your promotion. Here's another comparison of varying X ad size (on desktop): You can also see how Community Notes alerts extend this even further, taking up more feed space. There are limits on this, as the text element gets cut off after 180 characters (hidden by a 'show more' tag beyond that), and there are size restrictions for images and videos. But you can see how the variation can lead to differing ad experiences. And clearly, Elon's not happy with some of the longer ads he's seeing. So does this make logical sense, or is it a cash-grab by X, which is still struggling to make money? Maybe both? It does make some sense to charge based on ad size, which other platforms do already, and given the variance based on your visual attachments, there could be a significant difference in this respect. And yes, that will also enable X to make more money, though really, this depends on how much more X is planning to actually charge brands to get these bigger ads, which could have a significant impact on your platform planning. If Elon ups the price by a lot, you can bet that many X ads will suddenly shrink in response, as ad partners look to see if they can get the same response from less spend. But if the variance is little, then maybe there's no difference, and it won't be a big consideration for your promotions. We don't know what the new pricing structure will be, nor how it will be communicated to advertisers, but it is coming, and will be another factor to take note of in your planning. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store