Stankiewicz/Crowe review — dazzled by this five-star all-baroque evening
A top-level orchestra is so much greater than the sum of its parts that one often forgets that its parts — the individual players — are pretty sensational by themselves. This glorious, packed-out concert at the Wigmore Hall was a reminder.
The main box-office draw was probably the soprano Lucy Crowe, and in an all-baroque programme she certainly wasn't outshone. She delivered a series of testing Bach and Handel arias with such grace, agility, theatricality and wit that the notes seemed to leap off the page, and across the centuries, as though the ink were still wet.
In the Handel numbers she was required to be a raging sorceress, goaded to dastardly threats by a fanfaring trumpet, or a cooing bird, fluttering delicately above the stave, or a tempestuous lover. Bach, of course, required a more chaste parade of personae: a joyous bride and a soul searching for Christ. Whatever the character, Crowe made it utterly gripping within seconds.
Yet her performance was less than half the story of this concert. Next to her, and frequently matching her for razzle, dazzle and endlessly inventive trills and ornaments, was Olivier Stankiewicz, released from duty as the principal oboist of the London Symphony Orchestra and seemingly determined to cram as many prestissimo semiquavers as possible into his night of freedom.
And alongside him were 11 fellow instrumentalists, also drawn from many distinguished ensembles and clearly revelling in this exuberant feast of 18th-century chamber music. Prime among them was the Polish violinist Maria Wloszczowska, usually to be found leading the Royal Northern Sinfonia in Gateshead. She was a spirited and imaginative foil for Stankiewicz in the Bach Double Concerto for oboe and violin. She also established a wild, rustic atmosphere in a Vivaldi Oboe Concerto that was twisted this way and that in mood and tempo, and all the more exhilarating for it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit
US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government. WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that American policymakers may start to rely on. As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Mr Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect on Aug 7 . Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on imported goods has grown dramatically so far in 2025 . Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated US$152 billion (S$196 billion) through July, roughly double the US$78 billion netted over the same time period in fiscal year 2024 , according to Treasury data. Indeed, Mr Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed in July , which are expected to cost the government at least US$3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Mr Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than US$2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that does not happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Live: Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty in case involving ex-transport minister Singapore The past and future of Choa Bungalow, a 'last reminder' of Marine Parade's former shoreline Multimedia How Singapore is rethinking nature in the city Business Are Gen Z-ers in Singapore worried about generative AI coming for their jobs? World Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price Singapore No plans to fully liberalise cross-border ride-hailing services between Singapore and Johor: LTA Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am World Hamas says it will allow aid for hostages if Israel halts airstrikes, opens humanitarian corridors 'I think this is addictive,' said Professor Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' Mr Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Mr Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the United States away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That is because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year. 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Mr Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Mr Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Mr Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Mr Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri , recently introduced legislation to send US$600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Mr Trump said in July of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social program, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Mr Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogramme.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the United States, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Mr Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The country's Cabinet will hold a special meeting on Aug 4 to discuss its next steps. ZURICH - The Swiss government is open to revising its offer to the United States in response to planned heavy tariffs, Business Minister Guy Parmelin said, as experts warned the 39 per cent import duties announced by President Donald Trump could trigger a recession in Switzerland. Switzerland was left stunned on Aug 1 after Mr Trump hit the country with one of the highest tariffs in his global trade reset , with industry associations warning of tens of thousands of jobs being put at risk. The country's Cabinet will hold a special meeting on Aug 4 to discuss its next steps, with Mr Parmelin telling broadcaster RTS that the government would move quickly before the US tariffs are imposed on Aug 7. 'We need to fully understand what happened, why the US president made this decision. Once we have that on the table, we can decide how to proceed,' he said. 'The timeline is tight, it may be hard to achieve something by the 7th, but we'll do everything we can to show goodwill and revise our offer,' he added. Mr Parmelin said Mr Trump was focused on the US trade deficit with Switzerland, which stood at 38.5 billion Swiss francs (S$61.7 billion) in 2024, with Switzerland buying US-liquefied natural gas (LNG) among the options under consideration. Another option could be further investments by Swiss companies in the United States, Switzerland's biggest export market for its pharmaceuticals, watches and machinery. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore No plans to fully liberalise cross-border ride-hailing services between Singapore and Johor: LTA Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore The past and future of Choa Bungalow, a 'last reminder' of Marine Parade's former shoreline Multimedia How Singapore is rethinking nature in the city Business Are Gen Z-ers in Singapore worried about generative AI coming for their jobs? World Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran World Hamas says it will allow aid for hostages if Israel halts airstrikes, opens humanitarian corridors 'Look at the European Union, they promised to buy LNG. Switzerland imports LNG too – maybe that's one path,' Mr Parmelin said. 'Maybe more investments. But to be sure it's a strong enough basis for continuing talks, we have to fully understand what the US expects.' Both Mr Parmelin and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter were also ready to travel to Washington to pursue talks if necessary, he added. Swiss officials rejected reports that the higher than expected tariffs were imposed after a bad-tempered telephone call between Ms Keller-Sutter and Mr Trump late on July 31. 'The call was not a success, there was not a good outcome for Switzerland,' a government source told Reuters. 'But there was not a quarrel. Trump made it clear from the very beginning that he had a completely different point of view, that 10 per cent tariffs were not enough. 'We are working hard to find a solution and are in contact with the American side,' the source added. 'We hope we can find a solution before August 7.' Tariffs would have a huge impact on Switzerland's export-orientated economy and raised the risk of a recession, said Prof Hans Gersbach, an economist at ETH, a university in Zurich. Swiss economic output would be reduced by 0.3 per cent to 0.6 per cent if the 39 per cent tariff was imposed, a figure which could rise to above 0.7 per cent if pharmaceuticals - which are currently not covered by the US import duties - were included. Prolonged disruptions could shrink Swiss GDP by more 1 per cent, he said. 'There would be a risk of a recession,' he said. Swiss shares are expected to be hit by the tariffs news when the stock market reopens on Aug 4 after being closed during the Swiss National Day holiday on Aug 1. The tariffs could also see the Swiss National Bank cut interest rates in September, said Nomura. 'We expect one more 25bp policy rate cut from the SNB in September, which would take the rate to -0.25 per cent,' the bank said. 'A hit to growth from US tariffs on exports would likely weaken economic growth and cause further deflation pressures, adding to the likelihood of easing to a negative policy rate.' REUTERS
Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
Renewed sectarian clashes in south Syria kill four: Monitor
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The province witnessed deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouins in July. DAMASCUS - Renewed sectarian clashes in southern Syria's Druze-majority Sweida province killed at least four people on Aug 3, a war monitor said, as Damascus accused local groups of violating July's ceasefire. The province witnessed deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouins in July that drew the intervention of government forces and tribal fighters who came to support the Bedouins. A ceasefire put an end to the week of bloodshed – which killed 1,400 people, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights – but the situation remained tense, flaring into violence again on Aug 3. The Observatory said three Syrian security forces personnel were killed 'as clashes erupted with local factions around Tal Hadid in the western Sweida countryside'. The Observatory also reported the death of a 'local fighter'. Tal Hadid, controlled by government security forces, is a 'key control point' at a relatively high altitude, according to the monitor, allowing whoever holds it to overlook neighbouring areas. Fighting also erupted around the city of Thaala, the Observatory said, 'following bombardment of the area with shells and heavy weapons launched from areas under the control of government forces, while the sound of explosions and gunfire was heard in various parts of Sweida city'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore No plans to fully liberalise cross-border ride-hailing services between Singapore and Johor: LTA Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore The past and future of Choa Bungalow, a 'last reminder' of Marine Parade's former shoreline Multimedia How Singapore is rethinking nature in the city Business Are Gen Z-ers in Singapore worried about generative AI coming for their jobs? World Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran World Hamas says it will allow aid for hostages if Israel halts airstrikes, opens humanitarian corridors Syrian state-run news agency Sana accused Druze groups loyal to influential spiritual leader Hikmat al-Hijri of breaching the ceasefire by attacking government troops in Tal Hadid, killing one security forces officer and injuring others. In a statement, the Syrian interior ministry accused local groups of 'launching treacherous attacks against internal security forces in several locations and striking some villages with rockets and mortars, resulting in the killing and wounding of a number of security personnel'. A security source told Syrian state television that government forces regained control of Tal Hadid and other areas that were attacked on Aug 3. 'Force inhabitants to comply' According to the monitor and Sweida locals, Damascus has been imposing a siege on the province, with the Observatory saying the government wants to 'force inhabitants to comply'. On Aug 1, Sweida residents held protests across the province to demand the withdrawal of government forces and the opening of an aid corridor from neighbouring Jordan. The road linking Sweida to Damascus has been cut off since July 20. Damascus accuses Druze groups of cutting it, but the Observatory says armed groups allied with the government took control of the area and have been blocking travel. The United Nations was able to send some aid convoys to the province, but an interior ministry source told Syrian state television on Aug 3 that the humanitarian corridor was temporarily closed 'until the area is secured after outlaw groups violated the ceasefire'. Syria's minority communities have expressed concerns for their safety since December, when an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime Syrian ruler Bashar al-Assad, who had presented himself as a protector of minorities. While the new Syrian authorities have repeatedly stated their intent to protect all of the country's ethnic and religious groups, the killing of more than 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians along the coast in March and the violence in Sweida have raised doubts about their ability to manage sectarian tensions. The government has said it will investigate July's violence in Sweida, and a committee in charge of the inquiry held its first meeting on Aug 2. AFP
