logo
A Canine Gem operator put on probation, ordered to pay $15K in restitution

A Canine Gem operator put on probation, ordered to pay $15K in restitution

Yahoo30-01-2025
PLATTSBURGH — Hilary A. Davis, the operator of former animal rescue A Canine Gem in Beekmantown, which 49 dogs were seized from in February 2024 due to poor conditions, was sentenced Wednesday for five charges relating to the incident.
Davis was given probation and must pay fines and restitution, but she avoided prison time.
DOG HEALTH ISSUES
The charges stem from her mistreatment of dozens of dogs at her animal rescue facility, A Canine Gem, at 30 Ashley Road in Beekmantown. After receiving complaints about the condition of the dogs at that location, the Clinton County Sheriff's Department seized 49 of them Feb. 26, 2024.
Following the seizure, the dogs were temporarily housed at the Clinton County Jail in a cell pod that was not being used for inmates while they recovered from a variety of health issues.
While the condition of each dog varied, many were reportedly found malnourished and crammed into small cages with bare cement floors, causing several to have injuries and issues to their paws.
According to veterinary evaluation documents, other health issues found in the dogs ranged from emaciation, respiratory infections, hair loss, wounds, eye infections, umbilical hernia, ear mites, heartworm symptoms and heart murmurs to overgrown nails, dehydration, dermatitis, dental problems, matted coats, smelling of urine and happy tail.
Two of the 49 dogs eventually had to be put down — one due to a heartworm ailment, the other due to a throat tumor — the rest have since been adopted out.
After several court appearances in Beekmantown Justice Court last year, Davis's case made its way to Clinton County Court in November of 2024, where she pleaded guilty to one charge of second degree forgery, a felony, and four charges of overdriving, torturing and injuring animals, (failure to provide proper sustenance) under Agriculture and Markets Law section 353, all misdemeanors.
Since then, a negotiated plea agreement between Davis, her attorney Nicholas Evanovich of LaMarche Safranko Law in Plattsburgh, and the Clinton County District Attorney's Office was reached.
DEAL REACHED
In county court Wednesday, Judge William Favreau agreed to go along with the terms of that plea and sentenced Davis to a five-year felony term probation, a $5,000 fine, — the maximum allowed by law — a mandatory $300 surcharge, $50 DNA fee and a $25 crime victim fee for the felony charge.
Favreau also ordered Davis to pay a $12,000 restitution to Elmore SPCA for the shelter's role in taking care of the 49 dogs when they were seized, with $7,500 to be paid that same day, and a $3,000 restitution fee to the Clinton County Sheriff's Office.
'Those are agreed upon amounts,' Favreau said.
'The actual cost to those agencies, just in terms of the stress upon the sheriff's department and Elmore SPCA, far outweighed those numbers for restitution.'
A 10-year prohibition on owning, harboring or having custody or control of any animals, with the exception of her 12 companion animals she already has, was imposed on Davis as well. The prohibition also includes the breeding of animals Davis has been allowed to own, Favreau said.
Additionally, Elmore SPCA leadership requested a provision in the prohibition that says Davis must provide proof of proper care for the animals she owns, including proof of spaying/neuter certificates, vaccinations records, tests for diseases and any other medical forms that could be requested by the Probation Department. Favreau granted that request.
For the four misdemeanors, Favreau imposed a three-year misdemeanor term probation for each charge; these probation terms will run concurrent to the five-year probation.
ELMORE CONCERNS
Ahead of sentencing, assistant district attorney Kurt Reh had read a victim impact statement on behalf of Elmore SPCA's Executive Director Becki Moss-Patnode.
In the statement, Moss-Patnode said how she wanted to be a voice for the voiceless — the dogs — and detailed how tough the first hours and days were for them after being rescued.
'The eyes of these dogs had no sparkle to them, their bodies struggled for energy,' she wrote.
'However, within days of being with us, those ravenous dogs started to realize that food was coming. Instead of frantic and panicked barking, there was silence and they started calmly lying by their doors for us to come around with their breakfast and dinners. We vaccinated them and began treatment for their illnesses, parasites that plagued them. Their bodies had changed. They gained weight, and their fur started to shine. They became playful, and that glow slowly but surely returned to their eyes.'
Davis also spoke on her own behalf before sentencing and called the incident a 'sad situation I'm very sorry for.'
'I'm an honest person with no criminal record, not even a traffic ticket in the last 20 years,' she said.
'This situation is a very sad one for all involved, and I'm truly sorry for this. I have tried very hard to be a pillar in this community.'
An emotional Davis said she has been in the animal rescue business since December of 1996 and helped find homes for 'over 15,000' animals including dogs, cats and horses.
'Saving animals has been a passion of mine for most of my adulthood,' she said.
JUDGE COMMENTS
However, Davis's statement did not seem to move Favreau, who said 'I don't know how to take those comments, Ms. Davis.'
'If you were that good at what you were doing for so many years, since 1996 to this event in 2024, how could it go so sideways? Unless, throughout those years, there were many other animals that suffered,' he continued.
'Anyone who cares for animals, it's impossible to understand how they could let it get so far out of control. This really affected the community and a lot of people, who have their own pets, pet lovers, were shocked at the sheer number of animals who had to be rescued from your own rescue operation.'
After Davis's court appearance was over, Moss-Patnode said they were happy to get $12,000 in restitution but added the costs of care far exceeded that amount.
Of the punishments handed down, Moss-Patnode said, 'Unfortunately, New York state law really doesn't take animal cruelty seriously, so until those laws change, I don't think much will change.'
'So we're happy with what we could get, and that there is a felony charge involved in any animal cruelty case.'
LESSONS
Moss-Patnode questioned whether or not Davis had learned a lesson from the situation.
'Honestly, I really question whether or not she was in rescuing for the right reasons, and I am hesitant to say that she feels the remorse that she claims that she does,' she said.
'Typically, with experience comes greater knowledge of what you're doing. So the fact that she's been doing this since the '90s, and this was the outcome of all of it, is definitely concerning.'
Moss-Patnode remains concerned, as well, about Davis's 12 dogs she was allowed to keep.
'Especially since comments were made that she has dogs that are too young to be spayed and neutered, that concerns me,' she said.
'Do I think she probably takes care of her own dogs? Yeah, I do believe that she probably loves her own dogs, but I am always concerned that additional sales or adoptions will happen through her.'
Davis's request for an interstate transfer to Georgia has raised alarm bells for Moss-Patnode and Elmore SPCA staff, too.
'My understanding is that she has moved from place to place, and that there was a presence in Vermont prior to her coming here,' she said.
'So I am definitely concerned, and I know that the team at Elmore is also concerned about her moving to Georgia and having a similar situation happen.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump ally fighting for criminal investigations of Obama, Biden and Clinton
The Trump ally fighting for criminal investigations of Obama, Biden and Clinton

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Trump ally fighting for criminal investigations of Obama, Biden and Clinton

For three years, Mike Davis, a Republican lawyer and former legal counsel to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has pushed for federal criminal investigations of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and senior FBI, CIA and Justice Department officials. Now, a series of recent investigations approved by Attorney General Pam Bondi suggests to Davis that his long-sought goal is most likely approaching. Bondi this month approved two federal criminal investigations of New York Attorney General Letitia James and one of Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Bondi also instructed an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election. Bondi's order came weeks after National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama and his aides of a 'treasonous conspiracy' and said she had sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department. Davis applauded Bondi's actions in a recent interview. 'This is the greatest conspiracy in American history,' he said, referring to what he says are Democratic plots against President Donald Trump. 'There must be the most severe legal, political and financial consequences for this unprecedented weaponization. This must never happen again.' Bondi's office and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Obama, Biden, Clinton and former FBI, Justice Department and CIA officials have repeatedly dismissed the allegations. Democrats say new probes are an effort to distract attention from allegations that Trump has abused his power in his second term and from his failure to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Former senior Justice Department and FBI officials note that a Trump-appointed special counsel and Republican senators already investigated the claims and found no crimes. They called the idea 'absurd,' 'bananas' and 'insane.' Davis said he is unaware of Bondi's next step. But he praised the recent party-line Senate confirmation of a new U.S. attorney in South Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, whom he called a personal friend and urged senators to support. 'I want Jason to set up his own grand jury and pursue this aggressively,' Davis said. 'And I want him to put criminals in prison for a very long time.' Road map for a Florida federal investigation Davis called for Quiñones to convene a special federal grand jury in Port St. Lucie, the seat of St. Lucie County, which Trump carried by 10 percentage points last year. It would investigate what he calls a Democratic conspiracy to undermine Trump stretching from the 2016 campaign to the 2022 FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago estate to today. Quiñones, a Miami-Dade County judge appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis a year ago, is a former federal prosecutor in Miami and a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. He was a major crimes prosecutor but received poor performance evaluations, The Miami Herald reported. Quiñones filed and dropped a racial discrimination complaint and moved to the Civil Division, where he received satisfactory reviews. Quiñones and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Viewing the Mar-a-Lago search as part of a decadelong anti-Trump conspiracy serves a legal purpose, legal experts said. It could allow prosecutors to treat alleged acts from 2016 and 2017 as part of a single conspiracy and bypass a five-year statute of limitations on denial of rights charges. Davis said a 'conspiracy against rights' federal criminal charge could be used in the Florida investigation that he called for Quiñones to open. A special grand jury could investigate whether actions by Clinton and Obama in 2016 and 2017 violated Trump's rights as part of a single broad, anti-Trump conspiracy by Democrats that Davis believes includes the Mar-a-Lago search and continues today. Legal experts have noted that the "conspiracy against rights" charge was created by the Enforcement Act of 1870, which Congress passed to prevent white people from blocking freed slaves from voting. Davis said special counsel Jack Smith used the same charge when he accused Trump of trying to illegally reverse the outcome of the 2020 election in seven states that he lost. 'The Democrats set the precedent that former presidents are fair game,' Davis said. Three former FBI and Justice Department officials with direct knowledge of the Mar-a-Lago search told NBC News that it was conducted properly and approved by a federal judge and that it was the result of Trump's own actions. The officials said the National Archives first alerted them that Trump appeared to have classified materials. Trump then declined repeated requests to return the classified documents for a year. A former senior Justice Department official dismissed Davis' calls for a criminal investigation of the Mar-a-Lago search. 'It's outrageous,' the former senior Justice Department official said. Multiple investigations of Democratic rivals underway Three people familiar with the matter confirmed to NBC News this month that the Justice Department has opened a federal criminal investigation of lawsuits the office of James, New York's attorney general, filed against Trump. James has dismissed the Justice Department investigation, which is based in Albany, as political payback. The James probe is examining whether the state attorney general's office committed 'conspiracy against rights' and violated Trump's civil rights when it brought a lawsuit that claimed Trump grossly inflated the values of his assets for personal profit. A Manhattan judge ruled last year that Trump did so and ordered him to pay a roughly $500 million fine, a ruling that infuriated him. Separately, the Bondi Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation in Virginia into possible mortgage fraud by James and another into Schiff in connection with an allegation of potential mortgage fraud in Maryland. James and Schiff have said the investigations are political retribution. Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a Trump loyalist who represented Jan. 6 defendants and praised Trump's mass pardons of them, to oversee both probes. Could Democrats be indicted and convicted? Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor and Columbia Law School professor whom Republicans have accused of conspiring with former FBI Director James Comey, said filing criminal charges based on debunked claims is possible. 'If you're willing to ignore the facts,' Richman said, 'you can come up with criminal charges.' But Richman cautioned that securing a federal indictment, trial and conviction — even in areas where the majority of voters voted for Trump — would be difficult given the many actors and elements involved. Prosecutors need indictments from grand juries, judges can dismiss weak cases, witnesses must be credible, and jurors must unanimously agree on guilt. 'Jurors take their duties seriously,' Richman said. 'I'm not ready to say the people in these jurisdictions are totally in the tank for this administration.' A former senior national security official who spoke anonymously, citing the Trump administration's public attacks on former officials, suggested two potential scenarios: 'Either Bondi and Gabbard know that there is indeed no evidence of any criminal activity, in which case it's completely corrupt and a political stunt,' the former official said, 'or, more darkly, they actually believe this stuff and are acting out of authoritarian instinct and this is something out of Orwell.' This article was originally published on

Newsmax Settles Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit for $67 Million
Newsmax Settles Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit for $67 Million

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Newsmax Settles Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit for $67 Million

The move comes after the network was sued for defamation for claiming that the latter's technology was used to rig the 2020 presidential election Newsmax has agreed to pay $67 million to settle a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion's lawsuit stemmed from the network's false claims that its voting technology was used to rig the results of the 2020 presidential election. More from TheWrap Newsmax Settles Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit for $67 Million David Geffen Responds to Ex-Husband's 'Ludicrous and Contrived' Lawsuit: 'Petty Gossip and Salacious Lies' UTA Vice Chairman Jay Sures Ordered to Pay $150K in Legal Fees to Pro-Palestine UCLA Grad Student Paramount Countersues 'Top Gun: Maverick' Writer's Cousin, Who Claims He Wrote Key Scenes Per a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Newsmax will pay out the settlement in three installments over the next two years, including a $27 million payment already made on Aug. 15, $20 million on or before Jan. 15, 2026 and $20 million on or before Jan. 15, 2027. 'We are pleased to have settled this matter,' a Dominion spokesperson told TheWrap. In April, Judge Eric Davis ruled that Newsmax ran more than two dozen defamatory and false statements about Dominion following the 2020 election. However, Davis said that a jury would need to decide on whether Newsmax was liable for actual malice and whether Dominion could collect punitive damages. A trial was expected to start later this year. In a statement, Newsmax said it believed it was 'critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' adding that it stands by its coverage as 'fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' The network also said Davis 'ruled in ways that strongly favored the plaintiffs and limited Newsmax's ability to defend itself' and that the Delaware Court 'effectively enforced a confiscation of our property because our reporting was not always sympathetic to Joe Biden.' Additionally, it argued that actions taken against Newsmax – and Fox News who settled a separate lawsuit with Dominion for $787.5 million – represent a 'direct attack on free speech and a free press' and that the judiciary's 'willingness to punish news organizations for reporting on matters of urgent national debate undermines the role of the press in a free society.' 'With these matters resolved, Newsmax is positioned to continue its mission: delivering accurate reporting, fostering vigorous debate, and ensuring Americans have access to diverse viewpoints,' the statement concluded. 'At a time when public trust in media is at historic lows, our commitment to balanced reporting, coverage of critical issues facing Americans and open dialogue has never been more important.' In addition to Dominion, Newsmax also agreed to pay $40 million to settle another defamation lawsuit from the election voting systems company, Smartmatic, last year. Shares of Newsmax, which are up 5.5% during Monday's trading session, are down 84.7% year to date. The post Newsmax Settles Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit for $67 Million appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword

Obama, Biden and Clinton criminal investigations are most likely approaching, Trump ally says
Obama, Biden and Clinton criminal investigations are most likely approaching, Trump ally says

NBC News

timea day ago

  • NBC News

Obama, Biden and Clinton criminal investigations are most likely approaching, Trump ally says

For three years, Mike Davis, a Republican lawyer and former legal counsel to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has pushed for federal criminal investigations of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and senior FBI, CIA and Justice Department officials. Now, a series of recent investigations approved by Attorney General Pam Bondi suggests to Davis that his long-sought goal is most likely approaching. Bondi this month approved two federal criminal investigations of New York Attorney General Letitia James and one of Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Bondi also instructed an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election. Bondi's order came weeks after National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama and his aides of a ' treasonous conspiracy ' and said she had sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department. Davis applauded Bondi's actions in a recent interview. 'This is the greatest conspiracy in American history,' he said, referring to what he says are Democratic plots against President Donald Trump. 'There must be the most severe legal, political and financial consequences for this unprecedented weaponization. This must never happen again.' Bondi's office and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Obama, Biden, Clinton and former FBI, Justice Department and CIA officials have repeatedly dismissed the allegations. Democrats say new probes are an effort to distract attention from allegations that Trump has abused his power in his second term and from his failure to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Former senior Justice Department and FBI officials note that a Trump-appointed special counsel and Republican senators already investigated the claims and found no crimes. They called the idea 'absurd,' 'bananas' and 'insane.' Davis said he is unaware of Bondi's next step. But he praised the recent party-line Senate confirmation of a new U.S. attorney in South Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, whom he called a personal friend and urged senators to support. 'I want Jason to set up his own grand jury and pursue this aggressively,' Davis said. 'And I want him to put criminals in prison for a very long time.' Road map for a Florida federal investigation Davis called for Quiñones to convene a special federal grand jury in Port St. Lucie, the seat of St. Lucie County, which Trump carried by 10 percentage points last year. It would investigate what he calls a Democratic conspiracy to undermine Trump stretching from the 2016 campaign to the 2022 FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago estate to today. Quiñones, a Miami-Dade County judge appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis a year ago, is a former federal prosecutor in Miami and a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. He was a major crimes prosecutor but received poor performance evaluations, The Miami Herald reported. Quiñones filed and dropped a racial discrimination complaint and moved to the Civil Division, where he received satisfactory reviews. Quiñones and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Viewing the Mar-a-Lago search as part of a decadelong anti-Trump conspiracy serves a legal purpose: It could allow prosecutors to treat alleged acts from 2016 and 2017 as part of a single conspiracy and bypass a five-year statute of limitations on denial of rights charges. Three former FBI and Justice Department officials with direct knowledge of the Mar-a-Lago search told NBC News that it was conducted properly and approved by a federal judge and that it was the result of Trump's own actions. The officials said the National Archives first alerted them that Trump appeared to have classified materials. Trump then declined repeated requests to return the documents for a year. A former senior Justice Department official dismissed Davis' calls for a criminal investigation of the Mar-a-Lago search. 'It's outrageous,' the former senior Justice Department official said. Multiple investigations of Democratic rivals underway Three people familiar with the matter confirmed to NBC News this month that the Justice Department has opened a federal criminal investigation of lawsuits James' office filed against Trump. James has dismissed the Justice Department investigation, which is based in Albany, New York, as political payback. The James probe is examining whether the state attorney general's office committed ' conspiracy against rights ' and violated Trump's civil rights when it brought a lawsuit that claimed Trump grossly inflated the values of his assets for personal profit. A Manhattan judge ruled last year that Trump did so and ordered him to pay a roughly $500 million fine, a ruling that infuriated him. Separately, the Bondi Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation in Virginia into possible mortgage fraud by James and another into Schiff in connection with an allegation of potential mortgage fraud in Maryland. James and Schiff have said the investigations are political retribution. Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a Trump loyalist who represented Jan. 6 defendants and praised Trump's mass pardons of them, to oversee both probes. Davis said the 'conspiracy against rights' charge could be used in the Florida investigation he believes should be conducted. Legal experts have noted that the charge was created by the Enforcement Act of 1870, which Congress passed to prevent white people from blocking freed slaves from voting. Davis said special counsel Jack Smith used the same charge when he accused Trump of trying to illegally reverse the outcome of the 2020 election. 'The Democrats set the precedent that former presidents are fair game,' Davis said. Could Democrats be indicted and convicted? Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor and Columbia Law School professor whom Republicans have accused of conspiring with former FBI Director James Comey, said filing criminal charges based on debunked claims is possible. 'If you're willing to ignore the facts,' Richman said, 'you can come up with criminal charges.' But Richman cautioned that securing a federal indictment, trial and conviction — even in areas where the majority of voters voted for Trump — would be difficult given the many actors and elements involved. Prosecutors need indictments from grand juries, judges can dismiss weak cases, witnesses must be credible, and jurors must unanimously agree on guilt. 'Jurors take their duties seriously,' Richman said. 'I'm not ready to say the people in these jurisdictions are totally in the tank for this administration.' A former senior national security official who spoke anonymously, citing the Trump administration's public attacks on former officials, suggested two potential scenarios: 'Either Bondi and Gabbard know that there is indeed no evidence of any criminal activity, in which case it's completely corrupt and a political stunt,' the former official said, 'or, more darkly, they actually believe this stuff and are acting out of authoritarian instinct and this is something out of Orwell.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store