The Trump ally fighting for criminal investigations of Obama, Biden and Clinton
Now, a series of recent investigations approved by Attorney General Pam Bondi suggests to Davis that his long-sought goal is most likely approaching.
Bondi this month approved two federal criminal investigations of New York Attorney General Letitia James and one of Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Bondi also instructed an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election.
Bondi's order came weeks after National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama and his aides of a 'treasonous conspiracy' and said she had sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department.
Davis applauded Bondi's actions in a recent interview.
'This is the greatest conspiracy in American history,' he said, referring to what he says are Democratic plots against President Donald Trump. 'There must be the most severe legal, political and financial consequences for this unprecedented weaponization. This must never happen again.'
Bondi's office and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Obama, Biden, Clinton and former FBI, Justice Department and CIA officials have repeatedly dismissed the allegations. Democrats say new probes are an effort to distract attention from allegations that Trump has abused his power in his second term and from his failure to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Former senior Justice Department and FBI officials note that a Trump-appointed special counsel and Republican senators already investigated the claims and found no crimes. They called the idea 'absurd,' 'bananas' and 'insane.'
Davis said he is unaware of Bondi's next step. But he praised the recent party-line Senate confirmation of a new U.S. attorney in South Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, whom he called a personal friend and urged senators to support.
'I want Jason to set up his own grand jury and pursue this aggressively,' Davis said. 'And I want him to put criminals in prison for a very long time.'
Road map for a Florida federal investigation
Davis called for Quiñones to convene a special federal grand jury in Port St. Lucie, the seat of St. Lucie County, which Trump carried by 10 percentage points last year. It would investigate what he calls a Democratic conspiracy to undermine Trump stretching from the 2016 campaign to the 2022 FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago estate to today.
Quiñones, a Miami-Dade County judge appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis a year ago, is a former federal prosecutor in Miami and a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. He was a major crimes prosecutor but received poor performance evaluations, The Miami Herald reported. Quiñones filed and dropped a racial discrimination complaint and moved to the Civil Division, where he received satisfactory reviews.
Quiñones and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Viewing the Mar-a-Lago search as part of a decadelong anti-Trump conspiracy serves a legal purpose, legal experts said. It could allow prosecutors to treat alleged acts from 2016 and 2017 as part of a single conspiracy and bypass a five-year statute of limitations on denial of rights charges.
Davis said a 'conspiracy against rights' federal criminal charge could be used in the Florida investigation that he called for Quiñones to open. A special grand jury could investigate whether actions by Clinton and Obama in 2016 and 2017 violated Trump's rights as part of a single broad, anti-Trump conspiracy by Democrats that Davis believes includes the Mar-a-Lago search and continues today.
Legal experts have noted that the "conspiracy against rights" charge was created by the Enforcement Act of 1870, which Congress passed to prevent white people from blocking freed slaves from voting.
Davis said special counsel Jack Smith used the same charge when he accused Trump of trying to illegally reverse the outcome of the 2020 election in seven states that he lost.
'The Democrats set the precedent that former presidents are fair game,' Davis said.
Three former FBI and Justice Department officials with direct knowledge of the Mar-a-Lago search told NBC News that it was conducted properly and approved by a federal judge and that it was the result of Trump's own actions.
The officials said the National Archives first alerted them that Trump appeared to have classified materials. Trump then declined repeated requests to return the classified documents for a year. A former senior Justice Department official dismissed Davis' calls for a criminal investigation of the Mar-a-Lago search.
'It's outrageous,' the former senior Justice Department official said.
Multiple investigations of Democratic rivals underway
Three people familiar with the matter confirmed to NBC News this month that the Justice Department has opened a federal criminal investigation of lawsuits the office of James, New York's attorney general, filed against Trump. James has dismissed the Justice Department investigation, which is based in Albany, as political payback.
The James probe is examining whether the state attorney general's office committed 'conspiracy against rights' and violated Trump's civil rights when it brought a lawsuit that claimed Trump grossly inflated the values of his assets for personal profit. A Manhattan judge ruled last year that Trump did so and ordered him to pay a roughly $500 million fine, a ruling that infuriated him.
Separately, the Bondi Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation in Virginia into possible mortgage fraud by James and another into Schiff in connection with an allegation of potential mortgage fraud in Maryland. James and Schiff have said the investigations are political retribution. Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a Trump loyalist who represented Jan. 6 defendants and praised Trump's mass pardons of them, to oversee both probes.
Could Democrats be indicted and convicted?
Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor and Columbia Law School professor whom Republicans have accused of conspiring with former FBI Director James Comey, said filing criminal charges based on debunked claims is possible. 'If you're willing to ignore the facts,' Richman said, 'you can come up with criminal charges.'
But Richman cautioned that securing a federal indictment, trial and conviction — even in areas where the majority of voters voted for Trump — would be difficult given the many actors and elements involved. Prosecutors need indictments from grand juries, judges can dismiss weak cases, witnesses must be credible, and jurors must unanimously agree on guilt.
'Jurors take their duties seriously,' Richman said. 'I'm not ready to say the people in these jurisdictions are totally in the tank for this administration.'
A former senior national security official who spoke anonymously, citing the Trump administration's public attacks on former officials, suggested two potential scenarios: 'Either Bondi and Gabbard know that there is indeed no evidence of any criminal activity, in which case it's completely corrupt and a political stunt,' the former official said, 'or, more darkly, they actually believe this stuff and are acting out of authoritarian instinct and this is something out of Orwell.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asked for a yes or no on nonprofit transparency, top Maryland Democrats don't answer
BALTIMORE — It should be an easy yes-or-no answer, according to taxpayer advocate David Williams. But when Spotlight on Maryland asked the state's top three Democrats whether they would ensure transparency and accountability as tax dollars flow through nonprofits, none offered a yes or no response. The Baltimore Sun reported last month that neither state budget officials nor individual agencies can say exactly how much state money is flowing to nonprofits each year. That disclosure has led some state officials to call for more oversight. In response, Spotlight on Maryland — a partnership of The Sun, WBFF FOX45 in Baltimore and WJLA in Washington, D.C. — has launched an investigation into how much taxpayer money is allocated to Maryland nonprofits and how those dollars are spent. As part of that reporting, Spotlight on Maryland asked Gov. Wes Moore, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones and Senate President Bill Ferguson, if they would ensure full transparency and accountability around nonprofit funding. After receiving no response from Ferguson and Jones, Spotlight on Maryland sent a follow-up question to all three, asking if they would assist the investigation in the public interest as journalists follow the money through Maryland nonprofits. Moore, Jones and Ferguson did not respond to the follow-up question. 'This is crazy. It's an easy answer,' said Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. 'They should all say yes.' Moore, for his part, gave an answer on camera to a Spotlight on Maryland reporter at an unrelated news event in Salisbury last week. 'I think people know and realize that our administration believes in full transparency, that we understand that the things that we are going to support are things that are both sustainable and effective. And when you're looking at the entire budget for the state of Maryland, we are, we are very wise and smart stewards of taxpayer dollars to make sure that the right capital is going to the right usages,' the governor said. When The Sun asked last month whether Ferguson believes taxpayers should have access to a full accounting of how their money is spent and how much of it flows to nonprofits in Maryland, he said: 'All public dollars should be spent wisely and with the utmost care, whether a public agency or a nonprofit uses them. To that end, nonprofits are an important bridge between the state government and the communities they serve. That's why we have a robust audit division of the Department of Legislative Services that has been doing this important oversight work for decades.' As part of its July reporting, The Sun sent inquiries to individual state departments and agencies, asking them to provide the amount of money they allocate to nonprofits. A few offered specific dollar amounts. 'Many nonprofits receive funds directly from agency grant programs, and we don't track that centrally,' said Raquel Coombs, chief of staff for the Department of Budget and Management, in a July email. This lack of oversight raises concern, especially for a state that needed to make cuts and raise taxes to resolve a $3.3 billion budget deficit earlier this year. Nonprofit spending 'increases the size of government,' Williams said. The more that government spends — on nonprofits and other line items — the more taxpayer money that is needed to fund the government, he said. One political analyst said the state's top Democrats appear 'overly cautious' in not answering Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up questions on nonprofit spending. 'It seems like a no-brainer,' said Flavio Hickel, a political science professor at Washington College. 'You'd think they would say, 'I will do everything in my power to ensure good governance with taxpayer money.'' Why aren't they saying that? 'There are good nonprofits, but they're probably being cautious in case one bad actor fell through the cracks on their watch,' Hickel said. 'They're probably being overly cautious to prevent campaign ads down the line.' Even as the state's top leaders declined to answer Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up, the governor was quoted in a news release about his chief of staff, Fagan Harris, leaving for the top spot at the Abell Foundation, one of the state's biggest and most influential nonprofits with more than $300 million in assets. 'While he will be deeply missed personally and professionally, I look forward to working closely with him as he leads the Abell Foundation for years to come,' Moore said. Top officials in government administrations moving to nonprofits is similar to Pentagon officials going to work for defense contractors, Williams said. 'We need more checks and balances to stop the revolving door,' he said. 'The government and nonprofits are way too cozy. There needs to be a firewall.' Hickel said he couldn't comment on the specifics of Harris moving to a nonprofit and noted that it could be 'perfectly coincidental and benign.' But, he added, 'it does raise questions' about the relationship between the governor's office and influential nonprofits that shape life in Maryland. 'It's not uncommon at all, though, to see someone in a high government role going to work at a nonprofit,' Hickel said. 'We advise students to do that. We tell them to do legislative work for a few years, meet people, then go to a nonprofit.' --------------- Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
This conversation is being recorded: Trump's hot mic moment is the latest in a long global list
LONDON (AP) — Behold the power of the humble hot mic. The magnifier of sound, a descendant of 150-year-old technology, on Monday added to its long history of cutting through the most scripted political spectacles when it captured more than two minutes of U.S. President Donald Trump and eight European leaders chit-chatting around a White House news conference on their talks to end Russia's war in Ukraine. The standout quote came from Trump himself to French President Emmanuel Macron even before anyone sat down. The American president, reflecting his comments after meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin: 'I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand, as crazy as it sounds.' How politics and diplomacy sound when the principals think no one is listening can reveal much about the character, humor and humanity of our leaders — for better and sometimes for worse. As public figures, they've long known what the rest of us are increasingly learning in the age of CCTV, Coldplay kiss cams and social media: In public, no one can realistically expect privacy. 'Whenever I hear about a hot mic moment, my first reaction is that this is what they really think, that it's not gone through the external communications filter,' said Bill McGowan, founder and CEO of Clarity Media Group in New York. 'That's why people love it so much: There is nothing more authentic than what people say on a hot mic.' Always assume the microphone — or camera — is turned on Hot mics, often leavened with video, have bedeviled aspiring and actual leaders long before social media. During a sound check for his weekly radio address in 1984, U.S. President Ronald Reagan famously joked about attacking the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. 'My fellow Americans," Reagan quipped, not realizing the practice run was being recorded. "I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.' The Soviet Union didn't find it funny and condemned it given the consequential subject at hand. Putin, too, has fallen prey to the perils of a live mic. In 2006, he was quoted in Russian media joking about Israel's president, who had been charged with and later was convicted of rape. The Kremlin said Putin was not joking about rape and his meaning had been lost in translation. Sometimes a hot mic moment involves no words at all. Presidential candidate Al Gore was widely parodied for issuing exasperated and very audible sighs during his debate with George W. Bush in 2000. In others, the words uttered for all to hear are profane. Bush was caught telling running mate Dick Cheney that a reporter for The New York Times was a 'major-league a--hole.' 'This is a big f———- deal,' then-U.S. Vice President Joe Biden famously said, loudly enough to be picked up on a microphone, as President Barack Obama prepared to sign his signature Affordable Care Act in 2010. Obama was caught on camera in South Korea telling Dmitri Medvedev, then the Russian president, that he'll have 'more flexibility' to resolve sensitive issues — 'particularly with missile defense' — after the 2012 presidential election, his last. Republican Mitt Romney, Obama's rival that year, called the exchange 'bowing to the Kremlin.' 'Sometimes it's the unguarded moments that are the most revealing of all,' Romney said in a statement, dubbing the incident 'hot mic diplomacy.' Live mics have picked up name-calling and gossip aplenty even in the most mannerly circles. In 2022, Jacinda Ardern, then New Zealand's prime minister, known for her skill at debating and calm, measured responses, was caught on a hot mic tossing an aside in which she referred to a rival politician as 'such an arrogant pr—-' during Parliament Question Time. In 2005, Jacques Chirac, then president of France, was recorded airing his distaste for British food during a visit to Russia. Speaking to Putin and Gerhard Schroder, he was heard saying that worse food could only be found in Finland, according to widely reported accounts. Britain's King Charles III chose to deal with his hot mic moment with humor. In 2022, shortly after his coronation, Charles lost his patience with a leaky pen while signing a document on a live feed. He can be heard grousing: "Oh, God, I hate this!' and muttering, 'I can't bear this bloody thing … every stinking time.' It wasn't the first pen that had troubled him. The British ability to poke fun at oneself, he said in a speech the next year, is well known: 'Just as well, you may say, given some of the vicissitudes I have faced with frustratingly failing fountain pens this past year.' Trump owns perhaps the ultimate hot mic moment The American president is famously uncontrolled in public with a penchant for 'saying it like it is,' sometimes with profanity. That makes him popular among some supporters. But even he had trouble putting a lid on comments he made before he was a candidate to "Access Hollywood' in tapes that jeopardized his campaign in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential race. Trump did not appear to know the microphone was recording. Trump bragged about kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women who were not his wife on recordings obtained by The Washington Post and NBC News and aired just two days before his debate with Hillary Clinton. The celebrity businessman boasted 'when you're a star, they let you do it,' in a conversation with Billy Bush, then a host of the television show. On Monday, though, the chatter on both ends of the East Room press conference gave observers a glimpse of the diplomatic game. Dismissed unceremoniously from the White House in March, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy now sat at the table with Trump and seven of his European peers: Macron, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finland's President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump complimented Macron's tan. He said Stubb is a good golfer. He asked if anyone wanted to ask the press questions when the White House pool was admitted to the room — before it galloped inside. The European leaders smiled at the shouting and shuffling. Stubb asked Trump if he's 'been through this every day?' 'He loves it. He loves it, eh?" she said.
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's push for peace
Hello!Rebecca Morin here. It feels like a fall day in DC, but I'm not ready for summer to be over! A mad dash toward peace It was a much different meeting than the one in February. There were laughs, a handshake and a lot of 'thank yous' from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. Trump expressed optimism of peace between Russia and Ukraine after meeting with Zelenskyy and European leaders. By the end of the meetings, Trump told Zelenskyy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war. Trump in a social media post later said he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to start arranging face-to-face talks between Russia's leader and Zelenskyy, in a location to be determined. Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy. Will a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting happen? Trump said after a proposed meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, Trump would join the two leaders for a discussion aimed at pushing the warring sides closer together. However, Phillips O'Brien, a historian and professor of strategic war studies at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, said the meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy "may or may not happen." What to know about the proposed summit. No troops on the ground: Trump on Tuesday said U.S. troops won't be involved in any peacekeeping effort in Ukraine after the war. Trump on Monday had said European nations are the "first line of defense" but added "we're going to help them out also. We'll be involved." What assurances is Ukraine looking for. Overnight attacks: Russia attacked the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight, just a day after Trump's meeting Zelenskyy and European leaders. The city's mayor, Vitalii Maletskyi, said the attack was a sign Putin does not want peace. A politics pit stop Epstein files being turned over to lawmakers The Justice Department in four days will begin sending some of the so-called 'Epstein files' from its sex trafficking investigation into the disgraced late financier to the House Oversight Committee, committee Chairman James Comer said Monday. Comer earlier this month issued a subpoena to the DOJ for records related to Epstein, the longtime Trump friend who died by suicide in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. What to know about the committee's investigation into Epstein. 'Like a horror movie' Exhausting, terrifying and like something out of a horror movie. That's how Jeremy Atherton Lin described the recent appeal that seeks to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 10-year-old Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States. Experts like Kenneth Gordon, a marital and family lawyer in Florida, say the potential to overturn Obergefell is a "long shot." Obergefell is sound, from a legal perspective, Gordon said, and same-sex marriage is widely accepted by the general public. If Obergefell was overturned, same-sex marriages would likely remain protected due to the Respect for Marriage Act into law by former President Joe Biden. How the LGBTQ+ community feels about the appeal. Got a burning question, or comment, for On Politics?You can submit them here or send me an email atrdmorin@
