House Dems Equate Trump's Cabinet Meeting to 'Hostage' Situation
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, responsible for supporting Democratic candidates in the House of Representative, compared President Donald Trump's "100 Days" cabinet meeting to a "hostage" situation.
The DCCC made the analogy—"like watching a hostage video"—in reference to a video clip from the cabinet meeting in which Attorney General Pam Bondi offers effusive praise to Trump.
"Your first 100 days has far exceeded that of any other presidency in this country. Ever. Ever," Bondi leaned forward as she spoke emphatically, eyes locked with Trump. "Never seen anything like it. Thank you."
As cabinet members updated the group on their department's progress, most included opening remarks celebrating Trump's leadership. Red and blue "Gulf of America" hats served as party favors, laid out beside name placards around the table.
Chief of Staff Susie Wiles congratulated everyone on an "unparalleled" first 100 days in office. Vice President JD Vance called "most" previous presidents "place holders" in comparison to Trump.
Vance: you sit in the oval office and see portraits of presidents past and most of them have been place holders, people who allowed their staff to sign executive orders with an auto pen instead of men of action pic.twitter.com/QIRzmo1UNd — Acyn (@Acyn) April 30, 2025
Seated beside the president, Secretary of State Marco Rubio lauded Trump's removal of "perverts, pedophiles and child rapists."
Trump has made his intolerance for perceived opposition quite clear in his interactions with press, politicians, and even artists. An unquestioning allegiance to Trump's agenda was a guiding factor in his selection of cabinet nominees, and has proven an effective strategy as the president enacts a barrage of executive orders without a hint of the insider resistance he encountered during his first term.
While the willing participation of Trump's cabinet members casts doubt over hostage situation parallels, this White House is distinguished by an expectation of fervent loyalty.
Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump House of Representatives
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Suspends US-to-China Export Licenses for Nuclear Giants
Trade tensions between the US and China are heating up again, despite a 90-day pause on 100 percent-plus tariffs agreed on 12 May 2025. Now, the Trump administration has taken a sharp new turn by suspending licences for nuclear exports to China. This move could hit major nuclear and energy firms hard. Here's what it means for the industry—and what could come next. US Blocks Nuclear Trade with China In early June, the US Department of Commerce issued orders halting the approval of export licences for nuclear materials and components headed to China. The suspension affects items ranging from reactor parts to precision tools used in the energy sector. According to Yahoo Finance , the licence freeze is part of a broader strategy to weaken China's access to critical technology during the ongoing tariff standoff. A US official hinted at the plan earlier, stating that Washington was reviewing exports deemed 'strategically important' to Beijing. 'In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licences or imposed additional requirements while this review is ongoing,' said a department spokesperson. Nuclear Heavyweights in the Firing Line Industry giants Westinghouse and Emerson are expected to feel the impact. Westinghouse, which powers over 400 nuclear reactors worldwide, could face stalled exports of vital nuclear technologies. Emerson, a key provider of industrial measurement tools, also risks disruption to its supply chain. While neither company has commented publicly, analysts warn the export freeze could hit revenue hard. Other firms are also under pressure. GE Aerospace, which supplies hydraulic fluids and jet engines to China's state-owned aircraft maker COMAC, may face export challenges if restrictions broaden. The knock-on effect is rippling through energy sectors too. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners and Dallas-based Energy Transfer could lose hundreds of millions, according to Power Technology . Two insiders confirmed that both nuclear and energy businesses have already begun feeling the financial strain. What Comes Next? The US Department of Commerce has yet to outline its long-term plan for nuclear exports. However, President Trump is set to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in London on Monday, 9 June 2025. The face-to-face follows a long phone call between the leaders on Thursday, 5 June. Although the UK will host the talks, British officials confirmed they will not take part. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests. We welcome these talks,' said a UK government spokesperson. It remains unclear whether nuclear exports will be discussed directly. Observers expect the agenda to include China's access to US technology, rare earth exports, and the escalating economic friction. Industry Braces for Fallout As tensions grow, nuclear firms are left waiting for clarity. Many now face delays, lost revenue, and uncertain futures. Experts warn that if the licence freeze continues, it could reshape global supply chains and dent the US's influence in the nuclear sector. For now, the world watches as diplomacy and trade collide—while one of the most powerful industries hangs in the balance. Originally published on IBTimes UK
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Mocked for Calling LA Protesters 'Insurrectionists,' Demanding Jail Time: 'He Pardoned the Insurrectionists'
President Donald Trump was mocked online after declaring that those taking part in the Los Angeles protests against ICE were "insurrectionists" and demanding jail time, despite pardoning those convicted in the Capitol riots. The president was asked about "the people causing problems in LA" upon returning to the White House by reporters Monday. "The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators, they're insurrectionists, they're bad people. They should be in jail," Trump stated. Trump: "The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators, they're insurrectionists, they're bad people. They should in jail. Thank you." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 9, 2025 Los Angeles was home to various protests over the weekend in response to ICE raids across the city. More than 50 people have been arrested in connection with the protests, which Trump responded to by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to help aid law enforcement. However, users online were quick to point out the president's choice of words to describe the protesters, given that he had pardoned the rioters who participated in the insurrection on January 6, 2021. "It loses all meaning after he pardoned the insurrectionists," one user remarked. Another added, "And yet, he pardoned everyone who attacked the capital. So evil." It loses all meaning after he pardoned the insurrectionists. — Emoney (@emoney3113) June 9, 2025 And yet, he pardoned everyone who attacked the capital. So evil. — Sandra Grant (@grandsan) June 9, 2025 "The insurrectionists should be in jail you say?" another user chided. One person said, "Imagine if he said that about [January 6]." the insurrectionists should be in jail you say? 🤔 — schmook (@schmook) June 9, 2025 Imagine if he said that about j6 — Devin (@lionsdevin171) June 9, 2025 Trump defended the deployment of the National Guard in a Truth Social post Saturday, saying if Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass "can't do their jobs," then "the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Newsom condemned Trump's move, saying it was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions." The California governor later dared Border Czar Tom Homan to arrest him after Homan declared it was a "felony to impede law enforcement doing their job." Trump has seemingly supported this, telling reporters he thought it would be "a great thing" on Monday. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Los Angeles California
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Kristi Noem Once Called Federal Use of National Guard as 'Attack on States' Rights'. Now She Supports Trump's Use in LA Protests
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, once a vocal defender of states' rights against federal use of the National Guard, now supports President Donald Trump's deployment of troops in California. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is facing criticism for backing President Donald Trump 's decision to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles, despite having strongly opposed similar proposed federal action under former President Joe Biden. In February 2024, while serving as South Dakota's governor, Noem accused Biden of threatening "a direct attack on states' rights" when Democrats urged him to federalize the National Guard in Texas. If Joe Biden federalizes the National Guard, that would be a direct attack on states' the last several years, we've seen Democrats try to take away our Freedoms of religion, assembly, and speech. We can't let them take away our right to defend ourselves, too. South… — Kristi Noem (@KristiNoem) February 6, 2024 Noem said the move would trigger a "war" between Washington D.C. and Republican-led states. Noem even traveled to Texas to personally support Gov. Greg Abbott's border crackdown, which included National Guard troops interfering with federal immigration agents. But on June 8, Noem publicly supported Trump's use of 2,000 federally deployed National Guard troops to quell anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles—over the objections of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom. If @GavinNewsom was doing his job our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement. Under the leadership of @POTUS Trump we will put the safety of American citizens FIRST not these criminal illegal aliens that… — Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) June 8, 2025 "If [Newsom] was doing his job," Noem posted on X, "our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement." On CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday, she justified her shift by saying Trump acted because Newsom "makes bad decisions." Newsom himself called out Noem's change in opinion, reposting the homeland security secretary's 2024 tweet with the caption, "This aged well." Trump authorized the 60-day deployment under a federal statute allowing Guard use in emergencies where state leaders are unable, or unwilling, to enforce federal laws. Newsom called the move "a serious breach of state sovereignty" and demanded the order be revoked. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Joe biden Los Angeles California © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
