Static interference forced United Airlines to disable Starlink service
June 7 (UPI) -- Free Starlink internet service on some regional United Airlines flights has been suspended due to static interference.
The airline began offering free Starlink Wi-Fi service during flights in May, but static interference forced United officials to turn off the service on about 24 airliners, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The airline is working with Starlink to correct the problem, which it says does not affect flight safety.
"We expect the service to be back up and running on these aircraft soon," United officials said. "The fix will be deployed during routine maintenance, and the airline doesn't anticipate any impact on flight schedules."
The problem was first revealed by The Points Guy, which reported the issue commonly occurs when new onboard connectivity technologies are installed on aircraft.
United installed the Starlink service on about two dozen regional aircraft but received reports of static interference while the Wi-Fi service was used.
A similar problem arose when United Airlines installed its Viasat connectivity service on its main air fleet. A quick fix solved the problem.
Starlink is a subsidiary of the Elon Musk-owned SpaceX and uses a global network of small satellites to provide subscribers with Wi-Fi service anywhere in the world.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
5 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk says Google has the best shot at being the leader in AI
xAI CEO Elon Musk paid a rare compliment to his rival Google on Wednesday. "Outside of real-world AI, Google has the biggest compute (and data) advantage for now, so currently has the highest probability of being the leader," Musk wrote in an X post. But that "may change in a few years," he added. "For the foreseeable future, the major AI companies will continue to prosper, as will xAI. There is just so much to do!" Musk wrote. Musk and Google did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Google has long been a mainstay in AI. In 2017, Google Research released a paper titled "Attention Is All You Need." This seminal work introduced the world to the concept of the Transformer, the technology that powers large language models like ChatGPT. The search giant has also invested in AI startups such as Anthropic and Safe Superintelligence. Google owns a 14% stake in Anthropic, a startup founded by former OpenAI employees, per legal filings obtained by The New York Times. Google has continued to make hefty investments in AI. During its second-quarter earnings call last month, the company said it was raising its capital expenditures by $10 billion this year to $85 billion. Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, said the increase in capital expenditures would help meet the increased demand for chips and Google's AI products. Last year, Google DeepMind's CEO, Demis Hassabis, was one of three researchers awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry. Hassabis and his colleague, John Jumper, were recognized for Google DeepMind's work on protein-structure prediction. Musk's comments come as he continues to escalate his feud with Sam Altman and OpenAI. On Monday, Musk said xAI would take " immediate legal action" against Apple for what he said was Apple's bias toward OpenAI in its App Store rankings. A spokesperson for Apple told Business Insider on Tuesday that the App Store is "designed to be fair and free of bias." Musk and Altman cofounded OpenAI in 2015, but their relationship soured after Musk left its board in 2018. Last year, Musk sued OpenAI and accused the ChatGPT maker of violating its nonprofit mission when it partnered with Microsoft. Musk launched his own AI startup, xAI, in July 2023 and debuted his chatbot, Grok, later that year. xAI raised over $12 billion in its Series A, B, and C funding rounds in 2024 and was valued at a reported $50 billion. Last month, Musk said on X that his EV company, Tesla, will ask its shareholders to vote on whether to invest in xAI. He did not specify when the vote would take place. "It's not up to me. If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago," Musk wrote on X on July 13.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Gas Prices Poised To Fall Below $3 A Gallon This Summer
Long-suffering U.S. motorists are set to finally enjoy some reprieve at the pump, with indications that gas prices could decline to multi-year lows. U.S. gasoline prices appear poised to fall below $3 a gallon this summer, a level they last sank to more than four years ago, thanks to surging imports filling inventories at a time when bad weather events are dampening fuel demand. According to AAA data, the national average price of gasoline fell to 3.15 per gallon, the lowest level recorded during summer months over the past four years. Average gas prices across the country last fell below $3 a gallon in May 2021. However, many U.S. motorists are already enjoying gas prices below $3 per gallon, with GasBuddy reporting that most are paying $2.99 per gallon, with some paying as low as $2.79. Indeed, the median U.S. gas price currently stands at $2.97 per gallon. However, not everyone is smiling at the pump, with motorists in California ($4.49), Hawaii ($4.47), and Washington ($4.41) paying the highest prices for their gas. According to GasBuddy, the top 10% of stations in the country are selling a gallon of gasoline at $4.34, nearly $2 higher than the bottom 10% at $2.54 per gallon. Meanwhile, most U.S. motorists are paying $3.49 for a gallon of diesel, with the median at $3.59 per gallon. The top 10% of stations in the country are selling their diesel at $4.63 per gallon compared to an average of $3.07 per gallon for the bottom 10%.According to the latest Consumer Price Index, gasoline prices declined 8.3% Y/Y over the 52-week period ended June, with oil prices falling more than 20% amid concerns over lackluster demand and potential oversupply by OPEC+. Fuel demand fell 2.5% Y/Y in the week ended July 4, an ominous sign of waning demand in a high-demand season. Gasoline products supplied, a metric used as a proxy for fuel demand by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), averaged 9.2 million barrels a day over the past four weeks, good for a 1% Y/Y decline. Extreme heat has been blamed for the lackluster demand, with the experts saying high temperatures have discouraged driving. Summer is typically the peak driving season in the United States. But inclement weather is not solely to blame here. Improving fuel efficiency coupled with changes in driving patterns in the post-pandemic period--especially remote working--appear to have permanently depressed U.S. gasoline consumption, which is yet to eclipse its all-time high of more than 9.3 million bpd in 2018. "As we head toward August, I think gasoline will see additional weakness. The national average has a good chance of falling below $3 per gallon in September," said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. Another growing problem for the oil bulls–electric vehicles. Electric vehicles (EVs) are estimated to currently displace around 3.5 million barrels of oil per day globally, with a significant portion of this displacement occurring in the United States. This displacement is driven by the increasing adoption of EVs, particularly in China, Europe, and the U.S., where they are replacing traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. While the percentage of EVs on the road in the U.S. is still relatively small compared to the overall vehicle fleet, the impact on gasoline demand is growing as EV adoption accelerates. The IEA recently published its Global EV Outlook 2025 wherein it predicted that the global EV fleet will displace more than 5 mb/d of crude by 2030, with China accounting for half of that impact. Last year, the global EV fleet hit 58 million EVs, more than triple the tally just four years ago, making up 4% of the global passenger car fleet. The EV revolution is strongest in China, where roughly 1 in 10 cars is electric. However, oil demand destruction is most rampant in Europe, where EV adoption is most aggressive. Norway has been leading the continent in EV adoption, with 88% of new cars sold in 2024 fully electric, while 3% were plug-in hybrids. Not surprisingly, Norway's oil demand fell 12% from 2021 to 2024. Norway is a major supplier of natural gas to Europe, consistently ranking as one of the top, if not the top, suppliers of gas to the European Union. According to the European Commission, Norway supplied 52.6% of the EU's natural gas imports in the first quarter of 2025. By Alex Kimani for More Top Reads From this article on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Baby Grok really for kids? X's AI past says otherwise
Elon Musk's xAI unveils plans for Baby Grok, a kid-friendly AI chatbot, amid questions over safety, trust, and Grok's controversial past Elon Musk's xAI is reportedly developing 'Baby Grok', a child-friendly version of its Grok AI chatbot. Early reports suggest that it could serve as an educational assistant for children, answering questions and guiding learning in a safe and age-appropriate manner. But creating a truly trustworthy AI for kids isn't just about censoring bad words; it requires rebuilding the AI's training and safety systems from the ground up, ensuring it can protect young users from harmful, biased, or misleading content. With AI now present in classrooms, homes, and even children's toys, the stakes are high. If Baby Grok succeeds, it could become a valuable tool for modern education. If it fails, it could become another high-profile example of AI safety gone wrong. So, how exactly would Baby Grok work? What challenges will it face, and can Musk's team really make it safe enough for kids? Let's dig into the details. Why is Elon Musk building Baby Grok now? Musk's AI company, xAI, launched Grok in 2023 as a bold alternative to ChatGPT, integrating it directly into X (formerly Twitter) for premium subscribers. Grok quickly made headlines for its humor, quick wit, and intentionally 'edgy' tone, a style that won over some fans but also drew sharp criticism when the AI produced inappropriate or offensive responses to user prompts. The pivot toward Baby Grok mirrors a broader industry shift toward AI in education. Tech giants like OpenAI, Google, and Meta are racing to build AI-driven tutoring systems, interactive study aids, and personalized learning companions. The global AI in education market is projected to grow from USD 3.79 billion in 2022 to USD 20.54 billion in 2027, at a CAGR of 45.6% from 2022 to 2027. For Musk, a 'safe-mode' version of Grok could serve multiple purposes: appealing to parents who are wary of unfiltered AI, offering schools a controlled digital learning assistant, and easing concerns from regulators pushing for stricter AI safety laws. At the same time, it could shield xAI from the brand damage that unmoderated, free-form AI can cause, something Grok's initial rollout proved all too well. What Baby Grok promises, and how it would work? Baby Grok is designed to be a smart, child-friendly learning assistant, not just a filtered version of Grok. Its key goals include. Translating complex topics into age-appropriate explanations Presenting subjects like math, science, or history in ways that match a child's comprehension level. Avoiding profanity, explicit content, and violence Going beyond simple word filters, ensuring context-sensitive awareness to keep conversations safe and respectful. Offering interactive learning games and storytelling Features like games and stories can make learning fun while supporting skill development, an approach that has been shown to improve engagement and emotional growth in children. Encouraging curiosity without overwhelming Providing thoughtful, manageable responses that spark interest without cognitive overload. Creating this experience takes more than flipping a 'safe mode' switch; it requires filtered training data, child-centered design, and continuous oversight to ensure Baby Grok is both safe and genuinely educational. How would Baby Grok actually keep conversations kid-friendly? Musk hasn't released technical specifications yet, but AI safety researchers stress that a truly safe children's AI requires a blend of technology, human oversight, and continuous updates: Custom training dataset: Rather than being trained on open internet data, which often includes adult, violent, or misleading content, Baby Grok would need a highly curated, education-first dataset (such as National Geographic Kids, BBC Bitesize, or NASA's Climate Kids). Real-time content filtering: Outputs should pass through advanced filters similar to Microsoft's Content Safety API or Google SafeSearch, which automatically block inappropriate language, explicit imagery, or unsafe suggestions. Human moderation: Since no filter is flawless, platforms like Roblox and Discord rely on moderation teams to review flagged content. Baby Grok would need the same level of vigilance. Adaptive safeguards: Online risks evolve fast. Ongoing updates guided by child psychologists, researchers, and organizations like eSafety are essential to keeping the AI responsive to emerging threats. Importantly, a 2025 benchmark study introduced MinorBench, a tool specifically designed to assess language models' compliance with child safety safeguards, and it revealed significant variability even among top AI systems like Grok in how well they refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries. Can an edgy adult AI be remade for children? Musk's challenge is credibility. Grok's 'uncensored' style was originally marketed as a feature for adults, a stark contrast to the thoughtful tone parents expect from child‑friendly tools. Platforms like YouTube Kids demonstrate how even strict filters can fail, and with generative AI, the risk is amplified; every response is created in real time, not pulled from a pre‑approved library. Researchers at the Center for Humane Technology emphasize that without deep safety integration, child-facing AI can still reproduce bias, misinformation, or harmful advice. A recent framework introduced in 2025, 'LLMs and Childhood Safety', underscores this risk by proposing protective measures for language models used with children, pointing out that current systems often lack the standards needed to reliably prevent harmful outputs, even when they're designed for younger audiences. Before you dive in, take a moment to watch this short video for a quick overview. It sets the stage perfectly. Once you're done, scroll back up and keep reading for the full story. Why is building AI for kids more complex than it looks? Developing AI for children involves meeting stricter legal and ethical standards that go well beyond typical AI design. First, there are data privacy protections. Tools like Baby Grok must comply with stringent child-specific laws such as COPPA in the U.S. and GDPR-K in Europe, which demand explicit parental consent and careful handling of minors' data. Equally important is bias reduction, ensuring the AI avoids reinforcing harmful stereotypes and treats all children fairly, regardless of background. Then there's the need for educational accuracy, meaning the AI's responses must be grounded in trusted sources like Britannica Kids or Scholastic Learn at Home. A 2025 study published in Nature Humanities and Social Sciences Communications reinforces that ethical design, transparency, and verified educational content are critical for AI systems targeting children. The challenge is not just building a smart tool but earning lasting trust from parents, educators, and regulators alike. What's next for Baby Grok? If xAI follows its usual rollout strategy, Baby Grok may begin in a closed beta reserved for Premium+ X subscribers. The company could then expand through integrations with classroom platforms or learning devices, partnerships with educational publishers, and features such as parent dashboards that offer conversation logs and usage controls. But success will largely depend on early safety testing. A single viral misstep, such as a child receiving harmful advice, could severely damage its reputation before it's widely adopted. A 2025 study on AI educational tools emphasizes the importance of establishing strong safety guardrails from the start, including prompt engineering, human-in-the-loop moderation, and continuous evaluation to ensure content remains curriculum-aligned and age-appropriate Can Baby Grok handle the weight of childhood? Baby Grok could redefine AI in education if it balances innovation with strong safety and transparency. But Musk's history of pushing fast, sometimes at the cost of polish, raises questions. Baby Grok represents xAI's bold move into child-focused AI amid rising demand for educational tech. Building a safe AI for kids isn't easy; it requires more than filters, involving retraining, oversight, and ethical design. Musk's credibility is under scrutiny, especially given Grok's edgy origins and controversial responses. Past platform failures show the risks of repurposing adult AI for children without deep safeguards. Trust will be the ultimate test, from parents, educators, and regulators alike. If successful, Baby Grok could set a new standard for child-safe AI. If not, it may serve as a cautionary tale in the history of AI development. The key issue isn't just 'Can Baby Grok be built?' but 'Will parents trust it?'. If xAI meets the highest safety benchmarks and proves its reliability through independent audits, it could set a new standard for kid-friendly AI. If not, it risks becoming yet another cautionary tale in the growing list of AI examples. This story is made with AI assistance and human editing. Solve the daily Crossword
