logo
Unhousing the Rainbow: a reflection on South Africa's housing crisis

Unhousing the Rainbow: a reflection on South Africa's housing crisis

IOL News12-05-2025
By listening more than speaking, observing more than acting, Previn Vedan says he witnessed firsthand the persistent struggles for equitable housing and land rights in South Africa.
Image: Supplied
Previn Vedan
In 2022, I was a victim of a violent attack that left me disabled. The physical toll, and adjustments to my new adaptive lifestyle, necessitated a period of healing and reflection.
During this time, I reflected deeply on the systemic issues facing South Africa, and I rediscovered the purpose that once ignited my passion for justice.
I immersed myself in the very communities that first inspired my commitment to human rights. By listening more than speaking, observing more than acting, I witnessed first-hand the persistent struggles for equitable housing and land rights in South Africa. These experiences reaffirmed my belief that the fight for dignity and justice is far from over.
I have walked these streets. I have argued in the courts. I have buried the victims of neglect. I never left the struggle - I simply needed time to find the right words. Now, I have written them.
'Unhousing the Rainbow' is not just about land or laws. It is about dignity. It is about who we become as a nation. This is my long-form piece (divided in 10 parts) on housing and hope in South Africa.
Previn Vedan says the fight for dignity and justice is far from over.
Image: Supplied
Part 1: Finding the Words Again: Reflection, Struggle, and Housing's Past
From Land Act to Group Areas: A Legacy Written in Brick and Blood
South Africa's housing crisis cannot be divorced from its history. In 1913, the colonial regime passed the Natives Land Act, confining the Black majority to just 7% of the country's land - later expanded to 13% by 1936. This legislation marked the beginning of systematic dispossession.
Black families were uprooted from ancestral lands and herded into 'native reserves' and later, dusty townships on the fringes of cities.
The apartheid government doubled down with the Group Areas Act of 1950, which enforced strict residential segregation. Over the next few decades an estimated 3.5 million Black South Africans were forcibly removed from so-called 'white' areas in one of history's largest mass removals - a figure that does not include the thousands of Indian and Coloured South Africans that were also uprooted from places like Cato Manor and District Six under the same brutal laws.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Entire thriving neighbourhoods - like Magazine Barracks in Durban - were demolished, their people scattered and their histories erased in the name of racial planning. But these policies were not only about physical separation. They engineered apartheid's spatial economy.
Black, Indian and Coloured communities were deliberately placed far from city centers and stripped of access to quality schools, hospitals, and employment. By design, they endured disparate levels of service provision and opportunity. In these neglected townships - roads went unpaved, water and electricity were afterthoughts, and commuting to work meant long, costly journeys.
The scars of this spatial injustice remain deeply etched. Sober brick houses with neat yards may stand in one area - while just across an invisible line - crowded informal settlements sprawl without sewage, greenery or recreational space.
The Group Areas Act did not just segregate communities, it entrenched a hierarchy of opportunity.
Part two of 'Unhousing the Rainbow' will be published next Friday.
*Vedan is a South African lawyer, political activist, and advocate for social justice.
Cape Times
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Presidency: Ramaphosa, Mbeki's relationship remains 'cordial' despite National Dialogue differences
Presidency: Ramaphosa, Mbeki's relationship remains 'cordial' despite National Dialogue differences

Eyewitness News

time6 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Presidency: Ramaphosa, Mbeki's relationship remains 'cordial' despite National Dialogue differences

JOHANNESBURG - The Presidency said the relationship between Cyril Ramaphosa and former statesman Thabo Mbeki remains 'cordial' despite disagreements over the National Dialogue. Mbeki, through his foundation, has announced he will no longer be participating in the dialogue and has rejected an invitation to attend Friday's convention. The former president has for years been pushing for a National Dialogue; however, he is now complaining that the event has been taken over by the government and is no longer led by citizens and civil society. At a media briefing in Pretoria on Thursday, Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa respects and acknowledges all criticisms. 'One would have loved and it would have been great to have the former president there but if he is not there, he is not there. The reality is the show will go on and South Africans will continue with the dialogue process and hopefully at some point, not only the Thabo Mbeki foundation but also other foundations will find it among themselves to participate in the process.'

Ramaphosa to Mbeki and legacy foundations: ‘National Dialogue will proceed with or without you'
Ramaphosa to Mbeki and legacy foundations: ‘National Dialogue will proceed with or without you'

IOL News

time6 hours ago

  • IOL News

Ramaphosa to Mbeki and legacy foundations: ‘National Dialogue will proceed with or without you'

President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded to the withdrawal of several legacy foundations from the upcoming National Dialogue, saying 'the show goes on.' Image: ANC/X President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded to the withdrawal of several legacy foundations from the upcoming National Dialogue, saying 'the show goes on' and that dialogue will continue with or without legacy foundations, including former President Thabo Mbeki. Ramaphosa said that through his spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, during a media briefing at the Union Buildings on Thursday afternoon. This comes amid mounting criticism of the dialogue process from political parties, civil society groups, and prominent legacy foundations. The National Convention for the National Dialogue is scheduled to take place in Pretoria on 15 and 16 August. Magwenya emphasised that the convention is not the dialogue itself, but rather a platform to set the agenda and map out a roadmap for the broader National Dialogue. 'The National Convention is not the actual dialogue,' said Magwenya. 'It is a platform where the agenda for the National Dialogue will be set and agreed upon. The roadmap for the rollout of the actual dialogue will also be affirmed.' He said that the inclusivity of the process should not be questioned at this stage, as the convention is just the beginning of a nine-month, nationwide engagement. 'It's always been understood that this is the kick-off of the dialogue process. Out of the National Convention, we will get a clear roadmap for dialogues in communities, wards, districts and sectoral groups. At the end of this nine-month process, all South Africans will have had an opportunity to participate.' Magwenya dismissed concerns about the legitimacy of the process, arguing that the withdrawal of seven foundations does not undermine its credibility. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'With respect to the National Convention and the withdrawal of seven foundations - with all due respect, these foundations do not represent the majority of South Africans.' Last week on Friday, IOL News reported that several prominent legacy foundations announced their withdrawal from the process, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group. In a joint statement, the organisations expressed 'deep regret,' saying their decision was necessary to protect the credibility and integrity of the process. They accused organisers of deviating from the original citizen-led vision and shifting towards government control. 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately, in practice, shifted towards government control,' the statement read. Magwenya dismissed the notion that the foundations represent defined constituencies, arguing that their absence would not diminish the legitimacy or inclusiveness of the convention. 'These foundations were never set up to be constituency groups, as far as we understand, unless that has changed. We now have close to 1,000 confirmed delegates. The Convention will be representative of all sectors of society through the different formations and groups that have accepted invitations to attend.' He added that the dialogue must eventually reach communities, industries, households and other sectors. 'It can't be held over two days at a university campus - that would be illogical. The credibility of the dialogue is not a once off exercise . It will depend on the level of participation across communities and the outcomes of that process.' Magwenya rejected the idea that the credibility of the dialogue could be determined by one person or a handful of organisations. 'South Africa is much bigger than any one individual or any single foundation. It would've been great to have former (President Mbeki) there – but if he's not there, he's not there.' 'The reality is that the show will go on, and South Africans will continue with the dialogue process. Hopefully, at some point, not only the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and others will eventually decide to participate in the process and realise that there's no benefit out the boycotting the people of South Africa.' 'Boycotting the process is not boycotting the government – it's boycotting the people of South Africa.' He added that the dialogue process does not belong to Ramaphosa or the government 'It belongs to all South Africans. Those who choose not to participate are not disadvantaged by the president or the government – they are choosing not to be part of the broader national conversation.' Several political parties have also withdrawn from the National Dialogue.

Draft terms of reference for Mkhwanazi inquiry incorporate party inputs
Draft terms of reference for Mkhwanazi inquiry incorporate party inputs

IOL News

time8 hours ago

  • IOL News

Draft terms of reference for Mkhwanazi inquiry incorporate party inputs

The Ad Hoc Committee to probe allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will circulate the draft document integrating the inputs from parties to check if their submissions were correctly captured before the terms of reference are adopt on Monday. Image: Parliament The Ad Hoc Committee into serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi integrated all the submissions made by parties on the proposed terms of reference. This was after a marathon meeting where the committee took a break twice to allow the technical team to factor in the inputs of the parties that made written submissions prior to the deadline into one document. Committee Chairperson Soviet Lekganyane said the draft document would be sent to parties to check if their submissions were captured before they adopt the terms of reference. 'For the purpose of coherence in our engagements, it will be better, and also looking at the kind of document which must guide the work we will be doing, it will be important for parties and members of the committee to study it, especially the proposals that have been made here. 'I realise that there are so many areas of convergence on the draft that was released last week. You would need to study the proposal of the parties and agree when we make the final adoption,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The integrated terms of reference will be discussed and then finally adopted at a meeting on Monday. MK Party MP Sibonelo Nomvalo said as soon as they were done with deliberations on the terms of reference, they should get started with their inquiry's work. 'Our proposal is that we must start next week. We know that such is not to be determined in this meeting,' Nomvalo said. EFF leader Julius Malema agreed that the sooner they start working, the better. Malema said they could not come up with the commencement date without adopting the terms of reference. 'It is not given when we meet next week on the terms of reference that we are to agree and immediately start the inquiry,' he said. DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach urged that the integrated document be shared with parliamentary legal services to advise on whether any proposals are problematic. ANC Chief Whip Mdumiseni Ntuli said the integrated document should incorporate all inputs of the parties. 'If we can get it before the end of the day tomorrow, it will allow us to go through the document over the weekend,' Ntuli said. Lekganyane said the document would be sent to all the parties to confirm their inputs were correctly captured. He confirmed that the document will be taken to the parliamentary legal services to have a look at to make sure it complies with the laws of the country. 'The sooner we start, the better. In the next meeting, there should be a draft programme on commencement of proceedings, but that is dependent on whether we agree on the terms of reference on Monday,' Lekganyane said. The draft terms of reference say the parliamentary inquiry will be inquisitorial. The document proposes that the committee uses the services of an external legal counsel in an advisory capacity to assist it in carrying out its work and lead evidence from witnesses, but some want this function to be done by the parliamentary legal services. It also proposes that the committee may invite any interested parties to provide input if they wish to do so. 'In the event that an invited witness refuses to submit a sworn statement and/or avail themselves as requested, the committee may use its power of subpoena as provided for in the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act.' The document also proposes that legal representation be allowed to those who will testify, but they will be allowed to have their legal assistance at their own cost if they choose. 'Witnesses will be allowed to have their lawyers with them and, within reason, consult with and take advice from their lawyers. The committee will not allow lawyers to speak on behalf of their clients at all,' reads the document.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store