Treasury slashes early retirement costs
The early retirement programme aims to rationalise and rejuvenate the public service while retaining critical skills and promoting the entry of younger talent. Picture Shutterstock
The allocation for the early retirement programme has been revised down from R11 billion estimated in the 2024 Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement to R5.5 billion across 2025/26 and 2026/27.
'This budget also retains the provisional allocations for early retirement, allocations for Prasa and the municipal trading entity reforms announced before, but at a slightly lower level than anticipated in the March 12 budget,' says Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana in his speech.
Re-introduced last year, the incentive aims to rationalise and rejuvenate the public service while retaining critical skills and promoting the entry of younger talent.
In 2019 there was a similar offer, but it didn't solve the problem.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: not austerity budget, but a redistributive budget
'This initiative is expected to motivate 15 000 public service employees to apply for early retirement in 2025/26 and 2026/27, with R5.5 billion allocated to support the programme', says National Treasury Director-General Dr Duncan Pieterse.
Initially, at R11 billion, the early retirement was to extend to 30 000 employees and translate to a R2 billion year cost saving.
'We halved the provision and so halved the number of employees who will benefit,' says Pieterse at a media briefing before Godongwana delivered his speech.
Early retirement costs will come up to R5.5 billion for the two years. The government will spend R2.2 billion in the first year of implementation and then proceed to spend R3.3 billion in 2026/27.
'The March 2025 Budget Review provides details on key fiscal reforms, including a longer-term fiscal anchor and the reactivation of early retirement without penalties to support a sustainable public-service wage bill. These reforms are in progress,' says Pieterse.
ALSO READ: Godongwana cuts government spending to offset VAT shortfall
Hefty public wage bill
The public sector wage bill has weighed heavily on the fiscus for years, and attempts to rein it in have been largely unsuccessful.
Moneyweb reported that SA's wage bill breached R700 billion in 2023. Tabling the budget for the 2023/2024 financial year, Godongwana said he expects compensation for workers in the employ of the public service to reach R701.2 billion, surpassing a level he once thought would be reached in 2025.
In 2019, former finance minister Tito Mboweni introduced a public sector salary freeze for three years in an effort to control the ballooning wages. But in the 2023/24 financial year, public service wages increased.
Pieterse noted discussions with organised labour on the process for people to apply for early retirement are underway in the Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC).
'The allocation will be revisited on the conclusion of these consultations as part of the next budget process, although functions that are not parties to the PSCBC process – such as the Department of Defence – can proceed with implementation,' he says.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Why middle-class South Africans are allowed to grumble
Stuck in a financial time warp since the 2010 World Cup, those in the middle class too are victims of our non-growing economy, facing grim career prospects and shelling out money they don't have just to get by. And, I fear it may be worse for our children. So, I'm guessing here, but unless you happen to have owned land in Cape Town over the past 15 years, you're probably feeling poorer than you did back when we hosted the World Cup. As it turns out, that year in particular was probably a turning point in your finances. Up until then, at roughly the point Jacob Zuma and Sepp Blatter walked onto the pitch at FNB Stadium in 2010, things had been getting better in South Africa. Now, in this country, I completely understand why we don't discuss the plight of the middle class very often. It's because so many people in so many other parts of our society are suffering so deeply. But, if you belong to our middle class, however you define it, you are absolutely allowed (somehow a safer word than 'entitled') a bit of grumbling. In fact, quite a bit of grumbling. A lot of grumbling, really. As Moneyweb explained in what I thought was a really important and thoughtful piece on Monday, the evidence backs it up. You probably have a lot less money to spend than you did back then. You're allowed to ask at this point: 'But hold on, inflation is finally down, we didn't suffer what other people did during the pandemic (when places like Hungary suffered food inflation of 45%). Why does it still feel so bad?' I think it must feel bad because, actually, it's pretty bad. It's just taken us a long time to get here. It's not just about the numbers, it's about what Stanlib chief economist Kevin Lings described quite wonderfully as 'lived inflation'. As he explains it, the basket of goods used by Stats SA to measure consumer price inflation includes many things you don't buy often. Appliance inflation is -3.6% (which is why it really is a good idea to put off buying that new fridge or vacuum cleaner until next month). But, the price of things like electricity, water, food and transport – things you use every day – is going up at a much higher rate than official inflation. And these are costs you just can't avoid. Lings put it rather neatly on The Money Show last night: 'The main problem is a lack of prospect, a lack of progression in your career. If you go to other countries, there are many, many more job opportunities. As you gain experience in your business, you are looking to move up the corporate ladder. You're looking to prosper, looking for a better-paying job. Those jobs are available, so you find yourself moving to another business, a much better-paying job. That can increase your salary in one go by 20 or 30%.' And in the US, he says, that is a massive component of 'how to increase your income'. To look at it this way, you – yes, you in the middle class – are also a victim of our non-growing economy. Or, to quote Lings again (sorry, Kevin!): 'We're not investing, we're not growing, we're not employing, we're not expanding.' That one sentence probably sums up our entire situation. I do think there are other things that might well explain our current state of grumbling though. It's not just that we are paying an absolute fortune for electricity and other council services. It's that we get virtually nothing in return. It may be different where you bought land 15 years ago, but I think in most other places, you probably feel that you are just giving the council money for nothing. And that means you've had to put buckets of money you can't really raise easily into the solar panels on your roof. Or sink money you don't have into a borehole. I suspect that in many parts of Joburg, Tshwane and eThekwini on a Sunday afternoon you might hear the complaint that you have to over-invest in your property just to live. And that, in turn, is money you won't get back either. And, as bad as it is for you, I fear it may be worse for our children. And I do mean all of the children in our nation. It seems much harder now to get into the formal economy than it was when I was oversupplied with hair and attitude. And this is possibly of absolutely no comfort to you whatsoever, but I think that is the case for younger people in most places. The economies of the EU and the bigger, uppity island off its coast are also struggling. Youth unemployment in Spain is more than 20%. I have no idea what is going to happen in the US, and even China, an economy that has been growing at a staggering rate for so long, is so worried about its youth unemployment figures that it stopped publishing them for a while.
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Costs may reduce voter registration to one weekend before 2026 elections
The Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) has warned that the ongoing fiscal challenges could limit registration opportunities for the 2026 local government elections and potentially give South Africans only one chance to register. Chief electoral officer Sy Mamabolo said on Thursday the IEC expected the registration weekend to be in June 2026. However, he noted there was no guarantee there would be a second chance to register. 'The reason for that is financial. We are in discussion with the National Treasury so it may well be that ahead of the elections there may be one general registration weekend,' he said. 'Our preference is two but we all know the fiscal position of the country.' Mamabolo was part of the IEC delegation that addressed members of the KwaZulu-Natal legislature in Pietermaritzburg on the opening day of its multi-stakeholder engagement in the province. He confirmed that electronic voting will not be implemented next year, although there were policy discussions about using it in the future. The commission added that it was taking steps to prevent a repeat of the technical problems it experienced in the 2024 elections but reiterated that its systems were not compromised and the national elections maintained their integrity despite those setbacks. Mamabolo said the 2024 elections were relatively peaceful in comparison to past elections, despite being the most competitive and witnessing a significant increase in tension and legal disputes. 'The commission had to defend no less than 80 applications in various courts but we have to compliment the fact that the prevailing environment was fairly peaceful in comparison with previous iterations of elections.' The complaints came mostly from the technical challenges the commission experienced, mainly the functioning of the voter management devices (VMDs) in the voting stations and the 'crash' of its results dashboard. The IEC had in 2024 introduced, for the first time, independent candidates as part of the evolving electoral framework. However, Mamabolo reiterated that their ICT system was not hacked and the elections met the international standards of free and fairness, despite those challenges. The IEC's elections results dashboard was infamously interrupted during the counting of the national and provincial votes. Addressing the interruption of the election results dashboard, Mamabolo reiterated that the results were secured. Mamabolo also reflected on the 'suboptimal' performance of the VMDs on election day last year, saying the commission was also unhappy because it led to long queues and created a lot of of consternation at voting stations He said there were five applications (apps) that were operational in the VMDs but one of them, the voters roll app, experienced a glitch that caused it to the create multiple records for a single voter when their ID was scanned, instead of capturing a single record and sending it through the network. 'As that one transaction replicated over many times, sometimes as many as 20,000 times, it created a backlog between the local machine and our application pulls in the network.' He said the IEC has put measures in place to prevent future problems as they prepare for the 2026 elections. 'We have identified that problem, ameliorated it and, at the moment, we are procuring an external independent tester to test the application from the code itself - its transmission to the network - and we should be able to give the executive summary of that testing to political parties in the party liaison committee so that you can be assured that the testing has happened by an independent company and what the outcome is.' He urged political parties to work on their candidates' lists early because the commission cannot extend the cut-off date. 'The courts have repeatedly said the IEC can't unilaterally change the date of the election timetable so when the date for submission of candidates list is set, it can't be changed unless there is a tsunami or similar natural disaster. Parties must work on that with a view to around June/July (2026).' The proclamation date is expected to be around July from co-operative governance and traditional affairs minister Velenkosini Hlabisa.
The Citizen
17 hours ago
- The Citizen
Vat-registered schools set for rude ‘wake-up call'
New proposal will force them to deregister, resulting in potentially huge Vat liabilities. A significant number of schools that are currently registered for Value-added tax (Vat) will be forced to deregister from next year. That's if a proposal in the draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (TLAB) is passed into legislation. This policy decision will have massive financial implications for schools in the short term, possibly depleting cash reserves and having substantial cash flow implications. It is likely to have a knock-on effect on school fees going forward. Educational services have always been exempt from Vat, but only if the services were supplied in return for school fees, tuition fees, or payment for lodging. However, services were never exempt if the consideration was not in the form of school fees, tuition fees, or payments for lodging. National Treasury announced that the proposed amendment will come into effect on 1 January 2026. The policy intent was 'always' to exclude schools from the Vat net, it says in its reason for the change. WTS Renmere's Vat specialist Duane Shipp says many schools with commercial activities registered for Vat if they were above the R1 million registration threshold. These commercial activities include, among others, the supply of school uniforms or making available the sports facilities, school hall, swimming pool, and hostels of the school to private clubs or individuals. The schools charged Vat on the supply of these offerings, but they were also able to deduct the Vat incurred as input tax on the cost incurred to purchase the school uniforms, treats for the tuck shop, or the construction of the sport facilities or swimming pool. ALSO READ: Huge rates shock could force Joburg schools to close down Vat Act changes However, the amendment proposes the removal of 'school' and 'school fees' from the wording of the relevant sections in the Vat Act. 'The implication is that all supplies of good or services by schools, regardless of whether it is in return for school fees or not, will be exempt under the Vat Act,' says Shipp. A significant number of schools have been registered for Vat and claiming their input tax on capital expansions for more than a decade, if not longer. ALSO READ: Gauteng schools urged to settle electricity and water bills Vat vendor schools Charles de Wet, tax executive at ENSafrica, says the school as a Vat vendor had to charge Vat when renting the school hall or sports facilities to private clubs or individuals. However, they had the advantage of claiming a percentage of their input Vat on capital projects, and they could also claim a percentage of the input Vat on the overhead costs of the assets on an apportionment basis. This includes a portion of the electricity bill for the floodlights, or a portion of the water used for the sport fields. But, once an entity deregisters as a Vat vendor it must repay the input tax claimed on its capital assets, says De Wet. That is the 'exit' tax, he adds. The effect with the forced deregistration is that all the input Vat claimed on capital assets since registration for Vat must be repaid. Treasury has made a concession, allowing schools that will find themselves in this cash flow predicament to repay the Vat liability in twelve monthly instalments, 'or in so many instalments as the commissioner [of the South African Revenue Service] may decide.' This liability may well run into millions for some of the country's private schools, boarding schools, or more affluent schools. 'There is a big wake-up call coming for some schools,' says Shipp. ALSO READ: Temporary rates reprieve for Joburg schools Second time coming A similar proposal was also introduced in the draft TLAB bill last year, but the amendment extended to schools, technikons, and universities. The proposal was abandoned following an extensive public pushback, particularly from universities. This year, the proposal is back, but only targeted at schools, notes both Shipp and De Wet. The proposal does not fit into the structure of the Vat Act, says De Wet. Typically, it is not entities that are exempt from Vat, but rather the nature of the supply – in this case, educational services. 'It is strange that they are deviating from the format of the act. Treasury is now exempting the entity [schools registered under the SA Schools Act] and not the supply,' says De Wet. Policy intent Shipp also has difficulty understanding the policy intent behind the proposal. 'If the policy intent was always to exclude schools, why has the wording of the act [until now] not reflected the intent,' he asks. He also questions the short notice given to schools. Many schools have probably already passed their budgets for the next calendar year. Accommodating this unforeseen Vat liability will create enormous stress on the school's finances. The knock-on effect is that any commercial endeavour in future will come at a 15% higher price tag. The school will be charged 15% for the school uniforms, the construction of a swimming pool, or the tuck shop treats, but it will no longer be able to deduct its input Vat. Interested parties have until 12 September to publicly comment on the proposed amendment. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
