Gisteo Expands With AI-Powered Explainers & New Video Content Services for The Attention Economy
Miami, FL - March 18, 2025 - After 13 years at the forefront of explainer video production, Miami-based company Gisteo is expanding its offerings to equip businesses with the tools they need to break through the noise and thrive in today's attention economy. Its newest offerings leverage AI-powered video production and streamlined content creation solutions, enabling brands to engage their audience faster, more effectively, and at scale.
'The digital landscape is constantly evolving and expectations for engaging content are higher than ever,' said Stephen Conley, the Founder and Creative Director of Gisteo. 'This expansion builds on our core expertise in story-driven content while introducing formats that align with the evolving needs of today's businesses.'
Gisteo's new offerings include:
AI Explainers: Hyper-realistic digital presenters based on real human actors, making AI video production more engaging and accessible. With multilingual capabilities, this new offering enables brands to easily scale their messaging while maintaining authenticity.
Reel Interviews: A streamlined approach to thought leadership. Gisteo conducts remote interviews, extracts key insights, and transforms them into dynamic short-form videos with music, captions, and B-roll footage – delivering polished interview-based video content that resonates.
Remote Customer Testimonials: Authenticity sells, and this service allows brands to capture remote customer testimonials while maintaining high-production quality.
Express Explainers: Designed for businesses with tight deadlines and lean budgets, this service leverages templates and presets to deliver high-quality explainer videos with fast turnaround times and lower costs.
Extreme Messaging Makeover: A strategic service designed to refine brand messaging for greater clarity and impact, helping businesses sharpen their narrative and drive engagement.
As part of its expansion, Gisteo is also introducing an Unlimited Yearly Plan. This flat-rate, all-you-can-produce model gives companies unrestricted access to Gisteo's full suite of video services, enabling businesses to maintain a steady content pipeline with predictable costs.
Gisteo has already secured clients for its new services, reflecting a strong demand for flexible, scalable, and innovative video solutions.
To learn more about Gisteo's expanded service offerings or to book a consultation, please visit https://gisteo.com/.
About Gisteo
Founded in 2011, Gisteo is a Miami-based explainer video company specializing in clear, compelling storytelling. With a focus on simplicity and impact, Gisteo creates videos that break through complexity, connect with audiences, and drive action.
Socials: LinkedIn, @gisteo
Media Contact
Company Name: Gisteo
Contact Person: Stephen Conley
Email: Send Email
Phone: (305) 417-4059
Country: United States
Website: https://gisteo.com/
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
16 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
Vancouver Sun
18 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Delivery services under legal scrutiny for alleged 'drip pricing'
The practice known as 'drip pricing' is front and centre again in an action by the federal Competition Bureau against DoorDash and in a proposed class-action lawsuit brought by a Toronto law firm against Uber Eats. Drip pricing generally involves enticing customers by advertising low prices, but charging extra mandatory fees, usually when they are checking out. It continues to come under fire because 'disclosure around pricing and fees in various consumer transactions is, at times, less than thorough and transparent,' says Mike Robb, partner with London, Ontario-based law firm, Siskinds. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Competition Bureau says w hen 'the represented price is inaccurate, it makes it more difficult for consumers to comparison shop and result(s) in unfair outcomes for honest competitors.' Canada's competition watchdog is hauling DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary before the Competition Tribunal, accusing them of portraying the online cost of delivery as lower than the price consumers ultimately pay. The Competition Bureau says it investigated and is alleging DoorDash customers paid more, due to mandatory fees, added during checkout. The extra fees, the bureau says, include charges such as extra amounts for delivering items a further distance and for placing smaller orders. The bureau alleges the discretionary charges were sometimes framed as taxes. The bureau alleges DoorDash may have used drip pricing for close to a decade to make nearly $1 billion from mandatory fees, according to the Canadian Press . The bureau is asking the Competition Tribunal to order the company to stop the practice, cease portraying fees as taxes, pay a penalty and issue restitution to affected consumers. However, DoorDash is pushing back. 'This application is a misguided and excessive attempt to target one of Canada's leading local commerce platforms,' DoorDash spokesperson Trent Hodson told CP . 'It unfairly singles out DoorDash, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims.' Still, the bureau is standing its ground. 'Our litigation against DoorDash is another example of our efforts to ensure consumers are not misled and can trust the prices they see online. We urge all businesses to review their pricing practices and make sure they comply with the law,' said Matthew Boswell, commissioner of competition in a press release . The Competition Bureau has been more aggressive of late in battling drip pricing. Last fall, the bureau won a deceptive marketing case against Cineplex Inc. , noted Robb. It had been adding a mandatory $1.50 online booking fee. The company was ordered to pay a financial penalty of almost $39 million. Last summer, says Robb, the bureau reached an agreement with SiriusXM Canada . In that case, the company was ordered to pay a $3.3 million penalty over adding a fee on subscription plans that increased the monthly cost. Meanwhile, legal action against drip pricing is not exclusive to public regulators. Law firms that navigate class actions are getting in on the act too. Toronto firm, Koskie Minsky filed a statement of claim against Uber Eats with the Ontario Superior Court Justice last month. It alleges Uber Eats has been hiding an additional service fee within its overall delivery costs. The proposed class action alleges that Uber misrepresented the true cost of delivery by not disclosing the service fee until the final stage of the transaction, 'often obscured under a 'Taxes & Other Fees' line item, a practice known as drip pricing,' says the law firm on its website. The action has been brought on behalf of Canadian residents who on or after May 16, 2023, placed a delivery order using Uber Eats and paid a service fee. Further, the lawsuit alleges Uber One members, who are supposed to enjoy benefits such as no delivery fees on eligible orders, have been paying the service fee. It's 'really a delivery fee as it only applies to delivery orders' and it 'constitutes a breach of contract and negates the advertised benefit of the subscription.' Robb says 'the existence of parallel proceedings in these cases is not necessarily surprising or unusual.' He explains that the Competition Bureau has a statutory mandate to protect Canadian consumers and businesses from allegedly unfair business practices. In its case against DoorDash , it is asking the Competition Tribunal to provide restitution to consumers, though that's somewhat unusual, he says. 'It may or may not be equipped to negotiate and deliver remedies to consumers.' However, he points out that class actions always focus on recovery for consumers, 'even when the amounts are individually minimal. It is common in our cases that when they resolve, an administration mechanism is established to facilitate an accessible distribution of modest amount to individual consumers.' A recent example would be a payout website established for the bread-fixing class-action settlement. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Vancouver Sun
20 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Transportation minister says building in Europe would have cost B.C. Ferries an additional $1.2 billion
B.C.'s transportation minister now acknowledges that while he has concerns about B.C. Ferries' decision to award a contract to a Chinese state-owned company, the corporation had few other options. Building four new vessels in Europe would have cost B.C. Ferries a lot more money, Farnworth told Postmedia News. The corporation has warned additional costs could lead to further fare increases for taxpayers. 'I know some people have suggested going to Europe. But the reality is, I learned from B.C. Ferries, to go to Europe, to build the ships, it would be an additional $1.2 billion.' Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Farnworth said he was informed of the ferry service's decision to award the contract to Weihai shipyards about a month before it was made public this week, at which point he raised concerns about doing business with a country engaged in a trade war with Canada. 'I raised my concerns. One … the fact that there's no Canadian content in terms of construction. The tariffs, the trade disputes that are currently ongoing between our two countries is also, quite frankly, very concerning, and something that I think is going to be a real problem,' he said. However, part of the problem, Farnworth said, is that there were no Canadian bids for the contract, which seeks to have four vessels delivered by 2031 in order to replace B.C. Ferries' oldest ships. B.C. Ferries has refused to release the value of the contract with Weihai shipyards. North Vancouver-based shipbuilder Seaspan said in September that 'Canadian shipyards and their supply chains cannot compete with low-wage countries that have lower employment standards, lower environmental standards and lower safety standards.' It had urged the provincial government to step in to provide tax breaks and forgivable loans and grants to allow local companies to compete for bids. Farnworth said that although Seaspan has indicated it's now busy with federal contracts, he wants to develop a plan to ensure future contracts are kept in B.C. 'I know B.C. Ferries will be wanting to build more ships in the future, and I want to ensure that as much of that as possible is done here in B.C. and Canada,' he said. 'I've asked for work within my ministry in terms of what is required to ensure that happens.' The Shipyard General Workers Federation said in a statement Thursday that while Seaspan may not be in a position to bid, 'many smaller shipyards in Canada have expressed their willingness and capability to collaborate as a consortium to keep this work within our borders.' It urged the provincial and federal governments to intervene so that the project can be returned to Canada. Asked whether he planned to do so, Farnworth sidestepped the question and simply cited the additional cost that would come with moving the contract. A China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., told Postmedia earlier this week that such contracts could help China's military aspirations and preparations for a possible invasion of Taiwan. But Farnworth said he wasn't concerned. 'Shipyards all over the world are used for building commercial vessels and for military vessels. Our shipyards build military vessels as well,' he said. 'That is why I think it is important that we look at how we can ensure that we can build ships here in our own country, in the future.'
