logo
Starship launching from Florida? What to know about giant rocket, explosions and 'Gigabay'

Starship launching from Florida? What to know about giant rocket, explosions and 'Gigabay'

Yahoo10-07-2025
Floridians finally have the opportunity to provide some public feedback on SpaceX's plans to expand operations of its massive Starship rocket to the Sunshine State.
And unsurprisingly, residents are already expressing some of the same concerns that SpaceX opponents in Texas have long had about the spacecraft, which is being developed and tested for future human missions.
Starship has made headlines this year for a series of explosions that have occurred in 2025 after launching from SpaceX's Starbase headquarters in South Texas for uncrewed flight tests. But during the first of three scheduled public hearings on Florida's Space Coast, most of those who spoke addressed the potential environmental effects from Starship rocket launches.
The hearings come amid plans for billionaire Elon Musk's commercial spaceflight company to bring Starship production and launch capabilities to Florida potentially by the end of 2025.
Standing nearly 400 feet tall when fully stacked, Starship is due in the years ahead to play a pivotal role in the U.S. spaceflight program.
Tourists' guide to Florida launches: Vacationing in Florida and want to catch a rocket launch? Here's what to know
Here's what to know about the public hearings in Florida, as well as SpaceX's future plans for Starship in the state.
SpaceX is seeking regulatory approval to commence conducting Starship flight tests at both the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's neighboring Kennedy Space Center.
Before approval is granted, U.S. Air Force officials are providing a chance for feedback on potential environmental impacts from up to 76 future Starship-Super Heavy rocket systems launching per year from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
Just three people spoke during the first hearing, which took place Wednesday, July 9, though dozens more were in attendance. A second hearing took place later in the day, while the third and final in-person hearing is scheduled for 4 to 7 p.m. Thursday, July 10, at the Dr. Joe Lee Smith Recreation Center, 415 Stone St., Cocoa, Florida.
A virtual hearing is scheduled for 6 p.m. Tuesday, July 15, at spaceforcestarshipeis.com.
Previous public hearings took place regarding plans for 44 potential launches from the Kennedy Space Center.
While some residents have expressed concerns about the effect Starship launches could have on the environment and local wildlife, Florida officials have estimated that the endeavor could generate at least $1.8 billion of capital investment and about 600 new full-time jobs by 2030.
Environmental impact statements are underway for both potential launch sites.
"We want to make sure we understand the environmental impacts. But we also want to understand the economic impacts, and how we can best balance those," U.S. Rep. Mike Haridopolos, R-Indian Harbour Beach, told FLORIDA TODAY.
As SpaceX breaks ground in Florida on a new Starship facility it calls "Gigabay," the company is also finalizing plans to launch the Starship spacecraft by the end of 2025 from NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
For SpaceX head Musk, expanding Starship operations to a second state is crucial to accelerate the development of the vehicle.
SpaceX has long had plans in place to build a Starship launch pad at NASA's Kennedy Space Center near Cape Canaveral. The site is located at the historic launch complex 39A – the site of the U.S. space agency's Apollo moon mission launches.
SpaceX would not only equip the site to launch Starship, but to catch its Super Heavy rocket booster when it returns to the pad – as it has done three times at Starbase.
Ultimately, though, SpaceX has ambitious plans for the construction of its 380-foot-tall Gigabay in Florida.
The massive building, which will be used to stack and finalize the 232-foot-tall Super Heavy boosters, or lower stages, with the Starship vehicle before flights, is under construction near SpaceX's facility on Kennedy Space Center grounds.
Starship, regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed, towers over SpaceX's famous Falcon 9 rocket – one of the world's most active – which stands at nearly 230 feet.
When fully integrated, the launch system is composed of both a 232-foot Super Heavy rocket and the 171-foot upper stage spacecraft, or capsule where crew and cargo would ride.
Super Heavy alone is powered by 33 of SpaceX's Raptor engines that give the initial burst of thrust at liftoff. The upper section, also called Starship or Ship for short, is the upper stage powered by six Raptor engines that will ultimately travel in orbit.
SpaceX is developing Starship to be a fully reusable transportation system, meaning both the rocket and vehicle can return to the ground for additional missions. The Starship is due to play a pivotal role in the years ahead in U.S. spaceflight as NASA eyes a return to the moon and Musk has dreams of the first humans reaching Mars.
On June 18, Starship unexpectedly exploded while SpaceX was preparing for an upcoming flight test. No one was hurt in the incident, which occurred as the Starship spacecraft was standing alone on the test stand prior to being mounted on top of the rocket booster.
The mishap, which SpaceX later referred to on its website as "a sudden energetic event," completely destroyed the spacecraft and ignited several fires that caused damage in the area surrounding the test stand.
While SpaceX is investigating the mishap, Musk said in a post on X that preliminary data suggested that a pressurized tank failed at the top of the rocket.
The explosion was the latest fiery mishap SpaceX's Starship has encountered during – and, now, prior to – its flight tests in 2025.
Starship's most recent demonstration came May 27 when the spacecraft spun out of control roughly halfway through its flight and disintegrated in a fireball. Though Starship was unable to achieve its most important objectives, the distance the vehicle traveled far surpassed the previous 2025 flights in January and March, when Starship exploded within minutes.
The company has frequently stressed that its rapid and frequent testing is expected to sometimes lead to such explosive ends, but that even failed launches can provide data that helps engineers improve Starship's design.
Contributing: Brooke Edwards, FLORIDA TODAY
Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Will SpaceX Starship launch from Florida? Public invited to give input
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury says Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot
Jury says Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jury says Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot

MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. Bernard Condon And David Fischer, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Jury orders Tesla to pay $329M in Autopilot crash case, opening it up to other costly lawsuits
Jury orders Tesla to pay $329M in Autopilot crash case, opening it up to other costly lawsuits

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Jury orders Tesla to pay $329M in Autopilot crash case, opening it up to other costly lawsuits

MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and potentially striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety at a critical time for the company. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019.

Musk's X: Britain's Internet safety law 'seriously infringes' free speech
Musk's X: Britain's Internet safety law 'seriously infringes' free speech

UPI

time11 minutes ago

  • UPI

Musk's X: Britain's Internet safety law 'seriously infringes' free speech

"Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression," the Global Government Affairs wing of the Elon Musk-owned X said Friday on Britain's newly-enacted Online Safety Act. Photo by Ismael Mohamad/ UPI | License Photo Aug. 1 (UPI) -- The Elon Musk-owned social media platform X said Friday that Britain's newly-enacted Online Safety Act "seriously" is on the cusp of violating free speech masked as the fight to protect kids from explicit online content. "Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression," the Global Government affairs wing of the Bastrop, Texas-headquartered X said Friday. Britain's Online Safety Act created a new set of legal duties that tech companies must abide by. It mandated they evaluate the potential of users encountering illegal Internet content and children being exposed to online harm, which included a required safety assessment. "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety,'" the letter stated. The British parliament passed it in September 2023 in the quest to improve online safety for young people. X argues the British people may not of been aware of the "trade-off" when London passed the bill. The OSA covers more than 130 offenses ranging from harassment and "assisting or encouraging suicide" to terrorism, fraud and "unlawful immigration." It targets tech entities that spans "social media or video-sharing platforms, messaging, gaming and dating apps, forums and file-sharing sites." According to the former Twitter, the act's "laudable intentions" were at risk of "being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach." "While everyone agrees protecting children is a critical responsibility, it is also clear that an overly rigorous statutory framework layered with a 'voluntary' code and heightened police monitoring, oversteps the intended mission," it continued. On Friday, a British watchdog group indicated that those fears may may be valid. "The BBC is now reporting that information about the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, UK rape gangs, and more is being censored online due to the government's new Online 'Safety' Act," Silkie Carlo, director of Britain-based Big Brother Watch, posted on X. "Well done lads," she added in jest. X's government affairs offiec says free speech will suffer without a "more balanced, collaborative approach." Pornhub and other major pornographic websites had a targeted end of July date to implement its age verification mechanisms in order to comply. Musk, 54, has characterized himself as a "free speech absolutist." The former White House DOGE adviser, for his part, has said the act's purpose was "suppression of the people" as he tweeted a petition calling for it's repeal that got more than 450,000 signatures. OSA's deadline required pornographic websites to implement "robust" age verification methods or face fines close to $20 million or equal to 10% of company proceeds. X cited British regulator Ofcom how it "to date" had allegedly taken a "heavy-handed approach" to enforcement, which it said included a boost in resources, additional "layers of bureaucratic oversight and signaling an aggressive approach to ensuring compliance." In a recent Ofcom research study, some 8% of children aged of 8 to 14 accessed a pornography source over a 28-day period. It included 19% boys and 11% of girls from 13 to 14 years old. In addition to the increased government regulations, X officials also cite Britain's new "National Internet Intelligence Investigations" team unit company officials say "sets off alarm bells" and will further "intensify scrutiny." The social media company said the Internet teams "sole" focus is to monitor social media for "signs of unrest, such as anti-immigrant sentiment, to prevent real-world violence." "While positioned as a safety measure, it clearly goes far beyond that intent," the post reads. "This move has set off alarm bells for free speech advocates who characterize it as excessive and potentially restrictive."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store