Plastic pollution treaty talks open with 'global crisis' warning
States should seize the chance to shape history, the man chairing the talks said as 10 days of negotiations kicked off at the United Nations in Geneva.
"We are facing a global crisis," Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told the more than 1,800 negotiators as they prepared to thrash out their differences in the search for common ground.
"Plastic pollution is damaging ecosystems, polluting our oceans and rivers, threatening biodiversity, harming human health, and unfairly impacting the most vulnerable," he said.
"The urgency is real, the evidence is clear -- and the responsibility is on us."
Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
But after five rounds of talks, three years of negotiations hit the wall in Busan, South Korea, in December when oil-producing states blocked a consensus.
- Pathway to deal -
Key figures steering this revived attempt insist a deal is within reach this time around.
"There's been extensive diplomacy from Busan till now," the UN Environment Programme's Executive Director Inger Andersen told AFP.
The UNEP is hosting the talks, and Andersen said conversations between different regions and interest groups had generated momentum.
"Most countries, actually, that I have spoken with have said: 'We're coming to Geneva to strike the deal'.
"Will it be easy? No. Will it be straightforward? No. Is there a pathway for a deal? Absolutely."
- Dumped, burned and trashed -
More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items.
While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled.
Nearly half, or 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter.
In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024.
However, the supposedly final negotiations on a legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the seas, flopped in Busan.
One group of countries sought an ambitious deal to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals.
But a clutch of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus on treating waste.
- Production cap gap -
A cap on plastic production is one of the thorniest issues being debated in Geneva.
Katrin Schneeberger, the director of Switzerland's environment ministry, told the opening press conference: "This is no call for a production cap. Clarifying this in informal meetings was an important message to producing countries."
Without commenting on whether there would be a cap, Andersen then stressed that the treaty would cover the entire life cycle of plastics, from production to waste.
More than 600 non-governmental organisations are in Geneva, and this time have access to the discussion group meetings.
"We have to stop making so much plastic," Greenpeace's delegation chief Graham Forbes told AFP.
The group and its allies want a treaty "that cuts plastic production, eliminates toxic chemicals and provides the financing that's going to be required to transition to a fossil fuel, plastic-free future", he said.
"The fossil fuel industry is here in force," he noted, adding: "We cannot let a few countries determine humanity's future when it comes to plastic pollution."
- Big triggers -
France's Ecological Transition Minister Agnes Pannier-Runacher -- one of a few dozen ministers planning on heading to Geneva later in the talks -- warned Tuesday that the negotiations would be "difficult".
"I call on each state to take responsibility before we are overwhelmed by this pollution," she said in a statement.
Panama's delegate Juan Monterrey Gomez -- a fellow proponent of an ambitious treaty -- voiced optimism that a treaty could be struck on August 14.
"The beginning is better than Busan," he said of the start of talks.
No country wanting to be held responsible for sinking the negotiations "is probably the biggest trigger we can push", he told AFP.
rjm-im/sbk NewsWire
Just days after mocking Joe Root's Ashes record, David Warner's return to Lord's has ended in humiliation with a quick dismissal. NewsWire
Five Australians were on-board a tourist boat that capsized off Bali, killing two people and leaving another missing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

9 News
3 hours ago
- 9 News
Palestinians brush off Australia's 'symbolic' statehood recognition, advocate says
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Pro-Palestine advocates have labelled Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's move to recognise Palestinian statehood as "symbolic" and a "distraction", saying it will not help the situation on the ground. Monday's announcement confirmed Australia will join the United Kingdom, Canada and France in recognising Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The move is underpinned by commitments from the Palestinian Authority, including reaffirming recognition of Israel, the demilitarisation of Hamas, holding elections, governance and education reforms, and isolating Hamas from the future state. Ramia Abdo Sultan, the executive member of the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network. (Supplied) Ramia Abdo Sultan, the executive member of the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network, has been calling for action for her family members and others in Palestine. But she said the government's recognition was merely a "symbolic step" that did not address the "immediate and imminent" issues faced by Palestinians. "[My family] received news about Australia, as well as various other countries around the world, recognising Palestine in the next month, and they said, 'We want to hear about our right to actually exist first before an ocean of recognition. We want to know that we have a right to live, a right to self-determination and autonomy and agency, like every other person around the world'," she said. "That's what Palestinians on the ground in Gaza are saying." Mussa Hijazi, a lawyer who spent some of his childhood growing up in Palestine, went further to call the prime minister's recognition "a bit more sinister" than a "distraction". "Number one: it's very late. Two: it's symbolic. Three: it's creating a distraction from what is actually going on," he said. "We end up with this half-arsed attempt to basically quieten the public down by proposing possibly recognising a state at some stage, later down the track, subject to conditions," he added. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. (Nine) Albanese's sudden shift in policy followed building international momentum, sparked on July 25 when France announced it would be the first G7 country to move to recognise Palestine at the upcoming UN meeting. Albanese's decision has put him at odds with the United States, which was notified of Australia's plan to recognise Palestine ahead of the announcement. Organisers of the mass bridge protest accused the government of acting with political motivation, adding that recognition is meaningless without sanctions. "This decision is not borne of principle, but of political heat," Palestine Action Group Sydney said. Pro-Palestine protesters march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. (Janie Barrett) Pro-Palestine protesters have been calling for the government to go further, to sanction Israel and stop any arms trade with Israel. "We don't want symbolic steps and moves. We want actual tangible actions that are going to stop Israel from killing people again," Sultan said. "Once we have got a ceasefire, once people are being fed, once the Israelis have withdrawn, we can talk about all sorts of things, including a two-state, but right now it's a distraction," Hijazi said. Israel's security cabinet last week approved a plan to take over Gaza City, ramping up military action in the besieged enclave. The United Nations has warned that this plan would trigger more calamity in Gaza, causing the "unbearable suffering of the population". The World Health Organisation said the number of starvation-related deaths and malnutrition rates have spiked, while the United Nations estimates that at least 1300 Palestinians have been killed trying to access food since May 27. CONTACT US

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
United Nations-backed investigators allege systemic torture in Myanmar detention facilities by security forces
United Nations investigators say they have found evidence of systematic torture by Myanmar security forces and identified some of the most senior perpetrators. Warning: This story contains details of sexual offences which may distress some audience members. The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), formed in 2018 to analyse evidence of serious violations of international law, said victims were subject to beatings, electric shocks, gang rape, strangulation and other forms of torture such as the removal of fingernails with pliers. "We have uncovered significant evidence, including eyewitness testimony, showing systematic torture in Myanmar detention facilities," Nicholas Koumjian, head of the IIMM, said in a statement accompanying the 16-page report. The torture sometimes resulted in death, the report said. Children aged 2 to 17, who are often unlawfully detained as proxies for their missing parents, were among those tortured, it said. A spokesperson for Myanmar's military-backed government did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Reuters. The government has not responded to over two dozen requests by the UN team for information about the alleged crimes and requests to access the country, the UN report said. The military has said it has a duty to ensure peace and security. It has denied atrocities have taken place and has blamed "terrorists" for causing unrest. The findings in the report, covering a one-year period through to June 30, were based on information from more than 1,300 sources, including hundreds of eyewitness testimonies as well as forensic evidence, documents and photographs. Perpetrators identified so far include high-level commanders, the report said, although names were withheld due to ongoing investigations and concerns about alerting the individuals. Investigators focused on torture partly because many victims were able to identify perpetrators individually, which Mr Koumjian, a former prosecutor, said could help with future convictions. "People often know the names or they certainly know the faces of those who torture them or who torture their friends," Mr Koumjian told reporters in Geneva. Myanmar has been in chaos since a 2021 military coup against an elected civilian government plunged the country into civil war. Tens of thousands of people have been detained since then, the United Nations says. Junta chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing ended a four-year state of emergency last month and announced the formation of a new government, with himself as acting president, ahead of a planned election. The IIMM is investigating abuses in Myanmar since 2011, including crimes committed against the mainly Muslim Rohingya minority in 2017 when hundreds of thousands were forced to flee a military crackdown, and those affecting all groups since the coup. The IIMM is supporting jurisdictions investigating the alleged crimes, such as Britain and the International Criminal Court. However, Mr Koumjian said UN budget cuts threatened its work. Donations for its research on sexual violence and crimes against children, as well as funding for witness security, are set to run out at the end of the year, he said. "All of this would have a very substantial effect on our ability to continue to document the crimes and provide evidence that will be useful to jurisdictions prosecuting these cases," he said. Reuters/ABC


The Advertiser
18 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Australia set to recognise Palestine statehood at UN
AUSTRALIA TO FORMALLY RECOGNISE PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD: * Formal recognition of a Palestinian state will take place at the United Nations General Assembly, which will take place in September * The decision came after other allies, including the UK, France and Canada, also announced intentions to recognise Palestine at the UN meeting * Australia will join more than 140 member states of the UN in recognising Palestine * Conditions of Palestinian recognition will include assurances that Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organisation, will play no role in any government * Commitments would also be made for free and fair elections, as well as recognition from Palestine of Israeli statehood * Calls have also been made for hostages held by Hamas following the October 7 attacks to be released * Practical steps such as an Australian embassy would be reliant to assurances from the Palestinian Authority * Anthony Albanese previously said Palestinian recognition by Australia would be a matter of "when, not if" * While the prime minister was under pressure to follow the lead allies on recognition, he said he would not be driven by a set time frame * However, he since said Israel's decision to approve a plan to seize all of Gaza City helped lead to the decision to recognise Palestine * The prime minister said recognition was part of international efforts for peace in the Middle East and that a different approach was needed * While other countries will recognise Palestine at the UN's General Assembly, the global body as a whole is unlikely to recognise the state as a member * This is due to the UN Security Council members having a veto power over proposals * The US is one of the permanent members of the Security Council, and does not recognise a Palestinian state AUSTRALIA TO FORMALLY RECOGNISE PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD: * Formal recognition of a Palestinian state will take place at the United Nations General Assembly, which will take place in September * The decision came after other allies, including the UK, France and Canada, also announced intentions to recognise Palestine at the UN meeting * Australia will join more than 140 member states of the UN in recognising Palestine * Conditions of Palestinian recognition will include assurances that Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organisation, will play no role in any government * Commitments would also be made for free and fair elections, as well as recognition from Palestine of Israeli statehood * Calls have also been made for hostages held by Hamas following the October 7 attacks to be released * Practical steps such as an Australian embassy would be reliant to assurances from the Palestinian Authority * Anthony Albanese previously said Palestinian recognition by Australia would be a matter of "when, not if" * While the prime minister was under pressure to follow the lead allies on recognition, he said he would not be driven by a set time frame * However, he since said Israel's decision to approve a plan to seize all of Gaza City helped lead to the decision to recognise Palestine * The prime minister said recognition was part of international efforts for peace in the Middle East and that a different approach was needed * While other countries will recognise Palestine at the UN's General Assembly, the global body as a whole is unlikely to recognise the state as a member * This is due to the UN Security Council members having a veto power over proposals * The US is one of the permanent members of the Security Council, and does not recognise a Palestinian state AUSTRALIA TO FORMALLY RECOGNISE PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD: * Formal recognition of a Palestinian state will take place at the United Nations General Assembly, which will take place in September * The decision came after other allies, including the UK, France and Canada, also announced intentions to recognise Palestine at the UN meeting * Australia will join more than 140 member states of the UN in recognising Palestine * Conditions of Palestinian recognition will include assurances that Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organisation, will play no role in any government * Commitments would also be made for free and fair elections, as well as recognition from Palestine of Israeli statehood * Calls have also been made for hostages held by Hamas following the October 7 attacks to be released * Practical steps such as an Australian embassy would be reliant to assurances from the Palestinian Authority * Anthony Albanese previously said Palestinian recognition by Australia would be a matter of "when, not if" * While the prime minister was under pressure to follow the lead allies on recognition, he said he would not be driven by a set time frame * However, he since said Israel's decision to approve a plan to seize all of Gaza City helped lead to the decision to recognise Palestine * The prime minister said recognition was part of international efforts for peace in the Middle East and that a different approach was needed * While other countries will recognise Palestine at the UN's General Assembly, the global body as a whole is unlikely to recognise the state as a member * This is due to the UN Security Council members having a veto power over proposals * The US is one of the permanent members of the Security Council, and does not recognise a Palestinian state AUSTRALIA TO FORMALLY RECOGNISE PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD: * Formal recognition of a Palestinian state will take place at the United Nations General Assembly, which will take place in September * The decision came after other allies, including the UK, France and Canada, also announced intentions to recognise Palestine at the UN meeting * Australia will join more than 140 member states of the UN in recognising Palestine * Conditions of Palestinian recognition will include assurances that Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organisation, will play no role in any government * Commitments would also be made for free and fair elections, as well as recognition from Palestine of Israeli statehood * Calls have also been made for hostages held by Hamas following the October 7 attacks to be released * Practical steps such as an Australian embassy would be reliant to assurances from the Palestinian Authority * Anthony Albanese previously said Palestinian recognition by Australia would be a matter of "when, not if" * While the prime minister was under pressure to follow the lead allies on recognition, he said he would not be driven by a set time frame * However, he since said Israel's decision to approve a plan to seize all of Gaza City helped lead to the decision to recognise Palestine * The prime minister said recognition was part of international efforts for peace in the Middle East and that a different approach was needed * While other countries will recognise Palestine at the UN's General Assembly, the global body as a whole is unlikely to recognise the state as a member * This is due to the UN Security Council members having a veto power over proposals * The US is one of the permanent members of the Security Council, and does not recognise a Palestinian state