Huawei probe blunder sparks EU rules change
It soon turned out she had nothing to do with it — in a mix-up that has undermined confidence in the probe and pushed the European Parliament to review its rules to better shield lawmakers from unfounded accusations.
'To this day I cannot understand how they could have made such a blatant mistake,' Princi told AFP of Belgian prosecutors.
The Brussels prosecutor office did not reply to a request for comment.
Princi, 52, a member of late Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia party, was targeted by a request to lift her parliamentary immunity in mid-May, along with four other lawmakers.
Prosecutors alleged she attended a Brussels dinner with Huawei representatives seeking to curry favour among parliamentarians in June last year.
But on the day in question the Italian politician was yet to be formally appointed to the 27-nation bloc's assembly following European elections that month. She secured a seat only after another lawmaker renounced his.
Also, she was not in Belgium but in her native southern Calabria region, attending her daughter's Alice-in-Wonderland-themed end-of-year school play.
No more 'tarnishing'
Describing herself as 'stubborn and pig-headed', Princi lawyered up, compiled an 'almost 100-page long' dossier including geo-tagged photos of her daughter in a princess dress, and sent it to prosecutors.
Yet, her bid to get exonerated before things became public failed.
On May 21 EU parliament president Roberta Metsola named Princi among lawmakers targeted by authorities before a plenary sitting.
That was a step required by parliamentary procedure before the case could be passed to the committee on legal affairs, which is tasked to assess immunity waivers.
But the rules have since been revised, for, in an embarrassing about-face, prosecutors withdrew the request targeting Princi a day after she was publicly named.
'I will not accept the targeting and tarnishing of MEPs without a solid basis,' Metsola told a press conference in late June, announcing the changes.
Her office said that going forward parliament will require requests to lift a lawmaker's immunity to include 'essential elements' such as a clear description of the facts and the crime the accused is alleged to have committed.
'If the requests do not meet the minimum elements, the requesting authority will be asked to complement it' before any announcement is made, Metsola's office said.
Although brief, Princi said her involvement in the affair caused her a fair amount of stress during a few 'days of hell' — and dirty looks from colleagues.
'Question marks'
The fiasco has fuelled a debate on whether Belgian authorities are best placed to investigate EU corruption.
Daniel Freund, a transparency campaigner turned lawmaker for Europe's Greens, is among those who would like the European Public Prosecutor's Office, which already probes the misuse of EU funds, to be tasked with such cases.
'I guess the Belgian taxpayer doesn't have a particular interest to dedicate a lot of resources to making sure that EU institutions are clean. But since EU institutions are located in Belgium, it somehow falls into their remit,' he told AFP.
An earlier scandal over alleged bribery involving Qatar and Morocco, which erupted in 2022 when police raids in Brussels uncovered 1.5 million euros in cash at the homes of several lawmakers, is still weighed down in legal challenges with no trial in sight.
Were that to collapse, it 'would seriously put into question the role of the Belgian judiciary,' Freund said, adding 'some question marks' also hung over the Huawei probe.
The Huawei scandal burst into the public in March when police staged raids in Belgium and Portugal.
Investigators suspect Huawei lobbyists of offering gifts, including meals and invitations to football matches to lawmakers who would defend its interests in Brussels.
Eight people have been charged on counts including corruption, money laundering and participating in a criminal organisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
17 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump's push for Ukraine peace shifts to Zelensky in Oval Office again
The fate of Donald Trump's push to stop the fighting in Ukraine will be tested again as Volodymyr Zelensky prepares to respond to the US president's shifting demands following mixed signals from the Russia-US summit in Alaska. Trump will host the Ukrainian president at the White House on Monday in their first Oval Office encounter since a public spat in February. The new encounter comes in the shadow of Friday's still-secretive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, after which Trump abandoned his push for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine and Putin insisted that Kyiv give up land. Trump told Zelensky and European leaders in a phone call that Putin wants Ukraine to cede control of the entire Donbas region in Ukraine's east, renewing his longstanding demand, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition on anonymity. Zelensky has previously said that Ukraine won't give up territory and Putin has broken ceasefires before. The European leaders spoke with Trump as he flew back from Alaska, a meeting which failed to uncover a path to end the war, currently in its fourth year. Trump called his meeting productive, then also signalled he would tell Zelensky to make a deal, piling more pressure on the Ukrainian leader. Several senior European diplomats expressed angst over the outcome soon after they got word of the details, noting Putin appeared to have gained the most. They pointed to Putin's symbolic win for securing an invitation to the US and the Russian leader apparently prevailing on Trump to shift focus to an overarching peace settlement without an immediate ceasefire. European allies from the so-called coalition-of-the-willing countries that pledged support to Kyiv will hold a video call on Sunday, France said on Saturday. Some European leaders may also join Zelensky in person for his meeting with Trump on Monday, said one of the people. Trump's White House stayed deliberately tight-lipped on Saturday after the president's return to Washington, declining to further detail the talks, his plans or what he'd discuss with Zelensky. Zelensky has repeatedly ruled out giving up all of Donetsk and Luhansk, which Moscow's forces only partially control and have so far failed to take militarily. Russia would halt advancing its claims over the parts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson region it doesn't now control, effectively freezing the battle lines there, the people said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Saturday voiced his doubts about the Russian leader's intentions. 'Putin has promised a lot so far, signed many agreements. I don't believe it so easily. But at least, it's the beginning of a conversation,' Merz said in an interview with RTL/ntv. Trump told European leaders that he was prepared to contribute to guaranteeing Ukraine's security as long as it didn't involve NATO, they added. The president suggested Putin would be OK with that, the people said. Ready to work 'Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace,' Zelensky said in a social media post after a call with Trump on Saturday. Trump confirmed the Ukrainian president's visit to Washington in a Truth Social post, and said a meeting with Putin and Zelensky could be scheduled 'if all works out'. The US president said in the post that his meeting with Putin and the call with Zelensky both went 'very well'. 'It was determined by all' that the best way to end the war was to achieve a peace agreement and 'not a mere Ceasefire Agreement,' he wrote. Trump had said going into the summit that a ceasefire would be his key demand. He also threatened to walk out of the meeting and to impose new tough punitive measures if it wasn't met. Trump signalled on Friday he wasn't in a rush to implement fresh penalties on Russia's trading partners. 'This is just not Trump's forte,' said Charles Lichfield, deputy director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. 'He's not shaping the discussion, he's not setting the themes, and he's used to being in control, and this was him hosting, and yet we come out of it with him looking less in control. So it seems to be a bit of a failure to me.' Still, he said, Europe has no choice but to deal with Trump as the broker. 'He's the one who has the most direct line to Putin,' Lichfield said. 'I think the Ukrainians and Europeans are doomed to have to work through Trump.' Uneasy relationship Monday's visit to the White House will be a pivotal moment for Zelensky, who's had an uneasy relationship with Trump. His last visit in the Oval Office in February ended in a shouting match between the two leaders and led to the US briefly pausing military aid to Ukraine. Trump and Zelensky have since patched up their ties. European officials welcomed Trump's efforts but also reiterated the need for a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin, and Zelensky in a statement released on Saturday. That statement made no mention of earlier demands for an immediate ceasefire as a first step toward negotiations. The topic of a trilateral summit wasn't raised in Alaska, Russia's state TV channel Vesti reported on Saturday, citing Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov. European leaders also said that it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. 'International borders must not be changed by force,' according to the statement, signed by the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Finland, Poland, the UK and the president of the European Commission. Some European officials are concerned that Trump will now pressure Zelensky to make territorial concessions to reach a deal, according to people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. 'President Trump's resolve to get a peace deal is vital,' said European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. 'But the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon.' Putin continues to drag out negotiations and 'left Anchorage without making any commitments to end the killing,' Kallas said. Putin told his government on Saturday that the conversation with Trump in Alaska was 'very frank and meaningful,' the Kremlin said on its website. 'We, of course, respect the position of the American administration, which sees the need for a speedy end to military action,' he said. 'We would also like this and would like to move to resolving all issues by peaceful means.' In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity after the Alaskan summit, Trump said that there were a few sticking points remaining, even as he cautioned that the two hadn't reached a deal. He shifted his focus to Zelensky, putting the onus on him to end the war. 'We are clear that Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity' and 'no limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with third countries,' the statement from European leaders said. 'Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and NATO.' Meanwhile, Ukraine's Air Force said on Telegram Saturday morning that Russia launched 85 drones and a ballistic missile at Ukrainian territory overnight, underscoring Moscow's intention to press on with the war. 'We anticipate that in the coming days the Russian army may try to increase pressure and strikes against Ukrainian positions in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors,' Zelensky said on X.
Bangkok Post
18 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Xi visits Tibet for 60th anniversary event
Tibet marked its 60th year as a Chinese autonomous region on Thursday with songs, dances and a parade in its capital Lhasa with thousands cheering on, holding little red flags, amid placards telling all to heed the Communist Party's leadership. The festivities held at a massive square by the Potala Palace, the former winter residence of the Dalai Lama, coincided with a rare visit by President Xi Jinping and a huge delegation from Beijing that included senior leaders from the party and government. In the parade broadcast on China's national television, participants held aloft red placards reminding all of what Tibet needed to accomplish under the guidance of Xi. 'Unwaveringly focus on the four major tasks of ensuring stability, promoting development, protecting the ecological environment, and strengthening border defence,' one placard read. 'Adhere to the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era and fully implement the Party's strategy for governing Tibet in the new era,' another said. In September 1965, six years after the 14th Dalai Lama fled into exile in India in the wake of a failed uprising, the Communist Party established the Tibet Autonomous Region — China's fifth and last autonomous region after Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Guangxi and Ningxia. The designation is meant to confer ethnic minority groups such as the Tibetans greater say over policy matters, including freedom of religious belief. But human rights groups and exiles describe China's rule in Tibet over the decades as 'oppressive', an accusation that Beijing rejects. Since Xi became chief of the Communist Party in late 2012 and then president in early 2013, China has exerted greater institutional control in Tibet — from requiring Tibetan Buddhism to be guided by the Chinese socialist system to demanding its people to 'follow the party'. Foreign journalists and diplomats still require special permission to set foot in Tibet. China's hold over Tibetan Buddhism even extends to how the next Dalai Lama should be picked. As the current Dalai Lama turned 90 this year, Beijing said the Chinese government would have the final say over his successor in the event of his death, rejecting the Dalai Lama's claim that a non-profit institution set up by him would have the sole authority to do so. China also opposes all contact between political leaders and the Dalai Lama, saying it would send the wrong signal to 'separatist' forces. After Czech President Petr Pavel met with the Dalai Lama in India on a private trip this year, China said it would 'cease all engagement' with him. Amid foreign criticism of its rule in Tibet, China argues that the lives of ordinary people have dramatically improved. From 2012 to 2024, Tibet's road network nearly doubled to 120,000km, linking every town and village. The size of its economy also grew to 277 billion yuan ($39 billion) in 2024, a 155-fold increase from 1965, according to official data. 'Grateful to the general secretary, grateful to the Party Central Committee, and thankful to the people of the whole country,' one parade placard beamed.
Bangkok Post
a day ago
- Bangkok Post
Watchdog says transparency study not a corruption gauge
Amid criticism, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has explained that results from its Integrity and Transparency Assessment (ITA) are not a measure of corruption within agencies. It issued the clarification on Wednesday in response to public scepticism and ridicule after the State Audit Office (SAO) was ranked the highest among independent agencies with a score of 94.64. The SAO received the high score despite being the subject of ongoing investigations into the collapse of its 30-storey under-construction office building during the March 28 earthquake, killing more than 90 people. Sornchai Chuwichien, deputy secretary-general of the NACC, said the assessment is a tool for measuring governance and transparency, not an indication of corruption. The evaluation covers three areas: internal integrity and transparency, external integrity and transparency and open data integrity and transparency. The first two count for 30 points each on a 100-point scale and the third counts for 40 points. Mr Sornchai said committee members who oversaw the ranking included high-level executives of various organisations. Their expertise lies in many areas, and the ministries of interior and higher education were also engaged to ensure thorough checks. Asked about response to calls for a review, he argued: "If the scores match the indicators, the results stand." He acknowledged, however, that issues such as abuse of power or conflicts of interest may fall outside the ITA's scope. The SAO building collapse was allegedly caused by design and construction flaws, failure to follow safety procedures and the use of substandard materials, which involved nominees of a Chinese firm. However, investigations are also continuing into suspected irregularities in the bidding process for the SAO, with dozens of current and former officials being questioned. Details of procurement by the SAO have also raised eyebrows, including the purchase of 28 office chairs, each costing 97,900 baht, totalling 2.7 million baht. Chiang Rai Senator Maneerat Khemawong, meanwhile, has questioned the anti-corruption education curriculum and the NACC's effectiveness in tackling cases, during a Senate debate on the NACC's 2024 annual report.
