Greens founder is booted from his own party as he takes a parting shot: 'I knew I was gone'
Drew Hutton, who established the Australian Greens in 1991 with future parliamentary leader Bob Brown, has been kicked out of the Queensland branch he had established following a state council meeting on Sunday.
The 78-year-old environmental activist said the state branch he set up 35 years ago had been taken over by extreme transgender activists, who he argued had downplayed the dangers of puberty blockers and the need for biological women to have separate change rooms from biological men.
'The QLD Greens state council has just expelled me from the party,' he said.
'I knew I was gone the moment I walked into the room.'
Hutton, who also set up the Lock The Gate alliance in 2011 to campaign against coal seam gas mining on agricultural land, said environmentalists were now outnumbered in the party he set up.
'Not one environmental activist in the room. The only issues the Greens are really interested in are queer and transgender,' he said.
'When people learn what they are really on about, the Greens will be lucky to ever win a seat again.'
Queensland Greens convener Gemmia Burden said delegates had voted to expel Hutton for breaching party rules on transgender issues.
'Delegates from Queensland Greens branches have upheld the Constitution and Arbitration Committee's (CAC) ruling to expel Drew Hutton for breaching the Queensland Greens Code of Ethics,' she told Daily Mail Australia.
'This decision reflects the Greens' position as endorsed by its membership - that trans rights are non-negotiable human rights, a position publicly reaffirmed in 2022.
'No one should be subjected to violence or hate speech on the basis of their gender, nor their race, sexual identity, ethnicity, or religion.
'Respectful debate is the fundamental basis upon which members of the Queensland Greens make decisions, and the vast majority of members do so without breaching party rules.'
Burden said Hutton's comments 'went beyond respectful and robust discussion - they were harmful to the safety and wellbeing of people within the party and the broader community'.
Greens leader Larissa Waters, who hails from Queensland, is declining to intervene to save Hutton's membership.
'This was an independent decision of the party, via the governance processes established by the membership, and with a clear outcome. Nobody is above the rules,' she said.
The 78-year-old environmental activist said the state branch he set up 35 years ago had been taken over by transgender activists who had downplayed the need for biological women to have separate spaces from biological men (he is pictured protesting in 1983)
'Good governance means that people can put their case forward, including the right to appeal a decision. In this case the appeal was unsuccessful.'
But former Queensland Greens senator Andrew Bartlett, who was previously also a party campaign convener, said Hutton's expulsion highlighted how Greens members were now self-censoring their opinions on transgender issues.
'I don't think the party has a good capacity for self-reflection and for handling differences of opinion that are seen as critical for those that are in control,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
'Most political parties have a core group of people that have the main control and power over things, and I don't think they take criticism of them very kindly and that leads to people not speaking at all when they do have concerns; I think is unhealthy for any organisation.
'If they have some general concerns, they feel like they've just got to keep their mouths shut.'
Bartlett said former Greens leader Adam Bandt, who said trans rights were 'non-negotiable', had set the tone of the party nationally.
'It's not unique to Queensland - it's a view amongst the wider party that we need to be unequivocal,' he said.
He added Hutton's membership status should have been dealt with two years ago.
'It's been sitting there for like two years bubbling away - I think it's better if there's significant concerns about a serious difference of opinion that's seen as important enough, then it's better to try and bring it to the surface quickly,' Bartlett said.
Hutton had a series of Facebook posts in April criticising the transgender movement in the UK, arguing biological women needed safe spaces from biological men and that puberty blockers were a bad idea.
'A recent YouGov survey in the UK showed huge majority opposition to biological males, self-identifying as females, having access to women's sport and change rooms,' he said.
'Also majority support for biological sex as the defining element of woman and almost universal opposition to giving puberty blockers to children.
'Any political party supporting the extremist trans agenda will be lucky to make double figures once their position is widely known.'
Hutton said a Greens member of Chinese ancestry had written to him comparing his treatment to something out of the Chinese Communist Party.
'I'm getting many messages from Greens members expressing support for my appeal against suspension,' he said last week.
'Here is a particularly moving statement this Chinese-Australian member has sent to his branch reminding us that this is an issue about real people as well as principle.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government won a landslide majority in the lower house of Parliament but needs the Greens in the Senate to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition.
The Greens lost three of their four lower house seats at the last federal election in May, including the Queensland electorates of Brisbane and Griffith, as voters also kicked out former leader Adam Bandt in Melbourne.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The ultra-wealthy have exploited Australia's tax system for too long. It's time to ensure everyone pays their fair share
Unions want to tackle intergenerational inequality by reforming Australia's tax system. For the first time in living memory, younger Australians risk facing lower living standards than those before them. This is not acceptable to the union movement, so our one big idea is to rebalance the tax system so that productivity gains are fairly shared, housing becomes more affordable, and essential services are properly funded. Australia's current tax system is exploited by big business and the ultra-wealthy, entrenching intergenerational inequality and placing affordable housing out of young workers' reach, which threatens the services and infrastructure we all rely on. We need a minimum 25% tax on gas export revenues, a minimum 25% tax for trust funds and individuals earning more than $1m, and a one investment property limit for negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount benefits, with the grandfathering of current arrangements for five years. These changes have a simple intention: to make sure everyone pays their fair share, so productivity gains flow across society fairly. These proposed reforms would help restore fairness and opportunity for young Australians to get ahead in their lives. For the past 25 years, productivity increases have gone back into company profits, shareholder dividends, share buybacks and executive bonuses. Working people know that every time they check their bank accounts, there is no 'direct debit system' where the extra profits generated by increased productivity are automatically shared with them. Australia is a rich country but, for decades, as the 'economic pie' has got bigger, corporations have not just taken their own bigger slice, they have been eating into ours. The way to stop this is to make sure workers have strong rights at work to get the pay rises they deserve and to make sure our tax system ensures everyone – not just the ordinary worker – pays their fair share of taxes. There are flaws in our tax system that disadvantage younger Australians and reinforce inter-generational inequity. Just 1% of taxpayers own 25% of investment properties, fuelling house prices, skyrocketing rents and putting home ownership out of reach. House prices have gone up at twice the rate of wages in the last 25 years. The result? Workers can no longer afford to live near their jobs, while young people face high rents and are priced out of buying homes. It is true that housing supply needs to increase, but the tax system is adding to the affordability problem and that needs to change. The loudest complaints will come from those who have gamed the system to accumulate enormous economic and political power. Australia's economy is dominated by an artificially inflated property market, in addition a small number of large companies in a small number of industries. Claims that working people will automatically be better off if productivity increases are wrong. Dr Jim Stanford's recent paper on productivity shows that if real wages had grown at the same rate of productivity since 2000, average wages would be 18% – or $350 per week – higher than they are now. What you won't hear from big business is the real reason productivity growth in Australia has been slow: they have prioritised distributing profits rather than investing in capital, research and people. Workers' rights are not 'red tape', they are the way we get pay rises and limits on working hours. They are essential to workers benefiting from the productivity gains our hard work creates. If we take them away, workers will get even less. Our proposed reforms are targeted and achievable. These are simple changes that close loopholes and restore balance, because we recognise that the problem isn't everyday investors who are looking to build a nest egg with a housing investment, the problem is that the current tax system rewards investing in housing as an asset class so the richest mega-investors are accumulating a large number of properties, tying up capital that could be invested in things that contribute to productivity growth and forcing property prices up beyond what any ordinary working person can afford. Working people pay their fair share of tax, we just want everyone else to as well. Ninety-one people with an income over $1m paid no income tax in 2022-23. Not one cent! When the very wealthy pay less tax than a bus driver or an aged care worker, something is very wrong. Trust funds have also become tax minimisation schemes for rich people, and mega-profitable resource companies are also getting away with paying little or no corporate tax. Our proposals are about ensuring the economy works for those who actually keep it running: working people. Sally McManus is a trade unionist and political activist who has served as the secretary of the Australia Council of Trade Unions since 2017
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The economic roundtable is Jim Chalmers' chance for bold reform. Australians can't afford anything less
Jim Chalmers had a determined look about him this week, ahead of the government's much-hyped economic reform roundtable in Canberra. The atmosphere in the treasurer's office was reminiscent of the days immediately before a federal budget, with frenetic activity and an air of sleep deprivation among the small army of advisers. Preparations for the three-day event have been exhaustive and Chalmers works at a pace few people in the ministerial wing can sustain. Armed with a small page of handwritten notes, Chalmers told this column that the process of consulting with hundreds of individuals and organisations about how to turn around the country's productivity challenges had been more than worthwhile, as 30-odd attenders prepare to take their seats at the cabinet table on Tuesday morning. There's no doubt new approaches are needed. Productivity has barely grown at all since 2016. The stagnation in the Australian economy poses a threat to living standards, since working smarter is the long-run driver of securing higher incomes for households. Ken Henry, the former Treasury boss and summit invitee, puts the challenge another way. He calculates Australian workers have lost about $500,000 in potential pay rises over the past 25 years because of sclerotic productivity growth. 'I see it as three days to help inform three budgets,' Chalmers said, sitting at a conference table in the office previously occupied by Wayne Swan, his former boss and mentor. Family photos and a curated collection of books about politics and history dominate the space. Conscious of messaging and expectations in Canberra and beyond, Chalmers said outcomes from the roundtable would fuel and inform future decisions of the government, helping set a direction for Labor in this term of parliament an others to come. Solutions to emerging problems such as AI and an ageing population are also badly needed. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The event itself has required more than a little productivity already. Treasury received 900 submissions – twice the number of pitches received before Labor's jobs and skills summit early in the government's first term. Chalmers has held boardroom talks with business leaders and lobby groups, while ministers have convened more than 40 preparatory meetings of their own, attended by about 700 people. The Productivity Commission has released a slew of reports to guide the process. Bureaucrats in Chalmers' department have used AI to organise and structure this massive input of ideas, including the predictable mix of kite flying, influence peddling and ambit claims. On Friday, Chalmers sat down with his state and territory counterparts for the last of these events. Talking up consensus, the group agreed to work towards faster approvals for major infrastructure projects, to cut cumbersome and outdated regulation, to boost competition and build more homes more quickly. Some serious ideas are in the mix, illustrated by an awkwardly timed Treasury leak this week, which showed Labor was preparing to move forward with reforms to clear a backlog of 30,000 housing approvals held up by outdated environmental laws, as well as new rules for AI and a pause on changes to the National Construction Code. 'There's been a heap of effort,' Chalmers said. 'Working around the clock for four weeks to make sure that people's voices are heard and that we can shape up a meaningful and useful roundtable.' The meeting has become an organising tool for Labor's second term, including allowing Chalmers and Albanese to test ideas with voters and the media, and rule some ideas out. The prime minister has also stressed the government won't misjudge its mandate or foist new taxes on the electorate. Overdue ideas already firmly in need of resolution are being attached as well: changes to Howard-era national environmental laws will get a kick along and Anthony Albanese telegraphed this week that road user charging rules for electric vehicles would be thrashed out over the roundtable. Here a phased-in and staged approach is expected, treating heavy vehicles differently to ensure EV take-up continues to grow in line with the renewables transition. Labor might even come away with an idea or two for major reform proposals to take to voters at the next election, putting its thumping victory over Peter Dutton to use. But the lead-up to the summit hasn't all been smooth sailing. It emerged on Wednesday that Chalmers and Albanese had held a face-to-face meeting last week after a reported 'frisson' over expectations for the summit. Albanese appeared frustrated at some mission creep for the talks and the pair discussed the need to 'be on the same page' about major tax reform plans and the scale of Labor's ambition. After the story emerged, both were quick to say they meet all the time, while the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, talked up their cooperation at the heart of the government. Despite not wanting to shut down ideas ahead of the summit, Albanese and Chalmers have rejected calls to change the rate and base of the GST, and ruled out negative gearing and capital gains tax concession rule changes. The Australian Council of Trade Unions called for a four-day week for workers, without any loss of pay, a reform that feels both eminently possible in the future but too ambitious for the present. The Greens want Labor to move faster with expensive plans for universal childcare, an ambition Albanese is laying the groundwork for already, while the Coalition is both taking part in the talks and deriding them as akin to a tour of Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. It is unclear who will play the role of Augustus Gloop in this scenario. Labor can't afford not to be bold. It has identified the productivity problem and told voters it is better placed than the Coalition to manage the economy. Chalmers wants to be remembered as a reforming treasurer, and aspires to higher office, but will need to convince his colleagues – and the sometimes more cautious prime minister – of the case for ambition. Chalmers and Albanese made their own job harder by raising the prospect of sweeping tax reform at the start of the process, only to quickly shut down some of the serious proposals in a bid to manage expectations. The best way to undermine claims that the roundtable is a stage-managed talkfest is to make it a success: to take up real economic reform options that drive growth and boost productivity. Strengthening the budget and lifting living standards is as necessary as it is difficult, but buy-in from roundtable participants will be a crucial start, even if Labor has to spend political capital to get the job done.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Climate wars are simmering among the NSW Liberals – and they could pose a problem for Mark Speakman
The never-ending war within the Coalition over energy policy and climate targets appears to have infected the New South Wales Liberals, as they struggle to restore the administration of their branch and get traction with voters. It's bad news for the NSW opposition leader, Mark Speakman, whose hold on the leadership is being increasingly questioned. Until now, the main battle ground for the renewed climate wars has been Canberra, where the right of the Liberal party and the Nationals from Queensland – aided and abetted by US president Donald Trump – have used every opportunity to foment discontent. The federal Coalition leader, Sussan Ley, has promised to review the Coalition's energy policy, but there will be no easy answers. She will need to juggle the demands of MPs such as Nationals senator Matt Canavan and Liberal Andrew Hastie that she drop the net zero target, with the views of her city MPs, who know they could go the way of their former colleagues who lost seats to teal independents. Let alone doing the right thing for the planet. For the NSW Coalition, energy policy has been an area of mostly bipartisan agreement – until now. In 2020, the then energy minister Matt Kean, a Liberal who now chairs the Climate Change Authority, released the energy roadmap that showed how NSW would meet its objective to deliver a 70% cut in emissions by 2035 compared to 2005 levels, and net zero by 2050. It was supported by both sides. But last week the first signs of an unravelling emerged. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Just before the NSW parliament rose for a long break, the Liberal MP for Goulburn, Wendy Tuckerman, resigned from the shadow ministry over her own party's failure to listen to her concerns about windfarms. Ostensibly, it was over a failure of the leadership to consult on the electricity infrastructure bill, which the government said was urgent. The bill gave the energy minister, Penny Sharpe, the power to fast-track investments in synchronous condensers, which are urgently needed for grid stability. According to her office, it did no more than broaden the definition of priority infrastructure to ensure investments in this critical infrastructure by the privately owned electricity distributors could proceed. Whether it did more than that depends on who you ask. The Minns government says it doesn't alter the planning and consultation process for major infrastructure such as transmission lines. But it was a bridge too far for Tuckerman, whose electorate is part of a renewable energy zone and has seen dozens of projects proposed. 'I have had countless calls, emails and comments from community members that feel like they have just been kicked while they are down. They are bearing the brunt of poor planning and by the government's lack of accountability. They are not being listened to,' she said. 'I can no longer in good conscience be a part of a process that sidelines the voices of constituents and regional communities, or which undermines my ability to represent the people that put me here.' There's no doubt that Tuckerman's electorate is concerned about the scale of windfarm development – as is the Orana region near Dubbo. But the concerns have been turbocharged and taken to a wider audience by the Daily Telegraph, which has run no fewer than five stories in the space of two weeks about the harm that windfarms were causing farmers in Tuckerman's electorate. These were then amplified across other News Corp platforms including and Sky News, who interviewed the Telegraph journalists about their coverage, and by 2GB. At the same time, the rightwing advocacy group Advance has announced a campaign to kill off 'weakling' Liberals who support the net zero climate target. Advance members are being bombarded with emails seeking donations, with the aim to raise $450,000 before the end of August. Most of Advance's efforts seem focused on the federal Liberals, but the anti-net zero sentiment has reached the NSW Nationals, at least in the grassroots party. At their conference in June in Coffs Harbour, they voted to drop support for net zero. The problem for Speakman is that the climate issue could quickly become a wedge that will be used by the right to further fuel the leadership speculation that is already bubbling. Speakman is undoubtedly under pressure. There's no immediate appetite to replace him, among the dominant moderate faction from which he comes. But there is concern about a lack of cut-through, particularly as a recent Resolve poll in July in the Sydney Morning Herald showed Labor with a commanding primary vote lead over the Coalition of 38% (up five points on the last result in April) to 32% (down four), with the Greens up two to 13%. The Poll Bludger estimated this would imply a two-party Labor lead of at least 57-43, compared with 54.3-45.7 at the March 2023 election. A 5% swing would see the Liberals lose another five seats and condemn them to a further two terms of opposition. 'People are starting to worry about saving the furniture,' one Liberal said. The Kiama byelection on 13 September will be a test for Speakman. If he puts in a good showing, the troops might calm down. But with an election due in March 2027, the window for leadership bloodletting is fast approaching. Both sides were claiming underdog status in the South Coast seat, which was most recently held by the Liberal turned Independent Gareth Ward, who resigned after being convicted of rape. Ward enjoyed enormous personal support even after the charges were laid, so it's difficult to say whether voters will chose to punish the Liberals or follow the conventional wisdom of byelections and give the government of the day a good kick. In the meantime, the climate wars are simmering again and they've reached the doors of Macquarie Street. A NSW parliamentary committee is due to release a report on the renewable energy zones and their impact on rural communities as early as next week. It will provide an opportunity for the opponents of net zero to target more 'weakling' Liberals – and it will test out Speakman's skill in managing a difficult issue for his troops.
