logo
Five Years After 2020's 'Racial Reckoning,' Defunding The Police Is As Necessary As Ever

Five Years After 2020's 'Racial Reckoning,' Defunding The Police Is As Necessary As Ever

Refinery2909-07-2025
Sandy Hudson is an activist, public intellectual, creative, and the author of Defund: Black Lives Policing and Safety for All. In this op-ed, she looks back on the five years since 2020's ' racial reckoning ' and makes the case for why defunding the police is the only way to support a model of security and protection that increases public safety overall.
The 2020 uprisings feel like a fever dream. May marked the five-year anniversary of George Floyd's murder, and there's no doubt that the dizzying whitelash that predictably follows groundswells for racial justice is here, replete with its manifold macroscopic abuses against Black psyches — including rumors and calls from noted conservative public figures for President Trump to consider pardoning Mr. Floyd's murderer, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. The most charitable reading of the whitelash and its champions would assume they think there were scores of new policies implemented in response to the so-called 'racial reckoning', and that those imagined policies went 'too far.' Well, that's far from the truth.
In 2020, the 'Defund The Police' movement saw more mainstream coverage than ever before.
And what were those policies activists were calling for? For decades, we have been calling for governments to invest in programs and services that prevent harm, address social issues that can lead to unsafe conditions, and create new emergency services for the crisis issues people may experience and for which a police response is inappropriate. For example, ensuring there are enough properly trained adults in public schools to support child development, like nurses, counselors, and librarians, rather than police; investing in housing support for people who find themselves struggling with housing, rather than policing and harassing the homeless; and implementing new mental health emergency services, through which people in crisis can receive professionally trained medical intervention.
'
There is no reforming an institution that was created for the purpose of violent coercive control into a service that provides safety.
sandy hudson
'
There is such a large proportion of tax dollars allocated to policing as a stand-in strategy for education, housing, mental health, and other social issues, and we calling for policies that actually address these issues directly, rather than tossing them over to the police to deal with through the only tools they have access to: violence. And yes, some of these recommendations began to get public traction in 2020 – many of which are codified in the M4BL-sponsored People's Response Act, and which have the support of several lawmakers, including Congresswomen Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib.
But like everything else emerging from white supremacy, there is nothing rational about the ideas behind the whitelash. Their justifications are based in fantasy. While some major cities, like New York, Los Angeles, Austin, and Minneapolis, initially committed to defunding their police departments and reinvesting in public services and programs to prevent violence, most walked back their promises. In Minneapolis, the 2024 police budget is about $50 million more than what was spent on police in 2020.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Pantheon Books (@pantheonbooks)
And popular meager reforms that allocated more funding to police — like adopting the use of body cameras, providing additional training, or new oversight bodies — have failed to make a dent in police violence. In fact, more people were killed in the United States by police officers in 2024 than in any other year in the past decade. The problem is getting worse; not better. Some successful measures providing non-police options for emergency response, like the CAHOOTS crisis assistance program in Eugene, Oregon, have had to be discontinued due to a winding down of federal support. Trump issued an Executive Order to review and potentially rescind existing consent decrees issued by the Justice Department under previous administrations mandating police reform. And the license the Trump administration is giving policing agencies like ICE to terrorize migrants is indefensible — resulting in the harassment, detention and banishment of veterans, students, children, and hardworking people just trying to provide for their families.
All the while, the police continue to fail at the main thing we're told we need them for: safety.
'
Police are a threat to safety. Black communities know it. Migrant communities know it. Students and faculty engaging in peaceful protests on their campus know it.
sandy hudson
'
There is a reason why the activists and advocates who have been doing this work the longest say the only way forward is to defund the police, and put that funding into programs and services that create conditions of safety, preventing violence and harm before it starts. Besides the fact that policing has proven itself largely ineffective at addressing violence over its 250-year modern history, there is no way a service focused on response could ever address our myriad safety needs in a way that prevents violence altogether. Policing doesn't even accomplish its punitive agenda successfully–University of Utah professor of law Shima Baradaran found the conviction rates after an arrest was less than two percent per year. Her investigation found '97 percent of burglars, 88 percent of rapists, and over 50 percent of murderers get away with their crimes.'
And consider gender-based violence, one of the most common expressions of violence in our society. Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and other forms of gender-based violence are shamefully permitted to fester in our society because we continue to devote the lion's share of the responsibility to address it to police. More than 80 percent of women in the United States have experienced some form of sexual harassment, and one in five will experience a completed or attempted sexual assault — and yet, less than 22 percent of rapes are even reported to the police, in part because victims and survivors are aware of how futile a report can be. The cyclical attempts at reforming police that occur after yet another unbearable incident of police violence or corruption reaches public consciousness never seem to solve the problem because they can't. There is no reforming an institution that was created for the purpose of violent coercive control into a service that provides safety. These objectives are at cross purposes.
Just think of the safest places you know. Are they surrounded by cops? Of course not. But they are well resourced.
While we seemingly always have to do with less public funds for services we know create safer communities, like education, healthcare, housing, and public infrastructure, there is an unending pile of money for police.
Police are a threat to safety. Black communities know it. Migrant communities know it. Students and faculty engaging in peaceful protests on their campus know it. Journalists who are attacked by police while trying to cover demonstrations know it.
That's why it's crucial that we interrupt the cycle. We cannot have another 2020, followed by a series of attempts to implement ineffective reforms, followed by yet another whitelash. Activists and advocates must stay the course. Sometimes movements for justice look like the eruption we saw in 2020, but more often they are slow and steady refusals to stay silent as injustice persists. For all you who were moved in 2020, remember that the only way to prevent the systematic interruption of life caused by police is to remove the resources that enable them to harm us. The only way forward is to defund them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Buttigieg faces soft spot with Black voters as White House speculation grows
Buttigieg faces soft spot with Black voters as White House speculation grows

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Buttigieg faces soft spot with Black voters as White House speculation grows

Pete Buttigieg has been quietly making the rounds on an early 2028 tour after having announced that he would sit out races for governor and senator in 2026. In October, Buttigieg will speak at the Michigan Democratic Party's 'Best of the West' event, a prime swing-state spot for a presidential hopeful. The mayor-turned-Cabinet secretary is writing a book, a checklist item for presidential candidates. And he's been on the move since leaving his post as secretary of Transportation under former President Biden, sources close to him say. While all signs point to 'yes' on another Buttigieg presidential run, some Democrats wonder if he has what it takes to win. 'He's got one big, glaring soft spot … which is his relationship with the Black community,' said one veteran Democratic strategist. 'He didn't have a lot of African American fans from his time as mayor, he didn't have a lot of Black support when he ran for president, and I haven't seen evidence that he's done much to fix that over the last few years.' An Emerson College poll in late June showed Buttigieg continues to face problems with Black voters. In a stunning result, zero percent of Black respondents supported him when asked whom they'd back for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in 2028. 'You can't get nominated as a Democrat without the support of African American women,' the veteran strategist said. Buttigieg remains a star in the party who could be well suited to the politics of 2028. As Democrats try to find their footing after a devastating loss in the 2024 presidential election, they have learned that they need a candidate that can help to recapture working-class voters and independents, many of whom were key to President Trump's victory. 'Since leaving office, Pete has been eager to meet with people to have substantive discussions to hear more about their experiences and the issues that matter most to them,' said Chris Meagher, an adviser for Buttigieg. 'We're trying out several different formats — town halls, Q&As with different people on his social media, going out to podcasts and shows both political and nonpolitical, and more — to try to reach people where they are, both in-person and online.' But Buttigieg might not provide the cure for what ails the party, political observers say. 'Democrats need those voters to win,' said Julian Zelizer, a professor of public affairs and history at Princeton University. 'Part of what Democrats are looking for … is someone who could imagine appealing to working voters and Black working voters, Latino working voters, even rural working voters.' 'I'm not sure a lot of Democrats think that's the person who can do that,' Zelizer added. 'There's a perception he kind of is more out of the Obama-era Democrat, highly educated, kind of down to that world.' 'That's … baggage he's going to have to deal with,' he said. Still, Buttigieg is ahead in some early 2028 polling. The Emerson College poll from June, for example, shows that he is the front-runner in what is expected to be a crowded primary that could see more than two dozen candidates, including former Vice President Kamala Harris, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Harris on Wednesday said she would not run for governor of California next year, which suggests she could be thinking about a race in 2028. 'The fact that he is up against people like Newsom and Harris and he is ahead of them is not nothing,' one Democratic donor said. The donor added he was pleased to see Buttigieg buck some of his party's flaws in a series of interviews in recent months. In a sit-down with NPR earlier this week, for example, Buttigieg slapped his party for being 'too attached to a status quo that has been failing us for a long time.' He also weighed in on the controversy surrounding transgender athletes, an issue that has been making headlines since Newsom addressed it earlier this year. 'That does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said in the interview. In a May interview with MSNBC's Jen Psaki, Buttigieg spoke about how the Democratic Party can't just be anti-Trump without offering voters an alternative vision for the country. And in a March interview with Kaitlan Collins of CNN, he criticized Trump administration officials for using the messaging app Signal to share allegedly confidential information about a military operation in Yemen. But his own tenure as Transportation secretary could play a factor in a 2028 campaign. In March 2023, Buttigieg was criticized for taking too long to travel to East Palestine, Ohio, when a train derailed and created serious environmental and health concerns for the community. A few months earlier, he caught slack for two back-to-back air travel interruptions. 'Some of that stuff will definitely come back to haunt him,' the donor predicted. But Democrats say Buttigieg can point to a slew of accomplishments during his tenure — including his role in formulating and implementing Biden's trillion-dollar infrastructure legislation. 'More than anyone else in the Biden Cabinet, Buttigieg comes out with a story to tell and a case to make for why he'd do well in the top job,' said Democratic strategist Christy Setzer. 'Americans may not notice or care about the difference an effective, say, secretary of State makes, but they certainly know that six months ago, planes weren't falling out of the sky seemingly every week.' Democrats have also raised questions about how Buttigieg's sexuality could affect his performance with voters — which was also a discussion during his 2020 presidential run. If he were to win in 2028, he would be the first openly gay president. After 2024 and 2016, when Democratic candidates Harris and Hillary Clinton lost in their respective races to Trump, some Democrats say a Buttigieg nomination could be a stretch. 'Sadly, I expect diversity to be an issue in the next Democratic race for president,' the veteran Democratic strategist said. 'I don't think Democrats care that much, but after Clinton and Harris, many believe swing voters care a lot and there is budding reluctance to risk winning the White House back on the chance to make history.'

David Greising: Chicago aldermanic privilege raises its stubborn head again. This time against granny flats
David Greising: Chicago aldermanic privilege raises its stubborn head again. This time against granny flats

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

David Greising: Chicago aldermanic privilege raises its stubborn head again. This time against granny flats

When Lori Lightfoot was sworn in as mayor, her first executive order aimed to wipe out the impact of aldermanic privilege on the way city government functions. But privilege won out, as it so often does, and the City Council practice of allowing local aldermen to veto city actions in their wards — zoning and permitting changes in particular — remains almost wholly intact. Privilege raised its stubborn head again last month. A move to allow more accessory dwelling units in Chicago, in part to increase affordable housing citywide, seemed headed to passage at the July council meeting. But no — a deference to aldermanic privilege and a neatly executed parliamentary maneuver delayed a vote. Thanks to pushback from self-identified 'Bungalow Belt' aldermen, a yearslong push to allow 'granny flats,' coach houses and basement apartments throughout the city will need to wait until September. The proposal introduced by Ald. Bennett Lawson, 44th, was backed by Mayor Brandon Johnson, but the power of the mayor's office isn't what it once was when this particular mayor squares off against an increasingly independent-minded City Council. The effort to address the city's severe housing shortage — at least 150,000 units are needed, probably more — will have to wait. Homeowners who might have earned extra income will have to wait. Apartment dwellers seeking freshly constructed shelter, possibly in neighborhoods they might normally not be able to afford, will have to wait. Many aldermen claim the power of their privilege is their best bet for protecting their wards from unwelcome changes in city policy. They know what's best for their wards, they say. Besides, voters hold them responsible for everything that happens there. They need the veto power. The arguments may seem sensible at first blush. But the truths about aldermanic privilege, sometimes called aldermanic prerogative, should be enough to make an honest alderman blush. Aldermanic privilege is well known as a contributor to Chicago's culture of corruption. For example, aldermanic privilege lent credibility to then-Ald. Ed Burke's threat to block a Burger King construction project in his ward if the restaurant's owners refused to hire Burke's law firm and make a campaign donation. The extortion attempt helped put Burke in federal prison. A lesser-known attribute of aldermanic privilege is the way it perpetuates racial and economic inequities in Chicago. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said as much in 2023 after investigating a complaint from Chicago fair housing groups that aldermanic privilege perpetuates racial segregation in housing. 'By limiting the availability of affordable housing, the local veto disproportionately harms Black and Hispanic households,' HUD found. In addition to enabling corruption and exacerbating discrimination, aldermanic privilege also can simply enable bad policy — or block the adoption of good law. That's what is happening with the push to prevent expansion of accessory dwelling units across the city. The move to expand the use of granny flats and other ADUs is long overdue. It has been in the works since before 2021, when a pilot project launched in five test zones began — two each on the North and South sides and one on the West Side. Until then, ADUs were banned citywide, due to 1957 vintage zoning codes designed to reduce the risk of overpopulation. Redlining and blockbusting were the go-to tactics of race-based housing discrimination back then, and academic studies have shown the ban on granny flats was informed by segregationist intent, too. Overpopulation is no longer a concern. Chicago has lost around 800,000 residents since 1957. But rising economic inequity and increased gentrification are making it ever more difficult for many people to find decent, affordable housing. And the lack of affordable housing exacerbates racial and economic segregation, too. The delay by the City Council is all the more confounding because early results from the city's five pilot zones show some promise, but also some lessons that there is more work to do to bring more affordable, accessible housing to neighborhoods across the city. According to a report by my organization, the Better Government Association's Illinois Answers Project, around 300 units have popped up in the zones, but 90% of them are on the North Side. This means the West and South Side zones that could benefit substantially from new housing have not yet seen much impact. A restriction limiting ADU to owner-occupied properties, added only in the West and South Side zones, may have contributed to the limited adoption in those neighborhoods. Most of the new ADUs are in remodeled basements, where both construction costs and occupancy numbers tend to be smaller, not the coach houses that feed concerns among some opponents about population and building density, Illinois Answers reporter Alex Nitkin found. The pilot test, alongside lessons from other cities with more open ADU policies, have informed some of the compromises adopted in order to get the proposal out of the City Council's zoning committee last month. Limiting permits to owner-occupied buildings throughout the city is one of them. So are limits on the number of permits per block, based on zoning. The proposal also limits the use of granny flats for short-term rentals. Other cities have provided further protections that could be worth considering: requiring off-street parking, for example. But an Urban Land Institute study published just before Lightfoot launched the pilot-zone test warned that some such measures can impede the growth and socioeconomic benefit of ADUs. The City Council likely will take up the measure in September. Meanwhile, state Rep. Kam Buckner, D-Chicago, has drafted a bill for the state legislature that would ban prohibitions on ADUs and add measures designed to encourage their construction. The benefits of ADUs and the momentum toward removal of the ban are powerful enough that aldermanic privilege must not be allowed to stand in their way. A city ordinance drafted with appropriate safeguards could help address the city's housing shortage at minimum cost to our cash-strapped city. In other words, ADUs are an idea whose time has come — and the delays caused by the claims of aldermanic privilege are yet another reason why the end to that outdated tradition is long past due.

Former President Joe Biden tells lawyers convention in Chicago: ‘We need new heroes'
Former President Joe Biden tells lawyers convention in Chicago: ‘We need new heroes'

Chicago Tribune

time8 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Former President Joe Biden tells lawyers convention in Chicago: ‘We need new heroes'

Former President Joe Biden called on attorneys to lead the fight to uphold the Constitution during the Trump administration in a speech at a downtown Chicago hotel on Thursday in which he also reflected on his more than five-decade career in politics and beginnings as a young lawyer. 'It's not enough to honor the heroes who came before us. We need new heroes now,' Biden said at the convention of the National Bar Association, a group of predominantly Black American lawyers and judges. It was Biden's second public appearance in Chicago since leaving office, as he takes on a smattering of speaking engagements, confronts a cancer diagnosis and works on his memoir. During his more than 20 minute speech, Biden spoke about his career and the country with a long lens, noting at one point next year's 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and calling the founding document 'just words on pages, if we the people don't uphold it.' The administration of President Donald Trump is 'doing its best to dismantle the Constitution,' Biden said later, without mentioning the president by name. 'I'm being deadly earnest, man.' The lawyers' association honored Biden for his work in office, including his appointments of Black U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and a diverse slate of federal judges. Biden disclosed in May he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. He has not provided updates this summer about the disease but in May said he felt optimistic about his treatment. Prior to the announcement of his diagnosis, the former president this spring spoke before an audience of national advocates in Chicago, his first major appearance since leaving office in January. At that event, he also criticized the Trump administration, saying it was creating fear among the elderly over potential cuts to disability benefits. The oldest president in U.S. history at the end of his term, Biden has so far led a mostly quiet life after leaving office. He shared at a conference in San Diego about a month ago that he's working on a memoir, and a source familiar with his activities said Thursday he's spending time writing and meeting with friends and former staff. In Chicago, he reminisced before the audience of attorneys on his decision to leave a 'prestigious' law firm in his 20s to become a public defender, and eventually seek public office to become one of the country's youngest-ever U.S. senators. 'Can't sugarcoat this: these are dark days. But you all are here for the same reason that I left that prestigious law firm,' Biden said. 'It's because our future is literally on the line.' The former president, who is 82, moved carefully and had few verbal stumbles during his more than 20 minute speech. He joked about his age, saying at one point that 'it's hell turning 40 twice.' Biden for more than a year has faced questions about his physical and mental decline while in office, both from opponents in the Trump administration and from some members of his own party who have looked back unfavorably at his decision to run for re-election last year — a legacy that's expected to dog national Democrats into the 2028 race. Biden stayed in the running until last July, leaving Democrats without a competitive primary field and Vice President Kamala Harris with only a few months to campaign against President Donald Trump. Harris recently shared that the title of her memoir is taken from the length of her abbreviated campaign, which ended in a loss to Trump: '107 Days.' Gov. JB Pritzker, widely seen as an potential Democratic presidential contender, publicly stood behind Biden until the former president dropped out of the race, though he later added he had some concern about Biden's electoral chances following his debate performance last year. Pritzker's office said he had a separate event Thursday night. Mayor Brandon Johnson delivered brief remarks preceding the former president. The National Bar Association also honored civil rights leader the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. at its convention. Jackson, who was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease a decade ago, didn't speak at a small press conference but at one point put his arm around his son, U.S. Rep. Jonathan Jackson, when the younger Jackson knelt down beside his wheelchair.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store