logo
Halliburton, Schlumberger Brace for the Next Oil Slump

Halliburton, Schlumberger Brace for the Next Oil Slump

Yahoo14-05-2025

U.S. oilfield service majors had a good run after the pandemic lockdowns ended. Demand for oil rebounded strongly, drillers drilled more, and even the climate-focused energy policies of the Biden administration could not ruin that. Now, a price rout that has already prompted the E&P segment to issue warning after warning is putting the good run on an extended pause.
All of the majors reported lower earnings for the first quarter—yet more evidence that the lower prices have started to cause some real financial pain in the oilfield services sector. As producers begin to revise their production growth plans for the year—which most of them did at the release of their first-quarter results—the effects of that revision will bite oilfield service providers.
Baker Hughes posted a 27% drop in net profits for the first quarter, to $509 million, and warned about 'broader macro and trade policy uncertainty,' meaning tariffs and the oft-cited risk of a global slowdown as a result of these tariffs. But now OPEC+ is also pumping more—much more than it said it would—and this additional supply is making things even worse for producers.
Schlumberger also had a word of warning at the release of its first-quarter figures, which featured a more modest net earnings decline of 4% from a year ago but a 22% decline from a quarter earlier. Schlumberger's CEO said, 'The industry may experience a potential shift of priorities driven by changes in the global economy, fluctuating commodity prices and evolving tariffs — all of which could impact upstream oil and gas investment and, in turn, affect demand for our products and services.'Halliburton sounded the same alarm when it reported first-quarter performance, especially worried about the possibility that tariffs would lead to a surge in the price of oilfield services equipment—something that producers also worried about earlier this year when President Trump launched his trade policy offensive. Yet it seems the primary concern of the oilfield services sector is the price of crude.
'With oil prices falling out of the well-defined range that had persisted for much of the past 2+ years, producer budgets are encountering meaningful strain for the first time in several years,' analysts from Raymond James said, as quoted by Reuters recently.
Indeed, while there is a debate about the severity of price decline that U.S. shale drillers could endure without shrinking activity, Dallas Fed survey data and Baker Hughes' weekly rig count reports suggest that West Texas Intermediate below $65 begins to affect activity and the lower it goes, the more severe the impact on drillers, and, by extension, oilfield service providers.
Already some energy companies active in the shale patch are cutting their drilling budgets for the year. Diamondback Energy and Coterra Energy are among them, while the CEO of Formentera Partners, Bryan Sheffield, told Bloomberg last month that 'The industry needs to cut immediately and hunker down to let the tariff war play out,' describing the current situation in the industry as a 'bloodbath'.
The situation looks worse at home for the oilfield services majors because of shale oil's relatively high production costs, but it appears that global operations will also see some pain from the tariff war while it lasts. Schlumberger expects a decline in global oil investment, and Baker Hughes and Halliburton expect a direct impact on their share prices and earnings from the fallout from the tariff war.
On the flip side, cheap oil stimulates demand for the commodity, which would ultimately lead to higher prices as history tells us—and it would mitigate the impact of the tariffs. 'Unless you export the stuff, cheaper oil should bring some tailwinds for the global economy,' ING's Global Head of Macro, Carsten Brzeski, wrote in a recent note. 'It probably won't be enough to fully offset the tariff-driven inflation surge in the US, but it could help compensate for the adverse effect on eurozone growth and will definitely add to the current disinflationary trend.'
So, it seems Bryan Sheffield was right when he advised the industry to 'hunker down' and let the turbulent times play out. This is what drillers have been doing every few years as the cyclical nature of the industry manifests itself in yet another price rout. Indeed, there were warnings that the trough of the cycle was coming even before Trump began tariffing imports left and right. In January, Rystad Energy said the oilfield services sector was slowing down, and the slowdown would intensify this year.
'Market volatility, heightened geopolitical tensions and cost and capacity challenges,' were the issues Rystad Energy identified for the sector back in January, which suggests that even without a tariff war, oilfield services providers would be having a tough 2025. Yet it's not all doom and gloom—LNG is thriving, and offshore oil and gas is set to grow, too. The industry will weather this period of depression just as it weathered all the others that came before it.
By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.comRead this article on OilPrice.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget
Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget

Indianapolis Star

time37 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Trump-Musk feud shows why GOP can't actually balance the budget

The honeymoon phase of President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bromance has been waning for weeks, and now their relationship appears torn beyond repair just as publicly as it started. The pair exchanged blows on social media June 5, with Trump threatening on Truth Social to strip Musk's companies of subsidies, while Musk took credit for the 2024 GOP victory and took to X to accuse Trump of being on the Jeffrey Epstein list. This ridiculous escalation distracts from the real point at issue, though. Musk seems frustrated that Republicans used him in their charade to balance the federal budget, frustrated that Trump used him for his own end. But he really should be frustrated that he was so gullible – because he should have seen all of this coming. I'm frustrated that this is the only thing receiving attention, considering the amount of work that needs to be done with the budget. Whether Musk genuinely believed himself when he promised to cut $2 trillion (before quickly tempering that estimate) is up for debate. If he did believe it, he was entirely naive about both the current state of the Republican Party and our federal government. Republicans thought they could use Musk as a political win and distraction, allowing him to claw back government spending through the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, while congressional Republicans authorized massive deficit increases. Even after accounting for the economic growth that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would stimulate, it's projected to add $2.4 trillion (yes, with a T) to the federal deficit over the next decade. This figure stands as a mountain next to the small pile of $2 billion (yes, with a B) worth of verifiable budget cuts from DOGE. Hicks: Soaring national debt means cities need to prepare for cuts All the while, Republicans and Trump sang Musk's praises, knowing that they would turn around and spend money that we don't have. But Musk should have realized it was all a show. Trump skyrocketed the deficit in his first presidency, and every promise he's ever given for a balanced budget has been a lie. As much as MAGA likes to claim otherwise, Trump's GOP is no different than the swamp creatures they like to criticize. Those who are actually interested in cutting government spending, which I think Musk at least somewhat seems to be, should not attach the idea to political parties because they will inevitably disappoint. There hasn't been a genuine effort to produce a balanced budget since the late 1990s, and there isn't likely to be from either Republicans or Democrats anytime soon. I'm not the least bit surprised that these two narcissists' relationship flamed out so quickly. There was never enough room in Trump's White House for both his and Musk's personalities. Trump has never maintained an extended relationship with somebody who is willing to disagree with him publicly. During his first term, Trump had extremely high personnel turnover rates, both among his Cabinet and his aides. Trump's 'you're fired' catchphrase really says a lot about his approach to relationships. He is quick to turn on people who disagree with him or even just publicly embarrass him. Hicks: Indiana's startling Medicaid math forces unpleasant choices Musk has been loudly advocating against Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" for its impact on the deficit. After a week of Musk criticizing the deficit spending in Trump's bill, the president has clearly had enough. He cannot tolerate a dissenting voice from within his ranks. Trump and the GOP are now likely to kick a powerful ally to the curb, all because Trump is so vain that he cannot handle differing opinions. This is why the Republican Party is now made up of yes-men, because they have allowed Trump to push all the spine that he can out of the party. Now that the sideshow of Musk is gone, Republicans have one less thing to hide behind. I'm not sure that makes it any more likely they'll act responsibly, but at least it's more transparent to Americans now.

Xi Has 'Bowed To Reality,' Says China Analyst, Urges More Engagement Between Leaders To Resolve Trade Issues: 'No Substitute For Direct Negotiations With Trump'
Xi Has 'Bowed To Reality,' Says China Analyst, Urges More Engagement Between Leaders To Resolve Trade Issues: 'No Substitute For Direct Negotiations With Trump'

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Xi Has 'Bowed To Reality,' Says China Analyst, Urges More Engagement Between Leaders To Resolve Trade Issues: 'No Substitute For Direct Negotiations With Trump'

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. As U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping break the ice with a phone call after months of silence, analysts weigh in on what's in store for the U.S.-China trade. What Happened: The U.S. and China have been at odds over trade for a considerable period. The call signifies some advancement in establishing ground rules for a potential meeting. Jeremy Chan, Senior China Analyst at the Eurasia Group consultancy, stated that this communication suggests a level of respect from President Trump towards President Xi, reported The South China Morning Post. Trending: Start investing with eToro's CopyTrader — . However, analysts have noted that more than optimistic statements are required to resolve the deeply rooted trade differences between the two nations. Chan further noted that Xi typically consents to meetings with foreign leaders only after substantial groundwork has been laid through lower-level diplomatic efforts. "Xi has bowed to reality, like so many other foreign leaders before him, that there is no substitute for direct negotiations with Trump," stated Chan, who is also a former U.S. diplomat. On the other hand, ASPI's Wendy Cutler highlighted the complexity of the upcoming trade talks and the challenges. "The likelihood of further misunderstandings, coupled with a fundamental lack of trust, will present enormous challenges for the negotiators as they try to hammer out a deal," cautioned It Matters: This phone call comes in the wake of escalating trade tensions between the two countries. On Thursday, U.S. stocks dipped following reports of a phone call between Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, signaling a possible thaw in China trade tensions. The outreach was said to have come from the U.S. side, as per CNBC, citing Chinese state media. Earlier in May, President Trump had expressed his willingness to travel to China to meet with President Xi Jinping, emphasizing the importance of the U.S.-China relationship. In early May, the South China Morning Post reported that the U.S. and China are struggling to resume trade talks. China suggested using special envoys, but the U.S. prefers direct talks between Trump and Xi—a move China considers 'risky and uncertain.' This latest phone call could be seen as a step towards that potential meeting, and a move towards resolving the trade disputes. Baidu Inc (NASDAQ:BIDU) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd – ADR (NYSE:BABA) climbed 1.13% and 0.43%, respectively, on Thursday. Meanwhile, Inc. (NASDAQ:JD) declined 0.72% Read Next: Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year — Here's How You Can Invest In Multiple Pre-IPO AI Startups With Just $1,000. Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: Invest in Cytonics and help disrupt a $390B Big Pharma stronghold. Image via Shutterstock This article Xi Has 'Bowed To Reality,' Says China Analyst, Urges More Engagement Between Leaders To Resolve Trade Issues: 'No Substitute For Direct Negotiations With Trump' originally appeared on

Trump admin live updates: Trump says Musk will 'pay the consequences' if he funds Democrats

timean hour ago

Trump admin live updates: Trump says Musk will 'pay the consequences' if he funds Democrats

A bitter public feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk erupted on Thursday, with the Tesla billionaire agreeing to calls for Trump's impeachment while Trump suggested ending Musk's government contracts. Musk showed some signs of softening his tone, but Trump on Friday told ABC News Musk was a "man who has lost his mind" and that he was "not particularly" interested in talking to him right now. The spat began in part because of Musk's criticism of Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," a sweeping immigration and tax bill that would fund much of the president's domestic agenda.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store