logo
Top Misperceptions About Taxes

Top Misperceptions About Taxes

Forbes31-07-2025
Josh Strange is the Founder & President of Good Life Financial Advisors of NOVA. The firm works with federal employees and contractors.
The U.S. tax code is maddeningly complicated, making it difficult for most to navigate it effectively without professional help. Making matters worse is that tax laws keep changing.
Therefore, it's not surprising that numerous misconceptions and myths surround taxes, which can lead to costly mistakes. Perhaps the biggest one isn't a single misstep. Rather, it's a mindset: Most tend to view taxes as a single transaction each year.
The reality is that managing taxes is an inescapable part of wealth planning, one that requires a long-term strategy that accounts for today, tomorrow, a decade from now and beyond.
With that said, here are four common tax misperceptions:
1. I'm in the 22% tax bracket, so my annual income is subject to that rate.
People often fail to understand how the tax brackets work. The system is progressive, meaning, in reference to the above, only a portion of your annual income is taxed at 22%, not the entire amount.
For example, if you made $58,000 in 2024, the government taxes the first $11,600 at 10%, the next $35,550 at 12% and the remaining $10,850 at 22%. Minus deductions and credits, that would come to $7,813—18.7% of your salary and significantly lower than what you'd owe ($12,760) if all your income were taxed at 22%.
For all the griping about taxes, a lot of people pay less than they think, thanks to this miscalculation of the tax code.
2. I will be in a lower tax bracket in retirement.
On the surface, this is a reasonable assumption. After all, no more employment income equals fewer taxes. And for the most part, this is true, with research suggesting that retirees have lower tax rates than they did during their working years.
But it's not always the case. Several factors can boost your tax bill in retirement. Take required minimum distributions (RMDs), which are taxable.
Let's say you have a $2 million IRA when you turn 73, the age at which you must start taking RMDs. The good news is that you saved and invested well enough to be reasonably wealthy in retirement. The bad news is that you will be taxed like it because an IRA of that amount comes with an initial RMD of about $80,000, which could push you into a higher bracket.
The issue becomes even more acute if, on top of large RMDs, you also have a pension, an annuity or significant capital gains—all of which are also taxable. Further, keep in mind that depending on your income, up to 85% of your Social Security benefits can also be taxable.
3. You can mitigate estate taxes, but you can't eliminate them entirely.
If your estate is valued at $13.99 million or more at the time of your death, you will owe taxes on it. However, not many estates are worth that much, and virtually no one pays taxes on them.
However, even wealthy individuals and families can avoid estate taxes with proper planning and forethought. Currently, it's possible to give as many people as you want up to $19,000 each in a single year without them having to pay taxes or it impacting your roughly $14 million lifetime estate tax exemption (for married couples, those numbers are $38,000 and about $28 million, respectively).
Many states, like Virginia and Florida, don't have estate or inheritance taxes at all. However, most do, and the exemption amounts are typically lower than the federal one. For instance, Oregon taxes estates valued at $1 million or above.
4. Paying more taxes is always a bad thing.
Nobody likes paying taxes. In fact, getting a refund is often a cause for celebration, even though that's the equivalent of providing Uncle Sam an interest-free loan for a year.
However, a higher tax bill suggests that good things are happening. For example, it means that your income, whether from your job or investments, has substantially increased. Given the choice between paying no taxes and earning more money, I suspect most people would opt for the latter.
In truth, paying more when you're younger is sensible if it means paying less when you're retired, and, ostensibly, have a greater need for the money. Some of the above examples (e.g., drawing down your IRA strategically to avoid big RMDs) are a testament to that. That's lifetime tax planning, and it's just as important to a long-term financial plan as anything else.
People dislike taxes. A lot. Part of it is natural: Who likes giving up money? Another reason is undoubtedly that the tax code is so multifaceted and complex.
Working with a financial advisor can help demystify taxes, enabling you to craft a long-term tax strategy that can increase your wealth by reducing the amount of taxes you pay over a lifetime.
The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds, sources say
Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds, sources say

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds, sources say

By Nandita Bose and Max A. Cherney WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive CHIPS Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said. Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Lutnick is exploring how the U.S. can receive equity stakes in exchange for CHIPS Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed. Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest U.S. recipient of CHIPS Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. While Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the U.S. does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of U.S. influence on the big companies. In the past, the U.S. has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty. In a similar move earlier this year, Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel after being promised a "golden share" that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the U.S., or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent. The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the U.S. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. The U.S. Commerce Department late last year finalized subsidies of $4.75 billion for Samsung, $6.2 billion for Micron and $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the U.S. In June, Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them "overly generous". He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the U.S.

Vantage Data Centers plans $25 billion AI campus in Texas
Vantage Data Centers plans $25 billion AI campus in Texas

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vantage Data Centers plans $25 billion AI campus in Texas

(Reuters) -Vantage Data Centers said on Tuesday it would spend more than $25 billion to build a 1,200-acre data center campus in Shackelford County, Texas, as surging demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure fuels mega-scale developments. Backed by private equity firm Silver Lake and asset manager DigitalBridge, Vantage said the 1.4-gigawatt campus, dubbed "Frontier", is the largest in its global portfolio. Chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini need massive compute, prompting demand for purpose-built data centers. These facilities are costly as they require cutting-edge chips, servers, adequate power and cooling solutions. Companies including Alphabet, Microsoft and Meta Platforms are committing billions of dollars to expand and create their data center facilities. Vantage says the construction of the campus has begun, which will be home to 10 data centers and support ultra-high-density racks exceeding 250 kilowatts each. The first building is due in the second half of next year. Silver Lake was a founding investor in Vantage in 2010. Vantage CEO Sureel Choksi joined the company from Silver Lake in 2013. After exiting Vantage in 2017, Silver Lake said it was invited back on a proprietary basis in 2023 to support capital raising and co-lead a $9.2 billion equity financing with DigitalBridge in 2024.

It's Been The 'Summer of Stablecoins,' Goldman Says. Will Traditional Finance Be Upended?
It's Been The 'Summer of Stablecoins,' Goldman Says. Will Traditional Finance Be Upended?

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

It's Been The 'Summer of Stablecoins,' Goldman Says. Will Traditional Finance Be Upended?

Key Takeaways The roughly $270 billion global stablecoins market stands to disrupt the traditional financial services industry, but to what degree remains an "open question," according to a recent Goldman Sachs report. Goldman analysts say that concerns about the potential disintermediation of companies that provide payment and remittance services are overdone. The firm sees Circle's USDC taking greater share of the stablecoin market at the expense of Tether's offshore USDT. The first federal regulatory system signed into law brought about something of a summer awakening for stablecoins. Whether the roughly $270 billion global market in tokens pegged to real-world currencies will grow to trillions, and eat into traditional financial services industries, remains to be seen. Stablecoins, now predominantly used for crypto trading and for dollar access outside of the U.S., have been prophesied to replace and modernize legacy systems with blockchain efficiency. However, total disruption is unlikely, Goldman Sachs Research said in a report published Tuesday. Analysts including Will Nance and James Yaro wrote that stablecoin benefits will accrue to the infrastructure layer of the financial sector, particularly in interbank payments, as well as settlements in capital markets, complex, and cross-border transactions. However, they see "limited threats" to payments services, including the consumer card ecosystem, and that their collective underperformance presents an opportunity to buy. Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) are less rivals and more"likely to play a large role in facilitating stablecoin payments at scale in a consumer context," the report said. Also, risk to remittance players, including Remitly (RELY) and Western Union (WU), are exaggerated, according to the report. Goldman thinks GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins such as Circle's (CRCL) USDC will take greater share at the expense of USDT, Tether's offshore stablecoin. The firm sees $77 billion of growth in USDC, or an estimated compound annual growth rate of 40% from 2024 to 2027. Tether's USDT is the world's largest stablecoin, with a $165 billion market cap, compared to Circle USDC's $66 billion, according to research platform However, with Circle's elevated valuation after its blockbuster IPO earlier this year, Goldman favors Robinhood (HOOD) for its continued innovation in crypto. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store